Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “CART”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

3 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Standard-of-Care Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CART) and Bispecific T-Cell Engager (TCE) Therapies in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM).

We aimed to evaluate the real-world (RW) efficacy and safety of standard-of-care CART versus TCE therapies in relapsed/refractory myeloma (RRMM), to assess utilization, outcomes, and tolerability of these therapies in a RW oncology in the US. Data were derived from the US-based, electronic health record-derived deidentified Flatiron Health Research Database, 2021-2024. A total of 419 patients (CART n = 220; TCE n = 199) with a confirmed diagnosis of myeloma who received CART or TCE as a standard-of-care treatment after at least 2 prior lines of therapy were included. Patients in the CART cohort were younger, had better ECOG PS, and a higher receipt of a prior autologous stem cell transplant versus bispecific TCE cohort. In CART versus TCE cohort, the overall response rates (ORR) were 83.3% versus 66.3%, median duration of response 7.9 months versus 4.3 months, progression free survival (PFS) 13.6 months versus 10.5 months, and overall survival (OS) of 29.8 months versus 21.9 months, respectively. A higher percentage of hematologic toxicity, infections, and cytokine release syndrome (CRS) were noted in the CART versus TCE cohort. This study provides insights on the RW effectiveness of CART versus TCE in the treatment of RRMM; highlights the differences in patient selection, clinical responses, treatment duration, and toxicity profiles.

CART↗
PubMed2026

Discarding Bedside Cart Paper-Packaged Supplies Between Patients: What Evidence Is Required?

BACKGROUND: Discarding paper-packaged sterile supplies from bedside supply carts between patients in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) is a potential practice to target for environmental stewardship. OBJECTIVES: To determine opinions about this practice, including what evidence should be required to implement and what evidence would be adequate to abandon it. METHODS: A survey was distributed to all pediatric intensivists engaged in multicenter research in Canada and to all PICU nurses at one institution in Canada. RESULTS: The response rate was 75 of 254 (30%). The practice occurred in 54 (72%) of the respondents' units. Ten respondents (13%) agreed the practice was effective in preventing nosocomial infections. Most respondents agreed the practice should be based on empirical evidence, including a combination of improved patient outcomes (n = 57, 76%), rate of contamination of supplies within the supply carts (n = 55, 73%), and survivability of pathogens inoculated onto paper (n = 56, 75%). Most respondents agreed they would be comfortable with a randomized controlled trial (n = 52, 69%) and would support action based on the results (n = 54, 72%). The potential trial outcome most highly ranked was next-patient nosocomial infection with pathogen from the previous patient (n = 23, 31%); this was ranked more often by intensivists (P = .005). Other outcomes highly ranked included next-patient colonization with pathogen from the previous patient (n = 44, 59%) and pathogen detection on supplies within the supply cart (n = 43, 57%). CONCLUSIONS: Most respondents agreed that the practice was not based on empirical evidence, agreed the practice should be based on empirical evidence, and would agree to a randomized trial with patient-important outcomes.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Multimodal intervention benefits: Responder analysis of J-MINT PRIME Kanagawa trial.

INTRODUCTION: The J-MINT PRIME Kanagawa trial was an 18-month multimodal intervention (incorporating exercise, nutrition, and metabolic management) for dementia prevention. Because the primary analysis showed no significant benefits, we performed an exploratory responder analysis to identify responsive subpopulations. METHODS: We analyzed the Full Analysis Set comprising 188 participants. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis, applied to the intervention arm, identified baseline predictors of cognitive improvement. These rules were then applied to the entire cohort to evaluate treatment effects on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) using fully adjusted mixed-effects models for repeated measures (MMRM). RESULTS: CART identified a "Target Group" (N = 108) characterized by baseline profiles such as an MMSE score < 28 or specific metabolic ranges (e.g., LDL-C < 135 mg/dL). Within this target group, the intervention significantly preserved MMSE trajectories compared with the control group (group &#xd7; time interaction, P = 0.022). In contrast, the Non-Target Group (N = 80), consisting of high-functioning individuals (MMSE &#x2265; 28), exhibited no significant group &#xd7; time interaction. DISCUSSION: Multimodal interventions may effectively preserve global cognition in older adults with sub-threshold cognitive decline. Careful targeting of appropriate populations, while considering potential longitudinal measurement artifacts (e.g., practice effects), is essential. These findings provide a hypothesis-generating framework that warrants external validation in future prevention trials.

Humans↗