Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “bispecific”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Standard-of-Care Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CART) and Bispecific T-Cell Engager (TCE) Therapies in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM).

We aimed to evaluate the real-world (RW) efficacy and safety of standard-of-care CART versus TCE therapies in relapsed/refractory myeloma (RRMM), to assess utilization, outcomes, and tolerability of these therapies in a RW oncology in the US. Data were derived from the US-based, electronic health record-derived deidentified Flatiron Health Research Database, 2021-2024. A total of 419 patients (CART n = 220; TCE n = 199) with a confirmed diagnosis of myeloma who received CART or TCE as a standard-of-care treatment after at least 2 prior lines of therapy were included. Patients in the CART cohort were younger, had better ECOG PS, and a higher receipt of a prior autologous stem cell transplant versus bispecific TCE cohort. In CART versus TCE cohort, the overall response rates (ORR) were 83.3% versus 66.3%, median duration of response 7.9 months versus 4.3 months, progression free survival (PFS) 13.6 months versus 10.5 months, and overall survival (OS) of 29.8 months versus 21.9 months, respectively. A higher percentage of hematologic toxicity, infections, and cytokine release syndrome (CRS) were noted in the CART versus TCE cohort. This study provides insights on the RW effectiveness of CART versus TCE in the treatment of RRMM; highlights the differences in patient selection, clinical responses, treatment duration, and toxicity profiles.

CART↗
PubMed2026

MET-Aberrant non-small cell lung cancer: from kinase dependence to cell-surface targetability-mechanistic basis and biomarker framework for bispecific antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates.

MET-aberrant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not a uniform therapeutic entity. Its biology, diagnostic pathways, and treatment sensitivity differ across MET exon 14 skipping alteration (METex14), MET amplification, and MET overexpression. This heterogeneity cannot be fully explained by conventional event-based classification and is reflected in the distinct clinical activity of MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (MET-TKIs), bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). With the emergence of antibody-based therapies, MET has evolved from a signaling driver to a cell-surface target for receptor modulation and payload delivery. We therefore propose a clinically anchored two-dimensional framework for interpreting therapeutic relevance in MET-aberrant NSCLC: kinase dependence and cell-surface targetability. Neither dimension should be regarded as a directly measurable binary variable. Kinase dependence is inferred from genomic and treatment-contextual proxies, most strongly METex14 and, more conditionally, high-level focal MET amplification. Cell-surface targetability is approximated by drug-specific IHC assessment of assay-defined c-MET protein expression; however, receptor internalization, intracellular trafficking, and payload delivery capacity remain incompletely measurable in routine clinical practice. Within this framework, MET-TKIs have the most evidence-supported established role in tumors with evidence of MET-driven kinase dependence. EGFR × MET BsAbs have demonstrated clinical activity in broad post-osimertinib EGFR-mutant NSCLC, while EGFR/MET co-dependence or MET-mediated bypass activation provides a mechanistic rationale for their use; MET-defined preferential benefit remains to be prospectively established. MET-directed antibody-drug conjugates (MET-ADCs) are supported in drug- and assay-defined populations with high c-MET protein overexpression, although the predictive relevance of delivery-related factors remains hypothesis-generating. Accordingly, MET testing should shift from single-event detection to platform-oriented stratification: next-generation sequencing (NGS) for driver alterations and resistance profiles, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for high-level focal amplification, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for surface expression relevant to antibody-based therapies. This framework is intended to organize current biological and clinical evidence rather than to replace drug-specific companion diagnostics, regulatory indications, or prospectively validated treatment-selection algorithms. Precision treatment of MET-aberrant NSCLC is thus moving from event-based drug selection toward mechanism-based therapeutic matching. Future priorities include standardizing biomarkers, defining optimal target populations, and aligning biological subtypes, diagnostic strategies, and therapeutic platforms.

Antibody-drug conjugate↗
PubMed2026

Frontline therapies for adult patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVES: Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome-negative B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is the most common ALL in adults. Overall survival (OS) with frontline chemotherapy remains poor. Blinatumomab is currently the only targeted agent approved for frontline treatment. METHODS: We systematically reviewed 96 studies (43 interventional, 53 observational) between 2012-2026 evaluating frontline pharmacologic therapy in adults with Ph- B-ALL. RESULTS: Across chemotherapy studies, nearly half of patients relapsed within 3 years, and only 49%-69% survived beyond 3 years. Blinatumomab demonstrated robust and consistent efficacy in first complete response (CR1), supported by 2 randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 16 single-arm trials (SAT). In one RCT, blinatumomab reduced the risk of death by 59% versus chemotherapy alone (HR 0.41) when added to frontline consolidation in minimal residual disease (MRD) negative patients. Median OS reached 41.2 months in a SAT where blinatumomab monotherapy was administered to patients in MRD-positive CR1. SATs showed consistent efficacy outcomes regardless of age, MRD status, or chemotherapy backbone. DISCUSSION: Additional targeted therapies still under investigation have shown mixed results. CONCLUSION: Frontline inotuzumab (±blinatumomab) plus chemotherapy showed promise in older populations, while the efficacy benefit of rituximab was inconclusive. No new safety signals were identified in the frontline setting for targeted therapies.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Patient-reported outcomes with tarlatamab in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer after platinum-based chemotherapy: results from the phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial.

BACKGROUND: Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) is associated with a high symptom burden and impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This prespecified analysis from the phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial evaluated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for tarlatamab versus standard-of-care (SoC) chemotherapy following first-line platinum-based therapy. METHODS: DeLLphi-304 is a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 3 study in adults with ES-SCLC. PROs were assessed using validated instruments, including the EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-LC13, FACT-G GP5, BPI-SF, and the EQ-5D-5L visual analogue scale. Change from baseline, response rates, and time to deterioration in these PROs were analyzed. RESULTS: PRO data from all 509 patients enrolled were evaluated. Compliance with QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 assessments remained above 69% through 19 weeks. A higher proportion of patients receiving tarlatamab achieved symptom or functional improvement at 19 weeks compared with SoC in chest pain (19% vs 10%), cough (35% vs 26%), dyspnea (22% vs 7%), physical functioning (13% vs 8%), and global health status (23% vs 15%), respectively. Tarlatamab also delayed deterioration in symptoms, physical functioning, and pain at worst relative to SoC. FACT-G GP5 results indicated that patients receiving tarlatamab were less bothered by treatment side effects over time. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to its previously reported antitumor activity, tarlatamab demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in symptoms and HRQoL compared with SoC. These findings support a favorable benefit-risk profile of tarlatamab in patients previously treated for ES-SCLC.

Humans↗