SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Acceptability”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

138 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

PubMed2026

Clinical performance evaluation of single-shade versus multi-shade composite resins in non-carious cervical lesions: a 36-month randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Composite resins are widely used as the material of choice for definitive restorations due to their ability to integrate functional and aesthetic aspects in dental rehabilitation. Recently, one-shade composite resins have been introduced to simplify the clinical workflow. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the clinical performance of a "chameleon effect" composite resin with that of a multi-shade composite resin in non-carious cervical lesions after 36 months of follow-up. METHODS: This study was a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial with an equivalence design using a split-mouth approach. The sample consisted of 60 patients presenting at least two non-carious cervical lesions, totaling 120 restorations. Restorations were performed using two materials from the same commercial brand: Vittra Unique (one-shade group) and Vittra APS (multi-shade group). The clinical performance of the restorations was longitudinally evaluated according to the FDI criteria. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test, while other clinical parameters were compared using the chi-square test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: At baseline, no statistically significant differences were observed between the groups regarding the evaluated biological, functional, and aesthetic parameters (p > 0.05). Both materials demonstrated clinically acceptable performance according to the FDI criteria, with no significant differences between them. CONCLUSIONS: After 36 months, no significant differences were observed between the one-shade and the multi-shade composite resins in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This 36-month randomized clinical trial demonstrates that single-shade composite resins achieve structural durability and aesthetic integration equivalent to traditional multi-shade layering when restoring non-carious cervical lesions. This evidence validates a simplified, single-shade restorative workflow, significantly reducing chairside time and operator-dependent variables without compromising the clinical longevity.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Externally validated risk prediction models for gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Risk prediction models for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) offer potential for early identification and targeted prevention. External validation is crucial to assess model performance across diverse populations. Despite the availability of numerous GDM prediction models, limited evidence exists on their external validation frequency, methodological quality, and clinical applicability. This systematic review evaluated externally validated GDM prediction models, focusing on methodological rigor, reporting standards, and clinical relevance to inform future research and implementation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Databases including Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Emcare, and CINAHL were searched up to May 1, 2025. Studies reporting external validation of GDM risk prediction models were included. Two reviewers independently screened studies. Data were extracted using the CHARMS framework, and risk of bias and applicability were assessed using PROBAST+AI. The study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD420251125758). RESULTS: Twenty-six studies validated 33 models, with validation sample sizes ranging from 50 to 75 161. Over half used the IADPSG criteria to define GDM. Discrimination metrics were commonly reported, but calibration, overall performance, and clinical utility were often lacking. Meta-analysis was feasible for only four models: Teede et al., Nanda et al., Naylor et al., and Van Leeuwen et al., each showing fair discrimination. The Teede et al. model was the most widely validated, with 11 external validations across six continents and a pooled AUC of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.67-0.76). Despite fewer validations, the Nanda et al. model achieved the highest pooled discrimination (5 validations; pooled AUC 0.77, 95% CI: 0.74-0.80). The Naylor et al. and van Leeuwen et al. models also underwent meta-analysis, as sufficient external validation studies were available to support comparative performance assessment. Notably, 69.23% of studies had a high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: While many models showed acceptable predictive performance, most validations were methodologically weak. Future studies should follow best-practice guidelines and promote scalable validation strategies, such as algorithm sharing, to enhance clinical utility.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Robot-assisted versus freehand cannulated-screw fixation for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review of technical, clinical and adoption outcomes.

Robot-assisted guidance may improve the technical precision of percutaneous cannulated-screw fixation for femoral neck fractures. Whether these procedural advantages translate into better clinical outcomes remains uncertain. We compared robot-assisted and conventional freehand fixation in adults with femoral neck fractures. MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL were searched from inception to 15 July 2026 without language restrictions. Google Scholar was used only as a supplementary search source, together with forward and backward citation searching. Comparative studies of robot-assisted versus freehand fluoroscopy-guided cannulated-screw fixation were included. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I, with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale used as a complementary appraisal of non-randomised studies. Random-effects meta-analyses included prediction intervals and prespecified sensitivity analyses. The protocol was registered prospectively (PROSPERO CRD420261465038). Sixteen comparative studies involving 1,293 participants were included. Of these, 597 underwent robot-assisted fixation and 696 underwent freehand fixation. Two studies reporting random allocation and 14 non-randomised studies were included in the study. Robot-assisted fixation was associated with fewer guide-wire manipulations, greater screw-placement accuracy and 13.9 fewer fluoroscopic acquisitions per procedure (95% confidence interval [CI] -20.3 to -7.5). Earlier radiographic healing and modestly higher final Harris Hip Scores were also observed. Pooled estimates suggested lower risks of union failure, avascular necrosis and composite complications. Fluoroscopy duration, overall operative time and reoperation did not differ significantly. Heterogeneity was substantial for several continuous outcomes, with prediction intervals crossing the null for several estimates, indicating that the magnitude of benefit varied considerably between studies. Some clinical associations were also sensitive to eligibility-restricted analyses. Robot-assisted cannulated-screw fixation improves technical execution compared with freehand fixation. Patient-important clinical superiority and economic value have not been established, and evidence concerning learning curves, operator acceptability and system reliability remains insufficient. Current evidence does not support routine widespread adoption; adequately powered multicentre randomised trials incorporating economic and implementation evaluation are required.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Safety and immunogenicity of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine administered to adults: A phase 2, randomized, active-controlled trial.

We conducted a phase 2, randomized, active-controlled, observer-blind study (NCT05960097) among healthy adults ≥18 y of age who completed a primary COVID-19 mRNA vaccination series, with or without a booster, ≥3 months earlier. Participants were randomized (1:1:1:1:1) to either receive an investigational bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine encoding ancestral D614G and Omicron BA.4-5 spike proteins (CV0701 mRNA vaccine) at one of three dose levels, an investigational monovalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine encoding the Omicron BA.4-5 spike protein (CV0601 mRNA vaccine), or a licensed Original Wuhan/Omicron BA.4-5 bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. The primary objectives were to evaluate reactogenicity, safety and immunogenicity post-vaccination. Secondary and tertiary objectives were to further evaluate humoral and cell-mediated immunity post-vaccination. In total, 425 participants were vaccinated and 381 were included in the Day 29 per-protocol immunogenicity analysis. Most solicited events were mild to moderate. No vaccine-related serious adverse events or myocarditis/pericarditis cases were reported. For the CV0701 mRNA vaccine, a dose-dependent increase in Day 29 neutralizing titers against ancestral D614G and Omicron BA.4-5 was observed. Neutralizing titers against ancestral D614G and Omicron BA.4-5 declined by Days 91 and 181, but remained above baseline. Similar immune responses were observed for the CV0601 mRNA vaccine. At Day 8, CD4+ T cells (Th1 profile) increased in all study groups and CD8+ T cells increased in all study groups, except the lowest CV0701 dose group. The CV0701 and CV0601 mRNA vaccines elicited robust humoral and cellular immunity with an acceptable safety profile, comparable to a licensed, bivalent mRNA vaccine. Clinical Trial Registration EU CT number: 2023-504596-25-00 ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05960097.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery for spine multiple myeloma-a systematic review.

Spinal involvement in multiple myeloma (MM) commonly results in pain, vertebral instability, epidural spinal cord compression, and neurological deficits. Although conventional external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) remains the standard radiation modality because of the radiosensitive nature of MM, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as a highly conformal treatment option capable of delivering focal high-dose radiation while sparing adjacent spinal cord structures and uninvolved bone marrow. This systematic review evaluated the clinical outcomes and safety profile of SRS for spinal MM. A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify studies evaluating SRS for spinal MM. Extracted variables included patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment parameters, radiographic outcomes, pain response, neurological outcomes, local control, overall survival, and adverse events. Three retrospective studies comprising 133 patients and 181 treated spinal lesions met the inclusion criteria. Median patient age ranged from 59 to 65 years, with a slight male predominance across studies. Thoracic spine lesions represented the most treated region (55.5-67.7%). Median prescribed SRS dose was 14-16 Gy, predominantly delivered in a single fraction. Median follow-up ranged from 11.2 to 27.8 months. Local control rates ranged from 89.4 to 100%, with 6- and 12-month local control rates of 94% and 91%, respectively, in one study. Pain improvement was reported in 41-88% of treated patients/sites, with a median time to pain relief of 1.6 months in one cohort. Neurological improvement occurred in 56-71.4% of patients with preexisting deficits. Reported adverse events included vertebral compression fractures, fracture progression, pain flare, and tracheoesophageal fistula. De novo vertebral fractures ranged from 3.6 to 7%, while fracture progression ranged from 14 to 18%. SRS appears to provide excellent local control and meaningful pain and neurological improvement in patients with spinal MM, with acceptable toxicity profiles. The highly conformal nature of SRS may preserve uninvolved bone marrow and facilitate continuation of systemic therapy. However, the current evidence is limited to small retrospective studies with heterogeneous reporting, and further prospective comparative studies are needed to better define the role of SRS relative to conventional EBRT in spinal MM.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Ketamine assisted psychotherapy to reduce chronic neuropathic pain: A mixed-methods randomized pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous ketamine can provide short-term analgesia in chronic neuropathic pain but benefits often wane after treatment. We conducted a randomized pilot trial to assess the feasibility of combining ketamine infusions with psychotherapy to inform future efficacy trials. METHODS: In this single-center, randomized, outcome-assessor-blinded pilot trial at a Canadian tertiary pain clinic, adults with moderate-to-severe chronic neuropathic pain were randomly assigned in 1:1:1 ratio to the ketamine, psychotherapy, or combined ketamine plus psychotherapy arm. Ketamine was delivered as three intravenous infusions over 16 weeks; psychotherapy consisted of 16 weekly cognitive behavioral therapy and mindfulness-based meditation sessions. The primary outcome was feasibility, assessed using prespecified progression criteria. Exploratory outcomes included changes in pain interference (PROMIS 6a T-score), pain intensity, mood, and qualitative interview findings at week 20 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05639322). FINDINGS: Between October 23, 2023, and March 31, 2025, 30 participants were randomized, and 26 (87%) completed 20-week follow-up. Most feasibility criteria, including consent, retention, data completeness, and absence of study-related serious adverse events, were met; adherence targets were partially met. Exploratory pain outcomes showed numerical improvement across groups, with clinically meaningful reductions observed for pain interference and pain intensity. Sixty-four adverse events were recorded, mostly mild and in ketamine-containing groups; no serious study-related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Combined ketamine and psychotherapy was feasible and acceptably safe in this pilot trial, supporting evaluation in a larger efficacy-powered study. FUNDING: The study was funded by the St. Michael's Hospital Innovation Fund, The Canadian Pain Society Early Investigator Award and the Physician Services Incorporation Early Career Researcher Award.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy and Safety of Autologous Versus Prosthetic Grafts in the Repair of Popliteal Artery Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs) present a severe risk of progression to acute limb ischemia. Open surgery (OS) is the gold standard treatment; however, prosthetic grafts are acceptable in highly selected cases, especially when the great saphenous vein is not available. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing autologous versus prosthetic grafts for patency and limb preservation outcomes in patients with PAAs. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central were systematically searched from inception through October 2024. Outcomes were pooled using a frequentist random-effects model as odds ratios, mean differences, and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) on RStudio (Version 4.5.0). Risk-of-bias assessments were performed using ROBINS-I and MINORS. RESULTS: Twenty-two observational studies were pooled comprising 9,145 PAAs in 8,370 patients, of whom 6,434 (74.51%) were treated with autologous grafts and 2,200 (25.49%) with prosthetic grafts. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 86 months. Repair with autologous conduits significantly improved long-term primary patency (HR 3.93; P < 0.001), secondary patency (HR 6.02; P < 0.001), and long-term limb salvage (HR 2.69; P = 0.044) compared with prosthetic conduits. There were no significant differences in in-hospital amputation (P = 0.36), myocardial infarction (P = 0.61), mortality (P = 0.50), 2-year primary patency (P = 0.25), 5-year secondary patency (P = 0.06), or length of hospital stay (P = 0.95). Risk of bias was classified as moderate-to-high, reflecting confounding factors inherent to observational studies and moderate methodological quality by MINORS. Despite these limitations, treatment effects consistently favored autologous grafts in both short- and long-term analyses; however, caution is warranted given the limited number of available studies. CONCLUSION: The use of autologous conduits significantly favors both short-term and long-term efficacy and safety in the OS repair of PAAs. Given the limitations of the existing evidence, further comparative studies are needed.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy and Safety of Elagolix Versus Dienogest for Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Endometriosis Pain: A Phase III, Multicentric, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Non-Inferiority Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of elagolix with dienogest in women with moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain. DESIGN: A multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, parallel-group, active-controlled, non-inferiority phase III study. SETTING: Nineteen clinical centres across India. STUDY POPULATION: Women (18-49 years) diagnosed with endometriosis and experiencing moderate-to-severe pain. METHODS: Participants were randomised (1:1) to receive oral elagolix (150 mg once daily) or dienogest (2 mg once daily) for 24 weeks. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was change in endometriosis-related pain (Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]) from baseline to Day 85. Secondary outcomes included changes in NRS (Day 169), dysmenorrhoea, non-menstrual pelvic pain (NMPP) scores (Days 85 and 169), rescue medication use, patient global impression of change (PGIC), adverse events and bone mineral density. RESULTS: Of 340 patients screened, 230 were randomised (115 per group). At Day 85, both arms showed similar reductions in NRS pain scores with a treatment difference of 0.04 (95% CI: -0.3, 0.37) [p = 0.9747] demonstrating non-inferiority as upper 95% CI was below pre-specified margin of 1.5. At Day 169, both arms showed comparable improvements in overall pain, dysmenorrhoea and NMPP from baseline (p = 0.9372, p = 0.8884, and p = 0.9616, respectively). Rescue medication use and PGIC were comparable between treatment arms. Adverse event incidence was similar (elagolix: 14.8%; dienogest: 19.1%), with no serious TEAEs or discontinuations. No significant bone mineral density changes were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Elagolix demonstrated non-inferiority to dienogest with an acceptable safety and tolerability profile, supporting its use in managing endometriosis-associated pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: CTRI/2023/01/049292.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Evaluation of three Aspergillus antibody assays for screening of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: prospective diagnostic accuracy study.

OBJECTIVES: Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) is a frequent complication of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB), particularly in high-burden settings where access to reliable serological diagnostics remains limited. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of two immunochromatographic technology (ICT) lateral flow assays (LFAs) and an ELISA for CPA screening among patients with active or previously treated PTB. METHODS: In this two-year prospective multicentre diagnostic evaluation, serum from adults with prior or active PTB was tested using the Era Biology Aspergillus IgG ICT LFA, LDBio Aspergillus IgG/IgM ICT LFA, and Bordier Aspergillus fumigatus IgG ELISA. CPA diagnosis was established using a consensus composite reference standard incorporating clinical, immunological, radiological, and microbiological criteria. The Bordier ELISA was used as part of the immunological component of the consensus CPA diagnosis, with a cutoff optical density of ≥1.0. Diagnostic accuracy, agreement statistics, receiver operating characteristic analysis, and latent class analysis (LCA) were performed. RESULTS: Among 340 participants, 24 (7.06%) had CPA. Proportion of participants with positive antibody tests among all tested individuals were 6.76% for LDBio ICT LFA, 20.0% for Era Biology ICT LFA, and 11.47% for Bordier ELISA. Against consensus CPA diagnosis, Bordier ELISA showed 87.50% sensitivity and 94.30% specificity, LDBio ICT LFA 58.33% sensitivity and 97.15% specificity, and Era Biology LFA 66.67% sensitivity and 83.54% specificity. LCA estimated CPA prevalence at 7.72%. LCA-derived sensitivities and specificities were 86.58% and 99.92% for LDBio ICT LFA, 83.39% and 85.31% for Era Biology LFA, and 79.10% and 94.19% for Bordier ELISA. CONCLUSIONS: The Bordier ELISA showed high sensitivity and specificity, while the LDBio ICT LFA demonstrated very high specificity with strong LCA-derived performance. These findings support the use of ELISA for laboratory diagnosis and ICT as a point-of-care screening tool for CPA in resource-limited settings. Era Biology Aspergillus IgG LFA demonstrated moderate sensitivity and acceptable diagnostic performance, indicating its potential utility as a supplementary screening assay for CPA in settings where rapid, point-of-care testing is required.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Randomized phase-II trial of surufatinib plus FOLFOX/FOLFIRI versus FOLFOXIRI as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) typically involves oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based doublet chemotherapy with or without anti-angiogenic antibodies. Triplet regimens such as FOLFOXIRI have demonstrated synergy and improved efficacy as first-line therapy. Surufatinib, an oral multi-kinase inhibitor targeting VEGFR1-3, FGFR1, and CSF-1R, may enhance chemotherapy efficacy. We evaluated surufatinib combined with doublet (FOLFOX/FOLFIRI) versus triplet (FOLFOXIRI) chemotherapy as second-line treatment for mCRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicentre, open-label, randomized phase-II trial used Simon's minimax two-stage design. Eligible patients had mCRC progressing on or within 6 months after first-line doublet chemotherapy. Patients were randomized 1:1 to surufatinib 250 mg once daily plus either mFOLFOX6/FOLFIRI (doublet cohort, selected based on prior regimen) or FOLFOXIRI (triplet cohort). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: From September 2021 to November 2023, 57 patients were randomized (28 per cohort after one withdrawal). In the doublet cohort, ORR was 35.7% (95% CI: 18.6-55.9), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.4 months (95% CI: 3.8-7.0), and median overall survival (OS) was 19.0 months (95% CI: 9.2-28.8). In the triplet cohort, ORR was 39.3% (95% CI: 21.5-59.4), median PFS was 5.8 months (95% CI: 3.3-8.2), and median OS was 10.9 months (95% CI: 6.0-15.8). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred more frequently in the triplet (71.4%) versus doublet (57.1%) cohort, with higher rates of treatment delays (89.3% versus 72.0%) and discontinuations (25.0% versus 14.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Surufatinib plus doublet chemotherapy showed encouraging antitumor activity and acceptable tolerability in second-line mCRC, warranting further evaluation in a larger randomized trial. In contrast, surufatinib plus triplet chemotherapy was associated with increased toxicity, more frequent treatment delays or discontinuations, and shorter overall survival; this combination is not recommended for further investigation in this setting.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04734249Date of registration: January 31, 2021.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy and Safety Profile of a Triple Single-Pill Combination of Valsartan/Amlodipine/Chlorthalidone in Patients with Uncontrolled Hypertension.

PURPOSE: This randomized, double-blind, multicenter Phase III study evaluated the efficacy and safety profile of a single-pill triple combination of valsartan/amlodipine/chlorthalidone (KDF1901, Valdipine Plus) compared with a dual combination of valsartan/amlodipine (KDF1901-R) in patients with essential hypertension. METHODS: Patients (n = 294) with inadequately controlled hypertension after a 4-week run-in phase with valsartan/amlodipine (80/5 mg) were randomized to receive KDF1901 (valsartan/amlodipine/chlorthalidone 160/10/25 mg, n = 147) or KDF1901-R (valsartan/amlodipine 160/10 mg, n = 147) for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) from baseline to week 8. Secondary endpoints included changes in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (MSDBP), BP normalization rates, and response rates. Safety profile outcomes assessed treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), laboratory parameters, and serious adverse events. FINDINGS: At week 8, the KDF1901 group exhibited a significantly greater reduction in MSSBP (-22.8 ± 1.0 mmHg) compared with the dual therapy group (-16.7 ± 1.0 mmHg, P < 0.0001). Similarly, the mean MSDBP reduction was significantly greater with KDF1901 (P = 0.0006). BP normalization rates (75.9% vs 54.5%, P < .0001) and response rates (73.8% vs 51.7%, P < 0.0001) were significantly higher in the triple combination group. Overall, the incidence of TEAEs was similar between groups (24.7% vs 21.5%, P = 0.5783), with mild cases of dizziness were most commonly reported. Exploratory ad hoc analyses showed statistically greater changes in sodium, potassium, and uric acid levels with triple therapy, but clinically meaningful extreme electrolyte abnormalities were rare in both groups, and the overall laboratory profile remained acceptable. IMPLICATIONS: This trial reported that the single-pill triple combination KDF1901 significantly improved BP control compared with dual therapy without compromising tolerability. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT07116863.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Surgical management of jugular foramen meningiomas: a function-prioritized perioperative workflow.

OBJECTIVE: Jugular foramen meningiomas are challenging because of their deep, neurovascularly crowded location and multicompartment extension; hyperostosis and rigid dural attachment further narrow the corridor and increase the risk of lower cranial nerve morbidity, causing dysphagia and airway complications that may rarely require tracheostomy. This study aimed to describe a contemporary function-first workflow integrating compartment-based anatomy, venous sinus status, preoperative embolization, and continuous vagus nerve monitoring and its relation to clinically actionable recovery endpoints. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed 26 consecutive patients who underwent primary surgery for jugular foramen meningiomas (2014-2025). Tumors were classified as intradural + intrajugular (IJ) or intradural + intrajugular + extracranial extension (IJE). Retrosigmoid, suprajugular, or transjugular approaches were selected by tumor extension and sigmoid-jugular venous status. Selective embolization and continuous vagus nerve monitoring were used when feasible. Outcomes included extubation timing, time to oral intake, 1-year swallowing/voice severity, extent of resection, and salvage stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for progression/regrowth. RESULTS: Twenty tumors were IJ and 6 were IJE. Selective embolization was performed in 16 patients (62%) without complications. Continuous vagus nerve monitoring was implemented in 16 patients (62%); lower preservation rates showed an exploratory association with worse 1-year swallowing. All patients were extubated immediately after surgery. Oral intake began by postoperative day ≤ 7 in 20 patients (77%); only 1 required > 14 days before resuming oral intake. At 1 year, swallowing and hoarseness remained worse in 54% and 46% of patients, respectively, but almost all cases were mild; the same patient had moderate dysphagia/hoarseness, and none required tracheostomy, gastrostomy, long-term tube feeding, or phonosurgery. Simpson grade IV comprised 69% of cases but predominantly reflected intrajugular/extracranial residual rather than persistent intradural disease. No patient without preoperative facial nerve palsy developed new palsy; serviceable hearing was preserved in 70%, and 38% with preoperative nonserviceable hearing improved to serviceable hearing. During a median 55.6-month follow-up, 3 patients (12%) underwent salvage SRS for regrowth; none required reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: A function-first workflow guided by anatomical compartment extension and intraoperative monitoring can support rapid recovery and durable functional independence in jugular foramen meningiomas. The IJE phenotype identifies a higher-risk subgroup for delayed oral intake and postoperative subjective dysphagia/hoarseness, while continuous vagus nerve monitoring may provide actionable insights to calibrate surgical aggressiveness and support function-prioritized acceptance of intrajugular/extracranial residual with close surveillance and salvage SRS when needed.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Diagnostic Performance of Machine Learning for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Early and accurate diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and its organ involvement is essential. Previous reviews of machine learning (ML) in SLE combined heterogeneous tasks and validation strategies and may have overinterpreted model performance. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of ML and deep learning (DL) models for 3 clinically distinct SLE-related tasks: SLE classification or diagnosis, lupus nephritis (LN) diagnosis, and neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) discrimination. We also assessed methodological quality and certainty of evidence. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore were searched from January 2014 to April 2026. Eligible peer-reviewed diagnostic accuracy studies developed or validated ML or DL models for 1 of the 3 prespecified tasks, used an accepted reference standard, and provided data for a 2×2 contingency table. Bivariate random-effects meta-analyses with the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman adjustment were used to pool sensitivity and specificity. We reported 95% prediction intervals (PIs), assessed risk of bias using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies for Artificial Intelligence tool (QUADAS-AI; Viknesh Sounderajah [Imperial College London]), and evaluated certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework for diagnostic test accuracy. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies were included: 17 for SLE classification, 5 for LN diagnosis, and 7 for NPSLE discrimination. In the primary task-stratified analysis, pooled sensitivity was 0.91 (95% CI 0.86-0.94; 95% PI 0.56-0.99), and pooled specificity was 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.96; 95% PI 0.69-0.99), with low heterogeneity (I²=23.9% and 22.9%, respectively). DL models showed a sensitivity of 0.93 and specificity of 0.95, compared with 0.88 and 0.94 for traditional ML models. Certainty of evidence was high for most analyses but low for LN diagnosis because of inconsistency and imprecision. All studies were retrospective, and only 9 of 29 (31%) performed independent external validation. Overall risk of bias was high or unclear in 22 of 29 (75.9%) studies. No study reported model calibration, decision-curve analysis, or net clinical benefit. CONCLUSIONS: ML models showed promising diagnostic accuracy across 3 distinct SLE-related tasks, but wide PIs, limited external validation, and pervasive risk of bias restrict conclusions about real-world generalizability. Prospective multicenter studies with standardized tasks and reference standards, independent external validation, and formal assessment of calibration and clinical utility are required before clinical implementation.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Feasibility of implementation, diagnostic accuracy, and end-user impact of an electronic health record (EHR)-based ureteral stent tracking tool in a pediatric population.

INTRODUCTION & OBJECTIVES: Ureteral stent tracking systems have reduced stent retention in adults, but their accuracy and impact in pediatrics have been minimally explored. With low event rates in children, such tools may yield high false positives, raising questions on balancing event prevention with provider burden. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, diagnostic accuracy, and end-user impact of an Electronic Surveillance Tool for Evaluating Nephroureteral stent Tracking (eSTENT) at our institution. STUDY DESIGN: eSTENT, implemented in 1/2024, flags ureteral stents at risk for retention based on implant documentation, expected explant date, and explant documentation. Monthly reports are generated for stents missing explant documentation. We retrospectively evaluated the diagnostic performance of eSTENT from 1/2024-8/2025 at our pediatric hospital. A usability survey including a validated 1-7 implementation score (higher = easier implementation) was distributed to pediatric urologists and operating room nurses. RESULTS: Of 172 cases with ureteral stent placement, eSTENT flagged 28 events (16%) in 24 patients. Of these, 26 represented documentation gaps where explant had been appropriate. Two flags had no documentation of explant, representing near miss events that were identified. No retained stents occurred, consistent with high sensitivity and modest specificity. There were no flags in the last 6 months of the study period. Survey response rate was 100% for surgeons and 55% for nurses. Before eSTENT, stents were not routinely tracked. All surgeons and 93% of nurses reported no added burden, despite occasional misidentification of retained stents. Three surgeons found eSTENT beneficial, four were neutral, and free-text responses generally cited eSTENT's "fail safe" nature as positive. Nurses suggested improvements, including user support and integrated documentation reminders. The average implementation score among both groups was 6/7, indicating easy adoption. DISCUSSION: While the impact of stent tracking tools in adult literature has been positive, our study emphasizes the feasibility of broader adoption at a pediatric hospital. Integration of eSTENT may avoid the potentially devastating consequences of a retained stent. Prioritizing sensitivity over specificity appears acceptable for a "never event" in patient safety. Our study is limited by the retrospective nature of data collection and survey bias. CONCLUSIONS: Though no stents were retained in the study period, eSTENT appropriately flagged two cases without added burden to most end-users. Further optimization is warranted, but adoption in pediatric centers may enhance care reliability.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Artificial Intelligence Cannot Replace Peer Reviewers but May Help Editors Triage: A Comparative Analysis of a Large Language Model and Human Reviewer Recommendations at the American Journal of Sports Medicine.

BACKGROUND: The peer review system faces increasing strain from rising manuscript volumes, reviewer fatigue, and well-documented interreviewer disagreement. Large language models (LLMs) have shown potential to support the peer review process, but their ability to replicate editorial decisions at high-impact medical journals and their utility as manuscript screening tools remain unknown. PURPOSE: To compare the agreement between an LLM and the final editorial decision on manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Sports Medicine and to evaluate the potential of LLMs as a manuscript screening tool. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional agreement study. METHODS: Fifty-four manuscripts randomly selected from submissions to the American Journal of Sports Medicine (September 2024-October 2024) were reviewed by a locally deployed LLM (Ministral 3 14B; Mistral AI) using a standardized prompt. The artificial intelligence (AI) produced a categorical recommendation (reject, cascade, revision, or accept) and a numerical score (0-100) for each manuscript. Agreement with the final editorial decision was assessed by Cohen kappa (4-category model) for pooled human reviewers (n = 139 reviews) and the AI (n = 54). Screening performance was evaluated by positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, and specificity. RESULTS: Pooled human reviewers demonstrated fair agreement with the final decision (κ = 0.181 [P < .001]; 42.4% agreement), while the AI demonstrated slight, nonsignificant agreement (κ = 0.126 [P = .099]; 37.0% agreement). The AI recommended revision for 61.1% of manuscripts, of which 72.7% were ultimately rejected or cascaded, demonstrating systematic "revision bias." When the AI recommended rejection, 54.5% of those manuscripts were ultimately rejected and 27.3% were cascaded; when the AI recommended cascade, 50% were rejected and 50% were cascaded. However, when the AI recommended rejection or cascade (n = 21), 90.5% received a final decision of rejection or cascade (PPV, 90.5%; specificity, 81.8%). Manuscripts with an AI score <70 were rejected or cascaded 88.0% of the time (PPV, 88.0%). CONCLUSION: AI cannot replicate the nuanced judgment of human peer reviewers at a high-impact sports medicine journal. When AI recommended rejection or cascade, 90.5% of manuscripts received that final decision (descriptive PPV, 90.5%; 95% CI, 71.1%-97.3%), suggesting potential utility as an exploratory first-pass screening tool warranting further validation in larger cohorts. However, AI could not reliably distinguish manuscripts destined for outright rejection from those that would be cascaded to a sister journal-an important limitation for editorial triage applications.

Sports Medicine↗

PubMed2026

Adverse Experiences in Brief Meditation Practices: Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Meditation has become increasingly popular in recent decades. However, relatively little remains known about the prevalence of and risk factors for adverse experiences related to a single meditation practice. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to examine adverse experiences associated with 3 brief, digitally delivered meditation practices (mindfulness, self-compassion, and gratitude) relative to using the internet as usual, as well as to investigate whether preintervention characteristics could predict such outcomes. METHODS: In a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial using samples that were representative of the US and UK adult populations with regard to ethnicity, sex, and age, we examined adverse experiences associated with 3 brief (ie, 5 or 10 minutes) meditation practices (ie, mindfulness, self-compassion, and gratitude) relative to using the internet as usual. We also investigated the potential of using preintervention characteristics to predict such outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 5049 participants completed all preintervention measures and were randomly assigned to meditation or control conditions. Across the sample, 4.1% (204/4925) of participants reported having a distressing experience during the intervention, and 7.1% (348/4908) of participants experienced an increase in negative affect from before to after the intervention. The results showed that participants who were randomized to a brief meditation intervention were no more likely to report a distressing experience than those who were randomized to use the internet as usual (odds ratio [OR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.76-1.47; P=.76). The results also showed that participants who were randomized to a brief meditation intervention were less likely to report clinically relevant increases in negative affect relative to using the internet as usual (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.50-0.80; P<.001). Notably, participants in the 10-minute condition had a significantly higher likelihood of reporting a distressing experience than those in the 5-minute condition (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.07-1.89; P=.02). Preintervention characteristics showed acceptable discrimination ability to predict a distressing experience (area under the curve=0.73) and slightly lower ability to predict increased negative affect (area under the curve=0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, we found that the brief, digitally delivered meditation practices tested in this study carry risks of adverse experiences that are comparable to or lower than those of typical activities on the internet; 10-minute condition was more likely to result in distressing experiences than 5-minute condition; and adverse responses to a brief meditation practice can, at least to a certain degree, be predicted using preintervention characteristics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework 94HKS; https://osf.io/94hks/overview.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Second-Generation ELZA-sub400 Protocol: Individualized High-Fluence Cross-Linking for Ultra-Thin Keratoconus Corneas.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a second-generation individualized corneal cross-linking (CXL) protocol (ELZA-sub400) using high-fluence UV-A irradiation in ultrathin ectatic corneas. DESIGN: Retrospective, single-center, consecutive interventional case series. METHODS: Twenty-nine eyes of 24 patients with progressive keratoconus or post-LASIK ectasia and a post-soak intraoperative thinnest stromal thickness <400 µm were included. After epithelial removal and riboflavin soaking, continuous UV-A irradiation (365 nm) at 3 or 9 mW/cm² was delivered with total fluence titrated up to 10 J/cm² based on intraoperative ultrasound pachymetry and a previously published nomogram targeting an uncross-linked stromal margin of approximately 70 µm above the endothelium. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and up to 12 months using corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and corneal parameters measured using Scheimpflug tomography and anterior segment OCT (AS-OCT) with Placido-based topography. The main outcome measure was the proportion of eyes without progression at 12 months, defined as <1.0 D increase in maximum keratometry (Kmax). Secondary outcomes included changes in CDVA, refraction, Kmax, stromal thickness, demarcation line depth, densitometry, and safety parameters. RESULTS: At 12 months, 22/29 eyes (76%; 95% CI, 57.9%-87.8%) met the nonprogression criterion. Mean change in Kmax was -0.77 ± 5.10 D (95% CI, -2.71 to 1.17; P = .418). Mean demarcation line-to-anterior stroma distance was 205 ± 64 µm (95% CI, 180.7-229.3), and demarcation line-to-endothelium distance was 64 µm (IQR, 49-152). All demarcation lines remained within the stromal layer; 15/29 eyes (51.7%) had a demarcation line located ≤70 µm from the endothelium. Median CDVA changed from 0.10 to 0.32 logMAR (P = .142). Minimum stromal thickness showed a median change of -4.0 µm (P = .309). No significant change was observed in densitometry, and no eye developed deep stromal haze or endothelial decompensation. CONCLUSIONS: Second-generation ELZA-sub400 CXL halted ectasia progression in 76% of ultrathin corneas at 12 months and was associated with an acceptable short-term safety profile, including stromal-confined demarcation line formation and no observed endothelial decompensation. The numerical decline in spectacle CDVA observed in this severely affected cohort did not reach statistical significance but is clinically important and warrants confirmation in larger prospective studies.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

A randomized trial of viral vector and adjuvanted protein HBV therapeutic vaccine in people with chronic hepatitis B on nucleos(t)ide analogs.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of a therapeutic immunization strategy aimed at reaching a functional cure for chronic hepatitis B (CHB), relying on a heterologous prime-boost with viral vectors ChAd155-hIi-HBV and MVA-HBV, combined with sequential or concomitant administration of adjuvanted recombinant HBV proteins (HBc-HBs/AS01B). METHODS: This single-blind, randomized, controlled, first-in-human, phase 1/2 trial enrolled adults aged 18-65 years with HBeAg-negative CHB, virally suppressed on nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs), with HBsAg >50 IU/mL. Participants received NAs and the following regimens of 4 doses (8-week intervals): sequential administration of ChAd155-hIi-HBV, MVA-HBV, and 2 HBc-HBs/AS01B doses; co-administration of ChAd155-hIi-HBV+HBc-HBs/AS01B, followed by 3 co-administered MVA-HBV+HBc-HBs/AS01B doses; 4 HBc-HBs/AS01B doses; 2 placebo doses followed by ChAd155-hIi-HBV and MVA-HBV administered alone or with HBc-HBs/AS01B; or 4 placebo doses. Safety, efficacy (≥1-log decrease in quantitative (q)HBsAg or HBsAg loss 24 weeks post-dose 4 [day (D)337]), antibody, and T-cell responses were evaluated. RESULTS: In all, 134 participants were vaccinated. Grade 3 solicited adverse events (AEs) (median duration: 2-3 days) were more frequent after co-administration (systemic: 59.3%; administration-site: 33.3%) than sequential administration (systemic: 10.3%; administration-site: 12.8%) of high-dose viral vectors and proteins. No vaccine-related or fatal serious AEs were reported. After 4 doses, no participant had HBsAg loss or ≥1-log decrease in qHBsAg (D337 vs. D1). Co-administration induced the strongest anti-HBs response (73.7% achieved anti-HBs ≥10 mIU/mL 2 weeks post-dose 4 vs. 40.0% after sequential administration). Both sequential and co-administration induced HBc-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses, with a prime-boost effect of the viral vectors. CONCLUSIONS: Heterologous prime-boost with ChAd155-hIi-HBV and MVA-HBV, combined with sequential or co-administration of HBc-HBs/AS01B, had an acceptable safety profile, were moderately immunogenic, but no participants showed the expected efficacy outcome.

Humans↗