PubMed · 4884742
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
E Spees. 1969-02-24. Thymos primer.. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.207.8.1436
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVES: Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are among the most common healthcare-associated infections in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), but there are few resistome data available for relevant uropathogens. The goal of this study was to characterize the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) phenotypes and genotypes of a large collection of Gram-negative bacteria recovered from CAUTIs in a hospital in Mansoura, Egypt. METHODS: Phenotypic AMR profiles and whole-genome sequence data were generated for 132 isolates. Resistomes were predicted using ResFinder, CARD and AMRFinder. Similarity of uropathogen genomic data was determined using sourmash (kmer signatures). Escherichia coli genomic data were subject to a pangenome analysis using Panaroo. RESULTS: Sixty-seven E. coli (Phylogroup B2; 53.7%, 36/67), 14 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 11 Klebsiella pneumoniae, 9 Proteus mirabilis, 8 Providencia spp., 5 Enterobacter hormaechei and 18 rare CAUTI-associated isolates were identified. Several (22/132) isolates were multidrug-resistant, while almost half (62/132) were extensively drug-resistant. Phenotype-genotype discordance was found to be an important consideration in resistome studies in Egypt, with a total concordance of 91% (1115/1225), 85.7% (1273/1485) and 80.5% (1196/1485) for ResFinder, CARD and AMRFinder, respectively. Pseudomonas, at the species level, exhibited the greatest discordance. At the antimicrobial level, meropenem was subject to greatest discordance. New AMR variants were found for Egypt for Pseudomonas (blaOXA-486, blaOXA-488, blaOXA-905, blaIMP-43, blaPDC-35, blaPDC-45, blaPDC-201) and E. coli (blaTEM-176, blaTEM-190). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that there is phenotype-genotype discordance in AMR profiling among CAUTI isolates, highlighting the need for comprehensive approaches in resistome studies. We also show the genomic diversity of Gram-negative uropathogens contributing to disease burden in a little-studied LMIC setting.
According to our common medical culture, some facts are simply unquestionable, for instance Laënnec invented the stethoscope. But was he the first one? On a recent trip to Egypt we visited the temple of Kom Ombo, built prior to the roman period and renowned as a medical care center. Today, the tourist is fascinated by the magnificent hieroglyphics on the well-preserved walls testifying to significant advances in various fields of medicine including ophthalmology and gynecology. We were particularly interested by the basreliefs presenting vivid drawings of some of the first medical instruments. We easily identified curettes, scissors, a balance, forceps for dental extraction, and a surgical saw, but were captivated by two other instruments. The first one looked a lot like what Laënnec invented around 1820. The second one was amazingly similar to the instrument we use everyday, with a distal opening and flexible tubes (woven papyrus?) leading to proximal ear pieces. Our Egyptian guide was formal: the stethoscope was invented in Egypt. The scientific impact of our observations leaves something to be desired, but did make us think about the huge gap between the advancement of medical knowledge in ancient Egypt and Laënnec's (re)-invention. Exposed to a similar gap in history, what would our documents stored on CD and video tapes have to say to future touring doctors?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.