Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 7968452

Interleaved echo planar flow quantitation.

Abstract

A method is presented for rapid blood flow quantitation. It combines multiple shot echo planar imaging principles with phase contrast velocity encoding gradients. Preliminary validation experiments performed on a flow phantom indicate a good correlation with actual flow values. Measurements of pulsatile flow in the ascending and descending aorta, acquired in just 4 s, with a temporal resolution of 50 ms, are demonstrated.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G C McKinnon, J F Debatin, D R Wetter, G K von Schulthess. 1994. Interleaved echo planar flow quantitation.. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910320218

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effects of menopause on aortic root function in hypertensive women.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether the natural decrease in sex hormones that occurs during menopause in hypertensive women plays a role in aortic root stiffness. BACKGROUND: The effect of menopause-induced sex hormone deprivation on aortic root function is not known; however, it is of special interest in hypertensive subjects, whose aortic elastic properties are already compromized. METHODS: Eighteen women with essential hypertension were followed-up for 3 years, during which time they went through menopause (group A) and were compared with 22 age-matched hypertensive women with normal menses (group B) and 20 hypertensive men (group C). Blind echocardiographic tracings and simultaneous blood pressure measurements were obtained after at least 30 medication-free days, both at baseline and 3.5 years later. RESULTS: Aortic root function tended to be aggravated in both groups B and C, but not significantly so, with no between-group differences (p = NS), whereas it deteriorated in group A. Thus, in menopausal hypertensive subjects, aortic root systolodiastolic percent change decreased (from 6.7% to 4.9%, p < 0.0001 [p = 0.002 vs. group B; p = 0.006 vs. group C]); cross-sectional compliance decreased (from 18 to 13 cm2/mm Hg, p < 0.0001 [p = 0.002 vs. group B; p = 0.03 vs. group C]); Peterson's elastic modulus increased (from 1.2 to 1.9 dynes/cm2, p = 0.0006 [p = 0.003 vs. group B; p = 0.005 vs. group C]); aortic stiffiness index increased (from 7.0 to 10.8, p = 0.0008 [p = 0.004 vs. group B; p = 0.007 vs. group C]); and aortic root distensibility decreased (from 1.8 to 1.2 dynes/cm2, p < 0.0001 [p = 0.0003 vs. group B; p = 0.007 vs. group C]). Serum lipids did not change significantly in any group (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: In hypertensive women, the effect of menopause on the elastic properties of the aortic root is abrupt and devastating.

Aorta

Doppler derivation of complete pulmonary artery pressure curves in patent ductus arteriosus.

Doppler echocardiography can be used in patients with a patent ductus arteriosus to generate complete pulmonary artery pressure curves. This technique provides a dynamic evaluation of changes in pulmonary artery pressures throughout the cardiac cycle and provides more hemodynamic information than single-point Doppler velocity methods of estimating pulmonary artery pressures.

Aorta

Importance of pressure recovery for the assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Role of aortic size, aortic valve area, and direction of the stenotic jet in vitro.

BACKGROUND: Pressure recovery has been shown to occur distal to aortic stenoses in experimental and clinical studies. However, its clinical relevance in this setting has not yet been evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: To address the hypothesis that pressure recovery can cause significant differences between Doppler and catheter gradients in aortic stenosis and to examine the effects of aortic size, aortic valve area, and direction of the stenotic jet on these differences, stenoses with valve areas from 0.5 to 1.25 cm2 and aortic diameters from 1.8 to 5.0 cm were studied in a pulsatile flow model. Jets entered the aorta centrally or eccentrically with angles of 15 degrees, 30 degrees, or 45 degrees. Overall, good correlation was found between Doppler and catheter gradients. However, when the various combinations of orifices and aortas were analyzed separately, slopes varied from 1.0 to 1.86, and the Doppler-catheter gradient differences ranged from -2 (small valve area with a large aorta) to 66 mm Hg (80% overestimation by Doppler echocardiography) when the stenosis was moderate and the aorta was small. Mild eccentricity of the jet did not significantly alter the results. However, overestimation by Doppler decreased with increasing jet eccentricity. Finally, differences between Doppler and catheter gradients could be predicted by estimating pressure recovery from Doppler measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Significant pressure recovery can occur in aortic stenosis and can cause differences between Doppler and catheter gradients. These differences may reach clinical relevance, particularly when the stenosis is moderate and the aorta is small and can be predicted from Doppler measurements.

Aorta