SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “novice”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Virtual Reality Mastoidectomy as Precadaver Training for Novices: A Randomized Crossover Study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare cognitive load during virtual reality (VR) simulation and cadaveric dissection (CD) mastoidectomy training in novice learners. To determine whether training order influences cognitive load, characterize cognitive load progression during the procedure, and assess whether VR training improves subsequent cadaveric performance. METHODS: In this randomized crossover study, 24 core surgical trainees with no prior mastoidectomy experience performed a cortical mastoidectomy in both VR and CD settings. Participants were randomized to either VR-first or CD-first training sequences. Cognitive load was measured using a bespoke auditory reaction-time device at baseline and 10, 30, and 50 min. Relative reaction time (RRT) served as an objective index of cognitive load. Cadaveric performance was assessed using the Modified Welling Scale by two blinded otologists. RESULTS: Cognitive load was significantly lower during VR than CD, with mean RRT rising 26% from baseline in VR versus 60% in CD (p < 0.001). Training order did not affect cognitive load in either modality, and RRT increased progressively throughout mastoidectomy in both VR and CD. Participants who began with VR achieved significantly higher cadaveric performance scores than those who began with CD (mean 9.50 vs. 4.96; p < 0.001), and inter-rater reliability for performance scoring was high. CONCLUSION: VR mastoidectomy reduces cognitive load and enhances subsequent cadaveric performance in novice trainees, supporting its role as a cognitively optimized precadaver training modality that complements, rather than replaces, cadaveric dissection. These findings suggest VR enhances early learning efficiency and resource utilization in novice otolaryngology training. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Testing How Mindfulness Skills Change for Novice Meditators Using Headspace: Examining Trait Mindfulness and Perceived Stress as Moderators.

Mindfulness-based interventions are found to effectively reduce stress and improve mental health outcomes. Yet, it is not always clear how the mindfulness skills of attention and acceptance develop throughout the intervention. This knowledge gap is especially pertinent for novice meditators learning these skills for the first time, including whether some individuals are more prone to learning them. Using a randomized waitlist-controlled trial, we tested the effect of the app Headspace on changes in attention and acceptance over 8 weeks among participants new to mindfulness meditation. Further, we tested the moderating effects of trait mindfulness and perceived stress. Non-faculty university employees were randomized to a Headspace or waitlist control condition. Trait mindfulness and perceived stress were measured at baseline. Ecological momentary assessment survey data for attention and acceptance were collected five times a day in 4-day bursts at baseline and 2, 5, and 8 weeks post-randomisation. Attention and acceptance were significantly higher at Week 8 compared to baseline for the Headspace group, but not the control group. For the Headspace group, both skills showed significant change by Week 2. Trait mindfulness moderated this effect with those who were lower in trait mindfulness displaying greater increases in attention, but not acceptance. Perceived stress also moderated this effect with those who were lower in perceived stress displaying greater increases in attention and acceptance. Our discussion draws attention to implications for matching intervention content to individual needs to ensure participants reporting different levels of characteristics benefit from mindfulness training.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Development and Crossover Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-Assisted System for Solid Pancreatic Lesion Detection and Pancreatic Parenchyma Recognition in Endoscopic Ultrasonography (With Video).

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Pancreatobiliary endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is technically demanding, and supervised training opportunities are limited. We developed an artificial intelligence (AI) overlay system for detecting solid pancreatic lesions (SPL) and recognizing pancreatic parenchyma (PP) and evaluated its effect on reader performance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Across six centers, two deep learning-based models were trained using expert-annotated EUS frames. We then conducted a randomized, two-sequence, two-period crossover reader study in which eight endosonographers (five novices and three experts) interpreted image sets with and without AI assistance. The primary endpoint was superiority of sensitivity for SPL detection among novices; key secondary endpoints included specificity and PP recognition. RESULTS: From 118 patients, 120 SPL-positive/negative image sets and 160 PP-positive/negative image sets were constructed. Among novices, AI assistance improved SPL detection sensitivity (88.7% vs. 76.8%, p < 0.001) and accuracy (86.4% vs. 78.7%), while specificity met the predefined noninferiority criterion (84.2% vs. 80.5%, p < 0.001). For PP recognition, sensitivity increased numerically (86.3% vs. 83.3%) but did not meet the predefined superiority criterion (p = 0.095); specificity met the noninferiority criterion (87.8% vs. 81.0%), and accuracy increased from 82.1% to 87.0%. Among experts, sensitivity was maintained for both tasks, whereas specificity increased with AI assistance. CONCLUSIONS: AI assistance improved SPL detection among novice endosonographers. For PP recognition, sensitivity increased without reaching statistical superiority, whereas specificity met the predefined noninferiority criterion. These findings support a potential adjunctive role for AI in EUS interpretation.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Immersive virtual reality-assisted anatomy training improves endotracheal intubation performance in simulation: a randomized controlled trial among Chinese non-anesthesiology residents.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare immersive virtual reality (IVR)-assisted versus conventional anatomy training for teaching endotracheal intubation (ETI) to novice non-anesthesiology residents enrolled in China's Standardized Residency Training program. METHODS: A total of 90 non-anesthesiology residents without prior ETI experience were randomly assigned to either an IVR group receiving IVR-assisted anatomy training (n = 45) or a control group receiving conventional anatomy training (n = 45). All participants underwent a standardized teaching protocol. The primary endpoint was residents' ETI performance on a simulator, assessed using both the Global Rating Scale (GRS) and a task-specific checklist. The secondary endpoints included changes in written multiple-choice question (MCQ) scores and residents' evaluations of the course. RESULTS: In practical ETI assessments on a manikin, the IVR group achieved significantly higher scores on the task-specific checklist than the control group (90.34 ± 2.89 vs. 87.20 ± 3.29; p < 0.001), whereas GRS scores were comparable between groups. Both groups showed significant post-training improvement in knowledge scores (p < 0.001), with the IVR group showing a greater gain in theoretical knowledge (54.0% vs. 36.3%; p < 0.001). Participants in the IVR group also expressed a stronger preference for their training method (80.8%) and reported higher levels of motivation, confidence, and enjoyment (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: IVR-assisted anatomy training enhances the effectiveness of ETI training for novice non-anesthesiology residents, offering an interactive, engaging, and reproducible approach within China's Standardized Residency Training framework.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Rhinoplasty Difficulty Scale: Development and Psychometric Analysis of a Surgeon's Assessment of Rhinoplasty Technique and Nasal Deformity Correction.

BACKGROUND: Rhinoplasty surgeons lack a universal scale of the relative difficulty of rhinoplasty techniques and rhinoplasty deformities. OBJECTIVE: To compare the expert opinion of the difficulty of rhinoplasty techniques and rhinoplasty deformities among international rhinoplasty surgeons, as measured by a scale of difficulty. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of rhinoplasty surgeons collected training levels, experience, case volume, and perceived expertise. Rhinoplasty techniques/deformities (n = 64) were rated from 1-10, representing the least to most technically demanding. Rasch analysis was used to examine the fit of the observed data to Rasch model requirements, assess rating scale functioning, and provide estimates of internal consistency. RESULTS: Respondents (n = 63) were in practice (<5 years, 14%; 5-10, 20%; 10-20, 20%; 20-30, 26%; >30, 20%), and rhinoplasty volume ranged from <25 (14%) to >100 cases/year (32%). Self-reported expertise was comfortably novice (32%), intermediate (10%), advanced (28%), and expert (30%). Otolaryngology (42%), facial plastic surgery (30%), and plastic surgery (28%) were represented. Rasch estimates of internal consistency reliability were excellent (0.96 for surgeons and 0.99 for items); the item difficulties were more heterogeneous (mean: 0, SD: 1.23) than the distribution of surgeons (mean: -0.09, SD: 0.58). Survey items were ordered by difficulty, ranging from least difficult (inferior turbinate reduction = 1.01) to most difficult (contracted nose repair post-infection = 8.24). CONCLUSION: The newly developed Rhinoplasty Difficulty Scale provides ratings of common rhinoplasty techniques and deformities with a high correlation among experts using this rating scale.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Not just when, but how: An exploratory dual-control approach to video feedback in motor learning.

The present study provides exploratory evidence for a novel dual-control paradigm. It examines whether combining temporal over video feedback timing with learner-controlled interactive playback functions (pause, slow-motion, rewind) would enhance motor skill acquisition beyond temporal autonomy alone. Sixty-four novice adults were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: Full Control (self-controlled timing + interactive replay), Partial Control (self-controlled timing + non-interactive replay), Yoked Full Control (externally controlled timing + interactive replay), or Yoked Partial Control (externally controlled timing + non-interactive replay). Motor accuracy (Radial Error), movement consistency (Bivariate Variable Error), technical execution, and self-efficacy were assessed at pre-test, 24-h retention, and 72-h retention following two acquisition sessions on a dart-throwing task (120 trials total). The Full Control group demonstrated the greatest and most durable learning gains across all outcomes. The Group × Time interaction was significant across all dependent variables (η2ₚ ranging from 0.140 to 0.234), with Full Control demonstrating superior retention at both 24 and 72 h relative to other groups (though differences relative to Partial Control were more pronounced at 72-h retention). Critically, the Yoked Full Control group showed comparatively weaker outcomes despite access to the same interactive playback functions. These findings suggest that interactive video tools may be most useful when learners can regulate both when feedback is accessed and how it is inspected. Theoretical and practical implications for the design of learner-centered video feedback systems are discussed.

Humans↗