Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 42701154

Improving survival in Duchenne muscular dystrophy across eras: a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) was historically associated with death in the late teens or early twenties, mainly from respiratory failure. Survival has improved substantially with home mechanical ventilation (HMV) and multidisciplinary care, although variability remains. This study evaluated temporal trends in survival in DMD and the impact of HMV. METHODS: A study-level cumulative meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD420251163011) of studies reporting survival outcomes in patients with DMD was conducted (PubMed 1977 to 13 October 2025). Pooled estimates of median survival were calculated, and random-effects meta-analyses with predefined subgroups (HMV and study period) were performed, alongside meta-regressions. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: 53 studies (median follow-up 8 years), comprising more than 13,000 patients, of whom 60% received HMV, were included. Median survival differed substantially between ventilated (29 years, 95%CI 27 to 31) and non-ventilated (19 years, 95%CI 18 to 20) patients. Survival improved progressively over time in both groups. Glucocorticoid therapy was not associated with improved survival (p=0.45), whereas treatment with heart failure medications, including renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (p=0.002) and β-blockers (p=0.02), was associated with longer survival. The predominance of mortality shifted from respiratory to cardiac causes, while enhanced cardiac management was associated with a growing contribution of other causes of death. CONCLUSION: Survival in DMD has increased substantially over time, with median survival now approaching the third decade of life among ventilated patients. The growing contribution of cardiac and other non-respiratory causes of death highlights the importance of long-term multidisciplinary and early cardioprotective intervention. STUDY REGISTRATION: The meta-analysis and systematic review have been registered on PROSPERO (CRD420251163011).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Lara Benning, Zoe Bousraou, Bastian Gruber, Silvia Ulrich, Esther I Schwarz. 2026-09-06. Improving survival in Duchenne muscular dystrophy across eras: a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-026-14121-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A case report of Xp21 contiguous gene deletion syndrome with adrenal crisis and sensorineural hearing loss: clinical highlights and management pitfalls.

OBJECTIVES: To report a rare association of Xp21 contiguous gene deletion syndrome (CGDS) featuring sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), and to discuss the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. CASE PRESENTATION: A male infant presented with a salt-wasting adrenal crisis consistent with X-linked adrenal hypoplasia congenita. His follow-up clinical course during childhood revealed global developmental delay and SNHL, the latter of which has been under-reported in the literature for this condition. At five years of age, the development of progressive proximal muscle weakness and markedly elevated creatine phosphokinase levels led to a diagnosis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). The patient also exhibited pseudohypertriglyceridemia and elevated urinary glycerol, consistent with glycerol kinase deficiency. While initial exome sequencing failed to detect the genetic abnormality, subsequent chromosomal microarray analysis identified an Xp21 CGDS involving NR0B1, IL1RAPL1, DMD, and GK. Treatment of adrenal insufficiency with fludrocortisone and hydrocortisone was complicated by the higher steroid doses required for the management of DMD, resulting in exogenous Cushing syndrome and associated complications. CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights the necessity of evaluating for Xp21 CGDS in patients presenting with adrenal crisis and emphasizes the importance of multidisciplinary management to optimize outcomes in this complex pediatric endocrine disorder.

Humans

Seventeen-year follow-up of hypophosphatasia diagnosed in middle-aged siblings harboring a novel intronic and a rare missense ALPL gene mutation.

Hypophosphatasia (HPP) is the rare inborn-error-of-metabolism that features impaired mineralization of the skeleton and teeth due to a deactivating mutation or mutations of the gene ALPL which encodes the tissue-nonspecific isoenzyme of alkaline phosphatase (TNSALP). We report 17-year follow-up of twin sisters and a brother referred in middle-age for painful proximal femoral "stress fractures" and then diagnosed with HPP. They reported generalized muscle and bone pain, metatarsal fractures, arthropathy and, since childhood, tooth loss. Their concordant findings were explained by compound heterozygosity in ALPL for a rare maternal missense mutation (c.1403C > T, p.Ala468Val) in exon 12, together with a novel presumably paternal change (c.863-14G > A) predicting a cryptic mRNA splice site in intron 8. Fractures continued during follow-up until one sister received a three-and-one-half-year course of hydroxyapatite-targeted TNSALP supplementation therapy (asfotase alfa) during which substantial improvement occurred in her clinical, biochemical, and functional parameters as well as quality of life. Following subsequent unplanned treatment cessation she suffered significant clinical deterioration, including new fractures and loss of mobility. Her bone histopathology documented osteomalacia. Treatment resumption restored its benefits. Among ten asymptomatic family members evaluated in this four-generation kindred, eight were carriers heterozygous for either ALPL mutation. Those harboring the maternal missense defect manifested mild hypophosphatasemia, suggesting a dominant-negative mutation effect. This experience underscores the importance of in-depth phenotyping and then clinical follow-up to characterize ALPL variant combinations, and for maintaining effective asfotase alfa treatment.

Humans

Interventions with a significant mortality difference in acute respiratory distress syndrome: A systematic review and comparison with Guidelines.

INTRODUCTION: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has a high mortality rate. European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) and American Thoracic Society (ATS) Guidelines are the worldwide reference for clinicians in management of ARDS. Mortality represents one of the most important outcomes in intensive care practice and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) the highest level of evidence. We compared Guidelines recommendations with RCT results to highlight differences and find potential new therapeutic opportunities. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of all RCTs reporting a statistically significant mortality difference in ARDS and a subsequent comparison with ESICM and ATS Guidelines recommendations. RESULTS: We identified 33 RCTs and 23 interventions with mortality difference in ARDS patients. Seven interventions relate to invasive ventilation strategies, two to noninvasive ventilation strategies, one to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), 12 to drugs and one to nutritional support. In 25/33 (76%) RCTs the intervention was associated with mortality reduction and in 8/33 with mortality increase (24%). Multicenter studies were 24/33 (73%) while blinding was adopted in 19/33 (58%) studies. Guidelines recommendations supported by RCTs with mortality impact include: the use of low tidal volume ventilation, prone positioning, venovenous ECMO, steroids and the avoidance of high frequency oscillatory ventilation. Eight of the interventions identified were not mentioned by Guidelines but demonstrated reduced mortality, and five further interventions demonstrated increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review highlights potential gaps between RCTs results and Guidelines that could be used to plan future research or highlight topics to be discussed in future Guidelines.

Humans