Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Search Search PubMed

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Beyond da Vinci: a systematic review of next-generation multiport robotic platforms in pediatric surgery.

As robotic surgery expands beyond the da Vinci platform, the relevance of new-generation systems to pediatric patients remains uncertain. This review examined the technical characteristics, applications, and perioperative outcomes of alternative multiport robotic platforms in children. PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched through 28 February 2026 in accordance with PRISMA 2020. Owing to clinical heterogeneity, findings were synthesized narratively, with Wilson 95% confidence intervals for key binary outcomes. Six studies reported 166 patients across 27 procedure types. Senhance accounted for 164 patients, while Hugo RAS and Hinotori were each represented by one patient. Ages ranged from 15 days to 17 years and weights from 3.8 to more than 100 kg. Senhance was the only platform used with 3-mm robotic instruments. Conversion or planned escalation occurred in 19 patients (11.4%; 95% CI, 7.5-17.2%). Four intraoperative complications were reported (2.4%; 95% CI, 0.9-6.0%). Across all reports, 20 patients experienced postoperative complications (12.0%; 95% CI, 7.9-17.9%). In the largest cohort, seven patients required reintervention (4.6%; 95% CI, 2.2-9.2%) and seven were readmitted (4.6%; 95% CI, 2.2-9.2%). No deaths or comparative pediatric studies were reported. Published experience remains sparse and is almost entirely limited to Senhance. Current evidence describes early clinical use without establishing comparative safety, effectiveness, or platform superiority. Prospective multicenter studies with standardized reporting are needed.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Shielding performance and clinical applicability of lead-free materials in computed tomography.

Owing to the high radiation exposure associated with computed tomography (CT) examinations and the image quality degradation caused by conventional radiation shielding materials, this study evaluated the dose reduction performance and image quality maintenance potential of a newly developed lead-free composite shielding material. This material was composed of bismuth, tungsten, tungsten carbide, aluminium, and polyurethane. Phantom-based dose measurements demonstrated that the shielding material achieved dose reduction rates ranging from 17.6% to 37.6%, depending on tube voltage. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and changes in tube current-time product (mAs) under a scout-based automatic exposure control (AEC) protocol were analysed according to the presence or absence of the shielding material across regions. For the clinical evaluation, CT scans were performed on four patients. Furthermore, the images were reviewed to evaluate whether this material affected image quality. The shielding material exhibited radiation reduction levels comparable to those reported in previous studies. SNR and CNR analyses showed minor statistical variations in certain regions; however, most differences were not statistically significant, and even significant differences remained within a range that did not compromise diagnostic image quality. Under the scout-based AEC protocol, the use of the shielding material resulted in less than 1% variation in mAs values. No visually perceptible artefacts or clinically significant image quality degradation were observed. The proposed composite shielding material demonstrated the potential to mitigate some limitations of conventional shielding materials and showed preliminary clinical feasibility as an adjunctive strategy for radiation dose reduction in CT examinations.

Radiation Protection↗
PubMed2026

An automated geometric modeling framework in GATE for the design and optimization of high-sensitivity converging-beam SPECT collimators.

Objective.The trade-off between detection sensitivity and spatial resolution is a fundamental challenge in designing organ-dedicated Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) collimators. While converging-hole geometries offer a solution, their optimization is often hindered by the lack of flexible computational tools capable of modeling large-scale, non-parallel hole arrays. This study aims to develop an automated geometric modeling framework to facilitate the design and evaluation of complex converging- and diverging-hole collimators within standard Monte Carlo environments.Approach.We developed a specialized modeling framework by implementing custom C++ classes and a vector-based alignment algorithm within GATE. This platform enables automated, orientation-consistent construction of large-scale converging arrays not natively supported by standard implementations. A high-sensitivity pure cone-beam collimator (CBC) was designed using this framework. The evaluation used hot-rod, disc, and Jaszczak phantoms for physical characterization, while XCAT and dedicated brain models were employed for clinical tasks, including cardiac, brain perfusion, and DaTscan SPECT simulations.Main results.The CBC achieved a nearly fourfold sensitivity increase compared to a conventional low-energy high-resolution parallel-hole collimator at a 20 cm radius of rotation, while maintaining comparable spatial resolution. Despite a 52.3% field of view reduction, the CBC yielded a 2.2-fold noise reduction (CV: 11.7% vs 25.9%) and mitigated partial volume effects via geometric magnification. XCAT and brain phantom simulations confirmed enhanced anatomical definition and contrast recovery in cardiac, perfusion, and DaTscan tasks.Significance.This work provides an efficient computational tool for rapid design space exploration of advanced collimator geometries. The results demonstrate that the proposed CBC design offers a significant sensitivity advantage, making it highly suitable for high-performance, small-volume clinical applications such as brain and cardiac molecular imaging.

Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon↗
PubMed2026

Analyzing the impact of subcutaneous injection needle, device, and administration characteristics on patient pain, anxiety, and safety: a systematic literature review.

The subcutaneous (SC) injection route is a commonly used and important method for therapeutic delivery of a wide range of compounds, and needle characteristics have a significant influence on patient pain, anxiety, safety, and other outcomes. This systematic review evaluates the evidence on how needle-specific characteristics (e.g. gauge, length, tip design, wall thickness, concealment) and administration- or device-related factors can affect patient-reported outcomes and clinical safety indicators during and following SC injections. A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov in June 2024. Studies were included if they assessed the relationship between needle characteristics and pain, anxiety, safety, or related outcomes in individuals receiving SC injections. A dual-reviewer process was used for study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. Sixty-two studies met inclusion criteria. Evidence consistently indicated that thinner and shorter needles reduced patient-reported pain and adverse events such as bruising and bleeding. Tapered and lubricated needles, hidden or retractable needle designs, and use of autoinjectors or prefilled syringes also contributed to reduced anxiety and improved user satisfaction. However, results were heterogeneous, and many studies lacked sufficient power or single-variable evaluation of individual needle parameters, limiting definitive conclusions. Needle characteristics significantly influence patient experience and safety with SC delivery. While both clinical evidence and practical experience clearly favor thinner, shorter, and concealed needles, further standardized, high-quality research is needed to isolate and quantify the specific contributions of individual needle characteristics to optimize injection practices and support patient-centered device design.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Physical reconfiguration of limb electrodes for Precordial Bipolar Lead acquisition: Morphological validation against digital subtraction.

BACKGROUND: The V2 - V1 Precordial Bipolar Lead (PBL) selectively evaluates the right-to-left retrosternal axis and has shown diagnostic value beyond the standard 12‑lead electrocardiogram. However, its use has been limited by the need for raw electrocardiographic data and post-processing software. This study evaluated whether a simple physical reconfiguration of limb electrodes could reproduce the digitally derived V2 - V1 morphology with sufficient accuracy for clinical application. METHODS: Thirty-seven subjects underwent two sequential 10-s 12‑lead recordings using a Cardiovit FT-1 electrocardiograph sampled at 1000 Hz. In the standard recording, the digital PBL was calculated as V2 - V1. In the second recording, the right-arm and left-arm electrodes were repositioned to the V1 and V2 sites so that Lead I directly recorded the retrosternal dipole. Signals were filtered, synchronized, and analyzed using median beats. Morphological agreement was assessed with Pearson correlation on Z-normalized signals, while absolute agreement was evaluated using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC (Lewis, 1931; Nehb, 1938 [1,2])), root mean square error (RMSE), and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Mean Pearson correlation between digital and physical PBL was 0.955 (SD 0.043), with segment-specific correlations of 0.953 (SD 0.054) for QRS and 0.967 (SD 0.052) for ST-T. Lin's CCC and ICC(2,1) were both 0.871 (SD 0.110), and RMSE was 0.091 (SD 0.049) mV. Bland-Altman analysis showed minimal bias (-0.008 mV). CONCLUSIONS: Physical acquisition of the V2 - V1 PBL achieved high agreement with the digitally derived signal, supporting a simplified analog method for broader clinical implementation.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Re-evaluating pediatric laryngoscope blade size recommendations: Comparable intubation performance across blade sizes in pediatric manikin models.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric airway management traditionally emphasizes strict adherence to age-based laryngoscope blade size recommendations, despite limited empirical validation. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether intubation performance varies across a range of blade sizes, and whether a Macintosh 2 blade performs comparably across multiple pediatric age groups in a simulation setting. METHODS: We conducted a randomized crossover simulation study using three pediatric airway manikins (neonate, infant, and child age groups). Emergency medicine residents and faculty physicians performed intubations using multiple laryngoscope blade types and sizes, including standard and nonstandard options. Primary outcomes were intubation time and first-attempt success. Secondary outcomes included complications and operator-rated ease of glottic view and tube passage. Between-blade differences were estimated with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Across manikin sizes and blade types, intubation times were short and first-attempt success rates exceeded 98% in most conditions. Performance remained consistent even with blade sizes outside conventional age-based recommendations. Between-blade differences in intubation time were small, and complication rates were low across conditions. The Macintosh 2 blade performed comparably across all manikin sizes, with similar intubation times, high success rates, and favorable ease ratings. CONCLUSIONS: Intubation performance in pediatric manikin models was similar across a wide range of blade sizes. These hypothesis-generating findings warrant prospective clinical evaluation of simplified blade selection strategies for pediatric intubation.

Manikins↗
PubMed2026

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Franseen Fine-Needle Biopsy for Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Accurate tissue acquisition (TA) of solid pancreatic lesions is essential for guiding treatment with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) being the preferred method. Among FNB designs, the three-pronged Franseen-tip needle demonstrates strong diagnostic performance, though direct head-to-head comparisons with other FNB designs remain limited. METHODOLOGY: This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD420251123856). Eligible studies enrolled patients with solid pancreatic lesions who underwent EUS-guided FNB, directly compared the Franseen-tip with other FNB needles. Six databases were systematically searched through July 2025, and study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment (QUADAS-2 tool) were performed independently by two reviewers. Pooled estimates were generated using random-effects and bivariate hierarchical models. RESULTS: Sixteen studies (2,010 Franseen vs. 2,811 comparator) were included. Bivariate analysis showed that sensitivity and specificity of the Franseen needle were comparable to newer-generation comparator needles (sensitivity 91.3% vs. 94.0%; specificity 99.99% vs. 99.15%), whereas older-generation needles demonstrated lower sensitivity (80.8%) and inferior discriminatory performance (Negative Likelihood Ratio [LR⁻] 0.19 vs. 0.09). Diagnostic accuracy was higher with the Franseen needle (RR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.14; I2 = 69%). Sample adequacy was similar overall (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.95-1.14) but superior to older-generation needles (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.02-1.41) and in lesions > 30 mm (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.28, I2 = 81.2%). The Franseen needle achieved nominally strong diagnostic performance (DOR 116.6), although small-study effects were observed. Primary procedural outcomes were comparable between Franseen and comparator needles, including technical success (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.98-1.02) and histological core procurement (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.92-1.17). The Franseen needle had fewer low-cellularity samples (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.45-0.69) and lower specimen bloodiness (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.25-0.90) but a slightly higher overall adverse event rate (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.06-1.57). CONCLUSION: The Franseen needle provides superior diagnostic accuracy and sample adequacy compared to older-generation FNB needles with comparable performance to newer-generation designs. It reduces low-cellularity samples and specimen bloodiness, although adverse events are slightly increased, with other primary procedural outcomes remaining comparable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (Registration No. CRD420251123856).

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Comfort and Usability of Digital Versus Conventional Custom-Fit Mouthguards: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The use of mouthguards protects teeth and the supporting tissues against impacts. Digital impressions and 3D-printed models can reduce manufacturing steps and minimize discomfort. This study evaluated the fit, comfort, and usability of custom-made mouthguards, obtained by conventional and digital workflow, in amateur athletes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Amateur athletes were recruited for this randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical study. Each participant received two 4-mm-thick custom-fit mouthguards made of ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) sheets using two protocols: conventional impression using alginate to produce dental stone cast (CMP) and intraoral digital scanning to produce 3D-printed resin models (DMP). Each mouthguard was worn during all training and matches over 3&#x2009;months. The order of mouthguard use was randomly assigned. Patient satisfaction with the impression protocol and mouthguard use, model accuracy, and mouthguard fit were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 46 participants completed the study. The DMP protocol required less execution time (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.023), caused less discomfort (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.018), anxiety (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.008), nausea (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.027), difficulty breathing (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001), and unpleasant taste (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.006) compared to the CMP protocol. The pain (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.971) perceived by the participants was similar in both impression protocols. The CMP-mouthguards were considered to be better fitting by the majority of participants (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.027). Between-group comparisons revealed that DMP-mouthguard caused less discomfort immediately postadaptation (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.034), with no significant differences observed at 30 or 90&#x2009;days. CONCLUSIONS: The digital workflow demonstrated to be efficient in the fabrication of mouthguards. Digital impression was more comfortable, requiring less execution time, with more accurate printed models and produced mouthguards with reported comfort and fit levels similar to those manufactured conventionally.

Humans↗