Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42676230

Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Standard-of-Care Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CART) and Bispecific T-Cell Engager (TCE) Therapies in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM).

Poy Theprungsirikul·Rong Wang·Su-Hsin Chang·Noffar Bar·Sabrina Browning·Terri Parker·Shi-Yi Wang·Natalia Neparidze
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the real-world (RW) efficacy and safety of standard-of-care CART versus TCE therapies in relapsed/refractory myeloma (RRMM), to assess utilization, outcomes, and tolerability of these therapies in a RW oncology in the US. Data were derived from the US-based, electronic health record-derived deidentified Flatiron Health Research Database, 2021-2024. A total of 419 patients (CART n = 220; TCE n = 199) with a confirmed diagnosis of myeloma who received CART or TCE as a standard-of-care treatment after at least 2 prior lines of therapy were included. Patients in the CART cohort were younger, had better ECOG PS, and a higher receipt of a prior autologous stem cell transplant versus bispecific TCE cohort. In CART versus TCE cohort, the overall response rates (ORR) were 83.3% versus 66.3%, median duration of response 7.9 months versus 4.3 months, progression free survival (PFS) 13.6 months versus 10.5 months, and overall survival (OS) of 29.8 months versus 21.9 months, respectively. A higher percentage of hematologic toxicity, infections, and cytokine release syndrome (CRS) were noted in the CART versus TCE cohort. This study provides insights on the RW effectiveness of CART versus TCE in the treatment of RRMM; highlights the differences in patient selection, clinical responses, treatment duration, and toxicity profiles.

Explore related subjects

CARTT‐cell‐engagersbispecificrelapsed myelomaJournal Article

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Poy Theprungsirikul, Rong Wang, Su-Hsin Chang, Noffar Bar, Sabrina Browning, Terri Parker, Shi-Yi Wang, Natalia Neparidze. 2026-09-01. Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Standard-of-Care Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CART) and Bispecific T-Cell Engager (TCE) Therapies in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM).. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejh.70304

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Journal Article resourceJournal Article subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Discarding Bedside Cart Paper-Packaged Supplies Between Patients: What Evidence Is Required?

BACKGROUND: Discarding paper-packaged sterile supplies from bedside supply carts between patients in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) is a potential practice to target for environmental stewardship. OBJECTIVES: To determine opinions about this practice, including what evidence should be required to implement and what evidence would be adequate to abandon it. METHODS: A survey was distributed to all pediatric intensivists engaged in multicenter research in Canada and to all PICU nurses at one institution in Canada. RESULTS: The response rate was 75 of 254 (30%). The practice occurred in 54 (72%) of the respondents' units. Ten respondents (13%) agreed the practice was effective in preventing nosocomial infections. Most respondents agreed the practice should be based on empirical evidence, including a combination of improved patient outcomes (n = 57, 76%), rate of contamination of supplies within the supply carts (n = 55, 73%), and survivability of pathogens inoculated onto paper (n = 56, 75%). Most respondents agreed they would be comfortable with a randomized controlled trial (n = 52, 69%) and would support action based on the results (n = 54, 72%). The potential trial outcome most highly ranked was next-patient nosocomial infection with pathogen from the previous patient (n = 23, 31%); this was ranked more often by intensivists (P = .005). Other outcomes highly ranked included next-patient colonization with pathogen from the previous patient (n = 44, 59%) and pathogen detection on supplies within the supply cart (n = 43, 57%). CONCLUSIONS: Most respondents agreed that the practice was not based on empirical evidence, agreed the practice should be based on empirical evidence, and would agree to a randomized trial with patient-important outcomes.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

MET-Aberrant non-small cell lung cancer: from kinase dependence to cell-surface targetability-mechanistic basis and biomarker framework for bispecific antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates.

MET-aberrant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not a uniform therapeutic entity. Its biology, diagnostic pathways, and treatment sensitivity differ across MET exon 14 skipping alteration (METex14), MET amplification, and MET overexpression. This heterogeneity cannot be fully explained by conventional event-based classification and is reflected in the distinct clinical activity of MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (MET-TKIs), bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). With the emergence of antibody-based therapies, MET has evolved from a signaling driver to a cell-surface target for receptor modulation and payload delivery. We therefore propose a clinically anchored two-dimensional framework for interpreting therapeutic relevance in MET-aberrant NSCLC: kinase dependence and cell-surface targetability. Neither dimension should be regarded as a directly measurable binary variable. Kinase dependence is inferred from genomic and treatment-contextual proxies, most strongly METex14 and, more conditionally, high-level focal MET amplification. Cell-surface targetability is approximated by drug-specific IHC assessment of assay-defined c-MET protein expression; however, receptor internalization, intracellular trafficking, and payload delivery capacity remain incompletely measurable in routine clinical practice. Within this framework, MET-TKIs have the most evidence-supported established role in tumors with evidence of MET-driven kinase dependence. EGFR × MET BsAbs have demonstrated clinical activity in broad post-osimertinib EGFR-mutant NSCLC, while EGFR/MET co-dependence or MET-mediated bypass activation provides a mechanistic rationale for their use; MET-defined preferential benefit remains to be prospectively established. MET-directed antibody-drug conjugates (MET-ADCs) are supported in drug- and assay-defined populations with high c-MET protein overexpression, although the predictive relevance of delivery-related factors remains hypothesis-generating. Accordingly, MET testing should shift from single-event detection to platform-oriented stratification: next-generation sequencing (NGS) for driver alterations and resistance profiles, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for high-level focal amplification, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for surface expression relevant to antibody-based therapies. This framework is intended to organize current biological and clinical evidence rather than to replace drug-specific companion diagnostics, regulatory indications, or prospectively validated treatment-selection algorithms. Precision treatment of MET-aberrant NSCLC is thus moving from event-based drug selection toward mechanism-based therapeutic matching. Future priorities include standardizing biomarkers, defining optimal target populations, and aligning biological subtypes, diagnostic strategies, and therapeutic platforms.

Antibody-drug conjugate↗
PubMed2026

Frontline therapies for adult patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVES: Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome-negative B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is the most common ALL in adults. Overall survival (OS) with frontline chemotherapy remains poor. Blinatumomab is currently the only targeted agent approved for frontline treatment. METHODS: We systematically reviewed 96 studies (43 interventional, 53 observational) between 2012-2026 evaluating frontline pharmacologic therapy in adults with Ph- B-ALL. RESULTS: Across chemotherapy studies, nearly half of patients relapsed within 3 years, and only 49%-69% survived beyond 3 years. Blinatumomab demonstrated robust and consistent efficacy in first complete response (CR1), supported by 2 randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 16 single-arm trials (SAT). In one RCT, blinatumomab reduced the risk of death by 59% versus chemotherapy alone (HR 0.41) when added to frontline consolidation in minimal residual disease (MRD) negative patients. Median OS reached 41.2 months in a SAT where blinatumomab monotherapy was administered to patients in MRD-positive CR1. SATs showed consistent efficacy outcomes regardless of age, MRD status, or chemotherapy backbone. DISCUSSION: Additional targeted therapies still under investigation have shown mixed results. CONCLUSION: Frontline inotuzumab (±blinatumomab) plus chemotherapy showed promise in older populations, while the efficacy benefit of rituximab was inconclusive. No new safety signals were identified in the frontline setting for targeted therapies.

Humans↗