Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 42259717

Efficacy and Safety Profile of a Triple Single-Pill Combination of Valsartan/Amlodipine/Chlorthalidone in Patients with Uncontrolled Hypertension.

Abstract

PURPOSE: This randomized, double-blind, multicenter Phase III study evaluated the efficacy and safety profile of a single-pill triple combination of valsartan/amlodipine/chlorthalidone (KDF1901, Valdipine Plus) compared with a dual combination of valsartan/amlodipine (KDF1901-R) in patients with essential hypertension. METHODS: Patients (n = 294) with inadequately controlled hypertension after a 4-week run-in phase with valsartan/amlodipine (80/5 mg) were randomized to receive KDF1901 (valsartan/amlodipine/chlorthalidone 160/10/25 mg, n = 147) or KDF1901-R (valsartan/amlodipine 160/10 mg, n = 147) for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) from baseline to week 8. Secondary endpoints included changes in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (MSDBP), BP normalization rates, and response rates. Safety profile outcomes assessed treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), laboratory parameters, and serious adverse events. FINDINGS: At week 8, the KDF1901 group exhibited a significantly greater reduction in MSSBP (-22.8 &#xb1; 1.0 mmHg) compared with the dual therapy group (-16.7 &#xb1; 1.0 mmHg, P < 0.0001). Similarly, the mean MSDBP reduction was significantly greater with KDF1901 (P = 0.0006). BP normalization rates (75.9% vs 54.5%, P < .0001) and response rates (73.8% vs 51.7%, P < 0.0001) were significantly higher in the triple combination group. Overall, the incidence of TEAEs was similar between groups (24.7% vs 21.5%, P = 0.5783), with mild cases of dizziness were most commonly reported. Exploratory ad hoc analyses showed statistically greater changes in sodium, potassium, and uric acid levels with triple therapy, but clinically meaningful extreme electrolyte abnormalities were rare in both groups, and the overall laboratory profile remained acceptable. IMPLICATIONS: This trial reported that the single-pill triple combination KDF1901 significantly improved BP control compared with dual therapy without compromising tolerability. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT07116863.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Hae-Young Lee, Soon-Yong Suh, Ho-Joong Youn, Woo-Baek Chung, Ki Hoon Han, Youngkeun Ahn, Dong-Hun Cha, Seong-Hwan Kim, Jong-Seon Park, Choong-Ki Kim, Jung-Sun Kim, Jin-Ho Shin, Myeong-Ho Yoon, Jin-Bae Lee, Ji-Hyun Kim, Doo-Soo Jeon, Cheol-Woong Yu, Moo-Hyun Kim, Kyung-Hee Lim, Il-Suk Sohn, Jin-Ok Jeong, Chang-Gyu Park, You-Jung Choi, Chang-Hoon Lee, Junghwa Jeong, Seong-Bo Yoon, Sung-Uk Kwon, Sang-Hyuk Yeo, Chong-Jin Kim. 2026-06-08. Efficacy and Safety Profile of a Triple Single-Pill Combination of Valsartan/Amlodipine/Chlorthalidone in Patients with Uncontrolled Hypertension.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2026.05.010

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effects of exercise on aerobic capacity in people with prehypertension or hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

This study aimed to quantify the effects of exercise on aerobic capacity in people with prehypertension or hypertension and to identify exercise prescription parameters that optimize improvements. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus from inception to 24 October 2025. Data were pooled using standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Exercise significantly improved aerobic capacity in people with prehypertension or hypertension (SMD&#x200a;=&#x200a;0.88; 95% CI: 0.61-1.15; P &#x200a;<&#x200a;0.00001), with multicomponent training demonstrating superior efficacy. Exploratory subgroup analyses suggest that longer programs (&#x2265;12&#x200a;weeks), lower frequency (<3&#x200a;sessions/week), 60-min sessions or longer, total weekly exercise less than 180&#x200a;min, and professional supervision may be associated with better outcomes.

Humans

Left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of echocardiographic studies published from 2011 to 2025.

AIM: An updated meta-analysis targeting the prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), a cardinal marker of hypertensive heart disease (HHD), over the last 15&#x200a;years is lacking. Thus, we analyzed the literature in order to provide a comprehensive information on LVH prevalence, as assessed by echocardiography, in the hypertensive setting. METHODS: The PubMed, OVID-MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases were analyzed to search English-language articles published from 1 January 2011 up to 31 December 2025. Studies were identified by using MeSH terms and crossing the following search items: 'left ventricular hypertrophy', 'left ventricular mass', 'hypertensive heart disease', 'echocardiography', 'hypertension', and 'subclinical cardiac damage'. RESULTS: A total of 51 studies including 74&#x200a;632 hypertensive patients were considered. Overall, the prevalence of LVH in the pooled cohort, defined according to criteria recommended by echocardiographic guidelines, was 36.6% (95% CI: 33.4-40%). Data provided by 18 studies ( n &#x200a;=&#x200a;40&#x200a;108 patients) showed that the probability of having LVH was lower in men than in women (OR&#x200a;=&#x200a;0.62, CI: 0.48-0.80, P &#x200a;<&#x200a;0.0001). Among patients with LVH (17 studies), the risk of concentric LVH was almost twice as high as eccentric (OR&#x200a;=&#x200a;1.94, CI: 1.52-2.49, P &#x200a;<&#x200a;0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis suggests that the high contemporary prevalence of LVH reflects the failure of therapeutic strategies worldwide in the prevention and treatment of HHD. From a clinical perspective, these data imply the need for a more aggressive treatment of hypertension and related cardiovascular risk factors leading to LVH, especially in women.

Humans

Maternal vaccination with RSVpreF and risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: A bivalent respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prefusion F protein-based vaccine (RSVpreF) was approved in the United States in August 2023 for use during pregnancy to prevent infant RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease. The pivotal phase 3 trial identified a numerical imbalance in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) that did not reach statistical significance; postmarketing observational studies have since reported inconsistent findings. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess this association. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP from inception to Jan 26, 2026, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing HDP outcomes in RSVpreF-vaccinated versus unvaccinated or placebo-receiving pregnant individuals. Unadjusted risk ratios (RRs) were pooled using a random-effects model; adjusted estimates from observational studies were pooled separately by inverse variance methods. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251026835). RESULTS: Nine studies were included (3 RCTs, 6 retrospective cohort studies; n&#xa0;=&#xa0;148,267). RSVpreF vaccination was associated with a small but statistically significant increase in overall HDP risk (RR 1&#xb7;08, 95% CI 1&#xb7;02-1&#xb7;13; p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0&#xb7;004; I2&#xa0;=&#xa0;44%), driven by the observational studies group (1&#xb7;08, 1&#xb7;02-1&#xb7;14; I2&#xa0;=&#xa0;61%); RCTs showed a directionally consistent but non-significant RR (1&#xb7;12, 0&#xb7;87-1&#xb7;43; I2&#xa0;=&#xa0;0%). The association was attributable to gestational hypertension, with no significant association for preeclampsia/eclampsia. CONCLUSION: Maternal RSVpreF vaccination was associated with a small increase in HDP attributable to gestational hypertension and driven primarily by observational studies, in which residual confounding remains possible. The benefits of infant RSV prevention remain substantial, and these findings support continued postmarketing surveillance and informed shared decision-making.

Humans