SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

2,213 records · Page 11Linked to original sources

PubMed2026

Assessment of temporomandibular joint space changes after orthognathic surgery in skeletal malocclusion patients: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To interpret postoperative changes in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) joint space dimensions and condylar position following orthognathic surgery in patients with skeletal malocclusions, and to determine whether reported alterations represent clinically meaningful displacement or physiological adaptive remodeling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, and Cochrane Library was performed to assess pre- and postoperative TMJ changes using three-dimensional imaging. Joint spaces including anterior (AJS), superior (SJS), and posterior (PJS) and condylar morphology were evaluated. Methodological quality was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist. Due to methodological and clinical heterogeneity, findings were synthesized narratively with attention to malocclusion type and surgical movement. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies consisting 628 patients undergoing BSSO, Le Fort I osteotomy, vertical ramus osteotomy, or bimaxillary surgery were included. Most studies reported minor, adaptive postoperative changes in AJS, SJS, and PJS. Class II patients showed more consistent increases in AJS/SJS, whereas Class III patients demonstrated variable posterior or anterior remodelling depending on surgical movement. Volumetric analyses revealed region-specific adaptations without significant condylar displacement. Postoperative temporomandibular disorder symptoms were infrequent, and no consistent evidence supported detrimental TMJ effects attributable to surgery. CONCLUSION: Postoperative TMJ joint space changes after orthognathic surgery primarily represent physiological adaptive remodeling rather than pathological condylar displacement, with reported variability driven by malocclusion type, surgical movement, fixation method, and imaging protocol. Recognizing these predictable patterns is essential to prevent overinterpretation of postoperative imaging and to improve clinical assessment through standardized three-dimensional and long-term evaluation strategies.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Multi-omics reveals that burdock seed aglycone alleviates renal fibrosis by restoring mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation function.

Renal fibrosis (RF), a common pathological process driving chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression to end-stage renal failure, is closely associated with oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). Arctigenin (ATG), the main active component of burdock seed, exhibits anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic activities, but its mechanisms in RF treatment remain unclear. Here, we performed integrated transcriptomic and proteomic analyses to identify key targets and pathways of ATG in a unilateral ureteral obstruction-induced rat RF model. Multi-omics enrichment analysis revealed that NDUFS8 and NDUFS2 were the core targets of ATG, with the OXPHOS pathway as the central intersecting pathway. Our results suggest that ATG exerts anti-renal fibrosis effects by targeting the OXPHOS pathway to inhibit excessive reactive oxygen species production and oxidative stress. SIGNIFICANCE: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) continues to impose an escalating global health and socioeconomic burden, while renal fibrosis (RF), as the convergent pathological endpoint of virtually all progressive nephropathies, remains the principal determinant of irreversible renal failure and adverse clinical outcomes. Despite extensive efforts to develop antifibrotic therapies, effective clinical interventions remain elusive, largely due to the complex and multifactorial nature of RF pathogenesis. In this study, we employed an integrated multi-omics framework encompassing transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics to systematically decipher the antifibrotic mechanism of arctigenin (ATG), a bioactive natural compound derived from traditional Chinese medicine. Our findings identify mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation as the pivotal regulatory axis underlying the renoprotective effects of ATG and further establish key catalytic subunits of mitochondrial complex I as its direct molecular targets. Mechanistically, ATG not only restores complex I activity and reprograms mitochondrial energy metabolism but also preserves the intracellular stability and localization of these subunits, thereby preventing their aberrant release-mediated inflammatory activation and disrupting the self-perpetuating cycle linking metabolic dysfunction, inflammation, and fibrosis progression. Beyond revealing a previously unrecognized dual mechanism integrating metabolic and inflammatory regulation, this study provides compelling evidence that mitochondrial dysfunction is not merely a secondary consequence of tissue injury but a fundamental driver of fibrotic remodeling. Importantly, our work highlights the translational potential of natural product-based mitochondrial interventions for CKD treatment and supports a broader conceptual shift toward metabolism-centered therapeutic strategies for chronic fibrotic diseases. Given the central role of mitochondrial dysfunction across multiple organs, these findings may also have far-reaching implications for the treatment of systemic fibrosis-related disorders beyond the kidney.

Animals↗

PubMed2025

Instruments to Assess Bidirectional Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review.

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a significant public health issue that affects individuals, families, and society in profound ways. Over the years, research has often shown that such IPV is predominantly one-sided, with men as perpetrators and women as victims. However, more recent studies have revealed that IPV is frequently bidirectional, with both partners potentially being victims, perpetrators, or both. Despite this growing awareness, little is known about the tools used to assess bidirectional violence (BV). This systematic review aims to synthesize the published scientific literature on the instruments used to assess bidirectional IPV among adult men and women. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a search was conducted across databases such as PubMed, B-on, Web of Science, and Scielo. Fifty studies published between 2012 and 2024 met the inclusion criteria. Most of the studies were conducted with community samples recruited through online questionnaires. The Conflict Tactics Scale emerged as the most used instrument for evaluating BV, demonstrating robust psychometric properties. BV prevalence rates ranged from 2% to 98.4% and remained generally consistent across different instruments, except in the case of male reports. However, the limited number of studies on interpartner agreements and the reliance on single-partner self-reports pose challenges to the accuracy of these estimates. While this systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of the instruments used to assess BV, it underscores the need for future research to develop more precise, context-sensitive tools, that incorporate reports from both partners to improve the accuracy of BV assessment.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Extended Long-Term Effects of Cognitive and Aerobic Training on Cognitive Function in Patients With Stress-Related Exhaustion Disorder: A 4.5-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Stress-related conditions like clinical burnout and exhaustion disorder (ED) are associated with enduring cognitive problems. We have previously demonstrated that the addition of computerised cognitive training (CCT) and aerobic training (AT) to a multimodal rehabilitation programme (MMR) yielded greater improvements in cognitive function compared to MMR alone in patients with ED. These effects were maintained at the 1-year follow-up for CCT, but not for AT. Building on these findings, the present study examined the extended long-term effects of CCT and AT on cognitive function, psychological health, and work ability, 4.5 years after the interventions. Participants were recruited from a stress-rehabilitation clinic and 56 of the initial 132 participants returned for the 4.5-year follow-up. Assessments were conducted before (T1), immediately after (T2), 1-year after (T3) and 4.5-years after (T4) the interventions. Mixed model analyses assessed changes in the intervention groups relative to the control group from T1 to T4, with follow-up comparisons examining within-group stability of outcomes between T3 to T4. The primary outcome was cognitive performance on a global cognitive score. Secondary outcomes included domain-specific cognitive functioning, self-reported cognitive function, psychological health (burnout, depression, anxiety, and fatigue), and work ability. The analysis revealed sustained long-term effects on the global cognitive score, a trained updating task and episodic memory in the CCT group, with stable performance between one- and 4.5-year follow-up. The addition of AT did not yield any extended long-term effects on cognitive performance. Both groups showed extended long-term improvements in self-reported memory problems, although findings were mixed. Extended long-term improvements were observed on burnout for both groups, with additional effects on anxiety and work ability in the AT group. Notably, these effects were not present at the 1-year follow-up and are more plausibly explained by selective attrition rather than a delayed intervention effect. In conclusion, the result indicates that cognitive interventions such as CCT can have lasting positive effects on cognitive function in patients with ED, whereas the long-term psychological effects should be interpreted with caution. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT0073772.

Adult↗

PubMed2026

Optimizing smoking cessation pharmacotherapy and counseling for adult primary care patients: a factorial randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Even with the most effective smoking cessation pharmacotherapies (i.e., varenicline or combination nicotine replacement [C-NRT]), the majority of people ultimately return to smoking. This research explored how to optimize the use of varenicline and C-NRT to promote smoking cessation. METHODS: Primary care patients participated in a 2x2x2x2 factorial experiment that evaluated 4 factors: 1) Medication Type (Varenicline vs. C-NRT [patch + mini-lozenge]), 2) Preparation (pre-quit) Medication (4 Weeks vs. Standard); 3) Medication Duration (Extended [24 weeks] vs. Standard [12 weeks]); and 4) Counseling Type (Cessation Counseling [4 sessions] vs. Referral Support [2 sessions focused on use of referral resources]). This study was discontinued prior to reaching the proposed sample size (N = 608) due to pandemic-related budgetary constraints. RESULTS: Participants (N = 496) were 55% women and 45.6% Black individuals. There were no statistically significant main effects of the 4 factors on abstinence at 12, 26 or 52 weeks. There was a 3-way interaction between Medication Type, Preparation Medication, and Counseling Type (p = 0.04) predicting the primary outcome of biochemically confirmed abstinence at 52 weeks; cessation counseling vs. referral support improved varenicline quit rates when 4 weeks versus 1 week of pre-quit medication was offered. For C-NRT, counseling type did not significantly improve quit rates regardless of the use of preparation medication. CONCLUSIONS: There was no robust evidence that enhanced pre-quit or extended duration of varenicline or C-NRT increased abstinence rates. More intensive counseling may support cessation for different pharmacotherapy regimens. Given the lack of consistent findings, this research should be viewed as exploratory to guide future research.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Comparative Efficacy of Non-opioid Analgesic Drugs for Chronic Cancer Pain: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: While opioids remain the primary pharmacological intervention for cancer pain management, their clinical utility is frequently compromised by dose-limiting toxicities. This study aimed to determine the comparative efficacy, opioid-sparing potential, and clinical hierarchy of non-opioid adjuvant drug classes. The study was structured around the PICO framework to evaluate the pharmacological strategies currently utilized in multimodal clinical oncology. METHODS: A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane) was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2000 and 2025. The primary outcome was global analgesic efficacy (standardized mean difference [SMD]), while secondary outcomes included the opioid-sparing effect, defined as the percentage reduction in morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) and the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (Harms). A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to rank treatments using SUCRA values. The methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB 2.0) tool. RESULTS: Twenty-three RCTs (n = 1845) met the inclusion criteria. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (-1.10) and anticonvulsants (-1.06) demonstrated the most robust analgesic effects. The SUCRA ranking confirmed a clear hierarchy, with the combination of anticonvulsants and antidepressants showing the highest probability of efficacy. A significant opioid-sparing effect was observed for gabapentinoids and ketamine, facilitating MEDD reduction. While serious adverse events were rare, minor harms (somnolence, dizziness) were more frequent in the most effective classes. CONCLUSION: Our NMA provides a robust evidence base for a "Clinical Tier" system, ranking adjuvants by their balance of efficacy and safety. These findings support the early integration of Tier I agents (anticonvulsants and NSAIDs) to optimize pain control and reduce opioid-related toxicities in chronic cancer pain management.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Improving survival in Duchenne muscular dystrophy across eras: a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) was historically associated with death in the late teens or early twenties, mainly from respiratory failure. Survival has improved substantially with home mechanical ventilation (HMV) and multidisciplinary care, although variability remains. This study evaluated temporal trends in survival in DMD and the impact of HMV. METHODS: A study-level cumulative meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD420251163011) of studies reporting survival outcomes in patients with DMD was conducted (PubMed 1977 to 13 October 2025). Pooled estimates of median survival were calculated, and random-effects meta-analyses with predefined subgroups (HMV and study period) were performed, alongside meta-regressions. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: 53 studies (median follow-up 8 years), comprising more than 13,000 patients, of whom 60% received HMV, were included. Median survival differed substantially between ventilated (29 years, 95%CI 27 to 31) and non-ventilated (19 years, 95%CI 18 to 20) patients. Survival improved progressively over time in both groups. Glucocorticoid therapy was not associated with improved survival (p=0.45), whereas treatment with heart failure medications, including renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (p=0.002) and β-blockers (p=0.02), was associated with longer survival. The predominance of mortality shifted from respiratory to cardiac causes, while enhanced cardiac management was associated with a growing contribution of other causes of death. CONCLUSION: Survival in DMD has increased substantially over time, with median survival now approaching the third decade of life among ventilated patients. The growing contribution of cardiac and other non-respiratory causes of death highlights the importance of long-term multidisciplinary and early cardioprotective intervention. STUDY REGISTRATION: The meta-analysis and systematic review have been registered on PROSPERO (CRD420251163011).

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Hope is linked with more favorable tumor molecular signatures in serous ovarian cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Hope has been associated with improved quality of life and lower mortality in cancer, but the underlying biological mechanisms are poorly characterized. We previously reported that hope was associated with less inflammation and more normalized diurnal cortisol pre-treatment among women with ovarian cancer. We also reported associations of socio-environmental factors with pro-metastatic processes. Here, we used genome-wide transcriptional profiling to quantify associations between hope and tumor molecular signatures reflecting invasiveness, inflammation, and cellular immunity. METHOD: Participants were 74 women with serous ovarian cancer who provided demographic information and completed surveys pre-surgery. Hope was assessed using a face-valid item from the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Depression was assessed using the full CES-D without the hope item. Illumina HT12 microarrays were used to assay tumor RNA, and associations between hope and tumor gene expression were quantified, adjusting for depression, age, BMI, grade, and stage. RESULTS: Adjusting for covariates, hope was associated with multiple favorable differences in RNA expression, including lower levels of mesenchymal differentiation (p = 0.008) and pro-inflammatory gene regulation (NF-κB: p < 0.001; IRF1: p = 0.024; STAT: p = 0.018), elevated epithelial differentiation (p = 0.011), and elevated activity of the IRF7 transcription factor which promotes cellular immunity (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that hope is associated with an ovarian tumor gene expression profile characterized by reduced epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and inflammatory activity, and increased activity of a transcription factor promoting cellular immunity. These findings highlight potential biological implications of a resilience factor such as hope, but need replication with more robust assessments of hope.

Epithelial mesenchymal transition↗

PubMed2026

Randomized study of the effects of testosterone administration on severity of asthma in horses.

BACKGROUND: Low testosterone concentrations are associated with poor lung function in human asthmatics, and androgen administration improves airway obstruction in women with asthma. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: Testosterone improves clinical scores, lung function, airway neutrophilia, and airway remodeling in horses with severe asthma. ANIMALS: Ten horses affected by severe asthma from a research herd. METHODS: In a randomized, blinded, crossover study, horses received dexamethasone (0.06 mg/kg PO q24h for 10 days) or a single intramuscular injection of testosterone cypionate (0.35 mg/kg), with a 2-week washout period. Clinical respiratory scores were assessed at days 0, 2, 5, and 10; lung function was evaluated at days 0, 5, and 10; and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cytology and central airway remodeling at days 0 and 10. Mixed linear models were used for analysis. RESULTS: The respiratory clinical scores improved with dexamethasone administration (median [95% CI], from 12 (9-13) to 5 (3-6), P < .001), and remained unchanged with testosterone administration (from 10 [8-12] to 9 [8-11], P = .6). Pulmonary elastance improved with both treatments, but the effect was more pronounced with dexamethasone administration (from 5.1 cm H2O/L [2.4-5.8] to 0.5 [0.4-0.8], P < .001) than with testosterone administration (from 4.5 cm H2O/L [1.6-8.5] to 3.0 [1.0-4.1], P = .04). Pleural pressure and pulmonary resistance decreased only with dexamethasone. Neither treatment altered airway neutrophilia or bronchial remodeling. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Testosterone is less effective than dexamethasone and only mildly improves pulmonary elastance in horses with severe asthma.

Animals↗

PubMed2026

Vertical distribution of accessory canals in different tooth types: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically analyze the vertical distribution of accessory canals and propose potential root-end resection levels in different tooth types. DATA: Proportional distribution of accessory canals (PD-AC) in 1 mm intervals, cumulative proportions within 2 mm and 3 mm (CP-AC0-2 and CP-AC0-3), mean distance from accessory foramen to root apex or main foramen (MD-AF), and prevalence of accessory canals in 2D cross-sections (PR-AC-2D). SOURCES: A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted through December 25, 2025. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251107855). STUDY SELECTION: Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the AQUA tool. Nineteen studies were included for qualitative synthesis, of which eleven provided sufficient data for meta-analysis. A random-effects model was used, and subgroup analyses were stratified by tooth type, accessory canal type, and country. Within 0-1 mm, 1-2 mm, 2-3 mm, and 3-4 mm from the apex, 41.5%, 34.3%, 9.9%, and 4.4% of accessory canals were located, respectively. Molars had significantly higher proportions than anterior teeth both within 2 mm (90.0% vs. 72.4%) and 3 mm (96.9% vs. 87.5%). Of apical ramifications, 86.4% were within 2 mm. The pooled MD-AF was 1.472 mm. PR-AC-2D decreased from 29.3% at 1 mm to 1.3% at 5 mm. All studies presented moderate to high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: A 2 mm root-end resection level may be sufficient for molars, whereas anterior teeth may require a higher level. Further randomized controlled trials are needed. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: A 2 mm resection may adequately expose or remove most accessory canals in molars, potentially preserving more root length while maintaining treatment efficacy. In anterior teeth, a traditional 3 mm resection remains advisable until further evidence becomes available.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Quantitative Outcomes for Shared Assessment and Management in Forensic Mental Health: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Despite leading models of mental health care encouraging user involvement, users in forensic mental health (FMH) report poor involvement given the difficulty in reconciling shared approaches with risk-averse and legally mandated settings. While previous research has demonstrated qualitative benefits to shared approaches in FMH and has led to a proliferation of self-rated assessment tools, there remains to quantify agreement on self-rated tools and to clarify the impact of shared approaches on care. This meta-analysis examines (1) the correlation between clinician and user ratings, (2) the predictive validity of self-ratings for violence, and (3) the effects of shared risk management on violence and restriction in FMH. Five databases were searched from inception to April 2024, selecting for adult FMH inpatients, shared risk assessment, needs assessment or violence management as interventions, and quantitative outcomes (correlation, agreement, predictive validity, and effect on violence or restriction rates). Fifteen quantitative evaluations were retained. One of three planned meta-analyses could be conducted, with seven records providing paired clinician-user t-tests. Eleven more records provided clinical recommendations on operationalizing shared approaches. Random-effects meta-analysis showed a significant and large paired standard difference of .95 (95% CI = [.49,1.42]) across tools, with significant differences in DUNDRUM-3, DUNDRUM-4, and CANFOR sub-models. While acknowledging between-study heterogeneity, results substantiate quantitative differences where clinicians generally rate more needs and lesser progress than users across tools, showing that self-ratings can and should be used to broach collaborative discussions on needs and progress during FMH treatment. There remains an evidence gap for quantitative benefits in care outcomes and a need to standardize agreement measures for future comparisons and clinical sub-group analyses.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy vs Media Literacy for Prevention of Gaming Disorder and Unspecified Internet Use Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Mitigating the harmful effects of digitalization on youth mental health is essential. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) compared with a media literacy-based intervention for gaming disorder and unspecified internet use disorder and to determine whether universal or indicated prevention yields stronger benefits. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: PROTECTconfirm was a randomized clinical trial conducted from July 1, 2020, to August 31, 2024, across 44 secondary schools in Baden-Württemberg, Germany, with 1-, 4-, and 12-month follow-up. All students were included in universal prevention analyses, whereas indicated prevention analyses included a subgroup of adolescents at high risk meeting 2 or more Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) criteria for gaming disorder or unspecified internet use disorder at baseline. INTERVENTIONS: Students were individually randomized within 90 classes to PROTECTtraining, a CBT-based program; or PROTECTinfo, a structurally parallel media literacy program. Both consisted of four 90-minute sessions delivered weekly during school hours by trained local prevention professionals under live supervision and adherence protocols. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was gaming disorder symptom severity and unspecified internet use disorder symptom severity, assessed at 12 months with a modified version of the Video Game Dependency Scale. Secondary outcomes included internalizing, externalizing, and transdiagnostic symptoms. Primary and secondary outcomes were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: A total of 1793 students were randomized to PROTECTtraining (n = 896; mean [SD] age, 13.1 [1.5] years; 498 male students [56.1%]) or PROTECTinfo (n = 897; mean [SD] age, 13.1 [1.5] years; 484 male students [54.8%]). Participants in the subsample of 205 adolescents at high risk showed significantly lower 12-month severity of gaming disorder and unspecified internet use disorder symptoms with PROTECTtraining than with PROTECTinfo (mean [SD] Modified Video Game Dependency Scale score: 14.7 [9.7] vs 17.7 [10.3]; within-group Cohen d = -0.91 [95% CI, -1.10 to -0.72] vs Cohen d = -0.61 [95% CI, -0.80 to -0.42]; between-group Cohen d = -0.30 [95% CI, -0.55 to -0.05]), but not in the total sample (mean [SD] Modified Video Game Dependency Scale score: PROTECTtraining, 8.8 [8.3] vs PROTECTinfo, 9.4 [8.4]; within-group Cohen d = -0.11 [95% CI, -0.18 to -0.05] vs Cohen d = -0.04 [95% CI, -0.11 to 0.02]; between-group Cohen d = -0.07 [95% CI, -0.16 to 0.01]). Secondary outcomes did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial of 1793 adolescents, the CBT-based intervention reduced gaming disorder symptoms and unspecified internet use disorder symptoms more effectively than the media literacy-based intervention among adolescents at high risk. These findings support the use of CBT-based approaches primarily within indicated, rather than universal, prevention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) trial registration: DRKS00033989.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Evaluating the utility of melatonin in spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Spine surgery is increasingly performed worldwide, and acute postoperative stressors such as pain and anxiety remain highly prevalent despite historical management with opioids and other pharmacological agents. Recently, interest has emerged in melatonin administration given its endogenous physiological roles, low cost, favorable adverse event profile, and documented benefits throughout surgical literature. PURPOSE: This study aims to consolidate the existing evidence on melatonin's utility specifically in spine surgery, an area not yet comprehensively evaluated, to inform clinical practice and enhance spine surgeon comprehension. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Preregistered on PROSPERO, this systematic review queried PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science on November 21st, 2025, for studies reporting outcomes following melatonin administration in patients undergoing spine surgery. METHODS: Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 tool. Extracted variables included demographics, comparator medications, dosages, and other relevant details. Statistical analyses included frequency-weighted means (FWMs), associated standard deviations, narrative syntheses, and limited meta-analyses, where appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 6 moderate-quality randomized trials were included from 749 screened. Melatonin (3-10 mg) was administered to 227 patients (FWM age=43.3±8.6 years; 46.2% male; BMI=26.6±3.2 kg/m2), placebo to 125 patients (age=43.2±10.1 years; 60% male; BMI=28.5±4.3 kg/m2), and active pharmacologic comparators (fentanyl, gabapentin, dexmedetomidine, zolpidem) to 151 patients (age=46.6±8.9 years; 40.5% male; BMI=26.3±3.5 kg/m2). Procedures primarily involved uncomplicated lumbar laminectomies (1-4 levels), with outcomes assessed up to 24 hours postoperatively. Melatonin was associated with significant improvements in early postoperative VAS-pain scores, blood-pressure-related, analgesic-related, and anxiety-related outcomes versus placebo across most reporting studies. Compared with active pharmacologic agents, significant benefits were observed only in select nausea- and anxiety-related instances. Limited meta-analysis (n=2) demonstrated higher 24-hour VAS-pain for melatonin versus gabapentin, though mean difference was near-negligible and harbored extensive statistical constraints. CONCLUSION: Melatonin demonstrates variable utility following spine surgery, with generally consistent anxiolysis and frequent benefit versus placebo but less consistent and comparatively weaker efficacy relative to active pharmacologic comparators. Future outcome-homogenous studies incorporating more granular, expansive comparator arms and more robust quantitative analyses are needed to further elucidate melatonin's role in advancing spine care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

A narrative review of what cohorts have taught us and how they have laid the foundation for much of our understanding of type 2 diabetes.

This narrative review provides a historical perspective on how observational research on type 2 diabetes has been developed and consolidated over the last 50 years and how well-designed cohort studies will provide us with knowledge for research and practice in the future and aid guideline development. We have included data from a large number of cohorts from every continent that have been used to study the development and/or progression of type 2 diabetes, including cohorts that are general population-based, disease-based, intervention-based and registry-based. We have structured the results from the past 50 years based on the following themes: diagnosis and screening, complications, risk factors and pathophysiology. We also discuss the strengths and weaknesses of observational research when compared with other research designs. Finally, we discuss the emerging and future directions for type 2 diabetes research using cohorts, which include novel developments, such as artificial intelligence, precision health and the exposome. We conclude that cohort research has significantly advanced our understanding of type 2 diabetes and aided guideline development, and complements experimental work, such as human randomised controlled trials and animal studies. Both approaches are essential and complementary in our pursuit to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the development and progression of type 2 diabetes, and to change dogma, practice and policies for better outcomes.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

What's the meta now? More updates on the problems with systematic reviews.

BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews are intended to provide trustworthy evidence synthesis, yet previous iterations of this living review have identified numerous recurring problems in their conduct and reporting. This article presents the third version and second update of the living systematic review examining issues raised across the academic literature. METHODS: Using consistent eligibility criteria and methods from earlier versions, literature searches were updated to May 2025. Eligible meta-research and editorial articles describing problems with systematic reviews were analyzed to identify emerging themes. Additionally, four basic indicators of methodological quality of the included meta-research were presented across review versions. RESULTS: The update included 209 additional articles. Critically low methodological quality and absence of protocols remained among the most frequently reported issues in systematic reviews across disciplines and journals but notably in evidence underpinning clinical practice guidelines. Spin in abstracts and conflicts of interest continued to be common. Apparent improvements in reporting quality were inconsistent, with modest gains in some full-text reporting but persistent deficiencies in abstracts. Authorship diversity of systematic reviews improved in gender representation but remained geographically concentrated in high-income countries, and primary research included in reviews similarly lacked global representativeness. The issue of misalignment between systematic review evidence bases and global burden of disease bring the total number of problems with systematic reviews to 69. Emerging use of automation and artificial intelligence was variably reported. Descriptive comparison of meta-research articles over the three versions of this living review suggests a greater proportion meeting basic quality indicators in more recent updates. CONCLUSION: Across successive updates, problems with systematic reviews remain widespread and consistent rather than isolated. Incremental reporting improvements coexist with persistent concerns about transparency, bias, and representativeness. Future efforts should prioritize evaluating interventions and aligning research incentives to support genuinely trustworthy evidence synthesis.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Serum Copeptin Rises After Tolvaptan for Hyponatraemia, but Does Not Predict Risk of Rapid Sodium Rise: Pre-Specified Secondary Analysis of the TVFR Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Hyponatraemia is a common electrolyte disorder often driven by excess arginine vasopressin (AVP). Copeptin is a stable surrogate marker co-secreted with AVP. It is unclear whether treatment of hyponatraemia with tolvaptan, an AVP-V2 receptor antagonist, impacts copeptin. We aimed to assess the effects of tolvaptan on serum copeptin, compared to fluid restriction. DESIGN: Pre-specified secondary analysis of an open-label randomised trial comparing tolvaptan or fluid restriction for 3 days. PATIENTS: Hospitalised patients with plasma sodium (pNa) 115-130 mmol/L at a single-centre tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia. MEASUREMENTS: Copeptin measured at baseline and completion (Day 4, or discharge if sooner). RESULTS: Copeptin results were available in 45/54 participants, randomised to tolvaptan (n = 25) or FR (n = 20). Mean baseline copeptin was 10.4 pmol/L. pNa increased in both groups, significantly more with tolvaptan as previously reported. Copeptin remained stable after FR, but significantly increased after tolvaptan (mean adjusted difference between groups over 3 days 8.4 pmol/L, 95% CI 2.1-14.6, p = 0.01). Baseline copeptin did not predict rapid sodium rise. The rise in copeptin after tolvaptan may represent an exaggerated response to osmolality rise in these patients ('reset osmostat'), or feedback mechanisms from AVP blockade. CONCLUSION: Tolvaptan increased serum copeptin compared to fluid restriction. Further research is required to determine if there is clinical utility for measuring copeptin in hyponatraemia before it is adopted into practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12619001683123.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Diagnostic value of blood p-tau subtypes in Alzheimer's disease progression and pathology: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative disease and the most likely to lead to dementia. With the availability of the latest therapies, the need for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis is now gradually increasing. Whereas blood phosphorylated-tau (p-tau) has demonstrated excellent performance in the prediction and diagnosis of disease progression and Aβ positivity in AD, there are differences between different p-tau subtypes. Therefore, a pooled analysis of different blood p-tau subtypes is of more important clinical value. METHOD: Relevant literature was screened by complete search in four databases, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Scopus. Relevant data and AUC and their confidence intervals of the included literature were extracted and analyzed by classification according to p-tau subtypes. Quality assessment was performed using the QUADAS-2 tool. RESULT: Our results reveal that p-tau217 performs better in the diagnostic performance in most stages of AD, which is consistent with the guidelines. However, our results concluded that p-tau217 has poorer diagnostic performance in the stages of cognitive unimpaired or less cognitively impaired, especially in the Aβ positivity diagnosis of SCD and CU. Head-to-head meta-analyses formally confirmed that p-tau217 significantly outperforms p-tau181 across AD dementia, Aβ positivity, tau positivity, and biological staging (all P < 0.05), whereas no significant difference was observed between p-tau231 and p-tau181. CONCLUSION: By integrating single-arm pooled AUC estimates with formal head-to-head statistical comparisons, our study provides evidence-based support for plasma p-tau217 as the subtype with the most robust diagnostic performance across AD pathology and biological staging. Head-to-head analyses formally confirmed that p-tau217 significantly outperforms p-tau181 in Aβ positivity, Tau positivity, and biological staging.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Redefining the real problem in psychedelic trials: Why fighting the Lessebo matters more than blinding integrity.

Imperfect blinding is not specific to psychedelic trials. In randomized trials, treatment allocation is frequently correctly guessed, yet blinding integrity is rarely assessed outside of psychedelic research and is generally not considered a barrier in regulatory evaluation. The intense debate in psychedelics may reflect a broader double standard affecting mental health research, when uncertainties arising from imperfect blinding are confounded by those linked to patient-reported outcome measures. Indeed, people living with mental disorders are often viewed as unreliable reporters, despite well-documented limitations of clinician-rated scales and the absence of robust biological markers of symptomatic change. Importantly, it is the maintenance of reasonable doubt of treatment allocation that sustains internal validity and ethical feasibility of placebo-controlled designs, rather than perfect blinding. Concerns about expectancy bias in psychedelic trials are closely tied to blinding debates. When allocation is inferred, expectations may cluster in the arm perceived as active or in stereotyped experiences and influence outcomes differently in active and control arms, leading to a risk of lessebo, a negative placebo effect due to the negative expectation related to receiving a placebo. However, we argue that an underrecognized mechanism of lessebo is disappointment. This risk may reflect insufficient clinical management of disappointment rather than pre-treatment expectation alone. We therefore propose shifting the emphasis from preserving inevitably imperfect blinding towards mitigating disappointment in both arms. Establishing non-stereotyped expectations prior to treatment through structured psychoeducation, strengthened therapeutic alliance, and realistic preparation would help avoid lessebo effects. Such strategies would enhance ethical rigor, interpretability, and the clinical usefulness of psychedelic trials.

Humans↗