Effectiveness of passive vs. assistive robotic gait training on functional recovery and neuroplasticity post-stroke: A randomized controlled trial.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study seeks to compare the impacts of various robotic gait training (RAGT) modes on lower limb motor function recovery in stroke patients while exploring the corresponding neural mechanisms. DESIGN: A single-blind, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-eight patients aged 18-80 who had experienced their first unilateral subacute stroke accompanied by walking impairments were included. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to: (1) assistive mode training, (2) passive mode training, or (3) control group receiving only traditional rehabilitation. Clinical and neurological outcomes were assessed at pre-intervention (T0), and post-2-week intervention (T1). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes were evaluated using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Lower Extremity, Berg Balance Scale, Modified Barthel Index, the Functional Ambulatory Category, and functional near-infrared spectroscopy. RESULTS: Among the 48 patients recruited, significant time effects were observed across all groups in FMA-LE scores (p&#x202f;<&#x202f;0.001). Notable improvements were detected in the conventional group (MD = 2.69, p&#xff1c;0.01) and the passive group (MD = 3.67, p&#x202f;<&#x202f;0.001), with the assistive mode also demonstrating a significant effect (MD = 1.79, p&#x202f;<&#x202f;0.05). BBS scores improved across all groups; however, no significant differences were noted between the groups (p&#x202f;=&#x202f;0.11). Similarly, MBI scores showed a significant time effect (p&#x202f;<&#x202f;0.001), without notable group differences (p&#x202f;=&#x202f;0.29). CONCLUSION: All training modalities effectively enhanced motor function, balance, and daily living skills in stroke patients. Distinct cortical activation and connectivity patterns were observed between training modalities, which may reflect different neuroplastic mechanisms. These preliminary neural differences may help inform personalized rehabilitation strategies, although no clinical superiority of one mode over another can be concluded from the present data.