Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 3897155

Time, space and value.

Abstract

The ability of animals to associate stimuli depends on whether the stimuli are processed by the cognitive system or the affective system. Historically, a distinction was made between "thinking" and "feeling" by the empirical philosophers of the Renaissance. Recent evidence indicates that cognition and affect can be fruitfully applied to animal research. When animals are required to search an external environment for hidden food baits, they display an objective mastery of time and space as if they have acquired a "cognitive map" of the test area. Tests of an animal's ability to span the time between two external events yield intervals which can best be measured in seconds or fractions thereof. When animals consume a food, the affective value of that food is adjusted according to its utility in the internal milieu. If the food is nutritious, visceral feedback raises the preference value of the food. If nausea ensues, the taste becomes disgusting. Tests of an animal's ability to span the time between eating and nausea yield intervals which can best be described in hours or fractions thereof. Cognitive and affective processes are qualitatively distinct and subserved by different neural systems, yet they are both essential for associative learning. We offer a theoretical scheme designed to weld the two components into a single unitary sequence.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Garcia, M D Holder. 1985. Time, space and value.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3897155/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Distinguishing between early and late responders to symptoms of acute myocardial infarction.

The present study identified factors that distinguish early responders (i.e., requested medical assistance < 60 minutes after the onset of acute myocardial infarction [AMI] symptoms) from late responders (i.e., request made > or = 60 minutes after symptom onset). A questionnaire developed to assess demographic characteristics, contextual factors, antecedents to symptom onset, and behavioral, affective, and cognitive responses was administered in the hospital to 501 patients with documented AMI. Patients who believed that their symptoms were cardiac in nature were more likely to be early responders, whereas patients who attributed their symptoms to indigestion, muscle pain, fatigue, or another cause responded later (p < 0.0009). Early responders believed their symptoms to be more serious (p < 0.0001), felt more comfortable seeking medical assistance (p < 0.0001), were more anxious or upset when they first noticed symptoms (p = 0.0118), and perceived that they had less control of their symptoms (p < 0.0001) than late responders. A stepwise multiple regression analysis further suggested that unmarried patients responded significantly later than married patients, and patients who first experienced their symptoms at work responded significantly later than those who first experienced their symptoms outside of the home but not at work. These results suggest that situational and psychological variables are important determinants of lengthy decision delays in responding to symptoms of AMI.

Affect