Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 41887998

Fracture-related infection following open forefoot fractures caused by dropped objects.

Thomas J Policicchio·Austin T Gregg·Carla H Lehle·Robert K Wagner·Adam N Musick·Maaz Muhammad·Derek S Stenquist·Mitchel B Harris·David C Landy·Thuan V Ly·Arun Aneja
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the rate of fracture-related infection (FRI) of open forefoot fractures caused by dropped objects, and examined associations of treatment characteristics, including intravenous and oral antibiotics and operative debridement, with FRI. METHODS: Patients aged 18-80 years who sustained an open metatarsal or phalanx fracture caused by a dropped object between January 2021 and June 2024 were retrospectively identified from two Level 1 trauma centers. The primary outcome was FRI, determined based on the FRI consensus criteria. FRI rates were compared between those who underwent irrigation and debridement (I&D) at bedside versus in the operating room, and between those who received oral versus intravenous (IV) antibiotics. Patient characteristics were also analyzed to determine host factors associated with FRI. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients (median age 41 years [IQR: 29-56], 58% male) were included. Eighty-five patients (99%) received antibiotics, 31 (36%) of whom received intravenous antibiotics. Sixty-six patients (77%) received an I&D at presentation, 57 (66%) at bedside and 9 (10%) in the operating room. Thirteen patients (15%, 95% CI: 8.3%-24%) developed FRI. No significant difference in FRI rate was found between patients who underwent I&D at bedside versus in the operating room (12% versus 11%, p > 0.99). Among patients who did not undergo I&D in the operating room, no significant difference in FRI rate was found between patients who received oral versus IV antibiotics (17% versus 13%, p = 0.74). Insulin-dependent diabetes was associated with an increased risk of FRI (60% versus 12%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, one in seven patients developed FRI. No statistically significant differences in FRI rates were observed by I&D setting (bedside versus operative) or antibiotic route (oral versus IV), including in a subgroup analysis excluding patients treated with operating room I&D. These findings are limited by sample size and potential treatment selection bias and should not be interpreted as evidence of equivalence. Management should be individualized based on clinical judgement, resource availability, and patient factors. These findings can help guide the management protocols for "dropped objects" open forefoot fractures presenting to urgent care and the emergency department. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III.

Explore related subjects

HumansFractures, OpenRetrospective StudiesFemaleMiddle AgedMaleAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsDebridementForefoot, HumanTherapeutic IrrigationAgedAged, 80 and overForefoot fractureFracture-related infectionIrrigation and debridementMetatarsal fractureOpen fracturePhalanx fractureResource managementJournal Article

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Thomas J Policicchio, Austin T Gregg, Carla H Lehle, Robert K Wagner, Adam N Musick, Maaz Muhammad, Derek S Stenquist, Mitchel B Harris, David C Landy, Thuan V Ly, Arun Aneja. 2026-03-19. Fracture-related infection following open forefoot fractures caused by dropped objects.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2026.03.006

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Journal Article resourceAdult subjectAged subjectAged, 80 and over subjectAnti-Bacterial Agents subjectFemale subjectHumans subjectJournal Article subjectMale subjectMiddle Aged subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Comparative safety and operative efficiency of surgical approaches for open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular condylar fractures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical approach for mandibular condyle fractures remains controversial, particularly regarding the trade-off between facial nerve safety and surgical efficiency. METHODS: Our systematic review and frequentist NMA analyzed studies evaluating open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for mandibular condyle fractures. The primary safety outcome was transient or persistent (≥6 months) facial nerve weakness. The efficiency outcome was operative exposure time. Surgical approaches were categorized, and random-effects NMAs estimated odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs). Treatments were ranked using P-scores, and clustered rankings explored safety-efficiency relationships. RESULTS: Overall, 121 studies (n = 6659 patients) were included. For facial nerve safety, endoscope-assisted (EA), preauricular transmasseteric anteroparotid (PATMA), and high submandibular (HSMA) approaches ranked highest, while the retromandibular transparotid (RMTA) approach carried a higher risk. Analyses restricted to persistent weakness yielded consistent results. For exposure time, submandibular (SM), HSMA, and retromandibular transmasseteric anteroparotid (RMTMA) approaches were most efficient. Clustered ranking analysis identified HSMA and RMTMA as achieving the best overall balance between safety and efficiency. Subgroup analyses confirmed the overall hierarchy, though evidence for high-level and intracapsular fractures remains limited. CONCLUSIONS: HSMA and RMTMA offer an optimal compromise between safety and efficiency for extracapsular condylar fractures, while EA may minimize nerve injury risk where technical expertise allows. High-quality comparative trials - particularly for intracapsular fractures - are warranted.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

CL16019, A Combination of Cissus quadrangularis and Boswellia serrata Extracts Promotes the Healing of Distal Radius Fractures: A Multicentric, Randomized, Open-Label Study.

OBJECTIVE: Distal radius fracture (DRF) is the most frequent injury to the upper limb. Complications include nonunion, wrist stiffness and instability, local discomfort, and tendon irritation. The purpose of the current open-label clinical study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of CL16019, an herbal formulation of Cissus quadrangularis and Boswellia serrata extract, in accelerating fracture healing in volunteers with DRFs. METHODS: Fifty participants (both male and female; age: 30-50 years) with type I, IIA, or IIB DRFs (as per Lidstrom classification) were equally randomized and treated with standard treatment (ST) or ST + CL16019 for 60 days. The primary efficacy outcome was the radiographical bone fracture healing rate as scored by the Radius Union Scoring System (RUSS). Pain, swelling, and tenderness were among the clinical characteristics evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS). Wrist function improvements were assessed using the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation Questionnaire (PRWEQ). The intergroup and intragroup results were analyzed using a paired t-test and an analysis of covariance model, respectively. RESULTS: The RUSS scores for the ST and ST + CL16019 groups at the end of the trial were 5.54 &#xb1; 1.77 and 7.96 &#xb1; 0.20, respectively, with a p-value <0.0001. In addition, the CL16019 volunteers showed substantial (p < 0.05) declines in their VAS and PRWEQ scores. The ST + CL16019 group demonstrated higher Physician Global Assessment and Subject Global Assessment scores. CONCLUSIONS: Supplementation of CL16019 along with standard therapy was found to enhance the bone fracture healing rate, possibly by accelerating the callus formation rate and enhancing cortical bridging. These findings imply that CL16019 might be a good adjunctive in addition to ST for the faster healing of DRFs. The trial was registered with the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI) with the registration number CTRI/2021/12/039006, on December 29, 2021.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

The incidence and descriptive factors of calcaneal malunion after surgical fixation of intra-articular calcaneal fractures using the sinus tarsi approach: A retrospective cohort study with binary logistic regression analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the incidence of calcaneal malunion after minimally invasive sinus tarsi approach (MIS-STA) in displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (I-ACFs) and identified related descriptive factors of calcaneal malunion. METHODS: A retrospective review of 99 displaced I-ACFs treated with MIS-STA was conducted. Demographic data, pre-operative radiographs, and operative details were analyzed. Outcomes included numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores at rest and during activities of daily living (ADL), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) for ADL and radiographic parameters. Logistic regression was used to identify descriptive factors associated with malunion. RESULTS: Malunion occurred in 33/99 cases (33.3%). The significant descriptive factors were the initial B&#xf6;hler angle <&#x202f;0.5 &#xb0;, time to surgery >&#x202f;12.5 days, and Sanders type &#x2265;&#x202f;III. Malunion patients had significantly worse NRS and FAAM scores (p&#x202f;&#x2264;&#x202f;0.001). CONCLUSION: Calcaneal malunion after MIS-STA occurred in one-third of cases, with three descriptive factors identified and poorer outcomes observed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Comparative retrospective study with binary logistic regression analysis.

Humans↗