SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Patient Safety”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

1,400 records · Page 12Linked to original sources

PubMed2026

Non-genetic Risk Factors for Allopurinol-Induced Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reaction (SCAR): A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Allopurinol-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) are rare but potentially life threatening, particularly in Asian populations. While the genetic marker HLA-B*58:01 is a well-established risk factor, non-genetic factors may also contribute. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on associations between non-genetic risk factors and allopurinol-induced SCAR. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Web of Science from inception to 29 June 2026 for observational studies examining non-genetic risk factors for SCAR, defined as Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis, Acute Generalised Exanthematous Pustulosis, or Hypersensitivity Syndrome/Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms. Adults aged ≥ 18 years were included. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model; heterogeneity was assessed with I2. Mean differences were calculated for continuous variables. NIH Study Quality Assessment Tool was used for quality assessment of the studies. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies were included. Female sex (20 studies; 3340 SCAR cases, 562,647 controls) was associated with an increased risk of allopurinol-induced SCAR (OR 2.06; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-3.38). Chronic kidney disease (16 studies; 1625 SCAR cases, 553,804 controls) was also significantly associated with SCAR (OR 3.78; 95% CI 1.99-7.17). Five studies (177 SCAR cases, 1368 controls) reported higher allopurinol doses among SCAR cases than tolerant controls (mean difference 19.61 mg; 95% CI 2.97-36.24). No significant associations were observed for age or concomitant diuretic use in the primary meta-analyses. Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated consistent findings for most factors, although concomitant diuretic use became significantly associated with SCAR after exclusion of non-Asian and zero-event studies. CONCLUSION: CKD, female sex, and higher allopurinol dose were identified as significant non-genetic risk factors for allopurinol-induced SCAR. These findings support consideration of non-genetic factors alongside pharmacogenomic screening in future risk-stratification strategies. However, substantial heterogeneity and potential publication bias limit the certainty of the available evidence. Well-designed studies evaluating non-genetic predictors as primary outcomes are needed to develop robust integrated risk prediction models for clinical decision making.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2026

Ivonescimab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer after disease progression on EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy (HARMONi): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Ivonescimab has shown clinical efficacy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ivonescimab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC whose disease progressed after third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. METHODS: HARMONi is a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial done at 114 cancer centres and hospitals across Asia, Europe, and North America. Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years (upper limit: 75 years in Asia) with stage IIIB/IIIC or IV non-squamous EGFR-mutated NSCLC, disease progression after treatment with a third-generation EGFR-TKI, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via a centralised interactive voice response system or interactive web response system to receive ivonescimab (20 mg/kg) or placebo plus pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) and carboplatin (target area under the curve 5 mg/mL per min) intravenously every 3 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by brain metastases status at enrolment and geographical region. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival by blinded independent radiology review committee and overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of trial treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06396065), has completed enrolment, and is ongoing for treatment and follow-up. FINDINGS: From Jan 25, 2022, to Oct 1, 2024, 660 individuals were screened for eligibility; of these, 438 were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive ivonescimab plus chemotherapy or placebo plus chemotherapy (219 per group). Of enrolled patients, 257 (59%) were female and 181 (41%) were male; 306 (70%) reported race as Asian, and 105 (24%) as White. At a median follow-up of 22·3 months (95% CI 21·5-23·0), 275 progression or death events had occurred in 345 patients (129 events among 172 patients in the ivonescimab plus chemotherapy group and 146 events among 173 patients in the placebo plus chemotherapy group). Median progression-free survival was 6·8 months (95% CI 5·7-7·1) in the ivonescimab plus chemotherapy group versus 4·4 months (4·1-5·5) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·52; 95% CI 0·41-0·66; p<0·0001). At a median follow-up of 29·7 months (95% CI 27·7-31·0), 262 deaths occurred in 438 patients (122 in the ivonescimab plus chemotherapy group and 140 in the placebo plus chemotherapy group). Median overall survival was 16·8 months (14·3-19·0) in the ivonescimab plus chemotherapy group versus 14·0 months (12·8-15·7) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group (HR 0·79; 0·62-1·01). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events in the ivonescimab plus chemotherapy versus the placebo plus chemotherapy group were decreased neutrophil count (42 [19%] of 218 vs 36 [17%] of 218), decreased white blood cell count (28 [13%] vs 24 [11%]), decreased platelet count (27 [12%] vs 14 [6%]), and anaemia (22 [10%] vs 27 [12%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 61 (28%) patients in the ivonescimab plus chemotherapy group and 33 (15%) patients in the placebo plus chemotherapy group. Treatment-related adverse events led to death in four patients (disease progression, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, and hepatic failure, each in one patient; gastrointestinal haemorrhage and pulmonary embolism in one patient) in the ivonescimab plus chemotherapy group and five patients (pneumonitis, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, cognitive disorder, and embolic stroke, each in one patient) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group. INTERPRETATION: Ivonescimab plus chemotherapy showed a clinically meaningful and statistically significant progression-free survival benefit in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC after progression on EGFR-TKI therapy. The clinical benefit and lack of new safety signals of ivonescimab with chemotherapy support the potential for the combination as a new treatment option in this patient population. FUNDING: Summit Therapeutics.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Nonviral transposon‑engineered stem cells characterization: dose‑dependency between vector copy number and transgene expression.

Genetically engineered stem cells hold substantial promises for advancing regenerative medicine, yet ensuring their genomic safety remains a critical challenge. A key safety concern is vector copy number (VCN), which defines the number of integrated transgene copies per genome. Although ddPCR is used to assess VCN in virally transduced cells, its application in transposon‑engineered systems is limited. In this study, we extended VCN determination to non‑viral, transposon‑engineered stem cells. In alignment with FDA recommendations, the primary objective was to establish a robust and quantitative framework for interim VCN determination at the time of lot release. Specifically, we demonstrate that reliable interim VCN estimates increase in a dose‑dependent manner with increasing plasmid input. In addition, strong linear correlations between VCN and both EGFP median fluorescence intensity (MFI) and gene‑of‑interest (GOI) protein expression validate the accuracy of this framework. Furthermore, comparison of two distinct GOIs revealed gene‑specific differences in expression efficiency. Together, these findings validate a standardized VCN determination workflow that quantitatively links plasmid dose, genomic integration, and functional transgene expression. This workflow provides a systematic characterization of engineered cells, offering comprehensive information to support downstream risk‑based analyses to ensure the genomic safety and stability of the final cell product.

Transgenes↗

PubMed2026

Second-Generation ELZA-sub400 Protocol: Individualized High-Fluence Cross-Linking for Ultra-Thin Keratoconus Corneas.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a second-generation individualized corneal cross-linking (CXL) protocol (ELZA-sub400) using high-fluence UV-A irradiation in ultrathin ectatic corneas. DESIGN: Retrospective, single-center, consecutive interventional case series. METHODS: Twenty-nine eyes of 24 patients with progressive keratoconus or post-LASIK ectasia and a post-soak intraoperative thinnest stromal thickness <400 µm were included. After epithelial removal and riboflavin soaking, continuous UV-A irradiation (365 nm) at 3 or 9 mW/cm² was delivered with total fluence titrated up to 10 J/cm² based on intraoperative ultrasound pachymetry and a previously published nomogram targeting an uncross-linked stromal margin of approximately 70 µm above the endothelium. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and up to 12 months using corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and corneal parameters measured using Scheimpflug tomography and anterior segment OCT (AS-OCT) with Placido-based topography. The main outcome measure was the proportion of eyes without progression at 12 months, defined as <1.0 D increase in maximum keratometry (Kmax). Secondary outcomes included changes in CDVA, refraction, Kmax, stromal thickness, demarcation line depth, densitometry, and safety parameters. RESULTS: At 12 months, 22/29 eyes (76%; 95% CI, 57.9%-87.8%) met the nonprogression criterion. Mean change in Kmax was -0.77 ± 5.10 D (95% CI, -2.71 to 1.17; P = .418). Mean demarcation line-to-anterior stroma distance was 205 ± 64 µm (95% CI, 180.7-229.3), and demarcation line-to-endothelium distance was 64 µm (IQR, 49-152). All demarcation lines remained within the stromal layer; 15/29 eyes (51.7%) had a demarcation line located ≤70 µm from the endothelium. Median CDVA changed from 0.10 to 0.32 logMAR (P = .142). Minimum stromal thickness showed a median change of -4.0 µm (P = .309). No significant change was observed in densitometry, and no eye developed deep stromal haze or endothelial decompensation. CONCLUSIONS: Second-generation ELZA-sub400 CXL halted ectasia progression in 76% of ultrathin corneas at 12 months and was associated with an acceptable short-term safety profile, including stromal-confined demarcation line formation and no observed endothelial decompensation. The numerical decline in spectacle CDVA observed in this severely affected cohort did not reach statistical significance but is clinically important and warrants confirmation in larger prospective studies.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

primary analysis of the RANDOMIZED eortc-2139/columbus-ad trial: Adjuvant encorafenib and binimetinib versus placebo in high-risk stage II BRAF-V600E/K melanoma.

PURPOSE: Stage IIB/IIC melanoma has a high risk of recurrence after resection. Combined BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy showed benefit in resected high-risk stage III and advanced melanoma. The objective of this study was to investigate its role in stage IIB/IIC. METHODS: Adult patients with resected stage IIB/IIC cutaneous melanoma which had a BRAF V600E/K mutation were randomized 1:1 to receive encorafenib (enco) 450 mg QD + binimetinib (bini) 45 mg BID orally for one year or placebo. The study planned to randomize 815 patients and was designed to demonstrate superiority regarding recurrence-free survival (RFS). Following a premature termination of accrual, the study was amended with safety as the primary endpoint and RFS as secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Between June 9, 2022, and October 9, 2023, 339 patients were screened for a BRAF mutation and 110 randomized. Data cutoff was 19 Nov. 2024, after the last patient discontinued study participation. Among randomized patients, 87 (79%) had a BRAF V600E mutation, and 39 (35%) AJCC8 stage IIC. Median follow-up was 12 and 7 months for enco/bini and placebo arms, respectively. Among 54 patients who initiated enco + bini, grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (AE) occurred in 13 (24%) patients, and 18 (33%) patients had an AE leading to permanent treatment discontinuation. RFS at 12 months was 86% (95% CI: 65-95%) in the enco + bini and 70% (95% CI: 46-85%) in the placebo arm, distant metastasis-free survival at 12 months was 92% (95% CI: 77-97%) for enco + bini and 82% (95% CI: 55-93%) for placebo. CONCLUSION: EORTC 2139 - Columbus-AD demonstrated a consistent and manageable safety profile and encouraging efficacy results for the combination of enco and bini in resected stage IIB/C BRAF V600E/K-mutated cutaneous melanomas.

Adult↗

PubMed2026

A two-center randomized clinical superiority trial of single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy for severe obesity: SASSY study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass is a novel metabolic bariatric surgery intended to enhance metabolic outcomes and reduce the risk of postoperative complications. Although preliminary outcome data for single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass are promising, evidence from adequately powered, randomized head-to-head comparisons is scarce. This trial compares the efficacy and safety of single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy in patients with class II obesity (body mass index = 35.0-39.9 kg/m²) with at least one obesity‑related comorbidity or class III obesity (body mass index ⩾40.0 kg/m²). METHODS: This two-center randomized clinical superiority trial enrolls patients eligible for metabolic bariatric surgery at two specialized Norwegian centers. Included patients are randomly assigned (1:1) to either single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass or sleeve gastrectomy with standardized perioperative treatment and care. The primary endpoint is the between-group difference in change in body mass index from baseline to 2 years after single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy. Secondary endpoints include additional weight loss outcomes, the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease, surgical and postoperative complications, obesity-related comorbidities, nutritional status, bone mineral density, gastrointestinal symptoms, quality of life, and rates of revisional and conversion surgery. All endpoints will be evaluated at 2 and 5 years after surgery. Statistical analyses utilize linear mixed models and analysis of covariance within an intention-to-treat framework. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide high-level evidence with robust and comparative outcome data on single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, aiming to clarify the clinical utility of single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass and inform surgical practice. Findings will address gaps in medium- and long-term evidence regarding weight loss, safety, comorbidity resolution, and quality of life following single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Bioactive peptides for meat quality and preservation: Integrating peptidomics and computational screening.

Bioactive peptides generated from meat proteins, fermented meat products, and slaughter by-products have attracted increasing attention as functional molecules for improving meat quality and preservation. In meat systems, peptides can be produced through endogenous postmortem proteolysis, microbial fermentation, gastrointestinal digestion, or controlled enzymatic hydrolysis of underutilized animal by-products. These peptides are closely associated with key meat science endpoints, including postmortem tenderization, oxidative stability, color retention, flavor development, microbial inhibition, and the valorization of processing by-products. However, although high-resolution peptidomics has greatly expanded the identification of meat-derived peptide sequences, their translation into practical meat applications remains limited by matrix interactions, processing stability, sensory constraints, safety concerns, and insufficient validation in real meat systems. This review synthesizes recent advances in meat-related peptidomics and computational screening, including sequence-based prediction, machine learning, molecular docking, molecular dynamics, stability assessment, and safety-oriented filtering. Particular attention is given to how these approaches can prioritize peptides with antioxidant, antimicrobial, flavor-modulating, and preservation-related functions under meat-specific technological constraints. By integrating peptide generation pathways, mass spectrometry-based identification, in silico prioritization, and meat quality endpoints, this review proposes a stage-gated framework for translating meat-derived bioactive peptides from discovery to application. Future research should strengthen matrix-specific validation, standardized peptidomic reporting, and safety assessment to support the use of bioactive peptides in meat quality improvement, clean-label preservation, and circular utilization of meat industry by-products.

Animals↗

PubMed2026

Naltrexone Is Superior to Placebo for Abstinence and Craving Reduction in Alcohol-Associated Cirrhosis: NAL-CI Trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) coexisting with cirrhosis carries high morbidity and mortality, with no approved pharmacotherapy for AUD. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of naltrexone, an opioid receptor antagonist, in patients with compensated alcohol-associated cirrhosis (AaC) and AUD. METHODS: One hundred patients with compensated AaC and DSM-5 AUD were randomised 1:1 to naltrexone (50 mg/day) or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was point-prevalence abstinence at 12 weeks, defined as no alcohol use in the four preceding weeks. Secondary endpoints included craving (Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale [OCDS]-Obsessive and Compulsive subscales), lapses, relapses, and hepatic safety. Standardised psychosocial support was provided to both arms. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were well matched between groups (mean MELD 12.6 vs. 12.7; CTP score 5.9 vs. 6.2; age 42.9 vs. 44.3 years). AUDIT and OCDS scores were comparable between groups. Abstinence at 12 weeks was significantly higher with naltrexone: 64% (32/50) versus 22% (11/50), p < 0.001; OR 10.86 (95% CI: 1.89-62.2). Naltrexone significantly reduced lapses at 3 months (28% vs. 54%, p = 0.008) and showed a trend toward fewer heavy-drinking relapses (12% vs. 28%, p = 0.07). Maintenance of abstinence at 6 months favoured naltrexone (22% vs. 8%, p = 0.09). No patient developed hepatic decompensation attributable to study medication, and no AST/ALT elevation exceeding 5× ULN was observed in either group. Mean craving scores were lower with naltrexone by week 12 than with placebo: OCDS-O score (6.63 ± 1.16 vs. 9.29 ± 1.78, p < 0.01) and OCDS-C score (6.35 ± 1.23 vs. 9.02 ± 1.86, p < 0.01). Adverse events were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSION: Naltrexone is safe and effective in patients with compensated alcohol-associated cirrhosis, achieving a threefold higher abstinence rate and significantly reducing craving compared with placebo. These findings support the use of naltrexone as a pharmacological option in patients with compensated AaC and AUD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04391764.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Assessing the threat of Bacillus cereus: From toxin characterization to modern detection strategies.

Bacillus cereus is a spore-forming pathogen responsible for both diarrheal and emetic foodborne illnesses worldwide. Its significance in food safety has received growing attention. Recent advances, including the discovery of novel virulence factors and the development of emerging detection technologies, have provided new insights into its pathogenic mechanisms and surveillance strategies. This review critically examines the global burden of B. cereus infections, and molecular mechanisms of its major virulence factors, and the performance characteristics of current detection knowledge gaps such as the viable-but-non-culturable state and regulatory blind spots for emetic toxins, and discuss unresolved challenges in clinical management. By integrating epidemiological, microbiological, and technological perspectives with critical lens, this review aims to provide a valuable reference for future research and food safety practices.

Bacillus cereus↗

PubMed2026

Delphi study robot consenso: Strategies for the implementation of robotic surgery in general surgery in the Spanish hospital network.

INTRODUCTION: The implementation of robotic surgery in public hospitals presents multiple logistical, educational, and organizational challenges. In the absence of unified guidelines, a national consensus is required to optimize its safe and efficient adoption. This study aimed to establish a set of consensus-based and measurable recommendations for the implementation of robotic surgery programs in hospitals within the Spanish National Health System, based on the experience of centres with established robotic programs and intended to serve as guidance for hospitals that are initiating or planning their implementation. METHODS: A national Delphi study was conducted with the participation of robotic surgery experts from 26 public hospitals. The expert panel was composed exclusively of digestive surgeons with experience in robotic surgery. Three iterative rounds of expert panel evaluation were conducted between March 2024 and March 2025. The questions were grouped into five thematic blocks. Consensus was defined as an agreement level of ≥66.7%. Kendall's W coefficient was used to assess concordance. RESULTS: High levels of consensus were achieved on key aspects related to infrastructure, structured training, cost evaluation, and quality assurance mechanisms. Areas of disagreement were also identified, such as the need for a dedicated anaesthesiologist, purchase of accessory instruments during the initial phase, and official accreditation pathways. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a guideline for developing a national robotic surgery strategy focused on patient safety, program sustainability, and standardized training of surgical teams. These recommendations can guide hospitals at different stages of robotic technology adoption. Given that the consensus was reached from an exclusively surgical perspective, the recommendations focus on patient safety, program sustainability, and standardized training of the surgical team, and should be interpreted in an adaptable manner according to each centre's context, case volume, and available resources.

Cirugía Asistida por Robot↗

PubMed2026

The future of TCR-Treg therapies is renewables.

Cell therapy has longstanding roots in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation and early immune cell transfers in infectious disease and transplantation, where patient- or donor-derived cells have achieved therapeutic benefit in selected contexts. The modern era has been driven largely by oncology, with engineered modalities such as tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes, CAR-T cells and TCR-engineered T cells delivering transformative responses but requiring complex, costly manufacturing. These platforms are now being adapted for autoimmune diseases to induce durable, antigen-specific immune tolerance, yet broad application is limited by safety concerns, process complexity and access. Non-engineered cell therapies for autoimmunity, including mesenchymal stem cells, polyclonal regulatory T cells and tolerogenic dendritic cells, have shown acceptable safety and proof-of-principle for immune re-education, but clinical responses have been modest and inconsistent, with limited scalability. Engineered approaches such as CAR-T cells can induce reversible B cell depletion in B cell-mediated rheumatic diseases but only addresses antibody-driven pathology and not T cell-mediated autoimmunity. TCR-engineered Tregs have emerged as a promising antigen-specific strategy, offering localized, antigen-linked suppression with bystander tolerance. Preclinical and early clinical data suggest superior potency, stability and disease control compared with polyclonal Tregs at similar or lower doses, but translation is constrained by the rarity and fragility of Tregs and by labour-intensive, CAR-T-like manufacturing. This review highlights emerging solutions for closed, automated and decentralised production, and discusses allogeneic approaches using gene-edited or banked Tregs with HLA engineering or matching. Together, these advances support the development of scalable, "off-the-shelf" TCR-Treg products with potential to provide safe, affordable tolerance-restoring therapies for autoimmune disease.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Neurological effects of encapsulated dexamethasone sodium phosphate in children aged 6-9 years with ataxia telangiectasia (NEAT): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Ataxia telangiectasia is a rare, multisystem disorder with progressive cerebellar neurodegeneration and no approved treatments. The efficacy of corticosteroids, including erythrocyte encapsulated dexamethasone sodium phosphate (eDSP), which have been studied for two decades in this disease, has not yet been proven in randomised trials. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of eDSP in children aged 6-9 years with ataxia telangiectasia. METHODS: NEAT was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study, conducted at 20 sites across nine countries (Denmark, Germany, Italy, Norway, Poland, Spain, Switzerland, UK, and USA). Eligible participants were children aged 6 years or older weighing at least 15 kg, with a genetic diagnosis of ataxia telangiectasia and presence of neurological symptoms. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to the eDSP or placebo group via an independent interactive web response system and were stratified by age (6-9 years or ≥10 years), sex, and region (USA vs other countries). All participants, investigators, sponsors, and raters were masked to treatment assignments. eDSP was given intravenously every 21-30 days for six doses. All randomly assigned participants were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and safety populations; the primary and secondary efficacy analyses were conducted in participants aged 6-9 years in the ITT population. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in Rescored Modified International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (RmICARS) score between baseline and month 6, and a mixed-model-repeated-measures analysis was used. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06193200, and is completed. FINDINGS: Between June 24, 2024, and Dec 17, 2025, we screened 125 participants for eligibility, of whom 105 (84%) were randomly assigned to the eDSP group (n=51 [49%]) or the placebo group (n=54 [51%]) and received at least one dose of treatment. The mean age was 8·5 years (SD 1·9) in the eDSP group and 8·6 years (2·3) in the placebo group (overall age range 6-17 years). In the eDSP group, 24 (47%) of 51 participants were girls and 27 (53%) were boys and, in the placebo group, 26 (48%) of 54 were girls and 28 (52%) were boys. Of ITT participants aged 6-9 years, 38 (95%) of 40 in the eDSP group and 41 (95%) of 43 in the placebo group completed the study. Compared with the placebo group, no significant differences were identified in change in RmICARS score from baseline to 6 months in participants aged 6-9 years: least squares mean difference -1·30 (95% CI -2·77 to 0·18; p=0·085). Adverse events were reported in 47 (92%) of 51 participants in the eDSP group and in 50 (93%) of 54 participants in the placebo group. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were vomiting, pyrexia, pruritus, nasopharyngitis, cough, headache, and fatigue. There were no reports of treatment-related serious adverse events or deaths. Safety laboratory parameters did not identify adverse effects on growth, metabolism, bone mineral density, or endocrine function in any of the treatment groups. INTERPRETATION: The primary efficacy endpoint was not achieved, because the effect of eDSP on neurological symptoms did not reach statistical significance. The favourable safety profile of eDSP, previously described in a large study of children with ataxia telangiectasia, was confirmed in this trial. The eDSP programme, comprising two randomised studies and treating the largest cohort of patients with ataxia telangiectasia to date, underscores the need for rigorously designed trials of sufficient duration to detect sustained clinical benefit. FUNDING: Quince Therapeutics.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Memantine Augmentation for Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms in Bipolar Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Obsessive-compulsive symptoms are frequently observed in patients with bipolar disorder and present a significant therapeutic challenge. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of memantine as an adjunctive therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder in patients with bipolar disorder. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 46 patients with bipolar disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder, stabilized on quetiapine and lithium, were randomly assigned to receive either memantine (n = 23) or placebo (n = 23) for 6 weeks. RESULTS: The memantine group showed a significant reduction in Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale scores compared with the placebo group (Cohen d = 1.57 vs 0.42, P < 0.001). Nausea was the most common side effect, but overall adverse effects were minimal. CONCLUSION: Memantine appears to be a safe and effective adjunctive treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder in patients with bipolar disorder, warranting further investigation.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

The Impact of Nurse-to-Patient Ratios on Nurses' Burnout, Job Dissatisfaction, and Intention-to-Leave: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Adequate nurse staffing is essential for ensuring workforce well-being and patient safety. Imbalanced nurse-to-patient ratios contribute to burnout, job dissatisfaction, and turnover, which compromise care quality. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of nurse-to-patient ratios on nurse burnout, job dissatisfaction, intention-to-leave, and patient outcomes. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science identified cross-sectional studies examining nurse-to-patient ratios and related outcomes. RESULTS: Eighteen studies involving 183 876 nurses from 4085 hospitals were included. Higher nurse-to-patient ratios increased the odds of burnout (OR: 1.08), job dissatisfaction (OR: 1.10), and intention-to-leave (OR: 1.09). Each additional patient per nurse increased mortality and readmission risks by 7% to 8%, with decreased perceived care quality. CONCLUSION: Higher nurse-to-patient ratios adversely affect nurses and patients. Ensuring adequate staffing is critical to prevent burnout and maintain safe, high-quality care.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

ALG-020572, an Antisense Oligonucleotide for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection Discontinued for Drug-Induced Liver Injury.

Current treatment options for chronic HBV infection are suboptimal in that they fail to suppress HBsAg levels. ALG-020572 is an antisense oligonucleotide designed to reduce viral protein synthesis through degradation of HBV mRNA. ALG-020572-401 was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial consisting of two parts. Part 1 (single-ascending doses) evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of single doses of ALG-020572 or placebo in healthy participants. In Part 2 (multiple dosing), participants with non-cirrhotic HBeAg-negative, virologically suppressed chronic HBV infection were administered up to 7 doses of ALG-020572 to evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics and antiviral activity. In Part 1, 32 participants were randomized to ALG 020572 or placebo. Single doses of ALG-020572 up to 480 mg were well tolerated. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event reported was injection site reaction. ALG-020572 was rapidly absorbed and plasma exposures increased with dose. In Part 2, 8 participants with non-cirrhotic HBeAg-negative virologically suppressed chronic hepatitis B infection were enrolled and received up to 7 doses of ALG-020572. The study was prematurely discontinued after 4 participants experienced significant alanine aminotransferase elevations that were subsequently attributed to drug-induced liver injury. Single doses of ALG-020572 demonstrated a favourable pharmacokinetic and safety profile in healthy participants. Unexpectedly, ALG-020572 was poorly tolerated in participants with chronic HBV infection, resulting in the early termination of the study and further development of ALG-020572 due to idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury, suggesting caution is required in the development of this class of drugs. Trial Registration: Registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT0500102.

Adult↗

PubMed2026

Maternal disease control and pregnancy outcomes with anti-CD20 therapy versus natalizumab in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Management of multiple sclerosis (MS) during pregnancy requires balancing maternal disease control with fetal safety. Among high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies and natalizumab are commonly used in women with active disease, yet their comparative effectiveness and safety during pregnancy remain incompletely defined. This systematic review evaluated maternal disease activity and pregnancy-related outcomes associated with anti-CD20 exposure compared with natalizumab in pregnant women with MS. METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception through February 2026. Eligible studies included pregnant women with MS exposed to anti-CD20 before or during pregnancy and reporting maternal disease activity compared to natalizumab. RESULTS: Seven studies were included, comprising six observational cohort studies and one pharmacovigilance disproportionality analysis. Across studies, anti-CD20 exposure was consistently associated with lower relapse activity than natalizumab, particularly in the postpartum period. Anti-CD20 strategies were also associated with markedly lower postpartum MRI activity and more favorable disability-related outcomes where reported. Meta-analysis of three studies demonstrated a significant reduction in postpartum MRI activity with anti-CD20 therapy compared with natalizumab (RR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.24; I² = 0%). No clear increase in major congenital anomalies was identified, although some data suggested higher odds of small for gestational age and maternal antibiotic use with anti-CD20 exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-CD20 therapy was associated with lower maternal disease activity than natalizumab during pregnancy, especially for relapse prevention and postpartum MRI suppression. However, evidence regarding fetal and neonatal safety remains limited, warranting cautious individualized treatment decisions and further comparative research.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Autologous bone grafts versus alloplastic implants for orbital floor reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The choice of reconstructive material for orbital floor fractures remains a subject of debate. While autologous bone has historically been considered the "gold standard," alloplastic implants offer potential advantages in reducing surgical morbidity. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of autologous bone grafts versus alloplastic implants in orbital floor reconstruction. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD420251140583). Electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library) were searched from inception to August 2025. Randomized controlled trials and comparative cohort studies evaluating functional outcomes (diplopia, enophthalmos) and complications (ectropion, infection, malposition) were included. Data were synthesized using a random-effects model, with risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated. RESULTS: Twenty studies comprising 2,119 patients were included. Alloplastic implants demonstrated statistically significant superiority in periocular safety, with a reduced risk of postoperative ectropion compared to autologous grafts (RR = 2.245; p = 0.020). In an exploratory sensitivity analysis excluding one outlier study, autologous grafts were associated with a significantly higher risk of implant malposition (RR = 2.074; p = 0.004). Autologous reconstruction was associated with a strong trend toward increased postoperative pain (p = 0.052) and inherent donor-site morbidity. No statistically significant differences were observed regarding infection (p = 0.402), enophthalmos (p = 0.201), or diplopia (p = 0.221). CONCLUSION: Alloplastic implants were associated with a lower risk of ectropion and implant malposition, with functional outcomes statistically comparable to autologous bone. Given the elimination of donor-site morbidity, alloplastic biomaterials represent a safe and effective alternative for orbital floor reconstruction; however, the predominance of retrospective, heterogeneous studies in the current evidence base means these findings should inform, rather than replace, individualized surgical decision-making pending further high-quality randomized trials.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Skin cell suspension autograft as an evidence-based innovation in burn and wound treatment: A systematic review of global evidence across two decades.

BACKGROUND: Skin cell suspension autograft (SCSA) is a point-of-care approach to wound management facilitating epithelialization while reducing burden associated with conventional autografting. Despite growing clinical use of SCSA across diverse wound etiologies, the global clinical evidence describing its use has not yet been comprehensively synthesized. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes (PRISMA) guidelines to identify studies between January 2000 and December 2024 reporting clinical use of SCSA for wound closure. Data on patient demographics, wound characteristics, and treatment methods were extracted. Clinical, safety, and health economic outcomes were extracted for comparative studies evaluating SCSA against control treatments. RESULTS: Ninety-nine studies across 13 countries were included. Across the overall dataset, SCSA was used alone or in combination with autografting for burns, surgical wounds, traumatic injuries, inflammatory conditions, and chronic wounds. Among comparative studies (n=27), SCSA consistently reduced donor skin, and healing outcomes favored SCSA in 61%, while 39% reported equivalent outcomes. Pain and esthetic outcomes more frequently favored SCSA, while safety outcomes were generally similar, with some studies favoring comparators. Health-economic outcomes suggested potential reductions in length of stay and resource utilization, although findings were variable across studies. CONCLUSION: The available global evidence supports SCSA as a versatile modality for supporting epidermal coverage across wound types and clinical contexts. However, the findings should be interpreted in the context of the limitations of this review, which include heterogenous study designs, variable outcome reporting, predominance of non-randomized data, and the absence of a formal quantitative analysis. Nevertheless, the demonstrated clinical and economic benefits in comparative studies reinforce the role of SCSA as an evidence-based innovation for burn and wound treatment.

Humans↗