Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 7703409

Errors in kinesthetic transformations for hand apposition.

Abstract

We investigated the ability of human subjects to duplicate with the left hand the spatial location of the right hand, using only kinesthetic cues. Under this experimental condition, subjects produced large and idiosyncratic errors which varied with the spatial location of the hand. Tactile cues originating from contact of the hand with a rigid surface generally led to a decrease in the variable error. However, even without tactile cues, the variable error was small compared with other tasks in which subjects are required to estimate the spatial location of the hand on the basis of kinesthetic cues. The results suggest that subjects did not derive an estimate of the location of the right hand in extrapersonal space, but rather that they performed the task within intrapersonal space.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S I Tillery, M Flanders, J F Soechting. 1994-12-30. Errors in kinesthetic transformations for hand apposition.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-199412300-00045

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Rhythmic alternation and the optional complementiser in English: new evidence of phonological influence on grammatical encoding.

In a recall-based spoken production experiment, native English-speaking participants' variable use of the complementiser that to introduce the sentential complement in sentences like Henry knew (that) Lucy/Louise washed the dishes was found to be related to whether that inclusion/omission resulted in an alternating sequence of stressed and unstressed syllables between the verb of the main clause and the subject of the complement clause. This finding is discussed in relation to the question of whether and how phonological encoding can influence grammatical encoding in spoken language production.

Cues↗

Reversing the truth effect: learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth.

Repeated statements receive higher truth ratings than new statements. Given that repetition leads to greater experienced processing fluency, the author proposes that fluency is used in truth judgments according to its ecological validity. Thus, the truth effect occurs because people learn that fluency and truth tend to be positively correlated. Three experiments tested this notion. Experiment 1 replicated the truth effect by directly manipulating processing fluency; Experiment 2 reversed the effect by manipulating the correlation between fluency and truth in a learning phase. Experiment 3 generalized this reversal by showing a transfer of a negative correlation between perceptual fluency (due to color contrast) and truth to truth judgments when fluency is due to prior exposure (i.e., repetition).

Cues↗