Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42468801

Comparing the Efficacy of Mechanochemical Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Treating Great Saphenous Vein Incompetence: A Meta-Analysis.

Qingjian Cheng·Qinming Zhao·Junsheng Cao·Jianjun Wang·Long Jiang·Xuan Zhou
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of mechanochemical ablation (MOCA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the treatment of great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence. METHODS: Online databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing MOCA and RFA in the treatment of varicose veins in lower extremities from database inception to October 2025. Primary outcome was anatomic success. Secondary outcomes were visual analog scale (VAS), Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire score (AVVQ), and complications. Two reviewers independently screened the retrieved literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias in the included studies. Subsequent analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3. RESULTS: A total of four RCTs, one cohort study and retrospective cross-sectional study involving 737 patients (380 MOCA patients and 357 RFA patients) were included. The meta-analysis results showed that the RFA group was significantly better than the MOCA group in short term and long term of anatomical success rate [(odds ratio [OR] = 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI] (0.20, 0.71), P = 0.003), (OR = 0.17, 95% CI (0.06, 0.45), P = 0.0003)], but patients in the MOCA group had significantly lower perioperative period pain (mean difference [MD] = -4.48, 95% CI (-7.58, -1.37), P = 0.005] and required fewer days to return to normal activities (MD = -0.76, 95% CI, (-0.95, -0.57), P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in minor and major complications [(OR = 0.93, 95% CI (0.66, 1.33), P = 0.70), (OR = 1.30, 95% CI (0.32, 5.28), P = 0.72)] or quality of life scores (MD = -0.45, 95% CI (-2.53 to 1.63), P = 0.67). CONCLUSION: MOCA of GSV incompetence is an effective and safe method. Compared with RFA, it has lower postoperative pain score and faster recovery time. However, the anatomical success rates were significantly lower with MOCA than with RFA. Therefore, long-term follow-up to evaluate the impact on clinical results is required.

Explore related subjects

HumansSaphenous VeinTreatment OutcomeVenous InsufficiencyTime FactorsRadiofrequency AblationFemaleRisk FactorsMaleMiddle AgedCatheter AblationAgedAdultVaricose VeinsSclerotherapyJournal ArticleMeta-AnalysisSystematic ReviewReview

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Qingjian Cheng, Qinming Zhao, Junsheng Cao, Jianjun Wang, Long Jiang, Xuan Zhou. 2026-07-17. Comparing the Efficacy of Mechanochemical Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Treating Great Saphenous Vein Incompetence: A Meta-Analysis.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2026.07.016

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Adult subjectAged subjectCatheter Ablation subjectFemale subjectHumans subjectJournal Article subjectJournal Article; Meta-Analysis; Systematic Review; Review resourceMale subjectMeta-Analysis subjectMiddle Aged subjectSystematic reviews study

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Adaptive proteomic remodeling and eNOS upregulation in luminal endothelium and perivascular adipose tissue of patent saphenous vein grafts after CABG.

OBJECTIVE: Long-term patency of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) remains a significant challenge in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The biological factors underlying successful human grafts are poorly understood. We aimed to characterize the structural and molecular features associated with successful graft function. METHODS: Patent and occluded SVG and internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafts were obtained from explanted hearts of CABG patients undergoing heart transplantation for end-stage heart failure not attributable to graft failure, along with freshly harvested ITA and SVG controls. Samples underwent histomorphological analysis, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) proteomics. RESULTS: Patent ITA (ITA-P) showed minimal intimal hyperplasia with medial reinforcement, whereas patent SVGs (SVG-P) had organized, &#x3b1;-smooth muscle actin (&#x3b1;SMA)-positive myofibroblast-rich neointima. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) was markedly upregulated in patent grafts at two sites-the luminal endothelium and adventitial microvessels within perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT)-and lost at both sites in occluded SVG (SVG-O). Adventitial CD31-positive microvessels were significantly increased in patent grafts. Proteomically, ITA-P and SVG-P shared a largely common adaptive proteome enriched in translation, RNA processing, and extracellular matrix (ECM) organization, with shared upstream activation of NR4A3, EGFR, and STAT1, and conduit-specific signatures (IGF-1/RUNX2 in ITA-P; RETN/SRC/PTGES in SVG-P). PTGES was strongly expressed in the adventitia of SVG-P. CONCLUSIONS: Patent arterial and venous bypass grafts exhibited a shared adaptive phenotype characterized by dual-site upregulation of eNOS in both the luminal endothelium and the perivascular microvessels/PVAT. In SVG-P, PTGES was co-upregulated alongside eNOS, indicating a mechanistic link between the proteomic and IHC findings. These findings highlight the perivascular compartment as a site of adaptive, eNOS-associated changes in patent vein grafts.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Automated CEAP Classification of Venous Duplex Reports Using Multimodal Artificial Intelligence.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and internally validate a prototype multimodal artificial intelligence system for automated CEAP (Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical and Pathophysiological) classification of venous duplex ultrasound (VDUS) reports, integrating natural language processing of free-text components with computer vision analysis of hand-drawn anatomical diagrams. METHODS: Single centre retrospective observational study using routinely collected clinical data. One thousand consecutive venous duplex ultrasound reports from Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK (July 2024 - May 2025) were labelled according to the CEAP classification, excluding the Etiological component, which could not be reliably determined from duplex reports alone. Transfer learning was applied using ClinicalBERT for text and MobileNetV3 for diagrammatic data. Clinical classes were predicted from request line text. Text- and image-based pathophysiological models were developed for four anatomical territories (Great Saphenous Vein, Small Saphenous Vein, Deep system, Perforators), combined using late fusion with probability averaging. RESULTS: The clinical CEAP model achieved accuracy of 0.91, macro-F1 of 0.82, and macro-AUC of 0.98. Pathophysiological prediction varied, with text models broadly outperforming image models. Fusion yielded heterogeneous benefits, improving SSV performance but reducing Deep system accuracy. The performance of the final pathophysiological CEAP fusion models varied across anatomical territories: accuracy ranged from 0.70-0.92 and macro-AUC from 0.80-0.92. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the feasibility of automated CEAP classification from VDUS reports. Despite class imbalance affecting minority class predictions, the strong discriminatory performance validates this multimodal ML model for extracting clinically meaningful information from real-world data. This approach offers potential, pending external validation, to streamline vascular services through automated triage and guideline-compliant decision making.

Artificial intelligence↗