Deprescribing after hypotensive syncope: Recurrence burden and ambulatory blood pressure targets.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring↗
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Results for “Ambulatory”
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Reassessment of the effect of oral l-arginine on blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of oral l-arginine supplementation on ambulatory blood pressure (ABP). METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases was conducted from their inception through March 1, 2026. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of oral l-arginine intervention were included. Outcome measures included 24-h systolic blood pressure (24h SBP), 24-h diastolic blood pressure (24h DBP), daytime systolic blood pressure (dSBP), daytime diastolic blood pressure (dDBP), nighttime systolic blood pressure (nSBP), and nighttime diastolic blood pressure (nDBP). Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 17.0. The weighted mean difference (WMD) was used as the effect size, and the results were pooled with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 5 RCTs comprising 202 participants were included. Meta-analysis results demonstrated that oral l-arginine significantly reduced 24h SBP (WMD = -4.23 mmHg, 95% CI [-5.87, -2.58]; P < 0.01) and 24h DBP (WMD = -3.04 mmHg, 95% CI [-4.48, -1.59]; P < 0.01). Significant reductions were also observed for dSBP (WMD = -4.16 mmHg, 95% CI [-5.90, -2.41]; P < 0.01) and dDBP (WMD = -4.25 mmHg, 95% CI [-5.85, -2.66]; P < 0.01). Furthermore, oral l-arginine significantly lowered nSBP (WMD = -5.70 mmHg, 95% CI [-7.81, -3.58]; P < 0.01) and nDBP (WMD = -4.18 mmHg, 95% CI [-6.27, -2.09]; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Oral l-arginine supplementation significantly reduces ABP. However, the number of included studies was limited, and further validation through additional relevant research is warranted.
Arginine↗
Preoperative Olanzapine and Quality of Recovery after Ambulatory Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
BACKGROUND: Postdischarge nausea and vomiting negatively impact recovery after surgery. Preoperative administration of 10 mg olanzapine decreases postdischarge nausea and vomiting but increases sedation. No data are available on the impact of olanzapine on global quality of recovery. METHODS: This was a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in female patients 18 to 50 yr old undergoing ambulatory surgery during general anesthesia. Participants received 5 mg oral olanzapine or placebo in addition to antiemetic prophylaxis with dexamethasone and ondansetron. The primary outcome was Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) on postoperative day (POD) 1. Secondary outcomes included QoR-40 on POD 2, postdischarge nausea (any and severe) through POD 2, and postanesthesia care unit length of stay. QoR-40 analyses used mixed-effects models adjusted for baseline preoperative QoR-40 scores. The group differences and corresponding 95% CI are reported. RESULTS: A total of 384 participants received olanzapine (n = 191) or placebo (n = 193). Compared with placebo, olanzapine was associated with higher QoR-40 scores on POD 1 (difference, 9.0 points; 95% CI, 6.1 to 11.8; P < 0.001). The POD 2 difference was 4.8 points (95% CI, 2.0 to 7.6; nominal P = 0.001), and this secondary outcome remained significant after false discovery rate correction. Olanzapine was associated with lower odds of any nausea (odds ratio [OR], 0.43; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.66) and severe nausea (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.48) on POD 1. On POD 2, olanzapine was associated with lower odds of any nausea (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.76), but not severe nausea (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.30 to 1.40). Postanesthesia care unit length of stay did not differ between groups. The significance of these prespecified secondary outcomes was unchanged after false discovery rate correction. CONCLUSIONS: When combined with dexamethasone and ondansetron, a single preoperative dose of 5 mg olanzapine improved global quality of recovery after discharge from ambulatory surgery.
Humans↗
Reliability of resting heart rate measurements in atrial fibrillation.
BACKGROUND: Heart rate (HR) control in atrial fibrillation (AF) is commonly guided by resting HR measurements, usually with 12‑lead ECG or in-office pulse palpation. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the reliability of resting HR measurements in AF patients with long-term ambulatory ECG and activity monitoring. METHODS: We included patients who had recorded a full-disclosure ambulatory ECG with a mobile cardiac telemetry device equipped with an accelerometer (PocketECG, MEDICALgorithmics, Poland), with at least 95% AF. Resting HR samples (≤20 per individual/day) were collected as 10-s daytime (8 am to 8 pm) measurements after ≥10 min of rest. These samples were compared to each individual's mean daytime resting HR. RESULTS: In 832 patients (median age 77 (interquartile range (IQR) 69-83) years, 42% women) with a median registration duration of 13 days (IQR 7-22), the population mean daytime resting HR was 85 (±15) beats per minute (bpm). A single resting HR differed from the mean daytime resting HR by a mean of ±10.4% (IQR 3.6-14.4%). When the mean daytime resting HR was ≥110 bpm, 29% of resting HR samples were < 110 bpm, and when the mean daytime resting HR was 80-109 bpm,11% of samples were ≥ 110 bpm. Resting HR measurement variability decreased to 5.3% (IQR 1.9-7.5%) when four resting HR samples were averaged. CONCLUSION: In patients with AF, a single resting HR measurement often differs substantially from the mean daytime resting HR. When a precise measurement is clinically relevant, repeated resting HR sampling or ambulatory monitoring can address this measurement imprecision.
Humans↗
Intensive glycemic control in adults aged 80 years and older: A randomized trial evaluating diabetes complications and competing mortality.
AIMS: To evaluate whether intensive glycemic control reduces microvascular or macrovascular events compared with conservative glycemic targets in independently ambulatory adults aged 80 years or older with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, open-label, single-center trial enrolling independently ambulatory adults aged ≥ 80 years with type 2 diabetes. Participants were assigned (1:1) to an intensive glycemic target (HbA1c < 7 %) or a conservative target (HbA1c < 9 %) and followed for 5 years. Primary outcomes were composite microvascular and macrovascular events. Analyses were done by intention to treat. Cause-specific Cox models and Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models were used to account for all-cause mortality as a competing event. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00850798. FINDINGS: 206 participants were randomly assigned to intensive (n = 102) or conservative (n = 104) treatment. At 5 years, mean HbA1c was lower in the intensive group than in the conservative group (7·42 % vs 8·21 %; p = 0·005). Intensive therapy did not reduce microvascular events (hazard ratio [HR] 1·24, 95 % CI 0·76-2·04) or macrovascular events (HR 1·02, 0·36-2·92). Competing risk analyses showed no reduction in cumulative incidence of vascular outcomes (subdistribution HR approximately 1·0 for both). The cumulative incidence of death exceeded that of vascular events, indicating that many participants died before potential glycemic benefits could be realized. Severe hypoglycemia requiring hospitalization was more frequent with intensive therapy (7 vs 1 event). INTERPRETATION: In adults aged 80 years or older with type 2 diabetes, intensive glycaemic control improved glycaemic levels but did not reduce vascular events and increased the risk of severe hypoglycaemia. High competing mortality substantially limits the potential long-term benefit of intensive treatment, supporting conservative and individualized glycemic targets in very old adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00850798.
Aged, 80 and over↗
HYPNOSA: Study protocol for a prospective observational cohort of patients with obstructive sleep apnea.
BACKGROUND: Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is a common chronic disease that affects more than 20% of the adult population. One of the most frequent and characteristic symptoms of OSA is excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). This symptom is typically treated in patients with OSA with the application of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), the gold-standard treatment for this disease. In some patients who are adequately treated with CPAP, residual excessive daytime sleepiness (REDS) persists. The prevalence, associations, and outcomes associated with REDS remain poorly understood. METHODS: Multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study including 1000 patients. Participants will undergo a sleep study for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, clinical assessment, quality-of-life questionnaires, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and collection of biochemical variables and biological samples. Patients with OSA will receive standard care, and those prescribed continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) will be monitored for treatment adherence. OSA patients will be assessed at baseline and at 6, 12, and 24 months. DISSCUSION: We aim to establish a prospective observational cohort of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) treated with CPAP, with and without REDS. The HYPNOSA project will create the largest available registry of patients with OSA and REDS using real-world data, providing accurate prevalence estimates and long-term outcomes. Biological samples will be analyzed to assess the role of specific biomarkers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifer: NCT06514482.
Adult↗
Association Between 24-Hour Blood Pressure and Rates of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Progression in Glaucoma: The Vascular Imaging in Glaucoma Study.
PURPOSE: Low systemic blood pressure (BP) has been implicated as a risk factor for glaucoma progression. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between 24-hour BP and rates of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) loss in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-nine eyes from 42 subjects with glaucoma (mean age, 68.5 ± 7.6 years) enrolled in the Vascular Imaging in Glaucoma Study at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute. METHODS: Participants underwent 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring at baseline. Follow-up evaluations were conducted at 4-month intervals and included ophthalmic examination, BP measurement, and peripapillary RNFL thickness measurement with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. The association between BP and RNFL loss over time was assessed using linear mixed-effects models adjusted for age, sex, race, baseline RNFL thickness, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The effect of baseline 24-hour mean arterial pressure (MAP), systolic BP (SBP), and diastolic BP (DBP) on the rate of average RNFL loss over time. RESULTS: Eyes underwent an average of 13 ± 3 optical coherence tomography exams over 43 ± 10 months of follow-up. The mean rate of RNFL loss was -0.34 ± 0.64 µm/y (median: -0.32; interquartile range: -0.66 to -0.04 µm/y). After adjusting for confounding factors, every 10 mm Hg lower in 24-hour minimum MAP, SBP, and DBP was associated with -0.542 µm/y (P < .001), -0.360 µm/y (P = .003), and -0.458 µm/y (P = .008) faster RNFL loss, respectively. Eyes in the lowest quartile of average 24-hour MAP (81-90 mm Hg) and minimum 24-hour DBP (35-47 mm Hg) experienced significantly faster progression compared to those in the highest quartile, with differences of -0.68 µm/y (P = .017) and -0.63 µm/y (P = .030), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Lower systemic BP, especially minimum MAP, SBP, and DBP measured by 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring, is associated with faster rates of RNFL loss in primary open-angle glaucoma eyes. 24-hour BP monitoring may help predict glaucoma patients at greater risk of progression.
Humans↗
Feasibility and barriers to same-day physical therapy following lumbar fusion surgery.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of same-day (postoperative day 0; POD0) physical therapy (PT) following lumbar fusion and to identify factors associated with failure to participate. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed prospectively collected data from patients undergoing single-level posterior spinal fusion (PSF), with or without anterior (ALIF) or lateral (LLIF) interbody fusion, between January and December 2024 at a single institution. A standardized POD0 PT protocol was implemented for eligible patients. Patients were categorized into two groups: successful POD0 PT (ambulatory on POD0) and unable to participate. Demographic and surgical variables were compared between groups. Reasons for inability to participate were recorded and categorized. RESULTS: Among 129 patients in whom POD0 PT was attempted, 84 (65%) successfully participated, while 45 (35%) were unable. There were no significant differences in age, sex, BMI, ASA class, operative time, estimated blood loss, or surgical approach between groups. Patients who successfully completed POD0 PT had a significantly shorter hospital length of stay compared to those who did not (3.4 ± 1.6 vs 5.8 ± 2.9 days, P < 0.001), with no differences in complication rates, discharge disposition, emergency department visits, or reoperation rates. The most common barriers to POD0 PT were postoperative pain, medical issues (e.g., orthostatic hypotension, nausea, dizziness), and anesthesia-related somnolence. Less common factors included postoperative restrictions and logistical issues such as brace availability. CONCLUSIONS: POD0 PT following lumbar fusion is feasible in the majority of patients and is associated with a shorter hospital stay without increased complications. Failure to participate was not associated with the baseline patient or surgical characteristics evaluated in this study. Instead, the most common barriers were postoperative pain, transient medical issues, and anesthesia-related somnolence, suggesting that optimization of modifiable perioperative factors may improve the implementation of POD0 PT.
Humans↗
Ecological momentary assessment studies on food craving among healthy adults: A systematic review.
Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) can capture the dynamic nature of food craving in free-living conditions, addressing limitations of laboratory and retrospective reporting methods. This systematic review synthesized findings from EMA studies to characterize 1) methodological features, 2) the temporal dynamics of food craving, and 3) the relationship between craving and eating behaviors. A systematic search of PubMed and PsycINFO databases was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The review included 23 studies that utilized EMA designs to assess food craving repeatedly in daily life among healthy adults. Most studies employed EMA protocols that prompted participants to respond at pre-specified time points and utilized single-item craving measures. Most craving measures (71%) lacked specificity regarding the type of food craved. Results revealed a consistent positive within-person association between hunger and food craving. Conversely, associations between stress/negative affect and craving were inconsistent, varying by individual traits and context. Momentary food craving appeared to predict subsequent eating outcomes. Evidence suggested food craving may be a dynamic, transient state that co-fluctuates with hunger, functioning as a proximal antecedent to food intake. However, reliance on non-specific food craving measures and EMA protocols prompting at fixed schedules limits the granular understanding of craving mechanisms. Future research requires refining food craving measurement and incorporating randomized prompting within predefined windows, or participant-initiated sampling triggered by specific events (e.g., eating occasion), to better characterize food craving dynamics in relation to eating behaviors.
Humans↗
Treatment of OSA using mandibular advancement versus CPAP in improving cardiovascular health.
BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea is a significant risk factor for hypertension. We assessed the relative effectiveness of mandibular advancement device (MAD) versus continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in reducing 24 h ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and other health-related outcomes over 12 months. METHODS: In a randomized, non-inferiority trial, 321 participants with hypertension and increased cardiovascular risk were recruited for polysomnography. Of these, 220 with moderate-to-severe OSA (apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥15 events/hour) were randomized to MAD or CPAP (1:1). We report the final outcomes at the 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 180 participants (MAD: 89; CPAP: 91) completed the 12-month follow-up. Median usage for MAD and CPAP was 5.5 and 4.9 h per night, respectively. Compared to baseline, the 24 h mean arterial BP at 12 months decreased by 2.3 mmHg (P = 0.200) in the MAD group and by 1.0 mmHg (P = 0.999) in the CPAP group. The difference between-groups was -0.6 mmHg (95% confidence interval: -2.53 to 1.39, non-inferiority P < 0.019). The MAD group demonstrated a larger reduction in asleep BP compared to the CPAP group. The prevalence of excessive daytime sleepiness in the MAD group decreased from 30.3% at baseline to 10.1% at 12-month follow-up (P = 0.001), and from 38.5% to 7.7% in the CPAP group (P < 0.001). The between-group difference was 10.6% (P = 0.097). No significant within-group or between-group differences were observed in the prevalence of arrhythmias and plasma levels of cardiac biomarkers. CONCLUSION: At 12-month, MAD is non-inferior to CPAP for reducing 24 h mean arterial BP in participants with hypertension and increased cardiovascular risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04119999.
Humans↗
King's Mill anterior-posterior and transverse versus paracervical block in operative outpatient hysteroscopy: a randomised trial.
BACKGROUND: Pain control during operative outpatient hysteroscopy remains a clinical challenge, with the paracervical block (PCB) showing inconsistent efficacy. The King's Mill Anterior-Posterior and Transverse (KAPT) block targets the Lee-Frankenhauser plexus within the uterosacral ligament complex, where the highest density of uterine and cervical sensory fibres lies. We compared the KAPT block with the PCB in operative outpatient hysteroscopy. METHODS: Single-centre, participant- and outcome assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial in a UK district general hospital. Forty-eight women undergoing operative outpatient hysteroscopy were randomised 1:1 to the KAPT block or the PCB, each delivered with 10 ml of prilocaine. Pain was measured on a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) during the procedure and 10 minutes post-procedure (co-primary endpoints), and during cervical dilatation (exploratory). Analyses used the Mann-Whitney U test on an intention-to-treat basis, with Hodges-Lehmann median differences, percentile bootstrap 95% confidence intervals, and a hierarchical fixed-sequence testing strategy. RESULTS: Median intra-procedural VAS was 1 (IQR 0 to 3) with the KAPT block versus 2 (IQR 1 to 6) with the PCB (Hodges-Lehmann median difference -1.00, 95% CI -3.00 to 0.00; p = 0.040). At 10 minutes post-procedure, median VAS was 0 (IQR 0 to 1.25) versus 2 (IQR 0 to 3.25) (median difference -1.00, 95% CI -2.00 to 0.00; p = 0.011). Both co-primary endpoints reached significance under hierarchical testing. Cervical dilatation pain did not differ significantly (p = 0.146). Satisfaction was 100% in both arms; willingness to recommend was 100% (KAPT) versus 95.8% (PCB). No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The KAPT block was associated with lower intra-procedural and post-procedural pain than the PCB, with effect sizes consistent with a clinically meaningful difference. These findings support the KAPT block as a superior, anatomically targeted alternative to the PCB and justify evaluation in a larger multicentre trial.Trial registration: ISRCTN15619382.
Humans↗
Esketamine vs. sufentanil for quality of recovery after outpatient gynecological surgery: a randomized clinical trial.
BACKGROUND: Perioperative administration of esketamine has been reported to improve early quality of recovery (QoR). However, data on its effects in outpatient surgery are limited. This study aimed to assess the impact of esketamine on QoR in patients undergoing outpatient gynecological procedures. METHODS: In this investigator-initiated, double-blind, randomized clinical trial, patients aged 18-65 years scheduled for outpatient gynecological surgery under sedation were allocated to receive esketamine (0.2 mg/kg) or sufentanil (0.1 μg/kg) combined with propofol (1.5-3 mg/kg). The primary outcome was quality of recovery on postoperative day (POD) 1. Secondary outcomes included quality of recovery on POD2, sedation success rate, length of post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay, injection pain, postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, fatigue, patient and clinician satisfaction, sleep quality, and anxiety and depression. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients were randomized, with 63 assigned to the esketamine group and 63 to the sufentanil group. Of these, 125 patients were included in the final analysis (62 in the esketamine group and 63 in the sufentanil group), as one patient lacked follow-up data. The mean (SD) QoR-15 score on POD1 was 137.9 (14.5) in the esketamine group and 137.8 (10.7) in the sufentanil group, with no significant difference between groups (absolute difference, 0.2; 95% CI, -4.2 to 4.6; p = 0.93). For secondary outcomes, the esketamine group had a longer PACU stay (median, 28.0 vs. 23.0 min; p < 0.001), a lower incidence of severe injection pain (22.6% vs. 50.8%; p = 0.002), a higher proportion of patients with pain scores ≥ 4 at 30 min postoperatively (30.6% vs. 6.3%; p = 0.001), and higher fatigue scores (median, 3.0 vs. 2.0; p = 0.01). Other secondary outcomes did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing sedation for outpatient gynecological procedures, esketamine did not significantly improve quality of recovery on POD1 compared to sufentanil. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2500098466.
Humans↗
Lower urinary tract evaluation in children with cerebral palsy: A crossectional study.
INTRODUCTION: Cerebral palsy (CP) is a chronic, non-progressive motor disorder affecting voluntary movement and posture. Lower urinary tract (LUT) dysfunction is highly prevalent in children with CP. This study aims to evaluate LUT function in children with CP. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital. Patients aged 5-18 years with established CP diagnosis were included. Evaluation included clinical history, physical examination, urinary ultrasonography with post-void residual (PVR) measurement, and urodynamic studies when indicated. Patients were categorized into three groups; group-1 (LUT dysfunction), group-2 (symptomatic), and group-3 (asymptomatic) for analysis. RESULTS: The study included 97 children with CP (41 girls, 56 boys; median age 8 years). Of the patients, 61.8% were ambulatory (GMFCS I-III) and 38.2% were non-ambulatory (GMFCS IV-V). At least one LUT symptom was detected in 75.3% of patients. Incontinence was the most common symptom at 69.1%. Incontinence prevalence was significantly higher in non-ambulatory patients (81.1% vs 61.7%, p = 0.044). Invasive urodynamics was performed in 19 patients, and LUT dysfunction was diagnosed in 89.5% of them (19.3% of the entire population). Prematurity rate was significantly higher in patients with LUT dysfunction (94.1% vs 64.8%, p = 0.017). Binary logistic regression analysis identified elevated PVR as the strongest independent risk factor for LUT dysfunction (OR = 108, p < 0.001). Abnormal urinary frequency (OR = 14.9, p = 0.022) and quadriplegia (OR = 10.3, p = 0.016) were other independent risk factors. ROC analysis determined the optimal cut-off value for PVR as 19 mL (sensitivity 58.82%, specificity 94.92%). In the intergroup analysis, multinomial logistic regression identified elevated PVR as the strongest predictor (Group-1 vs Group-2: OR = 101; Group-1 vs Group-3: OR = 24, both p < 0.003). Lower gestational age was also an independent risk factor in both comparisons (OR = 1.25-1.26, p < 0.020). DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates LUT dysfunction affects 19.3% of children with CP, strongly correlating with motor impairment severity. Elevated PVR emerged as the strongest independent predictor (OR = 108), offering a practical non-invasive screening tool. Our proposed urodynamic criteria achieved 94.7% diagnostic yield, enabling selective evaluation. Limitations include single-center design and cross-sectional methodology without longitudinal follow-up. These findings support integrating systematic urological assessment into standard CP care for early intervention. CONCLUSION: LUT dysfunction prevalence is high in children with CP, and symptom frequency increases with higher GMFCS levels. Elevated PVR is the strongest predictor, with a clinically applicable cut-off value of 19 mL. Particularly in quadriplegic, non-ambulatory, and premature patients, close follow-up and urodynamic evaluation when necessary should be performed with a multidisciplinary approach.
Humans↗
Telmisartan-based monotherapy and combination regimens for blood pressure control in adults with hypertension: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and GRADE assessment.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and certainty of evidence for telmisartan-based antihypertensive regimens in adults with hypertension. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA 2020. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from inception to 2026. Eligible studies enrolled adults with hypertension and compared telmisartan monotherapy or telmisartan-containing combinations with placebo, usual care, non-telmisartan antihypertensive agents, or alternative telmisartan-based regimens. Continuous outcomes were pooled as mean differences (MDs) and dichotomous outcomes as risk ratios (RRs), both with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using random-effects models, with additional subgroup analyses conducted by comparator type. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. RESULTS: Twenty-five included reports (24 unique trials, since two reports present secondary outcomes from the same underlying trial) involving 6,521 participants were included, spanning placebo-controlled, usual-care-controlled, active-comparator, and telmisartan-combination-versus-telmisartan-monotherapy designs. Telmisartan-based therapy significantly reduced office systolic blood pressure (MD - 6.39 mm Hg; 95% CI - 7.86 to - 4.93; low certainty) and office diastolic blood pressure (MD - 4.88 mm Hg; 95% CI - 6.67 to - 3.09; low certainty), although the magnitude of effect was comparator-dependent. Based on only two trials, 24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure (MD - 7.16 mm Hg; 95% CI - 10.61 to - 3.72) and ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (MD - 4.42 mm Hg; 95% CI - 6.36 to - 2.48) were reduced with moderate certainty. Telmisartan-based regimens improved blood pressure response (RR 1.68; 95% CI 1.31 to 2.16; moderate certainty) but not blood pressure control achievement (RR 1.44; 95% CI 0.92 to 2.24; very low certainty). Overall adverse events, dizziness, and headache were comparable (very low to low certainty), while edema was less frequent with telmisartan-based therapy (RR 0.33; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.73; moderate certainty). CONCLUSION: Telmisartan-based regimens, particularly fixed-dose and multidrug combinations, effectively reduce office and ambulatory blood pressure and improve blood pressure response, with broadly comparable short-term safety and less edema. These effect sizes are comparator-dependent, and certainty of evidence for absolute blood pressure control achievement and for major adverse events is very low; heterogeneity, limited long-term data, and a predominance of Asian-population trials warrant cautious interpretation pending larger, higher-quality, and more geographically diverse confirmatory studies.
Humans↗
Effectiveness of passive vs. assistive robotic gait training on functional recovery and neuroplasticity post-stroke: A randomized controlled trial.
OBJECTIVE: This study seeks to compare the impacts of various robotic gait training (RAGT) modes on lower limb motor function recovery in stroke patients while exploring the corresponding neural mechanisms. DESIGN: A single-blind, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-eight patients aged 18-80 who had experienced their first unilateral subacute stroke accompanied by walking impairments were included. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to: (1) assistive mode training, (2) passive mode training, or (3) control group receiving only traditional rehabilitation. Clinical and neurological outcomes were assessed at pre-intervention (T0), and post-2-week intervention (T1). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes were evaluated using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Lower Extremity, Berg Balance Scale, Modified Barthel Index, the Functional Ambulatory Category, and functional near-infrared spectroscopy. RESULTS: Among the 48 patients recruited, significant time effects were observed across all groups in FMA-LE scores (p < 0.001). Notable improvements were detected in the conventional group (MD = 2.69, p＜0.01) and the passive group (MD = 3.67, p < 0.001), with the assistive mode also demonstrating a significant effect (MD = 1.79, p < 0.05). BBS scores improved across all groups; however, no significant differences were noted between the groups (p = 0.11). Similarly, MBI scores showed a significant time effect (p < 0.001), without notable group differences (p = 0.29). CONCLUSION: All training modalities effectively enhanced motor function, balance, and daily living skills in stroke patients. Distinct cortical activation and connectivity patterns were observed between training modalities, which may reflect different neuroplastic mechanisms. These preliminary neural differences may help inform personalized rehabilitation strategies, although no clinical superiority of one mode over another can be concluded from the present data.
Humans↗
Characteristics of post-exercise responders versus non-responders following aerobic or isometric exercise in physically inactive adults of African and South Asian descent with high-normal blood pressure or grade I hypertension.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate interindividual variability in post-exercise hypotension (PEH) and to characterise cardiovascular and autonomic differences between responders and non-responders following aerobic and isometric exercise in adults of African and South Asian descent with elevated blood pressure (BP). METHODS: Physically inactive adults of African and South Asian descent living in Suriname (18-65 years) with high-normal BP or grade I hypertension participated in a randomised controlled crossover trial. In this randomised cross-over trial, 47 adults (50.1 ± 10.8 years; 38% male) with high-normal blood pressure or grade I hypertension completed three conditions: aerobic exercise (30 min at 40-60% heart rate reserve), isometric handgrip exercise, and a non-exercise control. Ambulatory BP was assessed over 24 h. PEH was defined as the net effect: (post-exercise - pre-exercise) - (post-control - pre-control). Participants were classified as responders if daytime BP decreased ≥5 mmHg. Arterial stiffness, cardiac, and autonomic parameters were assessed. RESULTS: Following aerobic exercise, 46% of participants were classified as systolic responders compared with 28% after isometric exercise. No baseline differences were observed in demographic or clinical characteristics between responders and non-responders, suggesting that PEH variability may reflect underlying physiological rather than clinical differences. Aerobic responders demonstrated greater reductions in aortic augmentation index (-19.4% vs. -10.9%, p = 0.05), larger increases in stroke volume (+8.1 vs. -5.3 mL, p = 0.05) and cardiac output (+1.54 ± 1.89 vs. +0.58 ± 1.60 L/min, p = 0.009), and more favourable autonomic recovery. Among all variables, only the change in cardiac output was associated with PEH magnitude (r = -0.46, p = 0.006). No consistent physiological differences were observed following isometric exercise. CONCLUSION: PEH following aerobic exercise is characterised by a distinct responder phenotype associated with greater reductions in aortic augmentation index and favourable cardiac adaptations. These findings highlight substantial interindividual variability in BP responses and support the need for individualised exercise strategies in hypertension management.
Adolescent↗
Cardiorespiratory training for people with stroke.
RATIONALE: Low levels of cardiorespiratory fitness are common after stroke and are associated with post-stroke disability and increased risk of secondary stroke. Cardiorespiratory training interventions aim to increase cardiorespiratory fitness, improve physical function, reduce disability, and help prevent future strokes. Clinical guidelines recommend exercise as part of lifestyle modification for secondary prevention, and strongly recommend exercise for rehabilitation. This review is one of three reviews that were originally a single review on physical fitness training for stroke. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this review was to determine whether cardiorespiratory training after stroke has an effect on death, disability, adverse events, risk factors, fitness, walking, and indices of physical function when compared to a non-exercise control. SEARCH METHODS: In April 2025, we searched nine bibliographic databases and two trials registers to identify studies for inclusion in the review. We checked reference lists, tracked citations, and contacted experts. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials comparing cardiorespiratory training interventions with usual care, no intervention, or a non-exercise intervention in people with stroke. OUTCOMES: Our critical outcomes were death, disability, adverse events, risk factors, fitness, walking, and indices of physical function, assessed at the end of the intervention and the end of the longest follow-up. RISK OF BIAS: We used the Cochrane RoB 1 tool to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. SYNTHESIS METHODS: The studies evaluated different comparisons (e.g. cardiorespiratory training versus no intervention/waiting list control or versus attention control or versus usual care), which we synthesised into a single comparison: cardiorespiratory training versus control. We used random-effects meta-analysis on arm-level data (risk difference (RD) for dichotomous data, and mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) for continuous data, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs)). For outcome data that we did not meta-analyse, we followed Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guidance. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for critical outcomes. INCLUDED STUDIES: We included 53 studies (2672 participants, with an average age of 61.9 years). Most studies recruited ambulatory participants in the early subacute (7 days to 3 months) or chronic (> 6 months) phases of recovery. Exercise duration recommendations were met in 49 studies, and frequency recommendations in 48. Twenty-eight studies lacked balanced exposure between groups. Programme duration was 12 weeks or more in 16 studies (maximum: 24 weeks). Sixteen studies had a post-intervention follow-up period (12 weeks to 12 months from baseline). One study planned a six-month follow-up but did not report it. SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS: Cardiorespiratory training does not increase or decrease deaths at the end of intervention (RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.01; 36 studies, 1563 participants; high-certainty evidence) or the end of follow-up (RD -0.00, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.02; 10 studies, 713 participants; high-certainty evidence). Cardiorespiratory training may improve indices of disability slightly at the end of intervention (SMD 0.35, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.57; 17 studies, 1073 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. Re-expressed using the Barthel Index (0 to 20), the equivalent effect is MD 1.68, 95% CI 0.59 to 2.74. It is unclear if the effect is clinically meaningful (the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is +1.85). The effect is unclear at the end of follow-up (SMD -0.14, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.08; 5 studies, 347 participants; low-certainty evidence). Cardiorespiratory training does not increase or decrease the incidence of secondary cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events at the end of intervention (RD -0.00, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.02; 8 studies, 544 participants; high-certainty evidence) and probably does not affect them at the end of follow-up (RD -0.02, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.04; 4 studies, 412 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). It is very uncertain whether cardiorespiratory training affects systolic blood pressure (mmHg) at the end of intervention (MD -2.12, 95% CI -5.81 to 1.57; 9 studies, 535 participants; very low-certainty evidence) (MCID -2 mmHg) or follow-up (MD 0.93, 95% CI -4.30 to 6.16; 3 studies, 155 participants; very low-certainty evidence); the 95% CIs include the MCID. Cardiorespiratory training probably results in a slight improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2 ml/kg/min) at the end of intervention (MD 2.37, 95% CI 1.39 to 3.36; 13 studies, 608 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); it is unclear if the effect is clinically meaningful (MCID +3.5 ml/kg/min). The effect may be similar at the end of follow-up (MD 2.76, 95% CI 1.36 to 4.16; 5 studies, 237 participants; low-certainty evidence). Subgroup analysis favoured longer interventions. Cardiorespiratory training probably results in a slight increase in comfortable walking speed (metres per second) at the end of intervention (MD 0.08, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.12; 16 studies, 647 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), but the effect is not clinically meaningful (MCID +0.13). The effect is unclear at the end of follow-up (MD 0.02, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.10; 3 studies, 182 participants; low-certainty evidence). Cardiorespiratory training may improve indices of balance at the end of intervention (SMD 0.31, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.47; 18 studies, 772 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. Re-expressing using the Berg Balance Scale, the equivalent effect is MD 2.09, 95% CI 1.10 to 3.07; and it is unclear if it is clinically meaningful (MCID of +2). The effect is unclear at the end of follow-up (MD 0.90, 95% CI -1.32 to 3.12; 6 studies, 253 participants; low-certainty evidence). Overall, our certainty about the evidence is limited for most outcomes by imprecision (small number of studies and participants) or risks of bias (e.g. imbalanced exposure doses) or both. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Cardiorespiratory training after stroke does not affect mortality or the incidence of secondary events at the end of the aerobic exercise training programme or end of follow-up. It may increase fitness, reduce disability, increase walking speed, and improve balance at the end of intervention, but it is unclear if these improvements are clinically meaningful. Further well-designed randomised trials are needed to fully understand the potential benefits and long-term effects of cardiorespiratory training and the optimal exercise prescription. FUNDING: No dedicated funding REGISTRATION: Protocol (and previous versions) available via DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD003316.
Humans↗