SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “concurrent versus consolidative”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

418 records · Page 10Linked to original sources

PubMed2026

Fracture-related infection following open forefoot fractures caused by dropped objects.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the rate of fracture-related infection (FRI) of open forefoot fractures caused by dropped objects, and examined associations of treatment characteristics, including intravenous and oral antibiotics and operative debridement, with FRI. METHODS: Patients aged 18-80 years who sustained an open metatarsal or phalanx fracture caused by a dropped object between January 2021 and June 2024 were retrospectively identified from two Level 1 trauma centers. The primary outcome was FRI, determined based on the FRI consensus criteria. FRI rates were compared between those who underwent irrigation and debridement (I&D) at bedside versus in the operating room, and between those who received oral versus intravenous (IV) antibiotics. Patient characteristics were also analyzed to determine host factors associated with FRI. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients (median age 41 years [IQR: 29-56], 58% male) were included. Eighty-five patients (99%) received antibiotics, 31 (36%) of whom received intravenous antibiotics. Sixty-six patients (77%) received an I&D at presentation, 57 (66%) at bedside and 9 (10%) in the operating room. Thirteen patients (15%, 95% CI: 8.3%-24%) developed FRI. No significant difference in FRI rate was found between patients who underwent I&D at bedside versus in the operating room (12% versus 11%, p > 0.99). Among patients who did not undergo I&D in the operating room, no significant difference in FRI rate was found between patients who received oral versus IV antibiotics (17% versus 13%, p = 0.74). Insulin-dependent diabetes was associated with an increased risk of FRI (60% versus 12%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, one in seven patients developed FRI. No statistically significant differences in FRI rates were observed by I&D setting (bedside versus operative) or antibiotic route (oral versus IV), including in a subgroup analysis excluding patients treated with operating room I&D. These findings are limited by sample size and potential treatment selection bias and should not be interpreted as evidence of equivalence. Management should be individualized based on clinical judgement, resource availability, and patient factors. These findings can help guide the management protocols for "dropped objects" open forefoot fractures presenting to urgent care and the emergency department. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Comfort and Usability of Digital Versus Conventional Custom-Fit Mouthguards: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The use of mouthguards protects teeth and the supporting tissues against impacts. Digital impressions and 3D-printed models can reduce manufacturing steps and minimize discomfort. This study evaluated the fit, comfort, and usability of custom-made mouthguards, obtained by conventional and digital workflow, in amateur athletes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Amateur athletes were recruited for this randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical study. Each participant received two 4-mm-thick custom-fit mouthguards made of ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) sheets using two protocols: conventional impression using alginate to produce dental stone cast (CMP) and intraoral digital scanning to produce 3D-printed resin models (DMP). Each mouthguard was worn during all training and matches over 3 months. The order of mouthguard use was randomly assigned. Patient satisfaction with the impression protocol and mouthguard use, model accuracy, and mouthguard fit were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 46 participants completed the study. The DMP protocol required less execution time (p = 0.023), caused less discomfort (p = 0.018), anxiety (p = 0.008), nausea (p = 0.027), difficulty breathing (p < 0.001), and unpleasant taste (p = 0.006) compared to the CMP protocol. The pain (p = 0.971) perceived by the participants was similar in both impression protocols. The CMP-mouthguards were considered to be better fitting by the majority of participants (p = 0.027). Between-group comparisons revealed that DMP-mouthguard caused less discomfort immediately postadaptation (p = 0.034), with no significant differences observed at 30 or 90 days. CONCLUSIONS: The digital workflow demonstrated to be efficient in the fabrication of mouthguards. Digital impression was more comfortable, requiring less execution time, with more accurate printed models and produced mouthguards with reported comfort and fit levels similar to those manufactured conventionally.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Adherence and efficacy of the 0 - 7 - 21-day versus the 0 - 1 - 6-month hepatitis B vaccination schedules among people who use drugs: a two-year randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: To compare the adherence and efficacy between the 0 - 7 - 21-day and the 0 - 1 - 6-month hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination schedules among people who use drugs (PWUD) in China. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in 1261 HBV-susceptible PWUD from compulsory isolated detoxification centers (CIDCs) and methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) clinics in Xi'an. A 20 µg per-dose vaccine was used. HBV surface antibody (anti-HBs), surface antigen, and core antibody were tested at months 7, 15, and 22 after the first dose. RESULTS: Third-dose coverage was significantly higher in the 0 - 7 - 21-day group (74.40%) than in the 0 - 1 - 6-month group (51.58%, p < 0.001), mainly driven by participants from CIDCs (77.75% vs. 45.69%). Anti-HBs positive rates at months 7, 15, and 22 among participants who completed all three doses were significantly higher for the 0 - 1 - 6-month schedule (90.71%, 76.82%, and 67.35%) than for the 0 - 7 - 21-day schedule (74.23%, 49.40%, and 40.95%; all p < 0.001). HBV infection incidence was similar between schedules, but significantly different between vaccinees and non-vaccinees (p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: The 0 - 7 - 21-day schedule substantially enhances three-dose completion in PWUD, but induces a notably weaker anti-HBs response and persistence. Schedules should be selected based on the management models for PWUD and their individual characteristics. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1900022403).

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Minimally invasive versus open abdominoperineal resection and the risk of postoperative perineal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The impact of minimally invasive surgery on the risk of postoperative perineal hernia after abdominoperineal resection (APR) or extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) remains uncertain. This study compares perineal hernia rates and perioperative outcomes between minimally invasive and open approaches. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched through June 2026. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. A Bayesian meta-analysis was additionally performed for the primary outcome. RESULTS: Four comparative observational studies involving 763 patients were included; 249 underwent minimally invasive APR/ELAPE, and 514 underwent open APR/ELAPE. Postoperative perineal hernia was significantly more frequent following minimally invasive surgery (OR 4.13; 95% CI 2.24-7.61; p < 0.001). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the minimally invasive group (MD - 156.5 mL; 95% CI - 298.4 to - 14.5; p = 0.03), as was operative time (MD - 41.7 min; 95% CI - 60.8 to - 22.5; p < 0.01). No significant differences were observed in hospital stay (MD - 2.5 days; 95% CI - 5.4 to 0.4; p = 0.09) or 30-day readmission rates (OR 1.41; 95% CI 0.82-2.42; p = 0.209). Bayesian analysis yielded a posterior mean OR of 4.04 (95% CrI 1.96-8.36), corresponding to a 99.9% posterior probability that minimally invasive surgery increases the risk of postoperative perineal hernia. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive APR/ELAPE was associated with an increased risk of postoperative perineal hernia compared with the open approach. Strategies to reduce this complication while preserving the benefits of minimally invasive surgery warrant further investigation.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Adjuvant oxaliplatin with S-1 (SOX) versus S-1 for stage II-III gastric cancer (CAPITAL): A randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy following D2 gastrectomy constitutes the standard-of-care for resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) carcinoma. The CAPITAL trial is a multicenter, randomized, phase 3 study, aiming to assess the efficacy and safety of adjuvant oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) versus S-1 alone. METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed pathological stage II-III gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma after gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either the SOX regimen (n = 362) or the S-1 regimen (n = 362). The primary endpoint was overall survival. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01795027). FINDINGS: The median follow-up was 74.0 months (interquartile range [IQR], 35.5-89.3). The 5-year overall survival rates were 70.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 66.0-76.1) in the SOX group and 62.9% (95% CI, 57.8-68.5) in the S-1 group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.58-0.95; p = 0.018). The 3- and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 71.2% (95% CI, 66.5-76.3) and 66.2% (95% CI, 61.2-71.6) in the SOX group, as compared with 65.1% (95% CI, 60.2-70.5) and 55.6% (95% CI, 50.4-61.3) in the S-1 group (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61-0.96). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3-4 occurred in 87 (25%) of 349 patients in the SOX group and 45 (13%) of 347 patients in the S-1 group. The most common grade 3-4 adverse event was neutropenia, occurring in 44 (13%) of 349 patients in the SOX group and 23 (7%) of 347 patients in the S-1 group. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of adjuvant oxaliplatin to S-1 chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with gastric cancer. FUNDING: This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82573092 and 82573387).

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Bivalirudin Versus Heparin in Low and Non-Low Bleeding Risk Patients Undergoing Primary PCI for STEMI: The BRIGHT-4 Trial.

BACKGROUND: In the BRIGHT-4 trial, among 6,016 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a radial artery approach, procedural anticoagulation with bivalirudin plus a post-PCI high-dose infusion for 2 to 4 hours reduced the 30-day primary composite outcome of all-cause death or Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 3 to 5 bleeding, as well as death and bleeding individually, compared with heparin monotherapy. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether the benefits of bivalirudin apply principally to patients who are at low bleeding risk (LBR) as well as non-LBR. METHODS: In a prespecified analysis from BRIGHT-4, outcomes were examined by baseline bleeding risk, with LBR defined as a CRUSADE score <30. RESULTS: At baseline, 4,581 patients (76.1%) were categorized as LBR. Non-LBR patients had higher rates of the 30-day primary endpoint (8.6% vs 2.2%; HR: 4.08 [95% CI: 3.14-5.31]; P < 0.0001), driven by both greater mortality and BARC types 3 to 5 bleeding. In non-LBR patients, the primary outcome occurred in 8.1% of patients randomized to bivalirudin vs 9.2% of those randomized to heparin (difference: -1.1% [95% CI: -4.0% to 1.8%]; HR: 0.88 [95% CI: 0.62-1.26]). In LBR patients, the primary outcome occurred in 1.4% of patients randomized to bivalirudin vs 2.9% of those randomized to heparin (difference: -1.5% [95% CI: -2.3% to -0.6%]; HR: 0.49 [95% CI: 0.32-0.75]) (Pabsolute interaction = 0.81; Prelative interaction = 0.04). The effects of bivalirudin compared with heparin in reducing all-cause death were as robust in LBR patients compared with non-LBR patients (Pabsolute interaction = 0.67; Prelative interaction = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI with radial artery access, procedural anticoagulation with bivalirudin plus a high-dose post-PCI infusion for 2 to 4 hours reduced the 30-day risk of all-cause death and major bleeding in patients at low bleeding risk as well as in patients at higher-risk of bleeding. (Bivalirudin With Prolonged Full Dose Infusion Versus Heparin Alone During Emergency PCI [BRIGHT-4; NCT03822975]).

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Minimally invasive versus open surgery for gallbladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is increasingly being used in gallbladder cancer (GBC) for radical tumour extirpation. However, there are conflicting results on the morbidity outcomes following MIS. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the post-operative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing radical surgery for GBC between MIS and open surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Studies comparing MIS (laparoscopic, robotic or both techniques) to open surgery were included. The databases of MEDLINE, Cochrane and EMBASE were searched from 2001 till March 2025. The primary end point was post-operative morbidity and mortality. The secondary end points were hospital stay, blood loss, operative time and R1 resection rates. Random effect models were used for analysis. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies (laparoscopic [n = 19], robotic [n = 6] or both [n = 7]) involving 8568 (MIS = 3287 and open = 5281) patients were included. For overall and major morbidity (Clavian-Dindo >/ = III), the odds ratio (OR) of 0.60 (95% CI: 0.46-0.78) and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.52-1.0) respectively was obtained, favouring the MIS approach. Similarly, MIS showed lower odds for mortality [OR:0.62 (95% CI: 0.40-0.95)] compared to open surgery. MIS was associated with shorter hospital stay (less by mean of 3 days) and lesser blood loss (less by mean of 115 ml) but longer operative time (higher by mean of 5.8 min) and higher R1 resection rates (OR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.05-1.71). Oncological outcomes, however, were comparable. The certainty of evidence was very low to low across the studies. CONCLUSION: MIS for GBC was associated with relatively lower post operative morbidity and mortality with similar oncological outcomes but with a small but heightened risk of margin positive (R1) resection, especially in primary GBC. The certainty of evidence was very low to low across the included studies. Future prospective studies are needed to overcome the clinical heterogeneity and possible selection bias.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Empirical Meropenem Versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam for Critically Ill Adults With Sepsis: Feasibility of a Randomised Trial.

BACKGROUND: Meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam are commonly used empirical antibiotics in critically ill adults with sepsis, but whether one is superior to the other is uncertain. METHODS: The Empirical Meropenem versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam for Adult Patients with Sepsis (EMPRESS) trial is an ongoing investigator-initiated, randomised, open-label, adaptive clinical trial with an integrated feasibility phase comparing empirical treatment with meropenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam in critically ill adults with sepsis. The integrated feasibility phase enrolled 200 participants across 10 intensive care units (ICUs) in Denmark between 28 June and 12 December 2025. Five pre-specified feasibility criteria were evaluated; if all feasibility criteria were met, the trial would proceed unaltered, whereas failure to meet one or more criteria would require intervention and re-evaluation. RESULTS: We randomised 200 of 284 screened patients (70.4%). The median age was 70 years (interquartile range (IQR): 60-77), 65.5% were males. At randomisation, 80.0% received vasopressors or inotropes, and 43.5% were on invasive mechanical ventilation. Four of five pre-specified feasibility criteria were met: time to completion of the feasibility phase (5.5 months vs. threshold < 12.0 months), recruitment proportion (70.4% vs. threshold ≥ 50.0%), proportion of participants without consent to the continued collection of data (2.5% vs. threshold < 5.0%) and protocol adherence (81.0% vs. threshold ≥ 75.0%). The proportion of participants with timely primary outcome data availability (30-day mortality) within 45 days was 85.5% and below the pre-specified threshold of ≥ 95.0%. The proportions were low in the first 3 months (33.3%, 22.2% and 30.8%, respectively), increasing to 95.8% in the last month of the feasibility phase. All-cause mortality at 30 days was 30.5%, and specific serious adverse reactions occurred in 4.0% of participants. CONCLUSIONS: In this integrated feasibility evaluation of the EMPRESS trial comparing empirical meropenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam in critically ill adults with sepsis, four of five pre-specified feasibility criteria were met. The unmet criterion, timely primary outcome data availability, improved substantially during the feasibility phase. We consider the trial feasible and will proceed without modifications. EDITORIAL COMMENT: This feasibility study assessed recruitment, randomised allocation and data collection for the multicentre EMPRESS trial. For adaptive trials on trial platforms, careful interim checking of trial design functions is an important and necessary process. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Information System EUCT number: 2023-509703-33-00; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06184659; Universal Trial Number: U1111-1301-6379.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Comparison of analgesic efficacy of pericapsular group of nerve block versus anterior quadratus lumborum block in adult patients undergoing unilateral hip arthroplasty: A comparative randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty is a painful surgical procedure; therefore, it is a challenge to manage effective pain control during the perioperative period. STUDY OBJECTIVES: We compared the analgesic efficacy of the pericapsular nerve group block and the anterior quadratus lumborum block in patients undergoing unilateral hip arthroplasty. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTINGS: Operating room of a tertiary care center. PATIENTS: 92 adult patients of >18 years who underwent elective, unilateral total hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia were randomized to either Group P (USG guided PENG block with 30 ml 0.25% ropivacaine +4 mg dexamethasone) or Group Q (USG guided QL block with 30 ml 0.25% ropivacaine +4 mg dexamethasone) 20 min before surgery. MEASUREMENTS: We compared the total perioperative fentanyl consumption between the two groups in the first 24 h as the primary outcome. Other outcomes included time to first rescue analgesia in the postoperative period, NRS scores at rest and on movement at 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h, incidence of intraoperative hemodynamic changes, and incidence of postoperative PONV. MAIN RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the total fentanyl consumption between the two groups: 237.5 (150-450) μg in the P group and 250 (125-400) μg in the Q group; p = 0.617. The time to first rescue analgesia was similar in both groups: the P group (198 [123-268] minutes) and the Q group (241 [180-318] minutes); p = 0.120. There was also no difference in pain scores, intraoperative hemodynamic changes, or PONV. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the perioperative opioid consumption, pain scores, and adverse event rates between the pericapsular nerve group block and anterior quadratus lumborum block in adult patients undergoing unilateral hip arthroplasty. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI number: CTRI/2023/08/057157).

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Use of indocyanine green fluorescence versus patent blue V dye for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early breast cancer, a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is standard for axillary staging in early breast cancer. While the combination of radioisotope and blue dye (e.g., patent blue V, PBV) remains the standard, it has limitations including logistics, variable identification rate (IR), and allergic potential. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence is a promising alternative, but high-quality comparative evidence is needed. METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Forty patients with early-stage, node-negative breast cancer were allocated to SLNB using either ICG (n = 20) or PBV (n = 20). All patients subsequently underwent completion level I-II axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) as the pathological reference standard for diagnostic performance assessment. Primary outcome was sentinel lymph node (SLN) IR. Secondary outcomes included detection time, number of SLNs retrieved, false-negative rate (FNR), and safety. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The SLN IR was significantly higher with ICG (100% [20/20]) than with PBV (75% [15/20], p = 0.047). ICG was associated with a significantly shorter median detection time (14.5 vs. 24.0 min, p < 0.001) and retrieved more SLNs (mean: 3.6 vs. 2.4, p = 0.002). Most critically, ICG demonstrated 100% sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and overall diagnostic accuracy, with a 0% FNR. In contrast, PBV achieved a sensitivity of 75%, an overall diagnostic accuracy of 90%, and an FNR of 25%. No ICG-related adverse events occurred. PBV caused skin discoloration in 75% of patients and one (5%) allergic reaction. CONCLUSION: ICG fluorescence achieved a higher SLN IR, shorter detection time, higher sensitivity, lower FNR, and fewer tracer-related adverse events than PBV as a single tracer for SLNB in patients with early-stage breast cancer. These findings suggest that ICG is a promising standalone tracer when radioisotope mapping is unavailable. Larger multicenter studies are required before widespread adoption can be recommended.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Ketamine Plus Midazolam versus Fentanyl Plus Midazolam for Sedation and Analgesia during Image-guided Procedures in Interventional Radiology: Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background Opioid-benzodiazepine regimens remain common for radiologist-administered procedural sedation despite respiratory and analgesic effectiveness concerns. Purpose To compare intraprocedural pain and patient-reported experience between ketamine/midazolam and fentanyl/midazolam during image-guided procedural sedation. Materials and Methods This randomized clinical trial was conducted at a single academic center between June 2025 and February 2026. Adults undergoing image-guided lung or bone biopsy or abscess drainage were randomized to fentanyl/midazolam or ketamine/midazolam administered by interventional radiologists. Procedures were performed using US, CT, CT fluoroscopy, or combined CT and US guidance. The primary outcome was maximum intraprocedural pain (0-10 on the Numeric Rating Scale). Secondary outcomes included sedation depth, physiologic parameters, oxygen desaturation, patient-reported experience assessed using a modified Heidelberg questionnaire, and complications. Results Among 264 randomized procedures (132 procedures per group) in 260 participants (median age, 68 years [IQR, 61-75 years]; 135 [52%] female), ketamine/midazolam resulted in lower maximum intraprocedural pain than fentanyl/midazolam (mean difference, -1.4 points [95% CI: -2.0, -0.8]; P < .001). Pain scores greater than 4 occurred less frequently with ketamine/midazolam (2.3% vs 17%; absolute difference, 14 percentage points [95% CI: 8, 21]; P < .001). Ketamine/midazolam was associated with higher nadir oxygen saturation (mean difference, +1.4% [95% CI: 0.6, 2.2]; P = .001) and fewer oxygen desaturation events below 90% (three [2.3%] vs 13 [9.8%]; absolute difference, 7.6 percentage points [95% CI: 1.9, 13.3]; P = .02). Ketamine/midazolam produced deeper sedation and higher intraprocedural systolic blood pressure. Hallucinations occurred more frequently with ketamine/midazolam (15 [11.4%] vs five [3.8%]; absolute difference, 7.6 percentage points [95% CI: 1.3, 13.9]; P = .03), though overall procedural comfort, reduced recall, and perceived adequacy of sedation were improved. Procedure-related and sedation-related complications did not differ between groups. Conclusion Radiologist-administered ketamine/midazolam during image-guided procedural sedation improved analgesia and patient-reported experience with fewer hypoxemic events and no increase in complications compared with fentanyl/midazolam. Clinical trial registration no. NCT07040163

Aged↗

PubMed2026

Comparing the Efficacy of Mechanochemical Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Treating Great Saphenous Vein Incompetence: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of mechanochemical ablation (MOCA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the treatment of great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence. METHODS: Online databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing MOCA and RFA in the treatment of varicose veins in lower extremities from database inception to October 2025. Primary outcome was anatomic success. Secondary outcomes were visual analog scale (VAS), Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire score (AVVQ), and complications. Two reviewers independently screened the retrieved literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias in the included studies. Subsequent analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3. RESULTS: A total of four RCTs, one cohort study and retrospective cross-sectional study involving 737 patients (380 MOCA patients and 357 RFA patients) were included. The meta-analysis results showed that the RFA group was significantly better than the MOCA group in short term and long term of anatomical success rate [(odds ratio [OR] = 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI] (0.20, 0.71), P = 0.003), (OR = 0.17, 95% CI (0.06, 0.45), P = 0.0003)], but patients in the MOCA group had significantly lower perioperative period pain (mean difference [MD] = -4.48, 95% CI (-7.58, -1.37), P = 0.005] and required fewer days to return to normal activities (MD = -0.76, 95% CI, (-0.95, -0.57), P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in minor and major complications [(OR = 0.93, 95% CI (0.66, 1.33), P = 0.70), (OR = 1.30, 95% CI (0.32, 5.28), P = 0.72)] or quality of life scores (MD = -0.45, 95% CI (-2.53 to 1.63), P = 0.67). CONCLUSION: MOCA of GSV incompetence is an effective and safe method. Compared with RFA, it has lower postoperative pain score and faster recovery time. However, the anatomical success rates were significantly lower with MOCA than with RFA. Therefore, long-term follow-up to evaluate the impact on clinical results is required.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Alarms and alarm management with automated versus conventional ventilation in neurocritical care patients.

INTRODUCTION: False or clinically irrelevant alarms are a major driver of ICU alarm fatigue and nursing workload. Ventilator alarms make up a large share, and although automated ventilation modes can reduce manual adjustments, their effect on alarm burden is still unclear. This issue can be particularly relevant in neurocritical care patients, where precise ventilator and alarm management is imperative for patient safety. OBJECTIVES: This explorative post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial compared alarm frequency and management between automated ventilation and conventional ventilation in neurocritical care patients. METHODS: Ventilator alarms and manual ventilator changes were captured continuously from the ventilator for up to 24 h per patient. The primary endpoint was a composite of workload-relevant alarms; with alarm management interventions at the ventilator as a key secondary outcome. Additional endpoints included redundant alarms, alarm duration and ventilator management. RESULTS: 13 patients received automated ventilation and 24 received conventional ventilation. No difference was observed in workload-relevant alarm frequency between automated and conventional ventilation (3.28 [2.87 to 4.30] vs 3.73 [1.66 to 7.33] alarms per hour; P = 0.81), while alarm management interventions at the ventilator were lower with automated ventilation (0.14 [0.10 to 0.15] vs 0.21 [0.17 to 0.31] interventions per hour; P = 0.01). Other alarm frequencies, duration of alarms and ventilator management were similar. CONCLUSIONS: In this exploratory post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial in neurocritical care patients during the early phase of mechanical ventilation, automated ventilation did not reduce the frequency of total or workload-relevant alarms, nor their duration, but was associated with fewer alarm management interventions compared to conventional ventilation. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Automated ventilation may not reduce alarm frequency in neurocritical care patients, but the observed reduction in alarm-related bedside interventions suggests a potential benefit for nursing workload.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy and Safety of Elagolix Versus Dienogest for Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Endometriosis Pain: A Phase III, Multicentric, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Non-Inferiority Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of elagolix with dienogest in women with moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain. DESIGN: A multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, parallel-group, active-controlled, non-inferiority phase III study. SETTING: Nineteen clinical centres across India. STUDY POPULATION: Women (18-49 years) diagnosed with endometriosis and experiencing moderate-to-severe pain. METHODS: Participants were randomised (1:1) to receive oral elagolix (150 mg once daily) or dienogest (2 mg once daily) for 24 weeks. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was change in endometriosis-related pain (Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]) from baseline to Day 85. Secondary outcomes included changes in NRS (Day 169), dysmenorrhoea, non-menstrual pelvic pain (NMPP) scores (Days 85 and 169), rescue medication use, patient global impression of change (PGIC), adverse events and bone mineral density. RESULTS: Of 340 patients screened, 230 were randomised (115 per group). At Day 85, both arms showed similar reductions in NRS pain scores with a treatment difference of 0.04 (95% CI: -0.3, 0.37) [p = 0.9747] demonstrating non-inferiority as upper 95% CI was below pre-specified margin of 1.5. At Day 169, both arms showed comparable improvements in overall pain, dysmenorrhoea and NMPP from baseline (p = 0.9372, p = 0.8884, and p = 0.9616, respectively). Rescue medication use and PGIC were comparable between treatment arms. Adverse event incidence was similar (elagolix: 14.8%; dienogest: 19.1%), with no serious TEAEs or discontinuations. No significant bone mineral density changes were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Elagolix demonstrated non-inferiority to dienogest with an acceptable safety and tolerability profile, supporting its use in managing endometriosis-associated pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: CTRI/2023/01/049292.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Fourteen-Day Amoxicillin- or Tetracycline-Containing Bismuth Quadruple Therapy versus 14-Day Metronidazole-Based Triple Therapy as the Treatment for Clarithromycin-Resistant Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Combination therapy comprising a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), amoxicillin, and metronidazole (PAM) is used to treat clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori in the Republic of Korea, but eradication rates are decreasing due to an increasing incidence of clarithromycin resistance. We compared PAM, bismuth compounds plus PAM (PAM-B), and the combination of PPI, bismuth compounds, metronidazole, and tetracycline (PBMT) to determine whether PAM-B can achieve an eradication rate higher than that of PAM and comparable to that of PBMT. METHODS: This prospective multicenter study enrolled patients with clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori infections in the Busan and Gyeongsangnam-do of the Republic of Korea between December 2022 and February 2024. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, the eradication rate was significantly lower in the PAM group (68.2%) than in the PAM-B group (84.8%, p=0.024), whereas the difference from the PBMT group (81.8%) was not significant (p=0.070). The rate remained lowest in the PAM group (75.4%) in the per-protocol (PP) analysis (PAM-B, 96.5%, p=0.001; PBMT, 94.6%, p=0.004). Eradication rates were comparable between the PAM-B and PBMT groups in both the ITT (p=0.640) and PP analyses (p=0.633). Nausea and vomiting were significantly less frequent in the PAM-B group than in the PBMT group (6.8% vs 25.0%; p=0.007). Severe adverse events were rare, and all symptoms resolved after treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: PAM-B yielded eradication rates higher than those of PAM and comparable to those of PBMT, with no significant increase in the incidence of adverse events, suggesting the potential of PAM-B as a first-line treatment for clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori infection. Further large-scale studies are needed to validate these results. Registered retrospectively with the Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS; KCT0012265).

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Long-term microbiome and clinical effects of a microbiome-guided personalized diet versus low-FODMAP diet in irritable bowel syndrome: A 12-month follow-up randomized controlled trial.

Dietary therapy is central to irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) management, yet the long-term durability of the low-FODMAP diet (LFD), and of microbiome-guided personalization, remains unclear. We assessed the long-term clinical and gut-microbiome effects of a microbiome-guided personalized diet (PD) compared with a standard LFD in adults meeting Rome IV criteria for IBS. In this multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial with blinded outcome assessment, participants who completed a 6-week dietary intervention (PD or LFD) were followed at 6 and 12 months without further dietary intervention. Outcomes included the IBS Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS), IBS Quality of Life (IBS-QOL), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); gut microbiota were profiled by 16S rRNA sequencing. Longitudinal changes were evaluated using linear mixed-effects models, responder analyses, PERMANOVA, and PERMDISP. Both diets reduced IBS-SSS at 6 weeks. PD maintained symptom improvement at 6 and 12 months (-82.0 and -78.3 points from baseline), whereas LFD benefits regressed by 12 months (+29.3 points; between-group p = 0.001). At 12 months, IBS-SSS responder rates were higher with PD than LFD (62.5% vs 34.5%; absolute risk difference +28.0%, 95% CI 4.2-47.7; Fisher p = 0.029), and IBS-QOL, HADS-anxiety, and HADS-depression showed more favourable trajectories with PD. PD was associated with sustained Shannon alpha-diversity gains (+0.488 at 6 weeks; +0.205 at 12 months; both p < 0.01). A modest between-group beta-diversity difference at 6 months (R2 = 0.035; p = 0.011) was not significant at 12 months. This hypothesis-generating follow-up suggests more durable benefit with PD; larger trials powered for long-term clinical and microbiome outcomes are warranted.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Teaching Acute Coronary Syndrome High-Risk ECG Interpretation and Clinical Decision-Making Through FOAMed Videos and Podcast Versus Print-Based Materials Among Emergency Care Providers: Randomized Controlled Mixed Methods Trial.

BACKGROUND: Accurate interpretation of high-risk acute coronary syndrome (ACS) electrocardiograms (ECGs) is essential for early diagnosis and timely reperfusion, yet substantial deficits persist across health care professions. Digital self-learning formats such as FOAMed (Free Open Access Medical Education) are widely used, but their effectiveness has rarely been evaluated for complex, high-risk ACS ECG patterns. Existing ECG education studies often focus on students or single professional groups and established ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) criteria, leaving newer guideline-recognized STEMI equivalents, selected emerging occlusion myocardial infarction (OMI)-related patterns, and interprofessional emergency care underrepresented. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of FOAMed podcast and videos versus traditional print-based materials for teaching high-risk ACS ECG patterns and related clinical decision-making in emergency providers. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, interprofessional, controlled mixed methods trial across 5 training sites in Germany. Paramedics, prehospital emergency physicians, and emergency department clinicians received either a FOAMed multimedia module or print-based materials through concealed allocation; deviations from the intended 1:1 ratio resulted from participant no-shows. The intervention consisted of a 30-minute supervised self-learning session. In total, 103 participants were allocated to FOAMed (n=45) or print-based materials (n=58). Two coprimary outcomes were assessed: ECG interpretation accuracy and text-based ACS clinical decision-making. Secondary outcomes included subjective confidence, learning experience, and exploratory qualitative free-text responses. Outcome assessment was automated and blinded; mixed ANOVA was the primary analysis. The study was not prospectively registered because it assessed educational outcomes in health care professionals rather than patient health outcomes. RESULTS: All 103 participants completed the study. Both groups improved, with greater gains in the FOAMed group: ECG interpretation increased from 55% to 65.5% and text-based ACS clinical decision-making from 45% to 68%, versus 57% to 60% and from 47% to 63%, respectively, in the print-based group. Effect sizes were η²=0.055 for ECG interpretation and η²=0.044 for clinical decision-making. Exploratory subgroup analyses provided no evidence of differential effects across age, gender, or professional background and were likely underpowered. Qualitative responses (46 and 37 entries) provided contextual insights into perceived clarity, engagement, and practical relevance supporting the quantitative findings. CONCLUSIONS: This study is innovative in directly comparing a curated FOAMed multimedia module with selected print-based materials in an interprofessional emergency care population. It differs from existing research by focusing on subtle, emerging ischemic patterns and evaluating realistic, time-limited self-learning formats. The findings provide evidence that curated FOAMed resources can produce greater short-term improvements in ECG interpretation and text-based ACS clinical decision-making than traditional print-based materials in this setting. Although implications for clinical performance remain hypothetical, concise, high-quality digital modules may represent a practical supplement to structured continuing education in emergency care.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

No Efficacy of Dexamethasone Injections for Acute Sciatica: A Double-Blind Randomized Study Versus Saline.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of caudal injections for patients with acute sciatica remains controversial. The DEXHIA study was designed to evaluate whether ultrasound-guided caudal injection of dexamethasone provides superior clinical outcomes compared with saline placebo. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial included adult patients with sciatica secondary to lumbar disc herniation of less than 3 months' duration. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 16 mg of dexamethasone (4 mL) diluted with 16 mL of saline (DEXA group) or 20 mL of saline alone (PLACEBO group), administered by ultrasound-guided caudal epidural injection. The primary outcome was the change in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 3 weeks. Secondary outcomes included leg pain and low back pain assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS), health-related quality of life (SF-36), need for repeat epidural injection, and need for lumbar surgery. Clinical assessments were performed at 3 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients were randomized, with 53 participants assigned to each treatment group. The primary endpoint was not met, as the improvement in ODI at 3 weeks did not differ significantly between groups (mean change: -9.5 ± 4.4 in the DEXA group versus -13.8 ± 4.4 in the PLACEBO group; p = 0.18). No significant differences were observed for any relevant secondary outcome at any follow-up time point. During the 6-month follow-up, 34 patients in the DEXA group and 30 patients in the PLACEBO group underwent a second, non-blinded injection of dexamethasone (ns). Lumbar surgery was performed in 10 patients in the DEXA group and nine patients in the PLACEBO group (ns). Injection-related adverse events were mild and transient but occurred more frequently in the DEXA group. CONCLUSIONS: Caudal injection of soluble dexamethasone conferred no clinical benefit over saline placebo in patients with acute sciatica. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Epidural injections are widely used worldwide for the treatment of resistant sciatica and have been extensively studied in multiple meta-analyses. However, their clinical value remains debated due to the limited methodological quality of most available studies. We conducted a methodologically rigorous randomized, placebo-controlled trial, which yielded negative results. These findings question the efficacy of caudal epidural injection of a non-particulate corticosteroid administered via a remote (sacrococcygeal) approach for disc-related sciatica. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered under European Clinical Trials No. 2021-001571-17 and ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05000658.

Adult↗