Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 3754679

Quantitative comparison between saccadic and ataxic pursuits.

Abstract

Smooth pursuit has been determined by the examiners' visualization as 'smooth pursuit', 'saccadic pursuit', or 'ataxic pursuit' according to the shapes of the eye movements on the ENG (electronystagmography) recording paper. Even since the introduction of computers for the measurement of smooth pursuit, however, no trial to compare quantitatively between smooth pursuit, saccadic pursuit and ataxic pursuit had been made up to the present. In the present work we analysed 10 smooth (normal) pursuits, 23 saccadic pursuits and 7 ataxic pursuits quantitatively with a microcomputer and found that the phase relationship between target movements and eye movements was the most prominent factor for distinguishing smooth pursuit pattern differences.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N Ohashi, Y Watanabe, H Kobayashi, K Mizukoshi. Quantitative comparison between saccadic and ataxic pursuits.. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016488609132828

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A penalized likelihood approach to magnetic resonance image reconstruction.

Currently, images acquired via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) technology are reconstructed using the discrete inverse Fourier transform. While computationally convenient, this approach is not able to filter out noise. This is a serious limitation because the amount of noise in MRI and fMRI can be substantial. In this paper, we propose an alternative approach to reconstruction, based on penalized likelihood methodology. In particular, we focus on non-linear shrinkage estimators and show that this approach achieves a great reduction in integrated mean squared error (IMSE) of the estimated image with respect to the currently used estimator. This approach is extremely fast and easy to implement computationally. In addition, it can be combined with various alternative approaches to MR image reconstruction and can be easily adapted to other, non-MRI contexts, in which the observed data and the quantities of interest are related via a linear transform.

Brain Diseases↗