PubMed · 9299993
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
A P Schneider. 1997. Abortion procedure.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9299993/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: The use of methotrexate (MTX) for the treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy (EP) has become common practice, although the factors associated with a favorable outcome are not totally clear. The aim of this study was to investigate the predictors of successful MTX treatment. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-seven women with unruptured tubal EP in whom the hematosalpinx could be directly visualized by pelvic ultrasound were studied. Women who met the inclusion criteria were treated with MTX either: 50 mg/m(2) intramuscularly (n = 70) or with 1 mg/kg injected directly into the hematosalpinx under sonographic guidance (n = 67). The associations between the outcome of the treatment and different factors studied (human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) level, progesterone level, hematosalpinx diameter, hemoperitoneum volume and mode of MTX administration) were analyzed. RESULTS: The overall success rate, defined by a post-treatment normal hCG level (< 10 mIU/mL), was 79.6%. The initial hCG level and the route of administration of MTX appeared to be two independent factors that predicted success. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the success rate was significantly better when MTX was administered locally: the odds ratio (OR) was 9.7 (95% CI, 3.1-30), and was significantly poorer when the hCG level was >/= 1000 mIU/mL (P < 0.002): the OR was 0.10 (95% CI, 0.07-0.49). CONCLUSION: Among selected women with tubal EPs, the route of administration of MTX and the initial level of serum hCG are the most important factors associated with the success of medical treatment.
This double-blind randomized control study was conducted to evaluate whether a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) could act as an effective pain control method during first trimester suction abortion, and whether co-treatment of NSAID with misoprostol will decrease the efficacy of the cervical ripening effect of misoprostol. Subjects were randomized to receive misoprostol alone or misoprostol together with diclofenac sodium. Both groups of subjects suffered from similar incidence of preoperative side effects. Co-treatment of NSAID with misoprostol did not attenuate the cervical ripening efficacy of misoprostol. There was no significant pain reduction in the group treated with NSAID, except that a marginal benefit was found in the subgroup of multiparous women. About two thirds of the subjects in both treatment groups found that this was a satisfactory pain relief method during the procedure.