SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Robotic Needle Insertion”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

81 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Robotic Needle Insertion for CT-guided Percutaneous Biopsy of Thoracoabdominal Lesions: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Trial.

Purpose To compare safety and feasibility between a novel CT-guided robotic system and the conventional freehand technique for puncture biopsy of thoracoabdominal lesions. Materials and Methods In this prospective multicenter randomized trial, individuals with suspected lesions were enrolled between July 2023 and April 2024 across three university teaching hospitals and randomized to the robot-assisted group (n = 82) or the freehand group (n = 83). Procedure outcomes included the technical success rate, targeting error, number of CT scans and needle adjustments, puncture time, and complications. Descriptive and inferential statistics were calculated. Results A total of 165 participants (mean age, 60 years ± 10 [SD]; 83 male) were included. Compared with the freehand group, the robot-assisted group demonstrated a higher technical success rate (97.56% [80 of 82] vs 62.65% [52 of 83], P < .001), lower targeting error (mean Euclidean deviation: 1.7 mm ± 1.1 vs 4.5 mm ± 3.9, P < .001), and fewer CT scans (mean, 4.3 ± 1.9 vs 5.2 ± 2.3; P = .002) and needle adjustments (mean, 0.7 ± 0.7 vs 1.6 ± 1.6; P = .003). Despite differences in geometric precision, both groups achieved 100% (82 of 82 and 83 of 83) diagnostic yield. The median puncture time was comparable between groups (5.5 minutes ± 4.3 vs 4.8 minutes ± 7.0, P = .50). During lung biopsies, the robot-assisted approach yielded fewer complications compared with the freehand approach (4.88% [four of 82] vs 16.87% [14 of 83], P = .014). Conclusion Compared with the freehand approach, robot-assisted biopsy yielded greater precision and reduced adjustments and complications while demonstrating noninferior diagnostic efficacy and comparable duration. Keywords: Robotic Needle Insertion, Biopsy, Thoracoabdominal Lesions, Robot-assisted Biopsy, CT-guided Intervention, Percutaneous Needle Biopsy, Randomized Controlled Trial, Algorithm Development, CT, Clinical Testing, Interventional-Body, Biopsy/Needle Aspiration, Percutaneous, Thorax, Abdomen/GI, Liver, Lung, Kidney ©RSNA, 2026.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Risk factors and management strategies for needle disengagement from the visual field in pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify risk factors for suture needle disengagement from the visual field during pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) and propose effective strategies for prevention and management. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study analyzed clinical data from 339 pediatric patients who underwent RALP for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) at a single institution between August 2017 and December 2020. Patients were categorized based on the occurrence of needle disengagement from the visual field. Various patient demographics and surgical procedural factors were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression, along with LASSO regression, identified independent risk and protective factors. RESULTS: Needle disengagement occurred in 38 (11.21%) of 339 cases. Multivariate logistic regression identified five independent risk factors for needle disengagement: use of a 3-mm auxiliary trocar (OR = 4.69, 95% CI: 1.98-12.53, P < 0.001), non-standard needle holder use (OR = 2.32, 95% CI: 1.04-5.18, P = 0.038), unshaped suture needles (OR = 3.16, 95% CI: 1.44-7.19, P = 0.005), simultaneous use of ≥2 intra-abdominal sutures (OR = 2.46, 95% CI: 1.15-5.48, P = 0.023), and clamping the needle shank during withdrawal (OR = 3.42, 95% CI: 1.40-8.21, P = 0.006). Conversely, sufficient assistant experience (>10 cases) was identified as a protective factor (OR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.18-0.88, P = 0.021). CONCLUSION: Suture needle disengagement from the visual field during pediatric RALP is associated with specific technical and instrumental factors. Implementing targeted strategies-such as mandating specialized needle holders, preoperative needle shaping, a single-needle workflow, prioritizing clamping the suture thread over the needle shank during withdrawal, and ensuring adequate assistant training-has the potential to significantly reduce significantly mitigate the risk of needle loss and enhance overall surgical safety in pediatric RALP.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Robotic-assisted transbronchial biopsy versus computed tomography-guided transthoracic needle biopsy for peripheral pulmonary lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of direct comparative studies.

Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) and computed tomography-guided transthoracic biopsy (CTTB) are competing strategies for sampling peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). Whether they differ in yield or safety is uncertain. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review restricted to direct comparisons. We searched MEDLINE, Europe PMC, Scopus, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to 7 July 2026 for studies directly comparing RAB with CTTB in adults with PPLs. The primary outcome was strict 2024 American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians diagnostic yield. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I and certainty with GRADE. A cohort-genealogy step identified, per outcome, the largest set of cohorts sharing no patients; only that set was pooled, with Hartung-Knapp and Mantel-Haenszel sensitivity analyses. Five retrospective studies from one US health system were eligible. Four share patients; at most three cohorts are mutually independent. Across those three, diagnostic yield was comparable (risk ratio [RR] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93-1.06; I²=24%; Hartung-Knapp 0.87-1.13), with an identical relative effect under strict and intermediate definitions although absolute yields fell from 88% to 74-84% under strict criteria. Pneumothorax requiring a chest tube and/or admission was about three-quarters less frequent with RAB across all three cohorts (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.14-0.46; I²=0%; Hartung-Knapp 0.07-0.96). Strict yield (RR 0.99) and any pneumothorax (RR 0.06) were reported by two cohorts each and neither survives the few-studies correction. RAB took about 50 min longer than CTTB where same-session staging endobronchial ultrasound was counted in the robotic time, but only about 8 min longer than CTTB where it was not. Only one cohort reported yield by lesion size category and none reported yield by bronchus sign or lung zone, so lesion-level subgroups could not be pooled. Certainty was low for pleural complications and very low elsewhere. Low-certainty evidence indicates that RAB is associated with fewer pleural complications, with no statistically detectable difference in diagnostic yield; equivalence was not formally established. Because all evidence is retrospective, confined to one health system, and almost never stratified by lesion size or accessibility, these findings are hypothesis-generating and require a multicenter randomized trial.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Analyzing the impact of subcutaneous injection needle, device, and administration characteristics on patient pain, anxiety, and safety: a systematic literature review.

The subcutaneous (SC) injection route is a commonly used and important method for therapeutic delivery of a wide range of compounds, and needle characteristics have a significant influence on patient pain, anxiety, safety, and other outcomes. This systematic review evaluates the evidence on how needle-specific characteristics (e.g. gauge, length, tip design, wall thickness, concealment) and administration- or device-related factors can affect patient-reported outcomes and clinical safety indicators during and following SC injections. A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov in June 2024. Studies were included if they assessed the relationship between needle characteristics and pain, anxiety, safety, or related outcomes in individuals receiving SC injections. A dual-reviewer process was used for study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. Sixty-two studies met inclusion criteria. Evidence consistently indicated that thinner and shorter needles reduced patient-reported pain and adverse events such as bruising and bleeding. Tapered and lubricated needles, hidden or retractable needle designs, and use of autoinjectors or prefilled syringes also contributed to reduced anxiety and improved user satisfaction. However, results were heterogeneous, and many studies lacked sufficient power or single-variable evaluation of individual needle parameters, limiting definitive conclusions. Needle characteristics significantly influence patient experience and safety with SC delivery. While both clinical evidence and practical experience clearly favor thinner, shorter, and concealed needles, further standardized, high-quality research is needed to isolate and quantify the specific contributions of individual needle characteristics to optimize injection practices and support patient-centered device design.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Complication rates of 16- and 18-gauge needles for native kidney biopsies: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated complication rates and diagnostic yield reported in studies of adult native kidney biopsy using 16-gauge (16 G) or 18-gauge (18 G) needles. We included randomized trials and cohort studies of real-time ultrasound-guided biopsies, including case series. MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched through October 2024. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Random-effects meta-analyses estimated pooled proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and univariable random-effects meta-regression explored study-level associations with major complications, transfusion, or gross hematuria. We screened 4,499 titles and abstracts and reviewed 319 full-text articles; 62 studies comprising 68 biopsy series were included. The pooled major complication rate in studies using 16 G needles was 1.83% (95% CI: 1.20-2.79) and 1.29% (95% CI: 0.78-2.13) in studies using 18 G needles, with no statistically significant difference. Mean glomerular yield was 18.8 with 16 G and 17.5 with 18 G needles. In study-level meta-regression, studies with higher prevalence of acute kidney injury, lower mean estimated glomerular filtration rate, or lower mean hemoglobin reported higher pooled complication rates. Most studies were single-arm cohorts; between-needle differences therefore reflect indirect study-level contrasts. Interpretation is limited by retrospective design and heterogeneity across studies. Overall, studies using both needle sizes reported low complication rates and similar diagnostic yield, although definitions and reporting varied. Direct comparative studies are needed to determine whether meaningful differences exist.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Franseen Fine-Needle Biopsy for Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Accurate tissue acquisition (TA) of solid pancreatic lesions is essential for guiding treatment with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) being the preferred method. Among FNB designs, the three-pronged Franseen-tip needle demonstrates strong diagnostic performance, though direct head-to-head comparisons with other FNB designs remain limited. METHODOLOGY: This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD420251123856). Eligible studies enrolled patients with solid pancreatic lesions who underwent EUS-guided FNB, directly compared the Franseen-tip with other FNB needles. Six databases were systematically searched through July 2025, and study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment (QUADAS-2 tool) were performed independently by two reviewers. Pooled estimates were generated using random-effects and bivariate hierarchical models. RESULTS: Sixteen studies (2,010 Franseen vs. 2,811 comparator) were included. Bivariate analysis showed that sensitivity and specificity of the Franseen needle were comparable to newer-generation comparator needles (sensitivity 91.3% vs. 94.0%; specificity 99.99% vs. 99.15%), whereas older-generation needles demonstrated lower sensitivity (80.8%) and inferior discriminatory performance (Negative Likelihood Ratio [LR⁻] 0.19 vs. 0.09). Diagnostic accuracy was higher with the Franseen needle (RR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.14; I2 = 69%). Sample adequacy was similar overall (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.95-1.14) but superior to older-generation needles (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.02-1.41) and in lesions > 30 mm (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.28, I2 = 81.2%). The Franseen needle achieved nominally strong diagnostic performance (DOR 116.6), although small-study effects were observed. Primary procedural outcomes were comparable between Franseen and comparator needles, including technical success (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.98-1.02) and histological core procurement (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.92-1.17). The Franseen needle had fewer low-cellularity samples (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.45-0.69) and lower specimen bloodiness (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.25-0.90) but a slightly higher overall adverse event rate (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.06-1.57). CONCLUSION: The Franseen needle provides superior diagnostic accuracy and sample adequacy compared to older-generation FNB needles with comparable performance to newer-generation designs. It reduces low-cellularity samples and specimen bloodiness, although adverse events are slightly increased, with other primary procedural outcomes remaining comparable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (Registration No. CRD420251123856).

Humans↗

PubMed2026

[Effect of oblique needling after equal division and positioning of anatomic points on acute sacroiliac joint injury assessed with infrared thermography].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical therapeutic effect of oblique needling after equal division and positioning of anatomic points on acute sacroiliac joint injury assessed with infrared thermography. METHODS: A total of 150 patients with acute sacroiliac joint injury were randomly divided into an oblique needling group, a perpendicular needling group, and an acupressure+tuina group, with 50 cases in each group. After equal division and positioning of anatomic points at sacroiliac joints, the oblique needling, perpendicular needling and acupressure+tuina techniques of acupuncture were operated in three groups, respectively. The treatment was administered once daily, 5 sessions per week; 10 sessions constituted one treatment course, with a total of one course required in the trial. Before and after treatment, the scores of Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain, and World Health Organization quality of life-BREF (WHO QOL-BREF), as well as the average temperature of the lumbosacral region were observed in each group. Additionally, the correlation between the average lumbosacral temperature and efficacy indicators was explored. RESULTS: After treatment, the scores of JOA, WHO QOL-BREF in the oblique needling group were higher (P<0.01, P<0.001), and the VAS score was lower (P<0.01, P<0.001) than those in the perpendicular needling group and the acupressure+tuina group; and the average temperature of the affected lumbosacral region in the oblique needling group was lower compared with that in the other two groups (P<0.001). After treatment, the average lumbosacral temperature of the affected side showed a negative correlation with the JOA score in each group (r=-0.645, -0.482, -0.809, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Following equal division and positioning of anatomic points, the therapeutic effect of acupuncture with oblique needling is superior to the perpendicular needling and acupressure+tuina on acute sacroiliac joint injury. The average temperature of the affected lumbosacral region is correlated with the severity of lumbosacral dysfunction after treatment.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

A User-Friendly Protocol for Microinjection into Teleost Embryos to Study Gene Function.

Zebrafish (Danio rerio) and medaka (Oryzias latipes) are popular teleost models used in developmental biology and functional genomics. To achieve high-quality and reproducible microinjections, it is essential to have robust protocols for breeding, egg collection, and the precise delivery of genetic material. In this protocol, we present a comprehensive and optimized methodology for setting up breeding tanks under controlled photoperiod conditions to maximize egg yield while minimizing contamination. We provide detailed procedures for sex identification, pair selection, the use of grated breeding inserts, and methods to increase egg collection efficiency. We outline procedures for making injection gel beds, pulling needles, and calibration using one-microliter microcapillaries to achieve consistent nanoliter-scale injections. Our protocol outlines settings for the pico-liter injector that are optimized to deliver a precise amount per pulse with minimal variability. Finally, we demonstrate the application of these methods for gene knockdown using morpholino antisense oligonucleotides, gene knockout using CRISPR-Cas9, and gain-of-function mRNA overexpression experiments. Phenotypic assessments conducted at various developmental stages to evaluate gene-specific effects reveal consistent phenotypic outcomes between the morpholino and CRISPR-Cas9 approaches. This easy and comprehensive protocol enables efficient, precise, and scalable genetic manipulation of zebrafish and medaka embryos, thereby supporting advanced functional studies in developmental biology and disease modeling. To our knowledge, this is the first unified protocol for both zebrafish and medaka microinjection systems achieving 97.7% phenotype penetrance in CRISPR-Cas9 knockouts with precision together with a triple validation approach that confirms gene function across multiple techniques.

Animals↗

PubMed2026

Phase 1 Study Evaluating Gefurulimab Pharmacokinetics and Safety Following Delivery Via Autoinjector or Prefilled Syringe With Needle Safety Device in Healthy Adults.

PURPOSE: Gefurulimab, a novel dual-binding nanobody targeting complement component 5 (C5), is in clinical development for anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis. Gefurulimab has a low molecular weight, enabling subcutaneous (SC) self-administration by autoinjector (AI) or prefilled syringe with needle safety device (PFS-SD). We compared gefurulimab pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure and safety in healthy adults following a single SC dose administered by AI versus PFS-SD. METHODS: In this phase 1, open-label, randomized, parallel-group study (NCT06208488), healthy participants aged 18 to 65 years were stratified by weight and randomized equally to 1 of 6 combination groups of device and injection site (abdomen/thigh/upper arm). Participants received a single SC dose of gefurulimab on day 1 and were assessed throughout the 92-day evaluation period. Primary endpoints were PK parameters for each device: maximum observed concentration (Cmax) and area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUCinf, AUClast). PK across injection sites, pharmacodynamics, safety, immunogenicity, and device performance were also assessed. FINDINGS: Overall, 175 participants were randomized: AI (n = 87), PFS-SD (n = 88). Geometric least squares mean ratios (90% CI) comparing AI/PFS-SD for Cmax, AUCinf, and AUClast were 97.6% (94.5-100.8), 99.6% (96.1-103.3), and 98.8% (95.2‒102.6), respectively. Secondary analyses found no meaningful differences in PK parameters across injection sites. Serum-free C5 concentrations over time, treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) profiles, and antidrug antibody responses were similar between cohorts. Most TEAEs were mild; none led to study discontinuation. IMPLICATIONS: SC administration of gefurulimab by AI and PFS-SD was well tolerated with comparable exposure, meeting bioequivalence criteria.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Hydrodissection-assisted laparoscopic orchiopexy utilizing needle grasper for palpable undescended testes: Clinical efficacy analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic orchiopexy has emerged as a viable alternative for the treatment of palpable undescended testis (UDT). This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of needle-grasper hydrodissection-assisted laparoscopic orchiopexy (NHLO) in comparison to conventional laparoscopic orchiopexy (CLO) for palpable UDT. METHODS: A cohort of 96 patients diagnosed with palpable UDT, admitted between January 2020 and April 2024, was included in this study. Among these, 54 patients underwent NHLO, while 42 patients were treated with CLO. In the NHLO procedure, normal saline was injected into the retroperitoneal space to create a hydrodissection barrier, facilitating the separation and protection of the vas deferens and spermatic cord. The vas deferens and spermatic cord were meticulously dissected following the principles of integrity and minimal tissue trauma. Outcome measures included final testicular position, testicular volume growth, testicular atrophy, success rate, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between the NHLO and CLO groups in terms of age, laterality, operative time (NHLO: 38-46 min; CLO: 39-48 min), or complication rates (NHLO: 1.9 %; CLO: 0.0 %). At follow-up, all patients in both groups exhibited palpable testes in satisfactory scrotal positions. Notably, no visible abdominal scarring was observed in the NHLO group, whereas there were two noticeable scars on the abdomen in CLO. CONCLUSION: Needle-grasper hydrodissection-assisted laparoscopic orchiopexy is a safe, effective, and minimally invasive technique that provides optimal protection of the vas deferens and spermatic cord while achieving excellent cosmetic outcomes.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Robotic surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review.

Robotic surgery is used for selected gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs), particularly when location makes conventional wedge resection difficult. We synthesised technical, perioperative, pathological, functional and oncological outcomes. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 14 August 2026. Primary reports with at least three eligible robotic gastric-GIST patients were included. Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data and completed design-specific JBI appraisal. Because outcome definitions, denominators and reporting were heterogeneous, findings were synthesised narratively in accordance with SWiM guidance rather than pooled. Twenty-three studies, including six comparative cohorts, were included. Institutional robotic cohorts contained 3-45 eligible patients; one national registry included 1,567 robotic cases. Tumour size ranged from 2.68 ± 1.55 to 7.9 ± 1.8 cm among studies reporting means. Most institutional reports described R0 resection in all eligible patients; exceptions were 23/24 and 24/25, while the registry reported 1,425/1,567 R0 resections. Grade III morbidity occurred in 2/25 patients in one function-preserving series. Registry 30- and 90-day mortality after robotic resection were 0.5% and 0.8%, respectively. Comparative studies did not demonstrate superior postoperative or oncological outcomes with robotic surgery. Robotic gastric-GIST resection appears feasible in selected patients and may facilitate organ-preserving surgery at anatomically challenging sites. Current observational evidence does not establish comparative functional, oncological or economic superiority.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Delphi study robot consenso: Strategies for the implementation of robotic surgery in general surgery in the Spanish hospital network.

INTRODUCTION: The implementation of robotic surgery in public hospitals presents multiple logistical, educational, and organizational challenges. In the absence of unified guidelines, a national consensus is required to optimize its safe and efficient adoption. This study aimed to establish a set of consensus-based and measurable recommendations for the implementation of robotic surgery programs in hospitals within the Spanish National Health System, based on the experience of centres with established robotic programs and intended to serve as guidance for hospitals that are initiating or planning their implementation. METHODS: A national Delphi study was conducted with the participation of robotic surgery experts from 26 public hospitals. The expert panel was composed exclusively of digestive surgeons with experience in robotic surgery. Three iterative rounds of expert panel evaluation were conducted between March 2024 and March 2025. The questions were grouped into five thematic blocks. Consensus was defined as an agreement level of ≥66.7%. Kendall's W coefficient was used to assess concordance. RESULTS: High levels of consensus were achieved on key aspects related to infrastructure, structured training, cost evaluation, and quality assurance mechanisms. Areas of disagreement were also identified, such as the need for a dedicated anaesthesiologist, purchase of accessory instruments during the initial phase, and official accreditation pathways. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a guideline for developing a national robotic surgery strategy focused on patient safety, program sustainability, and standardized training of surgical teams. These recommendations can guide hospitals at different stages of robotic technology adoption. Given that the consensus was reached from an exclusively surgical perspective, the recommendations focus on patient safety, program sustainability, and standardized training of the surgical team, and should be interpreted in an adaptable manner according to each centre's context, case volume, and available resources.

Cirugía Asistida por Robot↗

PubMed2026

Beyond da Vinci: a systematic review of next-generation multiport robotic platforms in pediatric surgery.

As robotic surgery expands beyond the da Vinci platform, the relevance of new-generation systems to pediatric patients remains uncertain. This review examined the technical characteristics, applications, and perioperative outcomes of alternative multiport robotic platforms in children. PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched through 28 February 2026 in accordance with PRISMA 2020. Owing to clinical heterogeneity, findings were synthesized narratively, with Wilson 95% confidence intervals for key binary outcomes. Six studies reported 166 patients across 27 procedure types. Senhance accounted for 164 patients, while Hugo RAS and Hinotori were each represented by one patient. Ages ranged from 15 days to 17 years and weights from 3.8 to more than 100 kg. Senhance was the only platform used with 3-mm robotic instruments. Conversion or planned escalation occurred in 19 patients (11.4%; 95% CI, 7.5-17.2%). Four intraoperative complications were reported (2.4%; 95% CI, 0.9-6.0%). Across all reports, 20 patients experienced postoperative complications (12.0%; 95% CI, 7.9-17.9%). In the largest cohort, seven patients required reintervention (4.6%; 95% CI, 2.2-9.2%) and seven were readmitted (4.6%; 95% CI, 2.2-9.2%). No deaths or comparative pediatric studies were reported. Published experience remains sparse and is almost entirely limited to Senhance. Current evidence describes early clinical use without establishing comparative safety, effectiveness, or platform superiority. Prospective multicenter studies with standardized reporting are needed.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Hybrid robotic transversus abdominis release (hrTAR) for complex ventral hernias: a systematic review and preliminary synthesis.

Hybrid robotic transversus abdominis release (hrTAR) combines robotic posterior component separation with a planned limited open phase. Evidence supporting this strategy is sparse. Following PRISMA 2020, we searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library and registered the protocol in PROSPERO (CRD420261303285). Eligible studies reported hrTAR outcomes for ventral or incisional hernia repair. Findings were synthesized narratively; no pooled effect estimates were calculated. Three reports contained 85 hrTAR cohort entries. Because two reports came from the same institution and overlap could not be excluded, this total should not be interpreted as a unique-patient count. Surgical-site outcomes were heterogeneous: two reports used SSO endpoints (4% and 5%), whereas another reported surgical-site events in 25% of patients, including seroma and wound infection. Mean length of stay ranged from 1.8 to 3.7 days; the sample-size-weighted mean across studies reporting means was 2.9 days. One propensity-matched comparison reported shorter hospitalization and lower 30-day SSO with hrTAR than open TAR. No perioperative deaths or recurrences were reported during limited follow-up. hrTAR appears feasible in selected patients, but available evidence is exploratory. Standardized prospective multicenter studies with non-overlapping cohorts and longer follow-up are needed before comparative effectiveness, economic value, or wider adoption can be supported.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

How I do it: 3-Suture robotic pyeloplasty: Step-by-step technique.

Robot-assisted pyeloplasty is now a gold standard in the treatment of pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction. We describe a standardized "3-suture" technique designed to facilitate the pyelo-ureteral anastomosis. We used this technique in 65 paediatric patients aged 3-17 years. Early major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III) occurred in 3 patients (4.6%). The median operative time was 150 min. Surgical success was achieved in 96% of cases at a median follow-up of 9.5 months. This 3-suture approach offers a highly reproducible method for robotic pyeloplasty, facilitating accurate anatomical reconstruction with excellent surgical outcomes.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Applications of artificial intelligence in robot-assisted surgery: a systematic review.

To characterize applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in robot-assisted surgery, summarize technical and clinical performance, and assess the quality of the available evidence. PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus were searched for English-language journal articles published from 1 January 2020 through 31 October 2025. Randomized, observational, model-development, validation, and feasibility studies evaluating AI in robot-assisted surgery or closely related image-guided minimally invasive workflows were eligible. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment. Owing to heterogeneity in surgical procedures, AI tasks, analytical units, validation strategies, and outcomes, findings were synthesized descriptively without statistical pooling. The review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD420251175699). Seventeen studies were included: seven clinical prediction or decision-support studies, eight intraoperative recognition, segmentation, or image-guided studies, and two training or workflow studies. Five prediction studies reported area-under-the-curve values of 0.74-0.95. Technical studies reported F1 or Dice scores of 0.525-0.995 and task-specific accuracies of 0.840-0.998. Two randomized studies suggested benefits for personalized suturing feedback and automated camera control, but neither established improved patient outcomes. Only one study had low overall risk of bias; the remaining studies were at high or unclear risk or raised some concerns. AI applications in robot-assisted surgery show promise for prediction, intraoperative perception, training, and workflow support. Evidence primarily demonstrates technical feasibility rather than established clinical effectiveness. Independent multicenter validation and prospective evaluation of patient, educational, and workflow outcomes are required before widespread implementation.

Robotic Surgical Procedures↗

PubMed2026

Robotic assistance in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of leg length, cup orientation, and early outcomes.

This review examined whether robotic assistance alters postoperative leg-length discrepancy (LLD), acetabular cup orientation, or early hip-specific outcomes relative to conventional total hip arthroplasty (THA). We searched PubMed and Web of Science through May 2026 for comparative English-language reports. Study eligibility, data extraction, and methodological appraisal were undertaken independently by two reviewers. Mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated in Review Manager 5.4. Model selection was based on the target estimand and anticipated clinical and methodological diversity; leave-one-out and alternative-model sensitivity analyses were undertaken for heterogeneous outcomes. The protocol is registered with PROSPERO (CRD420261454043). The review included seven studies and 968 participants. Compared with conventional THA, robot-assisted THA yielded a smaller postoperative LLD (MD = -2.02, 95% CI -3.46 to -0.58; P = 0.006) and a higher Harris Hip Score (MD = 2.96, 95% CI 1.12 to 4.80; P = 0.002). Mean cup anteversion was lower in the robotic group (MD = -1.52, 95% CI -2.29 to -0.76; P < 0.0001), whereas cup inclination did not differ (MD = -0.71, 95% CI -3.26 to 1.83; P = 0.58). The robotic group also had higher Forgotten Joint Score (MD = 14.68, 95% CI 5.02 to 24.33; P = 0.003) and Oxford Hip Score values (MD = 2.61, 95% CI 0.71 to 4.51; P = 0.007). Robotic assistance was linked to a modest improvement in leg-length restoration and to higher scores on several early functional measures. The limited number of studies, predominance of nonrandomized designs, and marked heterogeneity in some analyses temper the certainty of these findings.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Robot-assisted versus freehand cannulated-screw fixation for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review of technical, clinical and adoption outcomes.

Robot-assisted guidance may improve the technical precision of percutaneous cannulated-screw fixation for femoral neck fractures. Whether these procedural advantages translate into better clinical outcomes remains uncertain. We compared robot-assisted and conventional freehand fixation in adults with femoral neck fractures. MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL were searched from inception to 15 July 2026 without language restrictions. Google Scholar was used only as a supplementary search source, together with forward and backward citation searching. Comparative studies of robot-assisted versus freehand fluoroscopy-guided cannulated-screw fixation were included. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I, with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale used as a complementary appraisal of non-randomised studies. Random-effects meta-analyses included prediction intervals and prespecified sensitivity analyses. The protocol was registered prospectively (PROSPERO CRD420261465038). Sixteen comparative studies involving 1,293 participants were included. Of these, 597 underwent robot-assisted fixation and 696 underwent freehand fixation. Two studies reporting random allocation and 14 non-randomised studies were included in the study. Robot-assisted fixation was associated with fewer guide-wire manipulations, greater screw-placement accuracy and 13.9 fewer fluoroscopic acquisitions per procedure (95% confidence interval [CI] -20.3 to -7.5). Earlier radiographic healing and modestly higher final Harris Hip Scores were also observed. Pooled estimates suggested lower risks of union failure, avascular necrosis and composite complications. Fluoroscopy duration, overall operative time and reoperation did not differ significantly. Heterogeneity was substantial for several continuous outcomes, with prediction intervals crossing the null for several estimates, indicating that the magnitude of benefit varied considerably between studies. Some clinical associations were also sensitive to eligibility-restricted analyses. Robot-assisted cannulated-screw fixation improves technical execution compared with freehand fixation. Patient-important clinical superiority and economic value have not been established, and evidence concerning learning curves, operator acceptability and system reliability remains insufficient. Current evidence does not support routine widespread adoption; adequately powered multicentre randomised trials incorporating economic and implementation evaluation are required.

Humans↗