SEARCH · Search PubMed

Search Search PubMed

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Effects of aromatherapy on menopausal symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The postmenopausal period presents a significant challenge to women's health, characterised by vasomotor, psychological, and sleep disturbances. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesised evidence on aromatherapy for menopausal symptoms. METHODS: We searched Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Scopus, SID, and Google Scholar until January 2, 2026. The protocol was registered (PROSPERO: CRD420261303084). Randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies were included. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and GRADE approach were used for quality assessment and certainty of evidence. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3. RESULTS: Of 4435 records, 21 articles from 17 studies (n = 1347) were included. Aromatherapy significantly improved sexual function (MD: 7.05, 95% CI: 3.64-10.45), sleep quality (MD: -3.95, 95% CI: -5.94 to -1.97), overall menopausal symptoms (SMD: -1.00, 95% CI: -1.43 to -0.58), vasomotor symptoms (SMD: -0.79, 95% CI: -1.11 to -0.47), physical symptoms (SMD: -0.78, 95% CI: -1.10 to -0.46), somatic symptoms (MD: -1.34, 95% CI: -2.46 to -0.23), psychological symptoms (SMD: -0.59, 95% CI: -0.96 to -0.23), anxiety (SMD: -0.63, 95% CI: -1.10 to -0.16), and depression (SMD: -0.57, 95% CI: -0.85 to -0.28). No significant effect was found for urogenital symptoms. GRADE certainty was 'Very Low' for sexual function and sleep quality, and 'Low' for other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary evidence suggests that aromatherapy may be a beneficial complementary therapy for alleviating some menopausal symptoms. However, given the substantial heterogeneity, methodological limitations, and limited number of studies for subgroup analyses, firm clinical recommendations cannot be made at this time. More rigorous, large-scale, multi-centre randomised controlled trials with standardised interventions and consistent adverse event reporting are required before definitive clinical recommendations can be made.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Menopause in the All of Us Research Program: a descriptive summary of electronic health record and survey response across sociodemographic characteristics.

OBJECTIVES: Menopause is a significant physiological transition with implications for health outcomes (eg, cardiometabolic disease), yet gaps remain in understanding this transition, including how menopause timing and type influence health outcomes. Large-scale cohort studies in midlife (age=40-60) females, including the All of Us Research Program (AoURP), provide opportunities to study menopause across diverse populations and data modalities. We characterized menopause-related data in AoURP, focusing on age distributions and concordance between electronic health record (EHR) diagnosis codes and survey responses. METHODS: We analyzed menopause-related surveys, EHR diagnostic codes, and genomic data among ~396,000 AoURP female participants. We summarized menopause-related variables across data sources, evaluated overlap between survey, EHR, and genomic data sets, and described age distributions overall and across sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: Among ~396,000 females, survey responses captured ~193,000 menopause observations, nearly seven times more than EHR diagnoses (~28,000), suggesting under-ascertainment in EHR data. Nearly all females (~99%) with an EHR menopause diagnosis reported menopause in the survey. Approximately 22,000 participants had overlapping menopause-related EHR, survey, and genomic data. Survey age patterns matched expectations, with participants predominantly <40 years reporting premenopausal status and those >60 years reporting postmenopausal status. A small subset with age >70 years (N≈1,700; 4%) reported no menopause, suggesting response or recall bias. EHR menopause codes were concentrated after age 45 years, with a notable spike at age 65. Modest differences in survey-based menopause age distributions were observed across sociodemographic characteristics (eg, race and ancestry). CONCLUSIONS: These findings inform sampling strategies, power calculations, phenotype definition, and study design for menopause research using AoURP data.

Age↗

PubMed2026

Social support and cognitive function in postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: An active social lifestyle may protect against cognitive decline in older adults, but few studies have examined specific social support dimensions in relation to specific cognitive domains. This study examines associations between social support dimensions and cognitive function in older women. METHODS: The Early versus Late Intervention Trial with Estradiol (ELITE) was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of oral 17β-estradiol versus placebo in postmenopausal women, designed primarily to evaluate the timing hypothesis on atherosclerosis progression and cognitive decline; the present analysis is a secondary, hypothesis-generating examination of the psychosocial substudy data (2009-2012). A total of 448 women completed psychosocial assessments every 6 months. Cognitive function was assessed at baseline, 2.5, and 5 years using composite scores for executive function, verbal memory, visual memory, and global cognition derived from 14 standardized tests. Perceived social support was assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study-Social Support Survey (MOS-SSS; 0-100 scale). Paired cognitive-psychosocial assessments were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models adjusted for age, marital status, blood pressure medication, BMI, education, income, race, and randomized treatment (hormone therapy or placebo). RESULTS: A total of 298 women (mean age 60.3 y) provided 322 paired visits. Positive associations were observed between instrumental social support and visual memory (β(SE)=0.0044(0.0022), 95% CI: -0.00002 to 0.0088, P=0.051) and between positive social interaction and global cognition (β(SE)=0.0092(0.0046), 95% CI: 0.0001-0.0182, P=0.047). In age-stratified analyses, the positive social interaction-global cognition association was significant among women <65 years (P=0.042) but not women ≥65 years (P=0.34). No association survived false discovery rate (FDR) correction for multiple comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of healthy middle- to older-aged women, no association between specific dimensions of social support and cognitive domains was statistically significant after correction for multiple comparisons. These hypothesis-generating findings suggest any association is modest at best and warrant confirmation in studies designed specifically for this question.

Cognitive function↗

PubMed2026

Age at menopause and subjective cognitive symptoms predict digital cognitive outcomes at the gynecological Well-Woman visit.

INTRODUCTION: Women are at increased risk for Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Growing evidence suggests that the menopausal transition may represent a vulnerable window for development of AD-related pathology. Yet, women are diagnosed with AD later than men. Conducting routine cognitive screenings and integrating information about both cognitive symptoms and age at menopause may help address sex-based disparities in detection and prevention. This study investigated whether subjective cognitive symptoms, in combination with age at menopause, were associated with performance on a digital cognitive task in postmenopausal women. METHODS: 183 postmenopausal women (mean age = 63.8, range = 45-85) were recruited after their Well-Woman visit. Participants completed the Screener for Cognitive Problems in Everyday Life (SCoPE) to assess subjective cognitive symptoms, followed by a sensitive measure of objective cognition: the Linus Health Digital Clock and Recall (DCR™). Information was also collected on age at menopause. We examined associations of subjective cognitive symptoms and age at menopause with digital cognitive performance, adjusting for age, education and depression. Model fit was evaluated using adjusted R2, AIC, and BIC. RESULTS: 48.1% of women reported one or more cognitive symptoms on the SCoPE. On objective testing, 73.2% scored in the normal range, 20.8% in the borderline range, and 6.0% in the impaired range. SCoPE total score was negatively associated with objective cognitive performance in adjusted models (B = -.12, p = .03). Age at menopause showed a significant quadratic association with cognitive performance (B = -0.006, p<.001). SCoPE total was not associated with DCR subtests, while age at menopause predicted both Delayed Recall and Clock Drawing. CONCLUSION: Subjective cognitive symptoms and age at menopause were associated with lower performance on a sensitive, objective cognitive test. Findings support routine cognitive screening and suggest that subjective cognitive symptoms as well as age at menopause are associated with cognitive function.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Factors Associated With Menopause Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Menopause, marked by hormonal decline and menstrual cessation, is associated with various symptoms. Socio-demographic and behavioural factors may influence symptom type and severity. Understanding these associations can inform better symptom management. OBJECTIVES: To identify factors associated with the presence and severity of menopausal symptoms through systematic review and meta-analysis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane for studies on demographic, behavioural, or health factors linked to vasomotor, vaginal dryness and joint symptoms in women aged 40-60. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies reporting odds ratios or raw numbers for symptom presence or severity were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Studies were combined for meta-analysis, reporting odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Quality assessment was performed to quantify the risk of bias. RESULTS: Of 9228 screened articles, 61 were meta-analysed. Compared with White women, Black women had higher odds of vasomotor symptom presence (OR 1.65, 1.41-1.94) and severity (OR 1.91, 1.10-3.29), and vaginal dryness presence (OR 1.27, 1.10-1.47), while Asian had lower vasomotor symptom presence and severity (OR 0.40, 0.22-0.72; OR 0.55, 0.53-0.56). Higher education (OR 1.31, 1.09-1.56), high income (OR 1.41, 1.01-1.97) and depression (OR 2.36, 1.51-3.70) were associated with increased presence of vasomotor symptoms. Smoking and obesity were associated with both presence (OR 1.63, 1.30-2.04 and 1.35, 1.02-1.78) and severity (OR 1.56, 1.07-2.27 and 1.42, 1.11-1.83) of vasomotor symptoms. CONCLUSION: Socio-demographic and behavioural factors, including ethnicity, education, income, smoking, obesity and depression, influence menopausal symptoms, highlighting the need for personalised care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO number: CRD42023459154.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Relationship between menopausal hormone therapy and incidence risk of breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is widely prescribed for alleviating menopausal symptoms. Prior studies have mainly focused on individual hormone therapy formulations. This meta-analysis comprehensively synthesized evidence across various regimens to systematically evaluate the association between MHT and breast cancer risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically searched CNKI, Wanfang, PubMed, and Web of Science from inception through August 2024. Eligible studies examining breast cancer risk following MHT were independently screened and assessed by two reviewers. The review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies were included. The random-effects model showed a significant but heterogeneous overall association (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.09-1.22; I² = 92.4%). Subgroup analysis identified hormone type, use status, and region as key determinants (P for interaction < 0.001). Stratification by hormone type resolved much of the heterogeneity, revealing risk confined to estrogen-progestin therapy (EPT; OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.26-1.64), while estrogen-only therapy (ET) showed no overall association (OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.91-1.10). Study type, region, and sample size were significant effect modifiers. For ET, randomized controlled trials demonstrated a protective effect (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.70-0.87), contrasting with neutral findings from observational studies. CONCLUSIONS: MHT is associated with a modest but significant increase in breast cancer risk, primarily driven by EPT. This risk was not observed with ET in observational studies, though trials suggested a protective effect. Crucially, the association shows marked geographical heterogeneity, indicating risk is modified by regimen and regional factors.

Humans↗