Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9063615

Memory during general anesthesia: practical and methodological aspects.

A E Bonebakker·M Jelicic·J Passchier·B Bonke
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Evidence coming from several studies into memory and awareness during general anesthesia suggests that in surgical patients who seem to be adequately anesthetized (i.e., unaware of what happens in the operating theater), some form of cognitive functioning is preserved. This finding has important implications both for clinical practice and for memory research. In order to give the methodological background of the present situation in this field of research, this article deals, on the basis of recent experiments, with important methodological aspects of studies into perception and memory during general anesthesia.

Explore related subjects

Anesthesia, GeneralAwarenessHumansMental RecallResearch DesignUnconscious, PsychologyJournal ArticleComment

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A E Bonebakker, M Jelicic, J Passchier, B Bonke. 1996. Memory during general anesthesia: practical and methodological aspects.. https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.1996.0032

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2003

[Lung function changes during anesthesia and thoracic surgery].

After anaesthesia and thorax surgery, a significant reduction in pulmonary function with up to a 50% decrease in FEV1, FVC, and FRC is seen, leading to a high risk of atelectasis and hypoxia, and therefore making respiratory complications the major course of perioperative morbidity and mortality in this group of patients. This severe reduction in lung function gradually diminishes within three weeks, but postoperative pain and sedation increase the deterioration in lung function, and treatment is therefore based on anaesthetic drugs with a short elimination time and effective postoperative pain treatment with epidural analgesia or other regional blockade, and minimal use of opioids. Together with more sparing surgical methods, it is possible to operate on patients with severely reduced preoperative lung function (FEV1 = 0.651 or 22% of predicted value) with lung resection and immediate extubation. A reduction in pulmonary complications after thoracic surgery from 25-30% down to 10-15% is also seen, depending on age and preoperative lung function.

Anesthesia, General↗
PubMed2003

Noxious stimuli do not modify myogenic motor evoked potentials by electrical stimulation during anesthesia with propofol-based anesthesia.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether motor evoked potentials (MEP) to transcranial electrical stimulation under constant blood propofol concentration are affected by the arousing effect of surgical noxious stimuli. METHODS: Twenty patients who underwent elective spinal surgery were studied. Patients were anesthetized with 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen, fentanyl, and propofol to maintain the bispectral index (BIS) score around 50. MEP in response to a multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation at stimulus sites of C3-C4 were recorded over the right abductor pollicis brevis muscle. Changes of peak-to-peak amplitude and onset latency of MEP, BIS score before and after surgical stimuli were evaluated. Propofol plasma concentration was measured at the same time points. RESULTS: Both MEP amplitude and latency did not change significantly after surgical stimuli although BIS increased significantly (48 +/- 6 to 58 +/- 5; P < 0.05). Plasma propofol concentration was maintained at the same level between the two measurement points (3.3 +/- 0.7 to 3.3 +/- 0.7 micro g*mL(-1)). There was no relation between BIS change and changes of MEP amplitude and latency, and propofol plasma concentration. CONCLUSION: MEP to the transcranial electrical stimulation under a constant and clinically appropriate blood propofol concentration are not affected by surgical noxious stimuli.

Anesthesia, General↗