Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 41786152

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy compared with endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage for palliation of malignant distal biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Saurabh Chandan·Tareq Alsaleh·Douglas G Adler
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: When ERCP is not feasible or fails in the palliation of malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO), EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) and EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) are viable alternatives. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the safety and efficacy of the 2 techniques for the palliation of MDBO. METHODS: Multiple databases were searched through November 2025 for studies that reported outcomes of EUS-CDS and EUS-GDB in patients with MDBO. A meta-analysis was performed to determine pooled proportions and relative risk (RR) with 95% CIs. We compared the rates of technical and clinical success, overall adverse events (AEs), and lumen-apposing metal stent dysfunction. A random-effects model was used for our meta-analysis, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 (%) statistics. RESULTS: Five studies (352 patients; EUS-CDS: 193 and EUS-GBD: 159) were included. Technical success was 93.3% (95% CI, 70.6-98.8) for EUS-CDS and 95.9% (95% CI, 90.0-98.4) for EUS-GBD (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.94-1.10; P = .6). Clinical success was 90.1% (95% CI, 84.7-93.7) versus 86.6% (95% CI, 80.3-91.0) (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.90-1.05; P = .4). There were no significant differences in overall AEs (19.7% vs 17.6%; RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.58-1.48; P = .8), severe AEs (11.0% vs 8.3%; RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.33-1.44; P = .3), or stent dysfunction (15.0% vs 14.5%; RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.35-2.58; P = .9). CONCLUSIONS: EUS-GBD appears comparable to EUS-CDS in terms of technical and clinical success, AEs, and stent dysfunction. Further prospective studies are warranted to corroborate our findings.

Explore related subjects

HumansEndosonographyCholedochostomyDrainageCholestasisPalliative CareStentsGallbladderUltrasonography, InterventionalBile Duct NeoplasmsJournal ArticleSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Saurabh Chandan, Tareq Alsaleh, Douglas G Adler. 2026-03-03. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy compared with endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage for palliation of malignant distal biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2026.02.044

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Comparative Study subjectHumans subjectJournal Article subjectMeta-Analysis subjectSystematic reviews study

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Versus Transjugular Portal Pressure Measurements: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: Published reviews of endoscopic ultrasound-guided portal pressure gradient (EUS-PPG) have emphasized feasibility and safety. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis specifically to evaluate how closely EUS-based portal pressure measurements track invasive comparator measurements in prospective paired studies and to summarize agreement, technical success, and adverse events. METHODS: We searched major databases through January 2026 for prospective cohorts reporting same-patient EUS-based portal pressure measurement and invasive hemodynamic measurements. Correlations were pooled with random-effects models and analyzed separately for studies comparing EUS-PPG with hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and studies comparing EUS-based portal measurements with direct portal venous pressure. Agreement and threshold discordance were summarized descriptively. RESULTS: Six prospective cohorts (127 attempted procedures) were included. In studies using HVPG as the comparator, the pooled correlation was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.72-0.89; I2 = 0%). In studies comparing EUS-based portal measurements with direct portal venous pressure, the pooled correlation was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.72-0.93; I2 = 16.9%). Technical success was 95.3%. EUS-PPG-attributed adverse events occurred in 2.4% of procedures, with no procedure-related deaths. Agreement data were limited. Reported limits of agreement were wide (approximately - 6 to + 7 mmHg), and discrepancies of 5 mmHg or greater occurred in 4 of 30 paired measurements. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-based portal pressure measurement is feasible and shows a strong association with invasive hemodynamic comparators, but the evidence base remains small (six cohorts, 127 attempted procedures). Further study will be necessary to establish patient-level agreement, procedural reproducibility, EUS-specific clinically significant portal hypertension thresholds, and whether HVPG-based decision thresholds can be transferred to EUS-derived measurements.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Comparative efficacy and safety of bi-flanged metal stents versus lumen-apposing metal stents for endoscopic drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs), particularly walled-off necrosis, are common complications of acute pancreatitis that often require endoscopic drainage. Bi-flanged metal stents (BFMS; NAGI; Taewoong Medical, Gyenoggi-do, Korea) and electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS; AXIOS, Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA) are frequently used, but comparative data remain limited. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of BFMS and LAMS in the endoscopic drainage of PFCs. METHODS: This meta-analysis followed the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Comprehensive database searches were conducted through November 2024 to identify studies comparing BFMS and LAMS for endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of PFCs. Outcomes were pooled using a random-effects model with RevMan Web, and statistical significance was defined as a P value less than 0.05. RESULTS: Three studies ( n  = 627; 329 BFMS and 298 LAMS) met inclusion criteria. No significant differences were observed between BFMS and LAMS for technical success [odds ratio (OR): 1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.55-2.43] or clinical success (OR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.51-1.87). Similarly, there were no differences in walled-off necrosis recurrence (OR: 2.01; 95% CI: 0.17-24.02), number of direct endoscopic necrosectomy sessions (OR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.05-5.12), or mean number of endoscopic procedures (mean difference: 0.18, 95% CI: 2.08-2.45). Adverse events were also comparable between groups, including bleeding (OR: 0.64), infection (OR: 1.18), stent migration (OR: 1.83), and stent occlusion/dysfunction (OR: 1.71). CONCLUSION: BFMS and LAMS provide equivalent efficacy and safety in the endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of PFCs. Either stent type represents a viable therapeutic option. Further large-scale prospective studies are warranted to refine stent selection strategies.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Variability in β-human chorionic gonadotropin concentrations following evacuation of a hydatidiform mole pregnancy: A retrospective cohort study from Vietnam.

BackgroundGestational trophoblastic disease refers to a group of tumors defined by abnormal trophoblastic proliferation. This disease produces a distinct tumor marker, beta-human chorionic gonadotropin, which can be useful for diagnosis and follow-up. The objective of this study was to investigate the variations in serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin levels after uterine evacuation as well and the progression of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.Materials and methodsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted at Tu Du Hospital, Vietnam, between January 2019 and December 2020. All patients diagnosed with molar pregnancy were analyzed retrospectively based on serial serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin levels following uterine evacuation. Post-evacuation outcomes, including relapsed molar pregnancy and gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, were also monitored.ResultsWe enrolled 560 patients with molar pregnancy, including 298 with complete hydatidiform mole and 262 with partial hydatidiform mole. Severe symptoms were more common in those with complete hydatidiform mole. Over the follow-up period, 97 cases of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia were noted. The data show that the median time to gestational trophoblastic neoplasia diagnosis was 8.75&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;4.41 (4-26) weeks. In terms of variations in the serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin levels, the generalized estimating equation model showed a faster decline in the complete hydatidiform mole group than in the partial hydatidiform mole group. Similarly, regression in serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin levels was significantly more rapid in patients who progressed to gestational trophoblastic neoplasia than in those with relapsed molar pregnancy (-11,593 vs. -20,651.22 and -12,946.26 vs. -46,329.23 mUI/mL, p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001).ConclusionsSurveillance of serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin levels remains essential for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia monitoring in patients with molar pregnancy following surgical evacuation. The post-evacuation serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin level regression curve helps distinguish gestational trophoblastic neoplasia from hydatidiform moles. Further evidence is required to strengthen these findings.

Humans↗