Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 8908914

Treatment protocols.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D K Benn. 1996. Treatment protocols.. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0039

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Paper tigers--do clinical guidelines improve health care quality in patients with testicular germ cell tumors in Germany?

In Germany, germ cell tumors are characterized by a marked excess mortality, i.e. a discrepancy between the actual mortality and the mortality expected with adequate implementation of the standard therapy. Moreover, Germany not only has a significantly increased mortality in an international comparison but also shows marked regional differences in the quality of medical care. This is partly due to difficulties in implementing the standard therapy. An attempt was made to improve the quality of medical care by setting up evidence-based diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines in 1996. Contrary to expectations, however, these guidelines have thus far remained largely ineffective, their implementation being hampered by a solely passive dissemination strategy. Added to this are inadequate medical care structures in which the guidelines cannot be properly implemented because of the organizational, social and professional context. Decisive for a quality improvement in the diagnosis, therapy and care of germ cell tumor patients is active dissemination of the guidelines supplemented by a change in the care structure. It is also important to establish indicators for measuring the success of guideline implementation and to perform continuous progress monitoring in order to specifically overcome evident barriers. Future research is required to create a better theoretical basis and to develop further strategies for guideline dissemination and implementation.

Clinical Protocols↗

[Selective reporting of positive outcomes in randomised trials--secondary publication.. A comparison of protocols with published reports].

INTRODUCTION: Selective reporting of positive outcomes is associated with bias. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a cohort study of 102 protocols of randomised trials approved by the Scientific Ethics Committees for Copenhagen and Frederiksberg in 1994-1995 and the corresponding 122 reports. RESULTS: The median proportion of incompletely reported outcomes per trial was 50%. Statistically significant outcomes were more often fully reported, odds ratio 2.4. In 62% of trials, at least one primary outcome was changed. DISCUSSION: Outcomes in randomised trials are often reported selectively.

Clinical Protocols↗

Do the right thing.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Clinical Protocols↗