Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cholestasis”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

2 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy compared with endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage for palliation of malignant distal biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: When ERCP is not feasible or fails in the palliation of malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO), EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) and EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) are viable alternatives. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the safety and efficacy of the 2 techniques for the palliation of MDBO. METHODS: Multiple databases were searched through November 2025 for studies that reported outcomes of EUS-CDS and EUS-GDB in patients with MDBO. A meta-analysis was performed to determine pooled proportions and relative risk (RR) with 95% CIs. We compared the rates of technical and clinical success, overall adverse events (AEs), and lumen-apposing metal stent dysfunction. A random-effects model was used for our meta-analysis, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 (%) statistics. RESULTS: Five studies (352 patients; EUS-CDS: 193 and EUS-GBD: 159) were included. Technical success was 93.3% (95% CI, 70.6-98.8) for EUS-CDS and 95.9% (95% CI, 90.0-98.4) for EUS-GBD (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.94-1.10; P = .6). Clinical success was 90.1% (95% CI, 84.7-93.7) versus 86.6% (95% CI, 80.3-91.0) (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.90-1.05; P = .4). There were no significant differences in overall AEs (19.7% vs 17.6%; RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.58-1.48; P = .8), severe AEs (11.0% vs 8.3%; RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.33-1.44; P = .3), or stent dysfunction (15.0% vs 14.5%; RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.35-2.58; P = .9). CONCLUSIONS: EUS-GBD appears comparable to EUS-CDS in terms of technical and clinical success, AEs, and stent dysfunction. Further prospective studies are warranted to corroborate our findings.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Biliary Cirrhosis in Myhre Syndrome: The First Case Report of Liver Transplantation and a Review of Reported Hepatic Findings.

Myhre syndrome is a rare autosomal-dominant disorder caused by gain-of-function pathogenic variants in SMAD4 and is now recognized as a progressive multisystem fibrotic disease. Although transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling plays a central role in hepatic fibrogenesis, hepatobiliary involvement in Myhre syndrome has not been systematically evaluated. We report the first case of Myhre syndrome complicated by rapidly progressive biliary cirrhosis requiring liver transplantation in a 15-year-old male with a confirmed SMAD4 p.Ile500Val variant. Following an infectious episode, the patient developed severe cholestasis with imaging and histopathologic findings consistent with fibro-obliterative cholangiopathy, ultimately necessitating living donor liver transplantation. A systematic review of 55 published reports comprising 217 patients with Myhre syndrome revealed that hepatic evaluation was rarely performed and that previously reported liver abnormalities were mild and secondary, most commonly related to right heart dysfunction or metabolic disease, with no prior cases of progressive biliary fibrosis. This case suggests that dysregulated SMAD4-TGF-β signaling may predispose selected organs to fibro-obliterative injury and that infection-driven inflammation may act as a critical trigger for hepatic fibrosis in Myhre syndrome, expanding the recognized spectrum of organ involvement in this disorder.

Humans↗