SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “high-risk medical devices”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

1,629 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Insights from expert panels on the EU clinical evaluation consultation procedure.

BACKGROUND: The Clinical Evaluation Consultation Procedure (CECP) under the EU Medical Device Regulation aims to strengthen and harmonize the assessment of high-risk medical devices. This review summarizes early insights from expert panels to support improved clinical evaluation practices. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This review analyses 34 expert panel opinions derived from 281 CECP submissions between April 2021 and December 2025. Statements from opinions were systematically extracted, de-duplicated, and grouped into thematic categories, with independent review and validation. The analysis focuses on common challenges found during the consultation procedure of the expert panels on the content of the clinical assessment in relation to clinical evidence, benefit-risk assessment, intended purpose alignment, and post-market clinical follow-up planning. RESULTS: Expert panel findings highlight recurrent issues in the sufficiency, consistency, and transparency of clinical evidence, underscoring the need for improved standardization and clearer guidance. CONCLUSIONS: Strengthening documentation quality and alignment across stakeholders will enhance the robustness, efficiency, and predictability of conformity assessments for high-risk medical devices.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Review of regulatory requirements for benefit-risk assessment for medical devices: uncovering existing methodologies.

INTRODUCTION: A positive benefit-risk profile is a prerequisite for the market approval of medical devices. However, regulations are often criticized for providing limited information on benefit-risk assessment (BRA) despite growing expectations for quantitative methods. A clearer understanding of regulatory requirements, existing methodologies, and unresolved issues is needed. AREAS COVERED: Relevant regulatory documents referencing BRA for medical devices were systematically identified, with a primary focus on the European regulation followed by screening to extract BRA‑related requirements and any explicitly or implicitly described methods. The findings were analyzed and consolidated by BRA context, type, objective, methodological description, and implementation, thereby establishing a basis for the BRA methodological landscape. EXPERT OPINION: BRA is not a single concept, but a set of context‑dependent assessments across lifecycle of a medical device. BRA within clinical evaluation framed into BRAs of risk management holds a pivotal role and is supported by the most detailed methodological guidance, although BRAs in other contexts are important. A structured overview of existing BRA requirements clarifies their treatment across regulatory documents. By differentiating BRA contexts, types, objectives, and required methodological detail, the analysis supports a more transparent understanding of BRA and helps identify priorities for methodological refinement and interface clarification.

Risk Assessment↗

PubMed2026

An impact assessment of the European medical device regulations implementation - the current status quo.

BACKGROUND: This research aims to assess the current impact of the medical and in-vitro diagnostic devices regulations (MDR/IVDR) on the device industry in the EU, under the lens of postimplementation and the amending regulation, and in advance of the final transition to the IVDR/MDR in the future. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A quantitative survey was administered to a diverse cohort of medical device enterprises, ranging from micro to large organizations. RESULTS: The survey indicates that the MDR/IVDR has harmed innovation, leading many manufacturers to seek initial device approval and launch elsewhere before in Europe. There is evidence that some manufacturers have rationalized their existing product portfolios and removed devices from the market as they stated they would in previous industry surveys. The MDR/IVDR has been shown to negatively impact manufacturers, with increased costs related to notified body (NB) fees, maintaining and updating documentation, recertification fees, and hiring additional staff. CONCLUSION: This study provides a current status of the effects of MDR/IVDR on manufacturers and finds that despite amending regulations and other interventions taken by the EU to mitigate regulatory burden, ensure product availability, and address stakeholder concerns, the EU is no longer the market of choice for new products.

Equipment and Supplies↗

PubMed2026

Effectiveness of Wearable Digital Therapeutics in Improving Sleep Outcomes Among Individuals With Insomnia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Wearable devices are increasingly used for sleep monitoring and as adjunctive treatment. Existing meta-analyses mostly pool composite digital therapies and rarely isolate stand-alone wearables or distinguish between objective and subjective end points. Whether stand-alone wearable interventions improve sleep outcomes in adults with insomnia, and which factors moderate treatment heterogeneity, remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of wearable digital interventions on sleep outcomes in adults with insomnia versus control strategies and explore moderators of effectiveness, including device-wearing position, intervention duration, and control type, using meta-regression. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‑Analyses) 2020 statement and the PRISMA-S (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‑Analyses Literature Search Extension) guideline. Five electronic databases and clinical trial registries were searched from inception to May 18, 2026. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating wearable digital interventions in adults with insomnia compared with sham, waitlist, usual care, or active control conditions and had an intervention duration of at least 1 week. Study screening, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment were carried out independently by 2 reviewers. Pooled estimates were calculated using a restricted maximum likelihood random-effects model with the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman correction. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic, and 95% prediction intervals (PIs) were calculated for the primary analyses. The certainty of evidence was rated using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. RESULTS: Sixteen RCTs (N=910) were included. Wearable digital interventions were associated with a significant reduction in objective sleep-onset latency (SOL; mean difference [MD] -4.52, 95% CI -8.38 to -0.67, PI -9.52 to 0.47 min) and a significant improvement in subjective sleep efficiency (SE; MD 2.00%, 95% CI 1.90%-2.11%, PI 1.85%-2.15%). Subjective total sleep time (TST) also showed a significant increase (MD 19.11, 95% CI 2.98-35.24, PI -16.20 to 54.43 minutes). Meta-regression showed that control type, intervention duration, and device location did not explain the heterogeneity of the insomnia severity index (ISI) (R²=0). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of pooled ISI estimates, and an Egger test indicated no small-study effects (P=.07). Certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to high. CONCLUSIONS: Wearable digital interventions provide selective benefits for objective SOL, subjective SE, and subjective TST in adults with insomnia, with no improvement in overall ISI. Despite statistically significant effects on several sleep parameters, wide PIs, substantial heterogeneity, and limited study numbers indicate preliminary, nonconclusive findings. Wearables should be viewed as affordable adjunctive tools requiring further validation, not substitutes for first-line cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia. Large-scale, long-term RCTs with standardized protocols and patient-level external validation are required to consolidate the evidence base.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy of targeted neuromodulation treatments: a clinical report.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral neuropathy is a debilitating condition characterized by chronic pain, numbness, tingling, burning, and tightness/swelling. Conventional therapies often focus on symptom management, and some patients experience chronic and refractory symptoms. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This retrospective clinical analysis evaluated the clinical outcomes of neuromodulation neuropathy treatment using the NeuroGen-Series device in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) or idiopathic peripheral neuropathy (IPN). 9,805 unique patients who underwent 133,741 treatments between 18 August 2017, and 23 July 2024, were analyzed. Patients were divided into treatment completers (≥24 sessions) and noncompleters (<24 sessions). Paired t-tests confirmed statistically significant reductions in pre- and post-treatment symptom scores (p < 0.001). RESULTS: Among completers, symptom severity decreased by an average of 46.2%. Tingling and pain showed the greatest improvement, while tightness/swelling and numbness showed the least reduction. 64% of patients reported improvement after one session, and 84% reported improvement after 24 sessions. Nonresponders accounted for 5.8% of patients overall. Younger patients and those with higher initial symptom severity were more likely to discontinue treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, neuromodulation treatment resulted in statistically significant reductions in symptom severity, though nonresponders and high attrition rate highlight the need for individualized treatment strategies and further investigation.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Percutaneous left ventricular assist device in cardiogenic shock associated with and without acute myocardial infarction: a real-world retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (pLVAD, such as Impella), are increasingly used for cardiogenic shock (CS). Outcomes may differ between acute myocardial infarction-related CS (AMI-CS) and non-AMI CS due to differing pathophysiology and trajectories. METHODS: Using the USA TriNetX Network (2016-2024), we identified adults with CS treated withpLVAD. AMI-CS was defined by MI within seven days of implantation; non-AMI CS included all patients with CS not attributable to acute MI, representing heterogeneous etiologies such as decompensated cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, valvular failure, pulmonary vascular causes, and arrhythmic shock. Patients with recent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) were excluded. Propensity matching produced two balanced cohorts (n = 2,026 each). RESULTS: Among 6,873 AMI-CS and 4,521 non-AMI CS patients, matched groups were similar (mean age 63 years, 26% female). AMI-CS had higher mortality at 30 days (hazard ratio [HR] 1.19, p = 0.002), 90 days (HR 1.13, p = 0.02), and 180 days (HR 1.14, p = 0.007). Heart failure (HF) exacerbations (HR 1.21, p < 0.001) and pulmonary edema (HR 1.23, p = 0.005) were also more common in AMI-CS. Stroke, ventricular arrhythmias, cardiac arrest, acute kidney injury, major bleeding, vascular complications, and hemodialysis were comparable. CONCLUSION: AMI-CS patients supported with pLVAD experienced higher mortality and greater HF-related morbidity than non-AMI CS.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Glaucoma filtering surgery combined with phacoemulsification in the era of new aqueous humor filtration devices: A systematic review.

We evaluate the efficacy and safety of filtering glaucoma surgeries combined with phacoemulsification (PCE)-including new aqueous humor drainage devices-compared to standalone procedures. We performed a systematic search up to March 23, 2025, including all comparative studies assessing trabeculectomy (TRAB), non-penetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS), Xen® Gel Stent (XEN), or Preserflo® MicroShunt (PMS) combined with PCE, versus the same surgery alone. Key exclusion criteria include inadequate follow-up (less than 12-month), absence of a defined success criterion, more than 50% of loss to follow-up at 12-month, and lens extraction performed without PCE. Main outcome was surgical success at ≥ 12 months. Secondary outcomes included intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction, decrease in hypotensive medications, and rates of complications. A total of 27 studies were included for analysis. Among studies comparing TRAB/PCE with standalone TRAB, half reported similar success rates, while others favored standalone TRAB, particularly using strict IOP thresholds. Safety profiles were comparable. For NPDS/PCE, data mostly showed equivalent outcomes versus standalone NPDS, with comparable safety. In studies on XEN/PCE and PMS/PCE, results suggested similar rates of surgical success, efficacy in IOP and medication reduction, and safety compared to their stand-alone procedures. Small differences occasionally favored standalone procedures under stricter success definitions. Current evidence suggests that combined filtering glaucoma surgery provides long-term efficacy and safety comparable to standalone, though some subgroups and outcome thresholds may slightly favor standalone approaches. The limited availability of high-quality prospective trials underscores the need for further large-scale robust studies.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Hand Pain and Sensory Deficits: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: 2026 Revision. Using the Evidence to Guide Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Practice.

SYNOPSIS: Carpal tunnel syndrome is common in women, manual laborers, and during pregnancy; it is often associated with medical conditions such as obesity and diabetes. The musculoskeletal rehabilitation clinician's approach to managing hand pain and sensory deficits associated with carpal tunnel syndrome should include prescribing a neutral-positioned wrist orthosis plus instructing the patient on how to modify activities, adjust ergonomics, and reduce exposure to risk factors. Here, we present for clinicians the most up-to-date information to guide their work in managing hand pain and sensory deficits associated with carpal tunnel syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2026;56(9):622-623. doi:10.2519/jospt.2026.0502.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Optimizing smoking cessation pharmacotherapy and counseling for adult primary care patients: a factorial randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Even with the most effective smoking cessation pharmacotherapies (i.e., varenicline or combination nicotine replacement [C-NRT]), the majority of people ultimately return to smoking. This research explored how to optimize the use of varenicline and C-NRT to promote smoking cessation. METHODS: Primary care patients participated in a 2x2x2x2 factorial experiment that evaluated 4 factors: 1) Medication Type (Varenicline vs. C-NRT [patch + mini-lozenge]), 2) Preparation (pre-quit) Medication (4 Weeks vs. Standard); 3) Medication Duration (Extended [24 weeks] vs. Standard [12 weeks]); and 4) Counseling Type (Cessation Counseling [4 sessions] vs. Referral Support [2 sessions focused on use of referral resources]). This study was discontinued prior to reaching the proposed sample size (N = 608) due to pandemic-related budgetary constraints. RESULTS: Participants (N = 496) were 55% women and 45.6% Black individuals. There were no statistically significant main effects of the 4 factors on abstinence at 12, 26 or 52 weeks. There was a 3-way interaction between Medication Type, Preparation Medication, and Counseling Type (p = 0.04) predicting the primary outcome of biochemically confirmed abstinence at 52 weeks; cessation counseling vs. referral support improved varenicline quit rates when 4 weeks versus 1 week of pre-quit medication was offered. For C-NRT, counseling type did not significantly improve quit rates regardless of the use of preparation medication. CONCLUSIONS: There was no robust evidence that enhanced pre-quit or extended duration of varenicline or C-NRT increased abstinence rates. More intensive counseling may support cessation for different pharmacotherapy regimens. Given the lack of consistent findings, this research should be viewed as exploratory to guide future research.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Clinical Trial: Effectiveness and Safety of a Novel Anal Insert Device for Treatment of Faecal Incontinence.

BACKGROUND: Treatment options for medically-refractory faecal incontinence (FI)-including anorectal biofeedback, dextranomer injection, and sacral nerve stimulation-are limited and outcomes are often suboptimal. Anal or vaginal insert devices are infrequently used. AIMS: We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of a new anal insert device (StaySure) in patients with FI. METHODS: Patients with FI for ≥ 6 months and ≥ 4 moderate or large FI episodes during a 4-week baseline entered a 2-4 week fitting/run-in period to individualise device size (10 or 13 mm) followed by a 4-week treatment period. Outcomes included effectiveness, safety, and quality of life (QoL). The primary outcome was the proportion achieving a ≥ 50% reduction in FI frequency. RESULTS: Of 124 enrolled patients, 98, 71, and 61 progressed through the baseline, fitting/run-in, and treatment phases respectively, with few exclusions due to device intolerance. In the intent-to-treat cohort of 59 participants (93% women), mean (SD) number of days with FI declined from 13.2 (7.0) to 6.3 (6.9), and FI weekly episodes declined from 5.4 (6.9) to 2.1 (5.1) (69% reduction; p < 0.001) with similar results for both device sizes. The primary endpoint was achieved in 76.3% of participants; 54.2% achieved ≥ 75% reduction. The FIQoL overall score increased from a mean (SD) of 1.9 (0.6) to 2.3 (0.6) (p < 0.001), indicating improved QoL. Improvements in FI frequency, FIQoL exceeded minimal clinically important difference thresholds, confirming clear clinical benefit. No treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The StaySure anal insert device is safe, well tolerated, and effective in reducing FI in patients with moderate to severe symptoms refractory to conservative therapies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03898778.

Adult↗

PubMed2026

Assessment of Surgical Salvage Outcomes for Exposed Cranial Neuromodulating Devices.

OBJECTIVES: Implanted neuromodulating devices (NMDs) such as cochlear implants (CIs) and deep brain stimulators (DBSs) are commonly used in modern medicine. Rarely, complications arise post-operatively, including hardware exposure. Traditional teaching suggests that these devices require removal if exposed; however, surgical salvage is a high risk, high reward alternative. We review our single institution experience managing NMD exposure with surgical salvage. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed on individuals who had a NMD implanted and underwent an attempt at surgical salvage for exposure during the study period (January 01, 2021 through December 31, 2023). Study outcome success was defined as maintaining a functional NMD 1 year after salvage was attempted. Surgical techniques associated with successful salvage were compared. RESULTS: Nine of 729 patients (1.2%) implanted with NMDs experienced hardware exposure during this 2-year study period. Nine subjects were referred for NMD salvage; however, only 6 of 9 subjects (66.7%, CI = 3; DBS = 3) underwent NMD salvage attempts. Four of the subjects had successful salvage demonstrated successful salvage with a functioning NMD and without wound healing concerns 1 year after their salvage procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Classic teaching states that exposed NMDs require explantation. However, this approach necessarily imposes time without benefit from the NMD between explantation and reimplantation. Our experience demonstrates that surgical salvage can be a successful alternative for the majority (66.7%) of individuals.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Copper-Containing Surface Engineering for Soft-Tissue Biomedical Devices: Structure-Function Relationships and Ion Release-Driven Biological Performance, A Systematic Review.

Copper and copper-based materials have gained increasing attention for the functional modification of implantable medical devices intended for prolonged soft-tissue contact, including vascular stents, catheters, and intrauterine devices. Owing to their broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, redox reactivity, and involvement in angiogenesis and cellular signaling, copper-based systems offer significant potential for multifunctional surface engineering. However, achieving a balance between antibacterial efficacy, corrosion behavior, controlled ion release, and cytocompatibility remains a critical challenge. This PRISMA-compliant systematic review analyzes copper-containing materials and surface modification strategies for soft-tissue biomedical applications. A structured search of Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed (2015-2025) identified 65 eligible studies. The review encompasses bulk copper-containing alloys, electrochemical and chemical surface modification techniques, physical vapor deposition approaches, and advanced hybrid systems integrating copper with polymers, hydrogels, or metal-phenolic networks. Across the reviewed literature, antibacterial performance was strongly dependent on copper concentration, microstructural distribution, and spatiotemporal ion release profiles. Moderate, well-controlled copper incorporation frequently improved antibacterial efficacy while maintaining acceptable hemocompatibility and cytocompatibility, particularly in vascular and blood-contacting devices. In contrast, excessive copper loading often accelerated corrosion and induced adverse cellular responses. Emerging multifunctional architectures demonstrated improved regulation of biological interactions, enabling simultaneous antibacterial, antithrombotic, and proendothelial effects. Overall, copper-based surface technologies represent a versatile platform for soft-tissue implant modification. Future translational progress will require precise control of copper release kinetics and comprehensive long-term in vivo validation to ensure safety and sustained therapeutic performance. From the authors' perspective, the most promising future direction involves multifunctional copper-based hybrid coatings capable of dynamically regulating ion release, host tissue integration, and antibacterial performance simultaneously. Strategies integrating hierarchical architectures, stimulus-responsive release systems, and clinically scalable fabrication methods are expected to play a key role in translating copper-containing surfaces from experimental concepts toward commercially viable soft-tissue biomedical devices.

Copper↗

PubMed2026

Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Using a Smart Ring and Telephone Counselling: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HB-CR) is a promising alternative to center-based cardiac rehabilitation as it can address several barriers impeding CR implementation because of its enhanced accessibility. However, to date, HB-CR has not garnered adequate attention due to a lack of communication between patients and medical staff. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of HB-CR by monitoring the pulse rate (PR) using a smart ring equipped with photoplethysmography. METHODS: Patients with cardiovascular disease were educated on structured HB-CR methods following a symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), and were instructed to wear the device during the exercise session. The recorded PR was uploaded to a website via a smartphone and monitored by medical staff. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: intervention or control group. The intervention group received weekly telephone counselling and was encouraged to maintain optimal levels of physical activity. In contrast, the control group only recorded their exercise data without additional interventions. After 3 months of training, the CPET was performed. RESULTS: Among the 64 randomized patients (32 in each group), an intention-to-treat analysis showed that peak oxygen consumption increased over time in both the groups, with a significantly greater improvement in the intervention group. The group-by-time interaction for peak oxygen consumption was statistically significant (estimated mean difference, 2.0 mL/kg/min; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-3.3; P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: HB-CR using a smart device was effective in improving oxygen consumption. However, appropriate monitoring and timely counselling by medical professionals are important for improved outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0005893.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

One in three patients with positional obstructive sleep apnea does not benefit from positional therapy: Insights from a home-based trial.

PURPOSE: Positional obstructive sleep apnea (POSA) is the most common phenotype of obstructive sleep apnea, yet patient selection for positional therapy (PT) remains suboptimal. With this analysis we aimed to clarify how many patients with POSA may not require PT because they do not habitually sleep supine at home, and how many fail vibrotactile PT despite appropriate indication. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of consecutive adults with POSA evaluated at a tertiary sleep center between 2021 and 2024. All patients underwent a home-based trial with a neck-based vibrotactile positional therapy device (Night Shift™), consisting of monitoring mode followed by therapy mode. Outcomes included the proportion of non-supine sleepers at home, failure rate of vibrotactile PT, device compliance and differences in supine sleep time between diagnostic testing and home monitoring. RESULTS: Of 92 screened patients, 74 met inclusion criteria (mean age 60.3 ± 13.2 years; mean AHI 22.9 ± 13.3 events/h). Fifteen percent (11/74) did not habitually sleep supine at home, indicating no clinical need for PT, and an additional 14.8% (11/74) failed vibrotactile PT. Overall, 30% of patients were either unlikely to benefit from PT or failed therapy. Non-response was frequently associated with psychotropic or sedative medication use and neurological or sleep-related comorbidities. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of patients diagnosed with POSA either do not require or fail vibrotactile treatment in real-world conditions. Incorporating a brief home monitoring and therapy trial into routine clinical practice may optimize patient selection, reduce unnecessary costs, and improve personalized management of POSA.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) vs. non-PCC strategies for warfarin reversal in left ventricular assist device recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) prolong survival in end-stage heart failure, and warfarin thromboprophylaxis is recommended to prevent device thrombosis and thromboembolic complications. When bleeding occurs or emergency surgery is required, rapid anticoagulation reversal is critical. Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) provides rapid reversal; however, its risk-benefit profile in LVAD recipients remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing PCC with non-PCC strategies for warfarin reversal in LVAD recipients. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were searched through June 2025 for studies of PCC versus non-PCC strategies for warfarin reversal in LVAD recipients. Two reviewers independently extracted data. Random-effects models were used to pool arm-level estimates and to pool head-to-head comparisons using mean differences or risk ratios (RRs). RESULTS: Eighteen studies involving 779 patients were included. Arm-level pooled estimates for PCC versus non-PCC comparators were 24.0% versus 15.8% for mortality, 16.5% versus 12.1% for thrombotic events, and 3.1 versus 5.7 for FFP units. Arm-level time to INR correction was longer with PCC overall (16.5 versus 13.6 h), driven by one elective cohort, but faster within the ICH subgroup (6.0 versus 13.7 h). In head-to-head comparisons, PCC achieved faster INR correction than non-PCC comparators (mean difference - 7.6 h; p = 0.001) and required fewer FFP units (-2.6 units; p = 0.019), with no significant difference in all-cause mortality (RR 1.14; p = 0.490) or thrombotic events (RR 1.43; p = 0.176). CONCLUSIONS: In head-to-head studies, PCC was associated with faster INR correction and lower FFP requirements than non-PCC strategies, whereas mortality and thrombotic events did not differ significantly. Given the observational evidence, wide confidence intervals, and heterogeneity, equivalent safety cannot be established, and prospective studies are needed to define the relative safety and effectiveness of the two approaches. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: PCC-based strategies may be considered for urgent warfarin reversal in LVAD recipients, particularly when rapid INR reduction or avoidance of large-volume plasma transfusion is clinically important. Treatment decisions should account for the indication, bleeding severity, and underlying thrombotic risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRD42024573925.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Intraocular Pressure Changes Following Intraluminal Stent Removal From the Paul Glaucoma Implant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: This study aims to systematically review and perform a single-arm meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate the effect of removal of intraluminal stent from the Paul glaucoma implant (PGI) on intraocular pressure (IOP) changes and to summarize its long-term efficacy and safety. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Glaucoma remains one of the leading global causes of irreversible vision loss, necessitating effective surgical management for refractory cases. Glaucoma drainage devices are critical for these complex forms, and intraluminal stent removal from the PGI serves as a key strategy to titrate aqueous outflow and optimize long-term IOP control. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by searching EMBASE, Medline, and CENTRAL. The meta-analysis ultimately included 5 observational studies. The Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Continuous outcomes (eg, postremoval stent IOP reduction) were analyzed using the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI); dichotomous outcomes (eg, hypotony incidence) were evaluated using pooled proportion with 95% CI. All meta-analyses employed a random-effects model. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis included 5 studies, involving a total of 283 eyes. The meta-analysis revealed that removal of the stent leads to a significant and immediate IOP reduction. The IOP reduction (immediate postremoval stent IOP minus preremoval stent IOP) was significant, with a pooled MD of -9.09 mm Hg IOP (MD = 9.09; 95% CI = [-11.77, -6.41]). In the preremoval stent high-IOP (>21 mm Hg) subgroup, the IOP reduction is -11.82 (95% CI = [-10.14, -13.51]). This reduction was significantly greater than the preremoval stent low-IOP (<21 mm Hg) subgroup, whose reduction is -6.66 mm Hg (95% CI = [-5.55, -7.77]). Regarding safety, the pooled proportion of clinically hypotony was low and highly consistent (I² = 0.00%) at only 0.03 (95% CI = [0.00, 0.15]). CONCLUSIONS: Intraluminal stent removal from the PGI is an effective and safe IOP-lowering intervention. Its IOP reduction effect is significantly more pronounced in patients with preremoval stent high IOP, providing crucial clinical guidance for managing persistently high IOP after PGI implantation.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Reliability, Device Agreement and Validity of Load-Velocity Profiles: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: For a valid one-repetition maximum (1RM) prediction via load-velocity (LV) relationships, high reliability and accuracy must be assumed. OBJECTIVE: Since individual study results indicate ambivalent prediction, this systematic review and meta-analysis was designed to provide a updated and comprehensive overview, extending knowledge about the validity and reliability of commercially available velocity sensors in Part I and the validity and reliability of velocity-based 1RM prediction models in Part II. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus. Validity and/or reliability studies or velocity-based 1RM prediction evaluations were included. Methodological quality was assessed using adapted COSMIN. The analysis was performed for intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and Pearson's correlation coefficient (r). The review was preregistered in PROSPERO (CRD42025634595). RESULTS: Sixty-three studies were included for sensor validity and reliability and 38 for 1RM prediction models. Part I: Velocity sensors demonstrated good-to-excellent pooled validity and device agreement (ICC = 0.91-0.92 [0.83-0.97]; k = 55 and 439, respectively); intra- and inter-day reliability were classified as good to excellent with ICC = 0.90-0.91 [0.85-0.95] (k = 228 and 608, respectively), with sensor technology moderating the results. However, substantial heterogeneity and wide ranges of study-level estimates indicated considerable variability across moderators, linear position transducer (LPT) generally showing more consistent performance than inertial measurement units (IMU). Part II: Velocity-based 1RM prediction showed ICCs = 0.90 [0.83-0.94] (k = 124) and ICC = 0.91 [0.72-0.98] (k = 9); for reliability and validity, respectively. DISCUSSION: Commercial velocity sensors generally provide high relative validity and reliability. Results varied depending on exercise complexity, intensity, sensor technology, and modeling approach. While velocity-based 1RM prediction demonstrated high average validity, large heterogeneity in lower body exercises significantly biased the results. Furthermore, the dearth of measurement error and agreement analyses prohibits final conclusions. CONCLUSION: Therefore, velocity-based monitoring and 1RM prediction require cautious interpretation, as sensor- and exercise-specific evidence remains limited.

Load–velocity relationship↗

PubMed2026

Prostate morcellation devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes and efficiency.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the efficiency and safety of different prostate morcellators used during prostate enucleation for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses guidelines. PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for studies published between October 2012 and May 2025. Studies reporting clinical outcomes of morcellators used during prostate enucleation were included. Primary outcome was morcellation efficiency (g/min). Secondary outcomes included intraoperative complications, device malfunction, and cost when available. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I), RoB 2 tool, and European Association of Urology case-series criteria. Random-effects meta-analyses and multilevel meta-regression adjusted for prostate volume were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies comprising 5980 patients were included, most undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. The most frequently evaluated devices were the Piranha™ (Richard Wolf GmbH, Knittlingen, Germany) and Lumenis VersaCut™ (Lumenis Ltd., Yokneam, Israel; 12 and 13 studies, respectively), followed by DrillCut™ (Karl Storz SE & Co. KG, Tuttlingen, Germany), MultiCut™ (Asclepion Laser Technologies GmbH, Jena, Germany), and Cyber Blade™ (Quanta System SpA, Milan, Italy) systems. Unadjusted weighted mean morcellation efficiency was 7.80 g/min (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.26-9.34 g/min) for Piranha, 4.70 g/min (95% CI 3.61-5.79 g/min) for VersaCut, 5.90 g/min (95% CI 3.16-8.64 g/min) for DrillCut, and 9.59 g/min (95% CI 4.78-14.39 g/min) for MultiCut. In volume-adjusted meta-regression using Piranha as reference, VersaCut remained significantly less efficient (-2.75 g/min; 95% CI -4.58 to -0.92 g/min; P = 0.003), with an even greater difference in prostates >70 mL (-4.34 g/min). Bladder mucosal injury was the most frequently reported complication; however, relatively rare across all devices. Meta-analysis demonstrated a significantly higher risk with VersaCut compared to Piranha (risk ratio 3.22, 95% CI 1.81-5.71), with low heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: This systematic review provides a contemporary clinical benchmark of the efficiency and safety of currently available prostate morcellators. Oscillating blade systems, particularly the Piranha morcellator, demonstrated higher morcellation efficiency and a more favourable safety profile than reciprocating blade devices, with the largest performance differences observed in patients with larger prostates.

Humans↗