PubMed1996
BACKGROUND: The assessment and localization of hearing impairments require reliable and valid recruitment indicators. Although many diagnostic tests are available, which of these tests are most important is still the subject of controversy. METHOD: To compare the efficacy of various diagnostic audiometric tests, 51 subjects with monaural sensorineural hearing loss were submitted to the following tests at 500 and 2000 Hz: category loudness scaling of narrowband noise bursts, alternate binaural loudness balance (ABLB), intensity difference limen test, SISI test, fixed frequency Békésy audiometry, and contralateral determination of the acoustic reflex threshold for pure tones. RESULTS: Using the findings of the ABLB test as reference, the results of the present study revealed that category loudness scaling and acoustic reflex audiometry are reliable quantitative recruitment indicators. This holds for the intensity difference limen test to a lesser extend as well. However, the recruitment selectivity of the SISI test and Békésy audiometry turned out to be considerably poorer. CONCLUSIONS: Category loudness scaling has proven to be a valuable element in the conventional recruitment test battery particularly for patients with symmetrical hearing loss. Therefore, category loudness scaling, ABLB test (when feasible), acoustic reflex measurement, and to a lesser extend the intensity difference limen test should be given the highest priority when selecting appropriate diagnostic audiometric tests. The efficacy of the SISI test and Békésy audiometry should be comprehensively reevaluated on the basis of expanded data. Until such material is available and a final judgement of the clinical value is possible, both these tests should be used and interpreted carefully.