Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 8014314

Nurses' medication errors.

Abstract

This paper reports on a qualitative study of nurses' experiences with medication errors. Using discourse analysis within a framework of an interpretive research design, the phenomenon of a not too uncommon occurrence in nursing practice was examined. Insight into nurses' involvement with medication errors was gained from interviews, group discussions and self-reports. Documents of disciplinary proceedings, where the Professional Conduct Committee of the United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting has dealt with incidents of medication errors, supplemented the data. Decisions made in situations of medication errors have moral implications at personal, institutional, and professional levels. The moral courage that is needed to learn from mistakes can be enhanced through honest dealings with the situation. Where the attention is shifted from the person involved onto the problem at hand, fair judgement may be advanced and the fear of owning up to a mistake be diminished. Only when reflected upon, can personal experience merge into the stream of development and progress. This study contributes to such reflection. Three key issues are discussed in-depth as they evolved during analysis of the data: These issues deal with identification and change; with guilt and shame and the reconciliation with human precariousness; and with teaching and learning. The manner in which discourse analysis was used here represents an innovative attempt to advance qualitative methodology in nursing research.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Arndt. 1994. Nurses' medication errors.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01116.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A psychosocial group intervention for Japanese women with primary breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: To the authors' knowledge, there had been no evidence for the efficacy of psychosocial intervention among Japanese cancer patients. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of a psychosocial group intervention in reducing psychologic distress and enhancing coping in this population in a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: The patient selection criteria were age younger than 65 years, lymph node metastasis positive and/or histologic or nuclear Grade 2-3, and surgery undergone within the previous 4-18 months as of the start of the study. We conducted a 6-week, structured, psychosocial group intervention. The intervention consisted of health education, coping skills training, stress management, and psychologic support. Subjects were assessed for psychologic distress and coping by administering the Profile of Mood States (POMS), Mental Adjustment to Cancer (MAC) scale, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HADS) scale at the baseline, at 6 weeks, and at 6 months. RESULTS: Fifty (33%) of the 151 patients participated and were randomized, and 46 (30%) completed the study. The experimental group had significantly lower scores than the controls for total mood disturbance and significantly higher scores for vigor on the POMS, and significantly higher scores for fighting spirit on the MAC at the end of the 6-week intervention. These improvements were sustained over 6 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that a short term psychosocial group intervention produces significant long term improvement in the quality of life of Japanese patients with primary breast carcinoma.

Adaptation, Psychological↗