Rhinoplasty Difficulty Scale: Development and Psychometric Analysis of a Surgeon's Assessment of Rhinoplasty Technique and Nasal Deformity Correction.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rhinoplasty surgeons lack a universal scale of the relative difficulty of rhinoplasty techniques and rhinoplasty deformities. OBJECTIVE: To compare the expert opinion of the difficulty of rhinoplasty techniques and rhinoplasty deformities among international rhinoplasty surgeons, as measured by a scale of difficulty. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of rhinoplasty surgeons collected training levels, experience, case volume, and perceived expertise. Rhinoplasty techniques/deformities (n = 64) were rated from 1-10, representing the least to most technically demanding. Rasch analysis was used to examine the fit of the observed data to Rasch model requirements, assess rating scale functioning, and provide estimates of internal consistency. RESULTS: Respondents (n = 63) were in practice (<5 years, 14%; 5-10, 20%; 10-20, 20%; 20-30, 26%; >30, 20%), and rhinoplasty volume ranged from <25 (14%) to >100 cases/year (32%). Self-reported expertise was comfortably novice (32%), intermediate (10%), advanced (28%), and expert (30%). Otolaryngology (42%), facial plastic surgery (30%), and plastic surgery (28%) were represented. Rasch estimates of internal consistency reliability were excellent (0.96 for surgeons and 0.99 for items); the item difficulties were more heterogeneous (mean: 0, SD: 1.23) than the distribution of surgeons (mean: -0.09, SD: 0.58). Survey items were ordered by difficulty, ranging from least difficult (inferior turbinate reduction = 1.01) to most difficult (contracted nose repair post-infection = 8.24). CONCLUSION: The newly developed Rhinoplasty Difficulty Scale provides ratings of common rhinoplasty techniques and deformities with a high correlation among experts using this rating scale.