Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 5619109

[Does staphylococcal allergy exist?].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B Gaudier, M Lelong, J Hénard, R Maillard. 1967. [Does staphylococcal allergy exist?].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5619109/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Flow cytometric analysis of cell killing by the jumper ant venom peptide pilosulin 1.

Pilosulin 1 is a synthetic 56-amino acid residue polypeptide that corresponds to the largest allergenic polypeptide found in the venom of the jumper ant Myrmecia pilosula. Initial experiments showed that pilosulin 1 lysed erythrocytes and killed proliferating B cells. Herein, we describe how flow cytometry was used to investigate the cytotoxicity of the peptide for human white blood cells. Cells were labeled with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies, incubated with the peptide and 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD), and then analyzed. The effects of varying the peptide concentration, serum concentration, incubation time, and incubation temperature were measured, and the cytotoxicity of pilosulin 1 was compared with that of the bee venom peptide melittin. The antibodies and the 7-AAD enabled the identification of cell subpopulations and dead cells, respectively. It was possible, using the appropriate mix of antibodies and four-color analysis, to monitor the killing of three or more cell subpopulations simultaneously. We found that 1) pilosulin 1 killed cells within minutes, with kinetics similar to those of melittin; 2) pilosulin 1 was a slightly more potent cytotoxic agent than melittin; 3) both pilosulin 1 and melittin were more potent against mononuclear leukocytes than against granulocytes; and 4) serum inhibited killing by either peptide.

Allergens

A novel T cell-regulated mechanism modulating allergen-induced airways hyperreactivity in BALB/c mice independently of IL-4 and IL-5.

The immunoregulatory functions of IL-4 and IL-5 have identified these cytokines as primary targets for the resolution of airways inflammation and bronchial hyperreactivity in asthma. However, the individual contribution of each of these cytokines and of IL-5-regulated eosinophilia to the induction of airways hyperreactivity in mouse models of asthma remains highly controversial. In this investigation, we have used IL-4- and IL-5-deficient mice of the same genetic background in combination with inhibitory mAbs to these cytokines to identify unequivocally the contribution of these factors to the induction of airways hyperreactivity. Sensitization and aeroallergen challenge of wild-type mice with OVA induced pathological changes to the respiratory epithelium, airways eosinophilia, and hyperreactivity to beta-methacholine. Inhibition of the actions of IL-4 and/or IL-5 did not abolish airways hyperreactivity, and in the case of IL-4-deficient mice pretreated with anti-IL-5 mAb, airways hyperreactivity persisted in the absence of pronounced airways inflammation. Airways hyperreactivity was abolished only by anti-CD4+ mAb treatment. However, aeroallergen challenge of IL-5-/- mice showed that morphologic changes to the airways were critically linked to IL-5 and eosinophilia. This investigation demonstrates the existence in BALB/c mice of a novel CD4+ T cell pathway for modulating airways hyperreactivity. These findings may provide an explanation for the dissociation of airways eosinophilia from the development of airways hyperreactivity observed in some cases of asthma and in animal models of this disease.

Allergens