SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Comparative transcriptomics”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

1,415 records · Page 19Linked to original sources

PubMed2026

A Sentiment-Based Comparison of AI- and Physician-Generated Empathic Statements in Palliative Care.

CONTEXT: Empathic communication promotes trust in patient-provider relationships. As healthcare integrates artificial intelligence (AI) into patient communication, we have yet to understand how these models' communication compares to that of physicians. OBJECTIVES: Our primary objectives were to examine patient preferences for AI-generated vs. palliative care physician-generated empathic statements addressing fear and anxiety around cancer treatment, and to analyze associations between linguistic features and patient preferences. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of the PALL-AI trial, a randomized controlled survey comparing cancer patients' preferences of AI- to physician-generated empathic statements. Physicians and AI were provided the same prompt with a maximum sentence length. Patient preferences for each statement were measured in blinded surveys. We analyzed sentiment of the statements using the Valence Aware Dictionary and Sentiment Reasoner (VADER) and the National Research Council Canada (NRC) Emotion Lexicon. We evaluated associations between sentiment scores and patient preferences using Spearman's correlation coefficients. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients completed blinded surveys, preferring the AI-generated statement 72.4% of the time. VADER sentiment analysis showed all three AI statements displayed positive sentiment, while all three physician statements displayed negative sentiment. Controlling for statement length, AI statements used twice as many positive words as human statements. However, they contained a similar number of negative words. Of the eight NRC emotions, "trust" and "joy" demonstrated the strongest correlations with patient preference. CONCLUSION: Patients preferred AI-generated statements around cancer care over those from palliative care physicians when standardized for prompt and statement length. Analysis shows AI-generated statements contain more positive language which may be the factor driving patient preference toward AI.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Early radiographic loss of intermetatarsal angle correction after single first TMT arthrodesis (Modified Lapidus) versus three-corner TMT arthrodesis.

INTRODUCTION: The Lapidus procedure treats hallux valgus with first-ray hypermobility. It can be performed as a single first tarsometatarsal (TMT) arthrodesis or a three-corner TMT construct with additional intermetatarsal fusion. Early loss of correction remains a concern. This study compared early radiographic stability between techniques. METHODS: Fifty patients (15 three-corner TMT arthrodesis, 35 single first TMT arthrodesis) treated between 2014 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), Méary's angle, and tibial sesamoid position were measured on weight-bearing radiographs at 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Both techniques achieved significant correction. The three-corner TMT arthrodesis group showed greater initial IMA correction at 6 weeks (p = 0.020) and maintained a lower IMA at 6 months (p = 0.001). Early IMA loss was greater after single first TMT arthrodesis (1.5°±1.7° vs 0.6°±0.8°, p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Three-corner TMT arthrodesis was associated with greater early intermetatarsal stability than single first TMT arthrodesis.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Clinical Utility of Ultra-Widefield Swept-Source OCT for Intraocular Tumors: Comparison With Ultrasonography, SD-OCT, and MRI.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical performance of ultra-widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography (UWF-OCT) in the assessment of choroidal tumors and to compare it with ultrasonography (US), spectral-domain (SD)-OCT, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). DESIGN: Retrospective diagnostic comparison. SUBJECTS: Thirty-nine eyes from 39 patients diagnosed with choroidal tumors at a single tertiary referral center. METHODS: This retrospective diagnostic comparison evaluated patients diagnosed with choroidal tumors at a single tertiary referral center between January 2023 and August 2025. All patients underwent UWF-OCT imaging at diagnosis. Tumor measurements obtained with UWF-OCT were compared with US, SD-OCT, and MRI. Comparative analysis among imaging modalities and predictors affecting UWF-OCT applicability was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Tumor thickness (mm) and largest basal diameter (LBD, mm) measurements, and complete measurability rate across different tumor size categories. RESULTS: Thirty-nine eyes from 39 patients (mean age 59.2 ± 16.9 years) were analyzed, including 27 choroidal melanomas (69.2%), 5 metastatic tumors (12.8%), 4 hemangiomas (10.3%), 2 osteomas (5.1%), and 1 (2.6%) indeterminate choroidal melanocytic lesion. UWF-OCT successfully measured both tumor thickness and largest basal diameter (LBD) in 100% (31/31) of small and medium choroidal tumors, substantially outperforming SD-OCT (complete measurement achieved in 63.6% of small tumors, and 0% of medium or large tumors). UWF-OCT measurements were systematically smaller than ultrasonography (thickness: -32.3%, P < .01; LBD: -11.1%, P < .01) and MRI (thickness: -29.2%, P < .01). Mushroom-shaped tumor morphology was the strongest negative predictor of UWF-OCT quality (OR = 0.015, 95% CI 0.001-0.196, P < .01). UWF-OCT's complete measurability was limited in large tumors (12.5%, 1/8). CONCLUSIONS: UWF-OCT provides precise, noninvasive, single-scan assessment of small-to-medium choroidal tumors with detailed structural visualization. It may be particularly useful for dome-shaped tumors, while multimodal imaging with US and MRI remains optimal for complex morphologies. Overall, UWF-OCT represents a valuable tool for diagnosis and treatment planning, with potential utility for longitudinal follow-up in choroidal tumor management.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy and Safety of Elagolix Versus Dienogest for Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Endometriosis Pain: A Phase III, Multicentric, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Non-Inferiority Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of elagolix with dienogest in women with moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain. DESIGN: A multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, parallel-group, active-controlled, non-inferiority phase III study. SETTING: Nineteen clinical centres across India. STUDY POPULATION: Women (18-49 years) diagnosed with endometriosis and experiencing moderate-to-severe pain. METHODS: Participants were randomised (1:1) to receive oral elagolix (150 mg once daily) or dienogest (2 mg once daily) for 24 weeks. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was change in endometriosis-related pain (Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]) from baseline to Day 85. Secondary outcomes included changes in NRS (Day 169), dysmenorrhoea, non-menstrual pelvic pain (NMPP) scores (Days 85 and 169), rescue medication use, patient global impression of change (PGIC), adverse events and bone mineral density. RESULTS: Of 340 patients screened, 230 were randomised (115 per group). At Day 85, both arms showed similar reductions in NRS pain scores with a treatment difference of 0.04 (95% CI: -0.3, 0.37) [p = 0.9747] demonstrating non-inferiority as upper 95% CI was below pre-specified margin of 1.5. At Day 169, both arms showed comparable improvements in overall pain, dysmenorrhoea and NMPP from baseline (p = 0.9372, p = 0.8884, and p = 0.9616, respectively). Rescue medication use and PGIC were comparable between treatment arms. Adverse event incidence was similar (elagolix: 14.8%; dienogest: 19.1%), with no serious TEAEs or discontinuations. No significant bone mineral density changes were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Elagolix demonstrated non-inferiority to dienogest with an acceptable safety and tolerability profile, supporting its use in managing endometriosis-associated pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: CTRI/2023/01/049292.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Short-term safety of dual versus single antiplatelet therapy in flow diversion for distal intracranial aneurysms: results from the DART trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Flow diverters (FDs) have become one of the primary treatments for intracranial aneurysms (IAs). However, their use in distal IA has been associated with higher complication rates compared with other techniques. The development of coated FDs, in combination with novel antiplatelet regimens, offers promising strategies to improve the safety profile of FDs in this context. This trial aimed to compare mono antiplatelet therapy (MAPT) using prasugrel versus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and prasugrel for the treatment of distal IA using the p48 MW HPC FD (WallabyPhenox). METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective, parallel-group, single-blind, non-inferiority randomized trial. Between February 2021 and February 2025, 140 patients were enrolled. After excluding 11 patients, 129 were included in the final analysis. The primary endpoint was the absence of new neurological deficits, defined as no shift in the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. The secondary endpoint was the incidence of any stroke. RESULTS: At the 30-day follow-up, 66 patients (98.5%) in the MAPT group and 59 patients (95.2%) in the DAPT group showed no new neurological deficits. With a predefined non-inferiority margin of 5%, the difference of 3.35% confirmed the non-inferiority of MAPT compared with DAPT (p=0.002). The incidence of any stroke was 4/67 (5.9%) in the MAPT group and 6/62 (9.6%) in the DAPT group (p=0.431). CONCLUSION: Prasugrel monotherapy for the treatment of distal IAs using the p48 MW HPC was non-inferior to DAPT within the first 30 days following treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-3q9zb73. UTN code: U1111-1290-2489. Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital das Clínicas de Ribeirão Preto - Universidade de São Paulo. CAAE number: 29848720.0.1001.5440.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion With Lateral Vertebral Screw Fixation Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Severe Lumbar Stenosis: Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The benefits of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) vs transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in severe lumbar stenosis (Schizas C/D) remain uncertain. This randomized trial compared clinical, radiographic, and safety outcomes of OLIF and TLIF. METHODS: From November 2018 to December 2021, a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial enrolled 260 adults with single-level severe stenosis and instability. In total, 224 patients were randomized to OLIF or TLIF. Prespecified outcomes followed consolidated standards of reporting trials. Primary outcomes were visual analog scale back/leg pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), with minimal clinically important difference thresholds of ODI ≥12-13 points or ≥30% improvement, and visual analog scale ≥1.5-2.0 points. Radiographic measures included disc height, lumbar and segmental lordosis, and canal cross-sectional area (CSA). Complications were recorded. Ethics approval was obtained from the institutional review board, the trial was registered with ISRCTN.com , and all patients provided written informed consent. RESULTS: In total, 224 patients were randomized, 5 were lost to follow-up (TLIF n = 2, OLIF n = 3). Baseline features were comparable. OLIF was associated with shorter operative time, less blood loss, earlier ambulation, and shorter hospital stay (all P < .05). Both groups achieved significant, clinically meaningful improvements. OLIF showed greater back pain reduction at 3-6 months and 2 years ( P < .05) and superior ODI improvement at 3 and 6 months ( P < .001), although long-term ODI scores were similar. Radiographically, OLIF provided greater restoration of disc height and segmental lordosis (all P < .001) and demonstrated progressive CSA increase (dynamic decompression), whereas TLIF achieved immediate, sustained CSA enlargement. Fusion rates were comparable at 1-2 years. Complication rates were low and similar (7.3% TLIF vs 5.5% OLIF), with most OLIF-specific events transient. CONCLUSION: Both OLIF and TLIF yield improvements in severe lumbar stenosis. OLIF offers perioperative advantages, earlier functional recovery, radiographic restoration, and dynamic canal remodeling, supporting its role as an equivalent alternative for lumbar spinal stenosis with some secondary advantages.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cancer-associated thrombosis is a condition associated with high mortality rates, yet limited evidence exists regarding the safety and effectiveness of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), focusing on a fixed follow-up period based on clinical practice guideline recommendations. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of DOACs versus LMWH in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis over a 6-month follow-up period. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched up to 30 June, 2025. Recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials and 28 cohort studies were included in our systematic review. After applying the criteria for a 6-month follow-up period, five randomized controlled trials and 16 cohort studies with 49,824 patients were analyzed in the meta-analysis. In randomized controlled trials, DOACs showed a lower incidence of venous thromboembolism recurrence (relative risk [RR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.87) compared with LMWH, with a non-significant increase in major bleeding (RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.87-1.88) and no significant difference in all-cause mortality (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.86-1.18). Cohort studies demonstrated a lower incidence of venous thromboembolism recurrence (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.62-0.76) with DOACs, a non-significant reduction in major bleeding (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.68-1.07), and a lower risk of all-cause mortality (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.31-0.72). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cancer-associated thrombosis, DOACs demonstrated a decrease in recurrent venous thromboembolism without increasing the risk of all-cause mortality. A non-significant increase in the risk of major bleeding was recorded in randomized controlled trials, but not in cohort studies. DOACs may provide greater effectiveness for cancer-associated thrombosis compared with LMWH.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Photothermal-Activated Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Conventional Platelet-Rich Plasma for Melasma: A Split-Face, Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Melasma is a common acquired pigmentary disorder that predominantly affects women with darker skin types and substantially impairs quality of life. Current treatments are limited by variable efficacy, adverse effects, and frequent recurrence. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as a potential regenerative treatment through growth-factor-mediated modulation of melanogenesis. Photothermal activation, which combines photobiomodulation with controlled hypothermic conditioning, has been hypothesized to promote a more sustained growth-factor release than conventional PRP. This study compared the efficacy and safety of photothermal-activated PRP (PT-PRP) and conventional PRP (C-PRP) for melasma treatment. METHODS: This split-face, double-blind, randomized controlled trial included 26 women with epidermal or mixed-type melasma. Each participant received three monthly sessions of intradermal PRP, with PT-PRP and C-PRP injected into opposite facial sides. Outcomes were assessed at weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12 using the modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI), Mexameter melanin and erythema indices, patient satisfaction, overall improvement, and adverse events. RESULTS: Both treatments significantly reduced mMASI by week 12, with no significant between-group differences at any time point. C-PRP showed significant mMASI improvement from week 4, whereas PT-PRP reached significance from week 8. For the melanin index, PT-PRP produced a significant within-group reduction at week 12, while C-PRP did not. At week 12, PT-PRP showed a significantly lower melanin index than C-PRP. Mild injection-site bruising was the only adverse event. CONCLUSION: PT-PRP and C-PRP produced comparable clinical improvement, but PT-PRP achieved greater objective melanin reduction at week 12. PT-PRP may represent a safe alternative treatment for melasma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Thai Clinical Trials Registry: TCTR20260318004.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

The Impact of PCSK9 Inhibitors on Development of Retinal Vascular Occlusions.

PURPOSE: PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) are a newer class of lipid-lowering drug that may be effective at lowering risk for retinal artery occlusion (RAO) and retinal vein occlusion (RVO). This study aims to investigate the relationship between PCSK9i use and retinal vascular occlusion among patients with hyperlipidemia. DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative clinical cohort study SUBJECTS, PARTICIPANTS, AND/OR CONTROLS: Patients with hyperlipidemia, defined as serum low-density lipoprotein level of ≥130 mg/dL and total cholesterol level of ≥220 mg/dL, prescribed a lipid-lowering medication were identified. Patients prescribed a PCSK9i were included in the study group and compared with control patients prescribed any other type of lipid-lowering drug. METHODS: This study was conducted using electronic health record data from health organizations in the United States through the TrinetX platform. Propensity score matching was completed based on relevant patient demographics, comorbidities, and laboratory values. Comparison of main outcomes between the PCSK9i and non-PCSK9i groups was performed using measures of association analysis to determine risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcomes measured consisted of occurrence of retinal vascular occlusion, RAO, RVO, central RAO, and central RVO at 3-year, 5-year, and 7-year time points. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, a total of 12,960 patients were included in each cohort. The analysis revealed that the PCSK9i cohort had a significantly lower risk for development of retinal vascular occlusions at multiple points, including 3-year (RR = 0.56, CI = 0.39-0.79), 5-year (RR = 0.50, CI = 0.37-0.67), and 7-year (RR = 0.46, CI 0.35-0.61) time points. This lower risk was also found in the PCSK9i group for an outcome of RVO at 5 years (RR = 0.50, CI = 0.34-0.73) and 7 years (RR = 0.47, CI = 0.33-0.67). For occurrence of RAOs (RR = 0.47, CI = 0.30-0.76) and central RVO (RR = 0.46, CI = 0.29-0.74) separately, the PCSK9i cohort had a lower risk at 7 years. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that PCSK9i may reduce the risk of retinal vascular occlusion compared with other classes of lipid-lowering medications.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction between intraoral scanning and conventional impressions for complete-arch implant prostheses: a pilot RCT.

OBJECTIVE: To compare framework passive fit, subjective evaluations, and short-term clinical outcomes between conventional impressions (CI) and intraoral scanning (IOS) for complete-arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (CIFDPs). METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 22 patients were allocated to the CI or IOS groups. All participants received a definitive one-piece CIFDP. The primary outcome was framework passive fit, assessed using the Vision and Tactile Score (V&T score), which included framework lift-off, the single-screw test, the full-screw test, smoothness of screw insertion, and radiographic gap assessment. Secondary outcomes included operator evaluation, patient satisfaction using a visual analog scale (VAS), early implant survival, marginal bone loss (MBL), modified Plaque Index (mPII), and complications at the 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were enrolled (CI: n = 11; IOS: n = 11), and one patient in the CI group was lost to follow-up. No statistically significant difference in the V&T score was observed between the CI and IOS groups (4.66 ± 0.17 vs. 4.65 ± 0.28; P = 0.93). The operator reported greater nervousness during the CI procedure than during IOS (21.82 ± 15.69 vs. 8.64 ± 7.47; P < 0.05). Patients in the CI group reported significantly greater discomfort, including nausea and anxiety, than those in the IOS group (P < 0.05). At the 6-month follow-up, the early implant survival rate was 100% in both groups. No significant differences were found between the groups in MBL (0.09 ± 0.09 vs. 0.06 ± 0.10 mm; P = 0.43) or mPII (0.10 ± 0.12 vs. 0.10 ± 0.28; P = 0.99). CONCLUSION: IOS and CI achieved comparable short-term clinical outcomes in patients who met the predefined inclusion criteria, including controlled implant number, spacing, and angulation. IOS provided a more favorable experience for both operators and patients. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: In complete-arch implant restorations, intraoral scanning may provide clinical outcomes comparable to those of conventional impressions while improving patient comfort.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Comparison of three tracking methods to assess usage of two pediatric powered mobility devices for young children with cerebral palsy.

Powered mobility devices are underutilized for promoting self-initiated mobility in young children with cerebral palsy due to prioritization of walking, caregiver effort, device characteristics, and environmental factors. Understanding device usage patterns is important to assess the impact of powered mobility interventions on child outcomes. As part of clinical trial (NCT04684576), three objective tracking methods including integrated loggers, Global Positioning System trackers (GPST), and caregiver reported activity logs (CRAL) were compared to provide insights into device usage patterns. Metrics included play session frequency, session duration, total usage minutes, and unique usage days for two powered mobility devices: Modified Ride-on Cars (MROC) and the Permobil Explorer Mini (EM). Twelve children with cerebral palsy used each device for eight consecutive weeks in home and community settings (16 weeks total), with device ordered randomized. Results showed no significant differences among tracking methods for the MROC. For the EM, only session duration differed between GPST and CRAL. Correlation analysis revealed variable relationships amongst tracking methods for both devices. The EM was used more frequently than the MROC, with significantly greater total usage minutes and session duration via CRAL, not GPST. The findings highlight the need for reliable tracking technologies that can be used across powered mobility devices.

Child, Preschool↗

PubMed2026

Comparison of black carbon measurements using filter-specific reference transmittance to those using lab blanks or an average of unloaded filters.

Filter-based optical techniques compare light transmission intensities between loaded (I) and unloaded (I0) filters as a measure of light-absorbing mass for subsequent estimations of equivalent black carbon (eBC). We analyzed 5,379 15 mm Teflon filters from the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network (HAPIN) trial to assess the influence that different methods of I0 estimations have on eBC measures. We compared eBC measurements using filter-specific I0 values (Method 1) to those using three other methods of I0 estimation: the lab blank scan from a given session (Method 2), the average of all pre-sample filter scans (Method 3), and the average of all lab blank filter scans (Method 4). We assessed the agreement between Method 1 and the alternative methods using Bland-Altman analysis. We also assessed the relationship between Method 1 and the alternative methods across the complete measurement range and after stratifying exposure data into quartiles according to Method 1 eBC exposures. The mean (SD) personal eBC exposure for Method 1 was 7.8 μg/m3 (5.9), and exposures ranged from 1.3 to 46.8 μg/m3. Compared to Method 1, eBC using Methods 2, 3, and 4 were higher by 0.7 μg/m3, 0.1 μg/m3, and 0.7 μg/m3, respectively. The performances of linear regression models between Method 1 and all other methods were moderate to strong (R2 range: 0.42-0.93) in the second, third, and fourth quartiles; however, the models in the first quartile (eBC range: 1.3-2.9 μg/m3) performed poorly (R2 = 0.25-0.26), with error approximately 25% of the mean. Our findings suggest that, in most instances, conventional methods for obtaining I0 values can be used to sufficiently characterize eBC; however, analyzing filters before sampling adds appreciably to the accuracy of eBC estimations in lower concentration settings.Implications: Filter-based optical techniques compare light transmission intensities between loaded (I) and unloaded (I0) filters as a measure of light-absorbing mass for subsequent estimations of equivalent black carbon (eBC). To assess the influence that different methods of I0 estimations have on eBC measures, we analyzed 5,379 15 mm Teflon filters from the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network (HAPIN) trial. Our findings suggest that, in most instances, conventional methods for obtaining I0 values can be used to sufficiently characterize eBC; however, analyzing filters before sampling adds appreciably to the accuracy of eBC estimations in lower concentration settings.

Soot↗

PubMed2026

Effects of phenylephrine and norepinephrine with restrictive infusion on oxygenation during one-lung ventilation for lung surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the effects of norepinephrine or phenylephrine combined with restrictive infusion on the oxygenation during thoracoscopic one-lung ventilation (OLV). METHODS: Ninety patients were randomly divided into three groups: the norepinephrine group (Group N), the phenylephrine group (Group P), and the control group (Group C). Arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) and intrapulmonary shunt fraction (Qs/Qt) were measured with patients in lateral positions during two-lung ventilation (TLV) at 10 min (T1), and during OLV at 15 min (T2) and 45 min (T3). Lung tissue samples were analyzed for endothelin and COX-2 levels after surgery. RESULTS: At T3, Group P had significantly higher PaO2 and lower Qs/Qt than Groups N and C (all p < 0.05), with no significant differences between Groups N and C (all p > 0.05). Compared to T1, Groups N and C showed significantly lower PaO2 and higher Qs/Qt at T2 and T3 (all p < 0.05), with no significant differences in PaO2 and Qs/Qt at T3 compared with T2 (all p > 0.05). Group P patients had lower PaO2 and higher Qs/Qt at T2 and T3 compared to T1 (all p < 0.05), but at T3, PaO2 increased and Qs/Qt decreased compared to T2 (all p < 0.05). Lung tissue levels of endothelin and COX-2 were significantly elevated in group P compared to groups N and C (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Combining phenylephrine with restrictive infusion during OLV improved oxygenation by increasing PaO2, decreasing Qs/Qt, and raising endothelin and COX-2 levels in lung tissue, thereby enhancing the HPV effect.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Meta-analysis and pharmacoeconomic study of rasagiline versus selegiline in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

OBJECTIVE: Given the persistent absence of direct head-to-head trials, this study aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of rasagiline versus selegiline as early-stage monotherapy for Parkinson's disease (PD), informing clinical selection and healthcare policies in China. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to April 2026. Focusing on short-term outcomes (10-16 weeks), an adjusted indirect treatment comparison (ITC) using placebo as a common anchor evaluated symptom improvement (UPDRS total scores) and adverse event (AE) incidence. For economic evaluation, a 2-year Markov model was constructed from a Chinese healthcare-system perspective. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated alongside robust sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Ten RCTs (rasagiline: 6; selegiline: 4) were included. The ITC revealed no statistically significant differences between rasagiline and selegiline in short-term symptomatic relief (Mean Difference = -0.82, 95% CI [-2.08, 0.44], p = 0.203) or AE risk (Odds Ratio = 0.83, 95% CI [0.50, 1.38], p = 0.475). The overall evidence certainty was rated as moderate. Economically, the base-case simulation indicated rasagiline yielded a marginal benefit of 0.0088 QALYs over selegiline but incurred an additional 17,111.10 Yuan. This resulted in an ICER of 1,951,505.55 Yuan/QALY, substantially exceeding the conventional willingness-to-pay threshold. CONCLUSION: Supported by moderate-certainty evidence, rasagiline and selegiline provide comparable short-term efficacy and safety for early-stage PD monotherapy. However, at its current pricing, rasagiline is not cost-effective. Significant price reductions or definitive proof of long-term superiority are required to justify its economic value.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

In Vitro comparison of herbal and conventional antifungals against Candida strains in Oral candidiasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the in vitro antifungal activity of herbal and conventional antifungals against Candida strains. DESIGN: In vitro studies were identified through PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science up until May 2026. This review is registered with Prospero (CRD420251128404). Eligibility was determined using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) framework, with specific inclusion and exclusion criteria focused on in vitro antifungal investigations comparing herbal antifungals with conventional antifungals. The risk of bias was assessed using the modified Quality Assessment Tool for In Vitro Studies (QUIN Tool). A meta-analysis was performed, with the primary outcome measure being the ratio of means (RoM). RESULTS: The systematic review included twenty-five articles. Most studies showed different results in inhibition zones or minimum inhibitory concentrations between herbal and conventional agents. The meta-analysis indicates that certain herbal antifungals are equally effective as or more effective than conventional antifungals against Candida dubliniensis, Candida lusitaniae, and Candida tropicalis. While the efficacy of herbal antifungals for Candida albicans and Candida glabrata was modest, Piper betle L. demonstrated significant inhibitory potential. In contrast, conventional antifungals outperformed herbal antifungals against Candida krusei and Candida parapsilosis. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis highlight herbal medicine as a potential antifungal therapy for oral candidiasis, emphasizing the need for new strategies due to resistance to conventional antifungals.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Sutureless versus renorrhaphy in robot-assisted off-clamp partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The necessity of routine parenchymal renorrhaphy during off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare perioperative, functional, safety, and oncological outcomes between sutureless and conventional renorrhaphy. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Comparative studies evaluating sutureless versus conventional renorrhaphy during purely off-clamp RAPN were included. Trifecta achievement was the primary outcome. Random-effects models were used for pooled analyses, with subgroup analysis according to study design. RESULTS: Four studies involving 787 patients, including one randomized controlled trial (RCT) and three propensity score-matched (PSM) studies, were included. The overall pooled estimate showed no statistically significant difference in Trifecta achievement (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.97-1.41), with substantial heterogeneity (I² = 86.5%). The PSM studies favored the sutureless approach (RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.05-1.52), whereas the RCT yielded an RR of 0.97 (95% CI 0.92-1.04) and met the prespecified noninferiority criterion without demonstrating superiority. The sutureless approach was associated with a smaller perioperative eGFR decline (MD - 3.89, 95% CI - 6.16 to - 1.62), while no significant difference was observed in eGFR at 3 months. No statistically significant differences were identified in major complications, blood transfusion, or positive surgical margins; urinary and vascular complications were sparsely reported. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients undergoing purely off-clamp RAPN, randomized evidence supports the noninferiority of a strategy that omits routine parenchymal renorrhaphy while permitting clinically necessary selective repair, but does not demonstrate superiority. Favorable estimates from PSM studies remain vulnerable to intraoperative treatment-selection bias. Current evidence is insufficient to determine whether omission of renorrhaphy affects urinary complications, long-term renal function, or oncological outcomes. REGISTRATION: This systematic review was registered prospectively in PROSPERO (CRD420261435995).

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy and safety of split-dose ultra-low-volume polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid versus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate for bowel preparation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Colonoscopy remains the gold standard for early detection and prevention of colorectal cancer, with adequate bowel cleansing being pivotal for its success. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of split-dose ultra-low-volume polyethylene glycol (PEG) with ascorbic acid (Asc) versus sodium picosulfate magnesium citrate for bowel preparation. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive literature search across Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to July 2025. Data analysis was conducted using R version 4.2.2 (31 October 2022) and RStudio version 2022.07.2 (2009-2022, RStudio, Inc.) Our literature search yielded six eligible studies involving 3285 patients. Our findings indicate no significant differences in overall and right-sided colon adequate cleansing rates between the two regimens: risk ratio: 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99-1.12, P  = 0.1082; and risk ratio: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.99-1.08, P  = 0.1755, respectively. However, PEG + Asc demonstrated a significantly lower rate of vomiting compared to sodium picosulfate magnesium citrate (risk ratio: 2.58, 95% CI: 0.94-2.78, P  = 0.0008), suggesting better tolerability. Other secondary outcomes, including nausea, abdominal pain, and overall Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores, did not show significant differences. The quality of the evidence varied across the outcomes. Our results support the comparable efficacy of both bowel preparation agents while highlighting PEG + Asc's potential advantages in tolerability. Our findings suggest that the choice between these two preparations can be tailored to the specific patient, considering their preferences or previous experiences, although some caution is advised in interpreting these findings.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy and Safety Profile of a Triple Single-Pill Combination of Valsartan/Amlodipine/Chlorthalidone in Patients with Uncontrolled Hypertension.

PURPOSE: This randomized, double-blind, multicenter Phase III study evaluated the efficacy and safety profile of a single-pill triple combination of valsartan/amlodipine/chlorthalidone (KDF1901, Valdipine Plus) compared with a dual combination of valsartan/amlodipine (KDF1901-R) in patients with essential hypertension. METHODS: Patients (n = 294) with inadequately controlled hypertension after a 4-week run-in phase with valsartan/amlodipine (80/5 mg) were randomized to receive KDF1901 (valsartan/amlodipine/chlorthalidone 160/10/25 mg, n = 147) or KDF1901-R (valsartan/amlodipine 160/10 mg, n = 147) for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) from baseline to week 8. Secondary endpoints included changes in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (MSDBP), BP normalization rates, and response rates. Safety profile outcomes assessed treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), laboratory parameters, and serious adverse events. FINDINGS: At week 8, the KDF1901 group exhibited a significantly greater reduction in MSSBP (-22.8 ± 1.0 mmHg) compared with the dual therapy group (-16.7 ± 1.0 mmHg, P < 0.0001). Similarly, the mean MSDBP reduction was significantly greater with KDF1901 (P = 0.0006). BP normalization rates (75.9% vs 54.5%, P < .0001) and response rates (73.8% vs 51.7%, P < 0.0001) were significantly higher in the triple combination group. Overall, the incidence of TEAEs was similar between groups (24.7% vs 21.5%, P = 0.5783), with mild cases of dizziness were most commonly reported. Exploratory ad hoc analyses showed statistically greater changes in sodium, potassium, and uric acid levels with triple therapy, but clinically meaningful extreme electrolyte abnormalities were rare in both groups, and the overall laboratory profile remained acceptable. IMPLICATIONS: This trial reported that the single-pill triple combination KDF1901 significantly improved BP control compared with dual therapy without compromising tolerability. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT07116863.

Humans↗