Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 42087841

Factors Associated With Menopause Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Menopause, marked by hormonal decline and menstrual cessation, is associated with various symptoms. Socio-demographic and behavioural factors may influence symptom type and severity. Understanding these associations can inform better symptom management. OBJECTIVES: To identify factors associated with the presence and severity of menopausal symptoms through systematic review and meta-analysis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane for studies on demographic, behavioural, or health factors linked to vasomotor, vaginal dryness and joint symptoms in women aged 40-60. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies reporting odds ratios or raw numbers for symptom presence or severity were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Studies were combined for meta-analysis, reporting odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Quality assessment was performed to quantify the risk of bias. RESULTS: Of 9228 screened articles, 61 were meta-analysed. Compared with White women, Black women had higher odds of vasomotor symptom presence (OR 1.65, 1.41-1.94) and severity (OR 1.91, 1.10-3.29), and vaginal dryness presence (OR 1.27, 1.10-1.47), while Asian had lower vasomotor symptom presence and severity (OR 0.40, 0.22-0.72; OR 0.55, 0.53-0.56). Higher education (OR 1.31, 1.09-1.56), high income (OR 1.41, 1.01-1.97) and depression (OR 2.36, 1.51-3.70) were associated with increased presence of vasomotor symptoms. Smoking and obesity were associated with both presence (OR 1.63, 1.30-2.04 and 1.35, 1.02-1.78) and severity (OR 1.56, 1.07-2.27 and 1.42, 1.11-1.83) of vasomotor symptoms. CONCLUSION: Socio-demographic and behavioural factors, including ethnicity, education, income, smoking, obesity and depression, influence menopausal symptoms, highlighting the need for personalised care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO number: CRD42023459154.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Janice Hoang, Kathryn Halliday, Deborah Allen, Wema Meranda Mtika, Eve Tranter, Grace Glover, Lynn Tatnell, Julia Hippisley-Cox, Carol Coupland, Sarah Hillman, Jennifer Hirst. 2026-05-06. Factors Associated With Menopause Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.70257

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effects of aromatherapy on menopausal symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The postmenopausal period presents a significant challenge to women's health, characterised by vasomotor, psychological, and sleep disturbances. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesised evidence on aromatherapy for menopausal symptoms. METHODS: We searched Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Scopus, SID, and Google Scholar until January 2, 2026. The protocol was registered (PROSPERO: CRD420261303084). Randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies were included. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and GRADE approach were used for quality assessment and certainty of evidence. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3. RESULTS: Of 4435 records, 21 articles from 17 studies (n = 1347) were included. Aromatherapy significantly improved sexual function (MD: 7.05, 95% CI: 3.64-10.45), sleep quality (MD: -3.95, 95% CI: -5.94 to -1.97), overall menopausal symptoms (SMD: -1.00, 95% CI: -1.43 to -0.58), vasomotor symptoms (SMD: -0.79, 95% CI: -1.11 to -0.47), physical symptoms (SMD: -0.78, 95% CI: -1.10 to -0.46), somatic symptoms (MD: -1.34, 95% CI: -2.46 to -0.23), psychological symptoms (SMD: -0.59, 95% CI: -0.96 to -0.23), anxiety (SMD: -0.63, 95% CI: -1.10 to -0.16), and depression (SMD: -0.57, 95% CI: -0.85 to -0.28). No significant effect was found for urogenital symptoms. GRADE certainty was 'Very Low' for sexual function and sleep quality, and 'Low' for other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary evidence suggests that aromatherapy may be a beneficial complementary therapy for alleviating some menopausal symptoms. However, given the substantial heterogeneity, methodological limitations, and limited number of studies for subgroup analyses, firm clinical recommendations cannot be made at this time. More rigorous, large-scale, multi-centre randomised controlled trials with standardised interventions and consistent adverse event reporting are required before definitive clinical recommendations can be made.

Humans

Relationship between menopausal hormone therapy and incidence risk of breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is widely prescribed for alleviating menopausal symptoms. Prior studies have mainly focused on individual hormone therapy formulations. This meta-analysis comprehensively synthesized evidence across various regimens to systematically evaluate the association between MHT and breast cancer risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically searched CNKI, Wanfang, PubMed, and Web of Science from inception through August 2024. Eligible studies examining breast cancer risk following MHT were independently screened and assessed by two reviewers. The review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Thirty-four studies were included. The random-effects model showed a significant but heterogeneous overall association (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.09-1.22; I&#xb2; = 92.4%). Subgroup analysis identified hormone type, use status, and region as key determinants (P for interaction < 0.001). Stratification by hormone type resolved much of the heterogeneity, revealing risk confined to estrogen-progestin therapy (EPT; OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.26-1.64), while estrogen-only therapy (ET) showed no overall association (OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.91-1.10). Study type, region, and sample size were significant effect modifiers. For ET, randomized controlled trials demonstrated a protective effect (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.70-0.87), contrasting with neutral findings from observational studies. CONCLUSIONS: MHT is associated with a modest but significant increase in breast cancer risk, primarily driven by EPT. This risk was not observed with ET in observational studies, though trials suggested a protective effect. Crucially, the association shows marked geographical heterogeneity, indicating risk is modified by regimen and regional factors.

Humans

Social support and cognitive function in postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: An active social lifestyle may protect against cognitive decline in older adults, but few studies have examined specific social support dimensions in relation to specific cognitive domains. This study examines associations between social support dimensions and cognitive function in older women. METHODS: The Early versus Late Intervention Trial with Estradiol (ELITE) was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of oral 17&#x3b2;-estradiol versus placebo in postmenopausal women, designed primarily to evaluate the timing hypothesis on atherosclerosis progression and cognitive decline; the present analysis is a secondary, hypothesis-generating examination of the psychosocial substudy data (2009-2012). A total of 448 women completed psychosocial assessments every 6 months. Cognitive function was assessed at baseline, 2.5, and 5 years using composite scores for executive function, verbal memory, visual memory, and global cognition derived from 14 standardized tests. Perceived social support was assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study-Social Support Survey (MOS-SSS; 0-100 scale). Paired cognitive-psychosocial assessments were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models adjusted for age, marital status, blood pressure medication, BMI, education, income, race, and randomized treatment (hormone therapy or placebo). RESULTS: A total of 298 women (mean age 60.3&#xa0;y) provided 322 paired visits. Positive associations were observed between instrumental social support and visual memory (&#x3b2;(SE)=0.0044(0.0022), 95% CI: -0.00002 to 0.0088, P=0.051) and between positive social interaction and global cognition (&#x3b2;(SE)=0.0092(0.0046), 95% CI: 0.0001-0.0182, P=0.047). In age-stratified analyses, the positive social interaction-global cognition association was significant among women <65 years (P=0.042) but not women &#x2265;65 years (P=0.34). No association survived false discovery rate (FDR) correction for multiple comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of healthy middle- to older-aged women, no association between specific dimensions of social support and cognitive domains was statistically significant after correction for multiple comparisons. These hypothesis-generating findings suggest any association is modest at best and warrant confirmation in studies designed specifically for this question.

Cognitive function