Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 8403870

A microcomputer based lung sounds analysis.

Abstract

The use of a microcomputer in lung sound-analysis is described. The system was used experimentally in order to evaluate automated auscultation as a mean for improving the sensitivity of pulmonary health mass screening. The sound signals from four custom-made piezoelectric transducers, affixed at specific locations on the chest wall, and the breathing flow signal produced by a pneumotachograph were amplified, filtered and digitized simultaneously at 4000 Hz per channel for 512 ms. The acoustic data were transformed to the frequency domain to enable the calculation of the power spectra. Those were averaged over successive runs and displayed as log power vs. frequency. The operator could assess the convergence of the spectral pattern using the on-line graphics and calculated parameters, and store the data once the noise level had reached a preset level. This procedure was repeated during expiration, inspiration and on breath arrest. The results of the off-line analysis of the lung sounds, combined with pulmonary function tests and a questionnaire, were used to identify lung pathology.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Nissan, N Gavriely. 1993. A microcomputer based lung sounds analysis.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2607(93)90045-m

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The fourth sound of Korotkoff in pregnancy: a myth.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the detection rate and the reproducibility of the first (K1), the fourth (K4) and the fifth (K5) phases of the Korotkoff sounds in pregnant women. STUDY DESIGN: In 77 pregnant women receiving antenatal care in a tertiary referral centre, two observers took 231 simultaneous blood pressure measurements with a shared mercury sphygmomanometer and a multi-aural stethoscope. Detection rates, percentages of observer agreement within 5 mmHg and kappa values were calculated for K1, K4 and K5. RESULTS: Both observers were able to detect K1, K4 and K5 in 98, 24 and 98% of all 231 measurements, respectively. In 46% of measurements, and in 23% of women, neither observer was able to detect K4. The observers agreed within 5 mmHg in 98 (kappa = 0.99), 69 (kappa = 0.42), and 96% (kappa = 0.99) of measurements for K1, K4 and K5, respectively. CONCLUSION: K4 cannot be detected and reproduced accurately in a significant proportion of pregnant women, and therefore should be abandoned as diastolic endpoint in pregnancy.

Auscultation