Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 3950310

Vision and reading disability: research problems.

Abstract

This paper reviews and analyzes the methodological problems of the studies of the relationship of vision and reading disability. Procedures that lead to false positive and false negative findings are discussed. False positive findings can be due to problems in subject selection procedures and criteria, failure to take into account correction of vision problems, use of unselected comparison groups, using unskilled testers, small sample size, and data analysis problems. False negative findings can be due to experimenter expectations, lack of a comparison group, statistical tests and use of clinical samples and failure to rule out competing explanations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H D Simons, J D Grisham. 1986. Vision and reading disability: research problems.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3950310/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Dyslexia.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Dyslexia

Dyslexia.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Dyslexia

Speech perception in adult subjects with familial dyslexia.

Speech perception was investigated in a carefully selected group of adult subjects with familial dyslexia. Perception of three synthetic speech continua was studied: /a/-/e/, in which steady-state spectral cues distinguished the vowel stimuli; /ba/-/da/, in which rapidly changing spectral cues were varied; and /sta/-/sa/, in which a temporal cue, silence duration, was systematically varied. These three continua, which differed with respect to the nature of the acoustic cues discriminating between pairs, were used to assess subjects' abilities to use steady state, dynamic, and temporal cues. Dyslexic and normal readers participated in one identification and two discrimination tasks for each continuum. Results suggest that dyslexic readers required greater silence duration than normal readers to shift their perception from /sa/ to /sta/. In addition, although the dyslexic subjects were able to label and discriminate the synthetic speech continua, they did not necessarily use the acoustic cues in the same manner as normal readers, and their overall performance was generally less accurate.

Dyslexia