A narrative review of what cohorts have taught us and how they have laid the foundation for much of our understanding of type 2 diabetes.

Sun H Kim; Ipsa Arora; Charles Agyemang; Ranjit M Anjana; Bj&#xf8;rn Olav &#xc5;svold; Marieke Blom; Shilpa N Bhupathiraju; Am&#xe9;lie Bonnefond; Juliana C N Chan; Timothy M E Davis; Kristian Hveem; Marit E J&#xf8;rgensen; Anton Lager; Lars Lind; Olle Melander; Andrea Natali; Jackie Price; Parminder Raina; Michael Roden; Olov Rolandsson; Mary R Rooney; Seyed Mohammad Mousavi; Andrei C Sposito; Reimar W Thomsen; Barbara Thorand; Rob M Van Dam; Kavita Venkataraman; Sarah H Wild; Ji Hee Yu; Petra J M Elders; Joline W Beulens; Femke Rutters

doi:10.1007/s00125-026-06812-4

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42644887

A narrative review of what cohorts have taught us and how they have laid the foundation for much of our understanding of type 2 diabetes.

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This narrative review provides a historical perspective on how observational research on type 2 diabetes has been developed and consolidated over the last 50 years and how well-designed cohort studies will provide us with knowledge for research and practice in the future and aid guideline development. We have included data from a large number of cohorts from every continent that have been used to study the development and/or progression of type 2 diabetes, including cohorts that are general population-based, disease-based, intervention-based and registry-based. We have structured the results from the past 50 years based on the following themes: diagnosis and screening, complications, risk factors and pathophysiology. We also discuss the strengths and weaknesses of observational research when compared with other research designs. Finally, we discuss the emerging and future directions for type 2 diabetes research using cohorts, which include novel developments, such as artificial intelligence, precision health and the exposome. We conclude that cohort research has significantly advanced our understanding of type 2 diabetes and aided guideline development, and complements experimental work, such as human randomised controlled trials and animal studies. Both approaches are essential and complementary in our pursuit to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the development and progression of type 2 diabetes, and to change dogma, practice and policies for better outcomes.

Explore related subjects

Humans Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Risk Factors Cohort Studies Animals 50 years Cohorts Knowledge Review Type 2 diabetes Journal Article

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Sun H Kim, Ipsa Arora, Charles Agyemang, Ranjit M Anjana, Bjørn Olav Åsvold, Marieke Blom, Shilpa N Bhupathiraju, Amélie Bonnefond, Juliana C N Chan, Timothy M E Davis, Kristian Hveem, Marit E Jørgensen, Anton Lager, Lars Lind, Olle Melander, Andrea Natali, Jackie Price, Parminder Raina, Michael Roden, Olov Rolandsson, Mary R Rooney, Seyed Mohammad Mousavi, Andrei C Sposito, Reimar W Thomsen, Barbara Thorand, Rob M Van Dam, Kavita Venkataraman, Sarah H Wild, Ji Hee Yu, Petra J M Elders, Joline W Beulens, Femke Rutters. 2026-08-26. A narrative review of what cohorts have taught us and how they have laid the foundation for much of our understanding of type 2 diabetes.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-026-06812-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Journal Article; Review resource Animals subject Cohort Studies subject Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 subject Humans subject Journal Article subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Metformin Adherence and Risk of Polyneuropathy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: An International Matched Cohort Study with Independent Validation.

BACKGROUND: Metformin is a popular first-line glucose-lowering medication for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Although metformin reduces the risks of various complications of diabetes, its potential to cause polyneuropathy by depleting vitamin B12 levels is concerning. This study investigated whether the adherence or discontinuation of metformin after adding-on a second-line antiglycemic agent increases the risk of polyneuropathy in patients with T2DM. METHODS: Data from TriNetX were obtained, and patients with T2DM who were receiving second-line antiglycemic agents were divided into metformin-adherent and metformin-nonadherent groups based on prescription claims data. Neuropathy incidence was evaluated using diagnostic claims and nerve conduction examinations. For independent confirmation and external validation of the primary findings, we used data from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) of Taiwan. RESULTS: After matching, 58,027 patients were included in each group. Compared with metformin adherent patients, metformin nonadherent patients had a higher risk of polyneuropathy (adjusted hazard ratios [aHR] 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-1.29; P < 0.001). Risks of diabetic foot ulcer, amputation, neuropathy-related medication use, and bone fracture were also higher among nonadherent patients. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of findings. In the validation NHIRD cohort (31,384 matched pairs), metformin nonadherence remained associated with increased polyneuropathy risk (aHR 1.25; 95% CI 1.10-1.42; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Metformin adherence in patients with T2DM who require second-line treatment may reduce the risk of polyneuropathy; vitamin B supplementation may enhance this benefit.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Baseline Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography and Polygenic Risk Profiles in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Analysis From the VOLTAIRE Study.

AIMS: To characterise baseline clinical, anatomical, and genetic cardiovascular risk profiles in participants enrolled in the VOLTAIRE (Evaluation of Polygenic Scores and CT Imaging in Risk Factor Modification in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes) study and examine concordance across these domains. METHODS: This analysis included adults with T2D who completed baseline computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) and polygenic risk score (PRS) assessment prior to randomisation in the VOLTAIRE study. Coronary atherosclerosis was evaluated using coronary artery calcium (CAC) score and CTCA-derived stenosis severity. Clinical risk was assessed using the New Zealand Society for the Study of Diabetes 5-year cardiovascular risk calculator. Polygenic risk for coronary artery disease was assessed using a genome-wide PRS and categorised into tertiles. RESULTS: Among 126 participants with T2D (mean age 57.5 ± 8.7 years; 62.7% male), coronary atherosclerotic burden was highly heterogeneous: 34.9% had CAC = 0, whereas 19.8% had CAC ≥ 400. Moderate-to-severe coronary stenosis (≥ 50%) was present in 40.5% of participants overall, including 20.4% of those classified as low clinical risk. PRS distribution was variable (low 37.3%, intermediate 35.7%, high 27.0%). Overlap between anatomical, genetic, and clinical domains was limited, with only 8.7% of participants classified as high risk across all three. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial heterogeneity and limited overlap exist between anatomical, genetic, and clinical cardiovascular risk measures in T2D. These findings support a multimodal approach to risk assessment integrating imaging and genetic profiling. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; ID: NCT07091162.

Aged↗

PubMed2026

Apoptosis protein markers in comorbid type 2 diabetes mellitus and depression; relationships with cognitive performance, incident dementia, and white matter hyperintensities.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and major depressive disorder (MDD) are reciprocal risk factors, and both elevate dementia risk. Dysregulation of programmed cell death is implicated in T2DM, MDD, and neurodegeneration, but proteomic markers of apoptosis have yet to be studied as dementia predictors in people with T2DM and/or MDD. This study examines apoptosis markers in comorbid T2DM and MDD, and their associations with cognitive, dementia, and neuroimaging outcomes. The retrospective sample (n = 15,765) consisted of UK Biobank participants (MDD only n = 1230; T2DM only n = 3644; comorbid T2DM + MDD n = 721). Individuals with T2DM + MDD comorbidity had poorer cognitive performance, and a higher 15-year dementia incidence (HR = 4.44, 95% CI = [3.23,6.11]). Among 60 apoptosis-related proteins identified by Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment, 41 were significantly up-regulated in comorbid T2DM + MDD relative to controls, and 4 were higher in the comorbid group than both T2DM alone and MDD alone. Tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 10 (TNFSF10), growth arrest and DNA damage-inducible protein GADD45 beta, tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 6, and RAC-gamma serine/threonine-protein kinase were associated with dementia risk. Nine proteins (e.g. apoptosis-inducing factor 1, mitochondrial, caspase-2, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 5, TNFSF10), were associated with white matter hyperintensity volumes in comorbid T2DM + MDD after FDR correction, but none were associated with cognitive performance, atrophy, or white matter microstructural changes. These findings identify peripheral apoptosis markers that were further elevated in comorbid T2DM + MDD compared to either alone, pointing to an important pathophysiological element underlying adverse outcomes in the context of mood and metabolic comorbidity.

Humans↗