Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 7067254

Compression neuropathy.

Abstract

Some of the experimental, pathologic, and clinical features of extremity compression are reviewed with special reference to vulnerability of peripheral nerves to compressive forces at specific anatomic locations. Attention is directed toward syndromes resulting from mechanical factors, and it should be pointed out that a nerve can be compressed at more than one level. Localized peripheral nerve compression is common in clinical medicine; carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common example. Physicians who maintain a high index of suspicion to the signs and symptoms of peripheral nerve compression will diagnose and treat these conditions earlier and thereby reduce the number of patients who develop permanent functional disabilities.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F W Bora, A L Osterman. 1982. Compression neuropathy.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7067254/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Microscopic extracapsular extension in the axilla: is this an indication for axillary radiotherapy?

PURPOSE: Although the axilla is often treated with radiotherapy (RT) postoperatively when microscopic extracapsular extension (ECE) of lymph nodal metastases is present, little data are available to assess axillary failure in the absence of such treatment. As it has been the practice at this institution to withhold axillary irradiation in the presence of microscopic extracapsular spread, we retrospectively analyzed our results for axillary recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Clinical records were reviewed of 82 women with Stage II node positive breast cancer treated with lumpectomy, axillary dissection, and RT in addition to systemic chemo/hormonal therapy. Axillary surgery consisted of a level I, II, +/- III dissection, with a median of 16.5 nodes removed. Tangential radiotherapy fields were used to treat the breast. All patients were also treated with an abbreviated supraclavicular field with the lateral border medial to the humeral head. Pathological sections were available for review in 72 of the 82 women. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of 72 (37.5%) had evidence of ECE; 45 of 72 (62.5%) had metastatic carcinoma confined within the nodal capsule. Clinical characteristics were comparable between the patients with and without ECE with the exception of (a) pathologic subtype, with a greater percentage of infiltrating ductal tumors associated with ECE (p = 0.044), and (b) number of positive lymph nodes, with 93% of patients without ECE having one to three positive nodes vs. only 56% among patients with ECE (p < 0.001). With a median follow-up of 40 months, 1 of 27 patients (4%) with ECE experienced an axillary failure as a component of first failure compared to 0 of 45 patients without ECE (p = 0.4). There were no isolated axillary failures. Five-year disease-free survival (72% without ECE vs. 57% with ECE, p = 0.12) and overall survival (83% vs. 53%, respectively, p = 0.068) suggested a less favorable outcome for patients with ECE. CONCLUSIONS: Microscopic ECE appears to be associated with increased axillary involvement and decreased survival rather than subsequent axillary failure. Our data suggest that radiotherapy to a dissected axilla may be omitted for the sole indication of microscopic extracapsular disease.

Axilla

Contralateral axillary lymph node metastasis as the first evidence of locally recurrent breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Carcinoma of the breast infrequently presents initially as axillary adenopathy. In such cases, after biopsy proves the presence of metastatic carcinoma, the primary tumor generally is assumed to be in the ipsilateral breast, despite negative mammographic findings and the lack of a clinically palpable breast mass. METHODS: The authors recently studied a case of a 50-year-old woman in whom recurrent neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast presented as a contralateral axillary lymph node metastasis. After mastectomy ipsilateral to the metastasis proved negative for tumor, a histologic comparison of the previous contralateral tumor with that in the lymph node was performed, followed by biopsy of the clinically and mammographically negative original lumpectomy site. RESULTS: Histologic and immunohistochemical studies proved that the original, metastatic, and locally recurrent tumors were identical, sharing unusual neuroendocrine features. The patient is currently disease free after chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Contralateral mammary carcinoma should be considered in the workup of a patient who presents with evidence of an axillary lymph node metastasis. Locally recurrent breast carcinoma may be clinically and mammographically occult. Histologic review of prior biopsy material and comparison with current tissue is essential in proper patient management.

Axilla