Potential errors in measuring the phase difference between chest flow and mouth flow.

M Mishima; K Kawakami; N Sugiura; T Fukunaga; N Sakai; T Hirai; K Kuno

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 8280667

Potential errors in measuring the phase difference between chest flow and mouth flow.

M Mishima·K Kawakami·N Sugiura·T Fukunaga·N Sakai·T Hirai·K Kuno

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We have previously reported that the phase difference between chest and mouth flows was a useful indicator of obstructive lung disease. In this paper, we calculated the effects of (i) airway reactance, (ii) extrathoracic airway shunt impedance, (iii) heating and humidification of the inspired air, (iv) abdominal gas volume, and (v) respiratory quotient on the measurement of the phase difference between chest flow (Vc) and mouth flow (Vm) using computer simulations. When the airway impedance was approximated as simple airway resistance, the phase difference (theta r) was calculated to be 0.8% less than the phase difference (theta s) calculated from the airway impedance (Za), including airway inertance and shunt compliance, in the normal lung. theta s became larger than theta r when the peripheral resistance increased, but did not exceed 5%. The extrathoracic airway shunt impedance effect did not exceed 0.1%, regardless of the respiratory frequency, airway impedance or thoracic gas volume. The influence of heating and humidification of the inspired air on the phase difference was calculated to be within 5%. The effect of abdominal gas was highly dependent on the abdominal gas volume and the respiratory pattern, but was calculated to be within 5%. The influence of the respiratory quotient was calculated to be negligible. As a result, it was concluded that none of the factors discussed above are an obstacle to the clinical application of this method for the evaluation of pathological changes in obstructive airway disorders.

Explore related subjects

Airway Resistance Computer Simulation Gases Humans Intestines Models, Biological Mouth Pulmonary Ventilation Reference Values Thorax Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

M Mishima, K Kawakami, N Sugiura, T Fukunaga, N Sakai, T Hirai, K Kuno. 1993. Potential errors in measuring the phase difference between chest flow and mouth flow.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8280667/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Correction of compliance and resistance altered by endotracheal tube leaks and non-linear pressure/volume-relationships.

Measurements of lung compliance (C) and resistance (R) are influenced by endotracheal tube leaks (ETTL) as well as non-linear pressure/volume relationships (P/V relationship). To keep C and R reliable, we developed an algorithm to mathematically correct inspiratory and expiratory volume (V) and flow. In this study, a ventilated lung model for non-linear P/V relationship with adjustment of an increasing ETTL was studied. In addition, the recordings (airway pressure, flow, and volume) of 21 infants (median weight: 1,220 g, range: 640-2,160 g, with a median leak size of 32%, range: 24-56%) were investigated. C and R were calculated continuously from the recordings of flow, volume, and airway pressure over time according to the changing volume. A method especially developed for the analysis of non-linear pressure-volume-relationship (APVNL) was employed. C and R affected by leaks were corrected applying the newly developed mathematical algorithm and compared with measurements without leakage. C could be corrected up to a leak of 80% and R up to 55% leak at half tidal V for the model with non-linear P/V-R. C and R without leak and after leak correction did not differ significantly in all infants where the APVNL method was applied (P > 0.05).

Airway Resistance↗

PubMed2007

Parenchymal tethering, airway wall stiffness, and the dynamics of bronchoconstriction.

We do not yet have a good quantitative understanding of how the force-velocity properties of airway smooth muscle interact with the opposing loads of parenchymal tethering and airway wall stiffness to produce the dynamics of bronchoconstriction. We therefore developed a two-dimensional computational model of a dynamically narrowing airway embedded in uniformly elastic lung parenchyma and compared the predictions of the model to published measurements of airway resistance made in rats and rabbits during the development of bronchoconstriction following a bolus injection of methacholine. The model accurately reproduced the experimental time-courses of airway resistance as a function of both lung inflation pressure and tidal volume. The model also showed that the stiffness of the airway wall is similar in rats and rabbits, and significantly greater than that of the lung parenchyma. Our results indicate that the main features of the dynamical nature of bronchoconstriction in vivo can be understood in terms of the classic Hill force-velocity relationship operating against elastic loads provided by the surrounding lung parenchyma and an airway wall that is stiffer than the parenchyma.

Airway Resistance↗

PubMed2007

Use of dynamic compliance for open lung positive end-expiratory pressure titration in an experimental study.

OBJECTIVE: We tested whether the continuous monitoring of dynamic compliance could become a useful bedside tool for detecting the beginning of collapse of a fully recruited lung. DESIGN: Prospective laboratory animal investigation. SETTING: Clinical physiology research laboratory, University of Uppsala, Sweden. SUBJECTS: Eight pigs submitted to repeated lung lavages. INTERVENTIONS: Lung recruitment maneuver, the effect of which was confirmed by predefined oxygenation, lung mechanics, and computed tomography scan criteria, was followed by a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) reduction trial in a volume control mode with a tidal volume of 6 mL/kg. Every 10 mins, PEEP was reduced in steps of 2 cm H2O starting from 24 cm H2O. During PEEP reduction, lung collapse was defined by the maximum dynamic compliance value after which a first measurable decrease occurred. Open lung PEEP according to dynamic compliance was then defined as the level of PEEP before the point of collapse. This value was compared with oxygenation (Pao2) and CT scans. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Pao2 and dynamic compliance were monitored continuously, whereas computed tomography scans were obtained at the end of each pressure step. Collapse defined by dynamic compliance occurred at a PEEP of 14 cm H2O. This level coincided with the oxygenation-based collapse point when also shunt started to increase and occurred one step before the percentage of nonaerated tissue on the computed tomography exceeded 5%. Open lung PEEP was thus at 16 cm H2O, the level at which oxygenation and computed tomography scan confirmed a fully open, not yet collapsed lung condition. CONCLUSIONS: In this experimental model, the continuous monitoring of dynamic compliance identified the beginning of collapse after lung recruitment. These findings were confirmed by oxygenation and computed tomography scans. This method might become a valuable bedside tool for identifying the level of PEEP that prevents end-expiratory collapse.

Airway Resistance↗