Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 7675619

Solving occlusion indeterminacy in chromatically homogeneous patterns.

Abstract

Overlapping figures can produce consistent depth stratification even when chromatically homogeneous. Since neither T-junctions nor X-junctions are present in these patterns, the problem arises of what rules determine the direction of depth stratification, ie which surfaces appear in front and which behind. In a series of demonstrations and formal experiments involving perception of stereopsis, motion, transparency, motion in depth, and reversible figures, the validity of the principle that the visual system tends to minimise the formation of interpolated modal contours was tested. The reason why larger surfaces tend to be seen modally in front, rather than behind, would reflect the geometrical property that when, in overlapping objects, larger surfaces are closer there will be shorter occluding boundaries than when smaller surfaces are closer. It is shown that this constraint is independent of the empirical depth cue of relative size. An example is also given of a simple computational strategy that extracts, from chromatically homogeneous patterns, occluding subjective contours corresponding to those perceived by human observers.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Tommasi, P Bressan, G Vallortigara. 1995. Solving occlusion indeterminacy in chromatically homogeneous patterns.. https://doi.org/10.1068/p240391

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Children with dyslexia and right parietal lobe dysfunction: event-related potentials in response to words and pseudowords.

Hari and Renvall (Trends Cogn. Sci., 5 (2001) 525) proposed that dyslexic children suffer from sluggish attention deployment due to a right parietal lobe dysfunction. To examine this hypothesis, good and poor readers (12, 11-year-old boys in each group) had to read familiar words (low attentional demand) and pseudowords (high attentional demand). The amplitude of the event-related potential at around 100 ms post-stimulus (N1) in response to words and pseudowords was used as measure of attention deployment. Consistent with the attention deficit/right parietal lobe dysfunction hypothesis, poor readers showed lower N1 amplitudes in response to pseudowords, but not in response to words at central sites of the right hemisphere. However, poor readers also showed lower N1 amplitudes to both words and pseudowords at left frontal sites suggestive of an early deficit in activating phonological codes.

Attention↗

Multisensory attention and tactile information-processing.

Although a great deal is now known about the peripheral sensory mechanisms involved in tactile information processing [Ann Rev Psychol 1990;50:305], it is only more recently that we have started to gain a clearer understanding of the effects of selective attention on tactile perception [Front Biosci 2000;5:D894]. To date, the majority of this selective attention research has considered each modality in isolation. However, in order to deal with the multimodal selection problems of everyday life, we need to be able to coordinate our selective attention cross-modally [Philos Trans R Soc, Sec B 1998:353; Curr Biol 2000;10:R731]. In this review, I will highlight the results of behavioral studies demonstrating the existence of extensive cross-modal links in selective attention between touch, vision, audition, and even olfaction. In particular, the review is structured around two key research questions: First, "Can attention can be selectively directed to a particular sensory modality?", and second "Are there cross-modal links in spatial attention?". The results of recent neuroimaging studies that have started to elucidate some of the neural mechanisms underlying these cross-modal attentional effects are also discussed, and potential questions for future research outlined.

Attention↗

Enhanced tactile performance at the destination of an upcoming saccade.

Previous work has demonstrated that upcoming saccades influence visual and auditory performance even for stimuli presented before the saccade is executed. These studies suggest a close relationship between saccade generation and visual/auditory attention. Furthermore, they provide support for Rizzolatti et al.'s premotor model of attention, which suggests that the same circuits involved in motor programming are also responsible for shifts in covert orienting (shifting attention without moving the eyes or changing posture). In a series of experiments, we demonstrate that saccade programming also affects tactile perception. Participants made speeded saccades to the left and right side as well as tactile discriminations of up versus down. The first experiment demonstrates that participants were reliably faster at responding to tactile stimuli near the location of upcoming saccades. In our second experiment, we had the subjects cross their hands and demonstrated that the effect occurs in visual space (rather than the early representations of touch). In our third experiment, the tactile events usually occurred on the opposite side of upcoming eye movement. We found that the benefit at the saccade target location vanished, suggesting that this shift is not obligatory but that it may be vetoed on the basis of expectation.

Attention↗