SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Neighborhood safety”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

432 records · Page 13Linked to original sources

PubMed2026

Diabetic macular edema and GLP-1 receptor agonist use: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are widely used for type II diabetes and obesity because of their cardiometabolic benefits. However, concerns regarding potential ocular adverse effects, particularly diabetic macular edema (DME), have prompted the need to clarify their retinal safety. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis study was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology statements (PROSPERO registration: CRD420251176164). MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), CENTRAL (Ovid), Web of Science, and PubMed were searched from inception to October 24, 2025. Randomized trials and observational cohort or case-control studies, including individuals with diabetes without baseline DME and exposed to GLP-1RAs were eligible. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using ROBINS-I. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Random-effects models were used to pool incidence proportions and hazard ratios (HRs). RESULTS: Thirteen retrospective cohort studies (2021-2025) using large real-world databases were included. Across 6 studies, the pooled proportion of incident DME among GLP-1RA users was 0.14 (95% CI: 0.07-0.23; I² = 99.8%). Compared with mixed antihyperglycemic therapies, GLP-1RA use was not associated with increased DME risk (pooled HR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.52-1.26). GLP-1RAs were associated with a higher relative risk of DME compared with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (HR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.17-1.94) but not compared with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (HR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.69-1.19). Evidence certainty was very low. CONCLUSION: Current low-certainty observational evidence does not support an overall increased risk of DME with GLP-1RA use. Prospective studies are needed to clarify comparative retinal safety.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Insulin, Semaglutide and Dapagliflozin in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Design and Methods of Triple Therapy for Type 1 Diabetes (TTT1)-An International Phase 3 Clinical Trial.

AIMS: Attaining target glycaemia can be a challenge in Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) due to insulin-induced weight gain. Adjunct therapy with modern glucose-lowering agents developed for type 2 diabetes (T2D) has great potential but may be insufficiently efficacious and carries risks of hypoglycaemia and ketosis. We designed the first Phase 3 clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of adding a Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) and a Sodium-Glucose Co-transporter (SGLT2) Inhibitor to insulin therapy in overweight and obese adults with T1D and glycaemia above target (HbA1c 7.5%-11.0% inclusive) (NCT03899402). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In Period 1, participants are randomized 2:1 (open label) for 26 weeks to semaglutide and insulin (uptitrated to 1.0 mg weekly) or standard insulin therapy. In Period 2, those randomized to semaglutide and insulin in Period 1 are further randomized (double-blind) for 26 weeks to dapagliflozin (10 mg daily) or placebo, in addition to semaglutide. The primary objective is to compare change in HbA1c on 'triple therapy' (dapagliflozin, semaglutide and insulin) with 'dual therapy' (placebo, semaglutide and insulin). Secondary objectives include comparisons of triple therapy with standard insulin therapy and dual therapy (semaglutide and insulin) with standard insulin therapy. Safety outcomes include hypoglycaemia and ketosis. A sample size recalculation during the trial based on analysis of masked data revised the original recruitment target from 114 to 82 participants. CONCLUSION: The TTT1 trial will provide clinically useful information on combination adjunct therapy in the treatment of T1D.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Early Analgesia for the Management of Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of early analgesic interventions, particularly NSAIDs versus opioids, in reducing pain and improving clinical outcomes among adults with AP. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov from database/registry inception to December 2025 to obtain relevant data. Randomized controlled trials involving adults aged 18 years or older diagnosed with AP, irrespective of the etiology and severity, who were administered analgesics (opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, epidural anesthesia, local anesthesia, and paracetamol) and compared with placebo, conventional treatment, or another analgesic modality were included in this review. The primary outcome assessed was pain reduction. The secondary outcomes assessed were the need for rescue analgesia, length of hospital stay, complications (local and/or systemic), mortality, and adverse drug effects. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0. Effect estimates were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis (DerSimonian-Laird approach), while nonpooled outcomes were summarized narratively. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies were included in the analysis. NSAIDs provided pain relief comparable to opioids, with a lower incidence of local complications (RR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.37-0.94). No significant differences in the need for rescue analgesia (OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.33-2.35), length of hospital stay (MD: -2.68 d, 95% CI: -6.27 to 0.91), mortality (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.19-3.05), and adverse drug effects (RR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.17-1.76) were observed. However, the findings are limited by study bias and heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Early analgesia with NSAIDs has efficacy and safety comparable to opioids in adults with AP, with the advantage of reducing local complications.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in functional motor disorders: A systematic review of effects and targets.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and potential mechanistic implications of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in adults with functional motor disorders (FMD), focusing on possible phenotype-specific responses and stimulation protocols. METHODS: Seven databases were searched from inception to July 2026. Randomised and non-randomised interventional studies were included. Risk of bias and evidence certainty were assessed using PEDro, RoB 2, JBI tools, and GRADE. Because of substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity, findings were synthesised qualitatively. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included. The primary motor cortex was targeted in 11 studies. Functional tremor showed the most consistent evidence with inhibitory stimulation: one small sham-controlled trial found a significant group-by-time effect on tremor severity (p = 0.007), while an uncontrolled prospective series reported 40 % reduction in postural tremor amplitude (p = 0.05). Evidence for functional weakness was conflicting: excitatory M1 stimulation increased objective strength by 25 % versus 10 % with sham (p = 0.004), whereas the largest inhibitory sham-controlled trial found no benefit (p = 0.80). No severe adverse events were reported, but safety reporting was incomplete. GRADE certainty was moderate for tremor and very low for all other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence is insufficient to establish the efficacy of rTMS in FMD or to recommend phenotype-specific protocols. Preliminary findings support further investigation of inhibitory stimulation for functional tremor, whereas evidence for excitatory stimulation in functional weakness remains uncertain. SIGNIFICANCE: The possible interaction between phenotype and stimulation direction is hypothesis-generating. rTMS should currently be considered an experimental, context-sensitive adjunct within multidisciplinary care, pending adequately powered phenotype-stratified sham-controlled trials. Prospero Registration Number: CRD420251250969.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Clinical Trial: Phase 3 Trial of Resmetirom Versus Placebo in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis-Reanalysis of Fibrosis Stage 2-3 Subset.

BACKGROUND: Resmetirom is an oral thyroid hormone receptor beta agonist clinically used to treat metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) among adults with stage F2 or F3 fibrosis. AIMS: Because the pivotal, 52-week, randomized, controlled, phase 3 MAESTRO-NASH trial (once-daily oral resmetirom 80 or 100 mg or placebo) included patients with F1, F2, or F3 fibrosis, we conducted a post hoc analysis aimed at assessing treatment response in the subset of patients with stages F2 and F3 fibrosis, consistent with the approved label population. METHODS: Co-primary end points were MASH resolution (hepatocellular ballooning score 0, lobular inflammation score ≤ 1, and ≥ 2-point nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score [NAS] reduction from baseline) with no fibrosis worsening, and ≥ 1-stage fibrosis improvement with no NAS worsening at Week 52. RESULTS: Among 917 patients with F2 or F3 fibrosis, metabolic risk factor prevalence was high (hypertension, 78.0%; dyslipidemia, 71.1%; type 2 diabetes, 67.0%). MASH resolution was achieved by 25.7% in the 80-mg group, 29.9% in the 100-mg group, and 9.5% in the placebo group (p < 0.0001 for both comparisons with placebo). Respective percentages with fibrosis improvement were 26.5%, 28.9%, and 17.3% (p < 0.01 for both comparisons). From baseline to Week 24, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased by 11.7% and 13.7% in the 80- and 100-mg resmetirom groups, respectively, and increased by 2.3% with placebo (p < 0.0001 for both comparisons). No new safety signals emerged. CONCLUSION: Results among patients with F2 and F3 fibrosis were consistent with the primary MAESTRO-NASH analysis population, demonstrating efficacy and safety of resmetirom after 52 weeks.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

High-flow nasal cannula oxygenation in sedated endoscopy for high-risk obstructive sleep apnea patients: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Hypoxemia is the most common adverse event during sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy. Patients with high obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) risk (STOP-Bang ≥5) are susceptible due to sedation-induced loss of upper airway tone exacerbating airway collapsibility. Although high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) benefits general at-risk populations, its efficacy in this specific cohort remains uncertain, as its mild positive pressure falls far below therapeutic continuous positive airway pressure levels for moderate-to-severe OSA, questioning its ability to stent the collapsible airway. Our prior proof-of-concept study in this cohort observed a 5% incidence of hypoxemia with HFNC, confirming feasibility and safety and justifying this confirmatory trial. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled single-blind trial will enroll 600 adults (STOP-Bang score ≥5) undergoing elective sedated gastroenteroscopy across three centers. Participants will be 1:1 randomized (stratified by center) to HFNC (30 L/min pre-oxygenation, 60 L/min post-induction) or conventional nasal cannula (6 L/min). Both groups receive standardized propofol-alfentanil sedation. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with at least one episode of hypoxemia (SpO2 75%-90% <60 s). Secondary outcomes include the proportion of patients with at least one episode of severe hypoxemia (SpO2 <75% or 75%≤SpO2<90% ≥60 s), the proportion with subclinical respiratory depression (90%≤SpO2<95%), and the frequency of other adverse events. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide definitive evidence on HFNC's efficacy in high-risk OSA patients, addressing whether it can overcome pressure limitations to prevent hypoxemia. Results are expected to inform sedation management guidelines, establish a new standard of care for this subgroup, and enhance procedural safety. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at the ClinicalTrials.gov on 14 December 2025 (NCT07307560).

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Autologous bone grafts versus alloplastic implants for orbital floor reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The choice of reconstructive material for orbital floor fractures remains a subject of debate. While autologous bone has historically been considered the "gold standard," alloplastic implants offer potential advantages in reducing surgical morbidity. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of autologous bone grafts versus alloplastic implants in orbital floor reconstruction. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD420251140583). Electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library) were searched from inception to August 2025. Randomized controlled trials and comparative cohort studies evaluating functional outcomes (diplopia, enophthalmos) and complications (ectropion, infection, malposition) were included. Data were synthesized using a random-effects model, with risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated. RESULTS: Twenty studies comprising 2,119 patients were included. Alloplastic implants demonstrated statistically significant superiority in periocular safety, with a reduced risk of postoperative ectropion compared to autologous grafts (RR = 2.245; p = 0.020). In an exploratory sensitivity analysis excluding one outlier study, autologous grafts were associated with a significantly higher risk of implant malposition (RR = 2.074; p = 0.004). Autologous reconstruction was associated with a strong trend toward increased postoperative pain (p = 0.052) and inherent donor-site morbidity. No statistically significant differences were observed regarding infection (p = 0.402), enophthalmos (p = 0.201), or diplopia (p = 0.221). CONCLUSION: Alloplastic implants were associated with a lower risk of ectropion and implant malposition, with functional outcomes statistically comparable to autologous bone. Given the elimination of donor-site morbidity, alloplastic biomaterials represent a safe and effective alternative for orbital floor reconstruction; however, the predominance of retrospective, heterogeneous studies in the current evidence base means these findings should inform, rather than replace, individualized surgical decision-making pending further high-quality randomized trials.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Skin cell suspension autograft as an evidence-based innovation in burn and wound treatment: A systematic review of global evidence across two decades.

BACKGROUND: Skin cell suspension autograft (SCSA) is a point-of-care approach to wound management facilitating epithelialization while reducing burden associated with conventional autografting. Despite growing clinical use of SCSA across diverse wound etiologies, the global clinical evidence describing its use has not yet been comprehensively synthesized. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes (PRISMA) guidelines to identify studies between January 2000 and December 2024 reporting clinical use of SCSA for wound closure. Data on patient demographics, wound characteristics, and treatment methods were extracted. Clinical, safety, and health economic outcomes were extracted for comparative studies evaluating SCSA against control treatments. RESULTS: Ninety-nine studies across 13 countries were included. Across the overall dataset, SCSA was used alone or in combination with autografting for burns, surgical wounds, traumatic injuries, inflammatory conditions, and chronic wounds. Among comparative studies (n=27), SCSA consistently reduced donor skin, and healing outcomes favored SCSA in 61%, while 39% reported equivalent outcomes. Pain and esthetic outcomes more frequently favored SCSA, while safety outcomes were generally similar, with some studies favoring comparators. Health-economic outcomes suggested potential reductions in length of stay and resource utilization, although findings were variable across studies. CONCLUSION: The available global evidence supports SCSA as a versatile modality for supporting epidermal coverage across wound types and clinical contexts. However, the findings should be interpreted in the context of the limitations of this review, which include heterogenous study designs, variable outcome reporting, predominance of non-randomized data, and the absence of a formal quantitative analysis. Nevertheless, the demonstrated clinical and economic benefits in comparative studies reinforce the role of SCSA as an evidence-based innovation for burn and wound treatment.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Penpulimab and Gemcitabine With or Without Anlotinib in Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Phase 2 Study.

This prospective exploratory phase 2 study employed a three-cohort, two-phase design to evaluate the potential of anlotinib as a substitute for cisplatin in gemcitabine-penpulimab combinations for metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients who were previously treated with cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy. Patients enrolled in the study were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio during the lead-in phase to one of three treatment arms: gemcitabine, cisplatin, penpulimab, and anlotinib (GP-PA, n = 8); gemcitabine, cisplatin, and penpulimab (GP-P, n = 6); or gemcitabine, penpulimab, and anlotinib (GAP, n = 6). The expansion phase enriched the optimal cohort, with stratification based on PD-L1 expression. The primary endpoints were safety and objective response rate (ORR), while the secondary endpoints included duration of response, disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). In the lead-in phase, grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 87.5% (GP-PA), 100% (GP-P), and 66.7% (GAP) patients, predominantly hematologic toxicities. ORR/DCR were 62.5%/87.5% (GP-PA), 83.3%/100% (GP-P), and 100%/100% (GAP). At median 20.2-month follow-up, median PFS/OS were 4.1/18.4 months for GP-PA and not reached for GP-P/GAP. In the expansion phase, a total of 14 patients received GAP, with an ORR of 93.3% and grade ≥ 3 TEAEs in 71.4% of patients. At data cut-off point, the median PFS had not been reached, and the 12-month PFS and OS rates were 53.8% and 78.6%, respectively. The GAP regimen demonstrated a favorable safety and efficacy profile, compared to the GP-PA and GP-P regimens in patients with metastatic NPC. These findings suggest that substituting cisplatin with anlotinib may offer a viable therapeutic strategy for this patient population.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Delphi study robot consenso: Strategies for the implementation of robotic surgery in general surgery in the Spanish hospital network.

INTRODUCTION: The implementation of robotic surgery in public hospitals presents multiple logistical, educational, and organizational challenges. In the absence of unified guidelines, a national consensus is required to optimize its safe and efficient adoption. This study aimed to establish a set of consensus-based and measurable recommendations for the implementation of robotic surgery programs in hospitals within the Spanish National Health System, based on the experience of centres with established robotic programs and intended to serve as guidance for hospitals that are initiating or planning their implementation. METHODS: A national Delphi study was conducted with the participation of robotic surgery experts from 26 public hospitals. The expert panel was composed exclusively of digestive surgeons with experience in robotic surgery. Three iterative rounds of expert panel evaluation were conducted between March 2024 and March 2025. The questions were grouped into five thematic blocks. Consensus was defined as an agreement level of ≥66.7%. Kendall's W coefficient was used to assess concordance. RESULTS: High levels of consensus were achieved on key aspects related to infrastructure, structured training, cost evaluation, and quality assurance mechanisms. Areas of disagreement were also identified, such as the need for a dedicated anaesthesiologist, purchase of accessory instruments during the initial phase, and official accreditation pathways. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a guideline for developing a national robotic surgery strategy focused on patient safety, program sustainability, and standardized training of surgical teams. These recommendations can guide hospitals at different stages of robotic technology adoption. Given that the consensus was reached from an exclusively surgical perspective, the recommendations focus on patient safety, program sustainability, and standardized training of the surgical team, and should be interpreted in an adaptable manner according to each centre's context, case volume, and available resources.

Cirugía Asistida por Robot↗

PubMed2026

Preoperative Carbohydrate Supplementation Reduces Thirst and Improves Patient Satisfaction Before Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Prolonged preoperative fasting is a major source of patient discomfort, particularly thirst, before elective cesarean delivery. This study aimed to evaluate whether preoperative carbohydrate (CHO) supplementation could alleviate these discomforts and improve patient satisfaction without compromising safety. METHODS: In this single-center randomized controlled trial, 262 women scheduled for elective cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia were randomly allocated to either the CHO group (Group CHO, n = 131), which received 355 mL of an oral carbohydrate solution on the night before and the morning of surgery, or the control group (Group C, n = 131), which followed conventional fasting. The primary outcome was the thirst Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10) score measured immediately before surgery. Secondary outcomes included hunger NRS, satisfaction NRS, and maternal and neonatal safety parameters. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Despite a longer preoperative fasting duration in Group CHO (9.25 ± 1.05 vs. 8.74 ± 0.97 h, P < 0.001), this group exhibited significantly lower thirst NRS scores (1.69 ± 0.90 vs. 4.02 ± 0.99, P < 0.001) and hunger NRS scores (1.25 ± 0.94 vs. 2.09 ± 0.82, P < 0.001), as well as higher satisfaction NRS scores (7.70 ± 0.69 vs. 5.69 ± 1.17, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses confirmed consistent benefits of CHO supplementation across most patient characteristics. Further analyses suggested that the maximum effect on thirst reduction occurred at approximately 9.2 h of solid fasting; however, the interaction between fasting duration and treatment group was not statistically significant (P = 0.187). CONCLUSION: Preoperative carbohydrate supplementation effectively reduces thirst and hunger and improves patient satisfaction before elective cesarean delivery without increasing maternal or neonatal risk. The beneficial effects were consistent across varying fasting durations, with exploratory spline analyses suggested a potential peak effect around 9.2 h, though this was not statistically significant and should be interpreted cautiously. These findings support the incorporation of carbohydrate loading into enhanced recovery protocols. TRIAL REGISTRATION: China Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2500097956.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Effects of low-dose esketamine on early quality of recovery following minimally invasive esophagectomy: a multicenter, randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) frequently experience moderate-to-severe postoperative pain and anxiety-depressive symptoms, compromising postoperative quality of recovery (QoR). Esketamine is a promising adjunct for analgesia and anxiolysis; however, the effect of low-dose esketamine on patient-centered recovery outcomes in MIE remains unclear. METHODS: In this double-blinded, multicenter randomized controlled trial, patients scheduled for elective McKeown esophagectomy were allocated to esketamine (0.25 mg/kg loading dose and 0.125 mg/kg/h continuous infusion during surgery) or placebo (equivalent volume and rate of saline). The primary outcome was the QoR-15 score on postoperative day (POD) 2. Secondary outcomes included QoR-15 scores on POD 1, 3, 7 and 30. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Anxiety Subscale (HADS-A) and Depression Subscale (HADS-D) scores, numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores, and the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) scores on POD 1 to 3, and safety evaluations. RESULTS: A total of 198 patients were analyzed (esketamine, n = 98; placebo, n = 100). Intraoperative esketamine significantly improved QoR-15 scores on POD 2 (116.9 ± 9.4 vs. 110.2 ± 9.8, p < 0.001) and POD 3 (123.6 ± 7.2 vs. 116.8 ± 8.4, p < 0.001) compared with placebo. HADS-A and HADS-D scores were lower in the esketamine group on POD 1 to 3 (all p < 0.001). Additionally, esketamine recipients reported significantly lower NRS scores at rest and during movement and BPI scores for pain severity and pain interference items (all p < 0.001). There were no significant between-group differences in safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative low-dose esketamine improved early, patient-reported recovery after MIE by enhancing analgesia and reducing postoperative anxiety and depression without increasing adverse events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Register (identifier: ChiCTR2400088916).

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Intraocular Pressure Changes Following Intraluminal Stent Removal From the Paul Glaucoma Implant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: This study aims to systematically review and perform a single-arm meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate the effect of removal of intraluminal stent from the Paul glaucoma implant (PGI) on intraocular pressure (IOP) changes and to summarize its long-term efficacy and safety. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Glaucoma remains one of the leading global causes of irreversible vision loss, necessitating effective surgical management for refractory cases. Glaucoma drainage devices are critical for these complex forms, and intraluminal stent removal from the PGI serves as a key strategy to titrate aqueous outflow and optimize long-term IOP control. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by searching EMBASE, Medline, and CENTRAL. The meta-analysis ultimately included 5 observational studies. The Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Continuous outcomes (eg, postremoval stent IOP reduction) were analyzed using the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI); dichotomous outcomes (eg, hypotony incidence) were evaluated using pooled proportion with 95% CI. All meta-analyses employed a random-effects model. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis included 5 studies, involving a total of 283 eyes. The meta-analysis revealed that removal of the stent leads to a significant and immediate IOP reduction. The IOP reduction (immediate postremoval stent IOP minus preremoval stent IOP) was significant, with a pooled MD of -9.09 mm Hg IOP (MD = 9.09; 95% CI = [-11.77, -6.41]). In the preremoval stent high-IOP (>21 mm Hg) subgroup, the IOP reduction is -11.82 (95% CI = [-10.14, -13.51]). This reduction was significantly greater than the preremoval stent low-IOP (<21 mm Hg) subgroup, whose reduction is -6.66 mm Hg (95% CI = [-5.55, -7.77]). Regarding safety, the pooled proportion of clinically hypotony was low and highly consistent (I² = 0.00%) at only 0.03 (95% CI = [0.00, 0.15]). CONCLUSIONS: Intraluminal stent removal from the PGI is an effective and safe IOP-lowering intervention. Its IOP reduction effect is significantly more pronounced in patients with preremoval stent high IOP, providing crucial clinical guidance for managing persistently high IOP after PGI implantation.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

A two-center randomized clinical superiority trial of single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy for severe obesity: SASSY study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass is a novel metabolic bariatric surgery intended to enhance metabolic outcomes and reduce the risk of postoperative complications. Although preliminary outcome data for single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass are promising, evidence from adequately powered, randomized head-to-head comparisons is scarce. This trial compares the efficacy and safety of single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy in patients with class II obesity (body mass index = 35.0-39.9 kg/m²) with at least one obesity‑related comorbidity or class III obesity (body mass index ⩾40.0 kg/m²). METHODS: This two-center randomized clinical superiority trial enrolls patients eligible for metabolic bariatric surgery at two specialized Norwegian centers. Included patients are randomly assigned (1:1) to either single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass or sleeve gastrectomy with standardized perioperative treatment and care. The primary endpoint is the between-group difference in change in body mass index from baseline to 2 years after single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy. Secondary endpoints include additional weight loss outcomes, the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease, surgical and postoperative complications, obesity-related comorbidities, nutritional status, bone mineral density, gastrointestinal symptoms, quality of life, and rates of revisional and conversion surgery. All endpoints will be evaluated at 2 and 5 years after surgery. Statistical analyses utilize linear mixed models and analysis of covariance within an intention-to-treat framework. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide high-level evidence with robust and comparative outcome data on single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, aiming to clarify the clinical utility of single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass and inform surgical practice. Findings will address gaps in medium- and long-term evidence regarding weight loss, safety, comorbidity resolution, and quality of life following single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy of citicoline as an add-on therapy in Parkinson's disease: a randomized, double-blind trial.

BACKGROUND: Citicoline is a promising therapeutic option for improving both motor and non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) beyond levodopa and other standard dopaminergic treatments. OBJECTIVES: The CITIPARK study evaluated the efficacy and safety of citicoline in improving clinical outcomes and quality of life (QOL) in PD patients on dopaminergic therapies. METHODS: The randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial compared citicoline (1000 mg/day intramuscular, two six-week cycles) with placebo for 24 weeks in PD under stable medications. The primary endpoint was change in Movement Disorder Society-Unified PD Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) total score; secondary endpoints included motor and non-motor subscores, QOL, clinical global impression (CGI) and safety. RESULTS: The study enrolled 485 participants, randomizing 474 (citicoline: 303; placebo: 171). Citicoline significantly increased the likelihood of achieving a minimal clinically important difference compared with placebo (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.06-3.99; P = 0.031) on the MDS-UDPRS total score in the modified intention-to-treat population. Among secondary outcomes, the citicoline group showed greater improvement in motor function (MDS-UPDRS III -2.97 vs -0.13; p = 0.009) and a greater improvement on CGI -II and CGI-III (3.26 vs 3.59; p = 0.021 and 9.30 vs 10.38; p = 0.018, respectively). AEs occurred in 22.1% and 27.1% of the citicoline and placebo groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Citicoline was well tolerated and associated with motor benefits compared with placebo in a highly compliant population. The results suggest a role of citicoline as a safe and possibly effective supportive therapy in PD treated with concomitant dopaminergic agents.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Recombinant vs Standard Influenza Vaccine in Adults With Severe Obesity: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with severe obesity are at increased risk of severe influenza and may have impaired immune responses to vaccination. Recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV) may provide enhanced protection compared with egg-based standard-dose influenza vaccine (SD), but data in this high-risk population are limited. METHODS: The AP-HP FLUO trial (NCT05409612) was an open-label, randomized clinical trial conducted in 15 centers in France (November 2022-March 2023) with 6 months of follow-up. Adults with BMI ≥35 kg/m2 were randomized 1:1 to receive RIV or SD, using minimization by center, age (<50 vs ≥50 years), and BMI (<40 vs ≥40 kg/m2). The primary outcome was the ratio (RIV/SD) of geometric mean hemagglutinin-inhibition (HAI) titers (GMTs) for 4 influenza strains 28 days after vaccination. Safety and reactogenicity were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 206 participants were included (104 RIV, 102 SD). Median age was 50 years, 60.2% were women, and median BMI was 41.0 kg/m2. At Day 28, GMT ratios favored RIV for A/H1N1 (1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.3), A/H3N2 (2.0; 95% CI, 1.3-3.2), and B/Yamagata (1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.8), but not for B/Victoria (0.9; 95% CI, 0.6-1.3). The effect did not vary significantly across the different age and BMI groups. By Day 180, titers did not differ significantly. Reactogenicity and safety profiles were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In adults with severe obesity, RIV elicited stronger short-term humoral immune responses than an egg-based standard-dose vaccine, suggesting potential additional benefit for influenza prevention in this vulnerable population.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Effect of an oral complementary medicine combination for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Many individuals use complementary medicine therapies for osteoarthritis, despite limited scientific supporting evidence. These therapies have demonstrated anti-inflammatory, antioxidative, and chondroprotective effects via different molecular pathways, suggesting potential therapeutic benefits. This trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel oral complementary medicine combination in adults with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis at 12 weeks. DESIGN: The 12-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled ATLAS trial was conducted in Australia from July 2024 to April 2025 (ACTRN12623000380695). Eligible participants were aged ≥40 years with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis and radiographic Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥2. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive the complementary medicine combination, comprising a total daily dose of Boswellia serrata extract 250 mg, pine bark extract 100 mg, methylsulfonylmethane 1500 mg, curcumin 500 mg, and piperine 5 mg, or placebo. The primary outcome was the 12-week change in knee pain (0-100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS)). A 95% confidence interval excluding differences >18 mm between groups was interpreted as the absence of a clinically meaningful difference. Harms were monitored weekly. RESULTS: Eighty-four participants were recruited (mean [SD], age 63.7 [8.0] years, BMI 29.0 [5.5] kg/m2), and 57% were female. At 12-weeks, both groups (intention-to-treat population: complementary medicine, n=42; placebo, n=41) showed a decrease in VAS pain (least squares means: complementary medicine 20.1 mm vs placebo 20.3 mm), however with no difference between groups: 0.16 mm (95% CI -6.81 to 7.12). The safety profile of experiencing any AE was similar between groups (risk difference, -3.4% [95% CI -24.8-17.9%]); and most adverse events were mild or moderate. Four participants experienced serious adverse events, unrelated to the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The complementary medicine combination was not superior to placebo for improving pain over 12 weeks, and the evidence does not support the use of this combination to treat people with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Ultrasound-guided high-voltage vs conventional pulsed radiofrequency in elderly cervical radiculopathy: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients with cervical radiculopathy present therapeutic challenges owing to comorbidities and medication-related risks. Long-term pharmacotherapy and surgical interventions are often suboptimal, necessitating evaluation of optimized pulsed radiofrequency strategies under image guidance. OBJECTIVES: This superiority trial compared the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root high-voltage pulsed radiofrequency (HVP-PRF) versus conventional pulsed radiofrequency (C-PRF) for pain management in elderly patients with cervical radiculopathy. METHODS: This single-center, parallel-group, assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial enrolled patients aged 60-85 years with cervical radiculopathy, randomly assigned (1:1) to HVP-PRF (70 V) or C-PRF (45 V). Procedures were performed under ultrasound guidance with sensory/motor stimulation confirmation and temperature ≤42°C. The primary outcome was change in upper-limb radiating pain on the Numeric Rating Scale (ΔNRS) from baseline to 3 months. Secondary outcomes included Neck Disability Index (NDI), neck pain NRS, Patient Global Impression of Change, responder rates, rescue analgesia use, and adverse events. Follow-up occurred at 1 week, 1, and 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were randomized and 101 received treatment. At 3 months, HVP-PRF demonstrated significantly greater radiating pain improvement versus C-PRF (adjusted mean difference 1.24, 95% CI 0.46-2.02, P=0.002). Functional improvement (NDI) was superior in the HVP-PRF group at 3 months (AMD 6.47, 95% CI 2.11-10.83, P=0.004). Responder rates (≥50% pain reduction) were higher with HVP-PRF at 3 months (68.75% vs. 42.22%, OR 3.01, P=0.011) and 6 months (65.22% vs. 43.18%, OR 2.52, P=0.035). Rescue analgesic use was lower in the HVP-PRF group during 1-3 months intervals (both P<0.05). Adverse event rates were comparable (27.45% vs. 32.00%). CONCLUSION: Under ultrasound visualization and electrical stimulation-based target confirmation with temperature control ≤42°C, HVP-PRF provided greater and more durable relief of upper limb radiating pain compared with C-PRF in elderly patients with cervical radiculopathy, with a comparable safety profile.

Humans↗