Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Saccades”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1985

The human pre-saccadic spike potential: influences of a visual target, saccade direction, electrode laterality and instructions to perform saccades.

Three components of pre-saccadic evoked potentials have been identified in humans: a slow negative shift (SNS), a positive antecedent potential (AP) and a spike potential (SP). This study examined the influences of: instructions to the subject to make saccades; the presence of a visual target; and the direction of the saccades on the amplitude of the averaged SP, which was recorded from P3 and P4 (International 10/20 System) in 20 normal, right-handed subjects. Recordings were made for spontaneous saccades prior to receiving instructions in six subjects. Twenty subjects performed self-paced saccades in the presence of a 10 degrees visual target (two red LEDs) and while blindfolded in a dark room. The SP was either absent or grossly altered (broadened) for spontaneous saccades in an illuminated room; it was robust for self-paced saccades in light or darkness. Three-way analysis of variance revealed a highly significant cortical laterality (P3 vs P4) X saccade direction interaction (P less than 0.001), reflecting that for a given saccade direction, the SP was larger over the contralateral recording site for the self-paced light (SPL) paradigm (Newman-Keuls test). In the self-paced dark (SPD) paradigm, though, this was only true for saccades to the right. By contrast, scatter plots of the directional indices (D.I. = [(SP for contralateral) - (SP for ipsilateral)]/[(SP for contralateral) + (SP for ipsilateral saccades)] for left (P3) and right (P4) recording sites from individual subjects revealed a significant negative correlation for both SPL (r = 0.78) and SPD (r = 0.74) paradigms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Transfer of gain changes from targeting to other types of saccade in the monkey: constraints on possible sites of saccadic gain adaptation.

1. Our goal was to use behavioral experiments to delimit where in the simian oculomotor system the gain of horizontal saccadic eye movements might be controlled. Our strategy was to change the gain of saccades to visual target steps (called targeting saccades) and to examine whether these changes transferred to other types of saccades. We reduced the gain of targeting saccades by jumping the target backward as a saccade was made so that the saccade appeared to overshoot. After 1,000-1,500 saccades to such backstepping targets, the average overshoot, and therefore the saccadic gain, had decreased substantially. 2. After the gain of targeting saccades had been reduced by 15-22%, several kinds of saccades were tested. Most were elicited by various visual targets. Some were made to jumping targets, which were timed to elicit saccades with longer (delayed saccades) or shorter (express saccades) latencies than normal or to targets that disappeared after a brief exposure (memory-guided saccades). Others were elicited to stationary targets (self-paced saccades) or in pursuit of a smoothly moving target (catchup saccades). Finally, we tested the saccadic fast phases of vestibular and optokinetic nystagmus. 3. Gain reduction of targeting saccades transferred at least partially to all the other types of saccades made to target jumps. The percentage gain transfer was calculated as (gain reduction of test saccades)/(gain reduction of adapted targeting saccades). The average percent transfer to delayed, memory-guided, and express saccades was 96, 88, and 91%, respectively. 4. Monkeys also showed substantial gain transfer to self-paced saccades, which scanned stationary targets. The average percentage gain transfer was 69% in the four animals tested. When two humans performed the same task, there was no transfer at all. These data suggest that saccadic gain adjustment involves different processes in monkeys and humans. 5. The transfer of gain to the catchup saccades of smooth pursuit varied from 41 to 100% across the four monkeys tested. Nevertheless, the average percentage gain transfer for all the animals was 75%. 6. As judged by the amplitude distribution of fast phases before and after adaptation, there was little, if any, saccadic gain transfer to the fast phases of vestibular or optokinetic nystagmus. In 12 of 13 experiments, there was no significant decrease in fast phase amplitude after a gain reduction of targeting saccades (P > 0.1). 7. This study shows that the average percentage gain transfer from targeting to delayed, express, memory-guided, self-paced, and catchup saccades was never < 69%. Although there was substantial transfer to saccades elicited by jumping, stationary, remembered, or slowly moving visual targets, there was relatively little to the saccadelike fast phases of nystagmus. The transfer of saccadic gain to the very short-latency express saccades suggests that adaptation modifies a subcortical locus. Moreover, the major locus must lie only in the premotor pathway for visual saccades, because saccadic gain adaptation is only poorly transferred to the fast phases of vestibular and optokinetic nystagmus.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed1996

Saccadic reaction time in the monkey: advanced preparation of oculomotor programs is primarily responsible for express saccade occurrence.

1. The introduction of a period of darkness between the disappearance of an initial fixation target and the appearance of a peripheral saccade target produces a general reduction in saccadic reaction time (SRT)-known as the gap effect- and often very short latency express saccades. To account for these phenomena, premotor processes may be facilitated by release of visual fixation and advanced preparation of saccadic programs. The experiments described in this paper were designed to test the relevance of the ocular fixation disengagement and oculomotor preparation hypotheses by identifying the influence of different factors on SRTs and the occurrence of express saccades in the monkey. 2. The SRTs of two monkeys were measured in two behavioral paradigms. A peripheral saccade target appeared at the time of disappearance of a central fixation target in the no-gap task, whereas a 200-ms period of no stimuli was interposed between the fixation target disappearance and the saccade target appearance in the gap task. The distribution of SRTs in these tasks was generally bimodal; the first and second mode was composed of express and regular saccades, respectively. We measured the mean SRT, mean regular saccade latency, mean express saccade latency, and percentage of express saccades in both tasks. We also estimated the gap effect, i.e., the difference between the SRTs in no-gap trial and the SRTs in gap trials. 3. Once the animals were trained to make saccades to a single target location and produce express saccades, SRTs in both no-gap and gap trials displayed a broad tuning with respect to the spatial location of the trained target when the target location was varied randomly in a block of trials. Express saccades were made only to a restricted region of the visual field surrounding the trained target location. A gap effect was present for nearly all target locations tested, irrespective of express saccade occurrence. Finally, the probability of generating an express saccade at the trained target location decreased with the introduction of uncertainty about target location. 4. The occurrence of express saccades increased with the duration of the visual and nonvisual (gap) fixation that the animal was required to maintain before the onset of a saccade target. The gap duration was effective in reducing the mean SRT for gaps < or = 300 ms, and it was more influential than comparable variation in the visual fixation duration. 5. The occurrence of express saccades made to targets of identical eccentricity increased when the initial eye fixation position was shifted eccentric in a direction opposite to the saccade direction. Concomitantly, mean SRT decreased by approximately 2 ms for each 1-deg change in initial eye fixation position. 6. The occurrence of express saccades depended upon contextual factors, i.e., on both the behavioral task (no-gap or gap) and the latency of the saccade that the monkey executed to the same target in the preceding trial. The highest percentage of express saccades was observed after an express saccade in a no-gap trial, whereas the lowest percentage was obtained after a regular saccade in a gap trial. 7. These findings indicate that training-dependent express saccades are restricted to a specific spatial location dictated by the training target, and their incidence is facilitated by high predictability of target presentation, long-duration foreperiod, absence of visual fixation, eccentric initial eye position opposite to the saccade direction, and express saccade occurrence in the previous trial. The release of fixation afforded by the gap accounts for the general gap effect, but has only a modulatory influence on express saccade generation. We conclude that advanced motor preparation of saccadic programs generally reduces SRT and is primarily responsible for the occurrence of express saccades, which therefore may be caused mainly by neuronal changes restricted to a specific locus-coding for the trained movemen

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1997

Peak velocities of visually and nonvisually guided saccades in smooth-pursuit and saccadic tasks.

Smooth pursuit typically includes corrective catch-up saccades, but may also include such intrusive saccades away from the target as anticipatory or large overshooting saccades. We sought to differentiate catch-up from anticipatory and overshooting saccades by their peak velocities, to see whether the higher velocities of visually rather than nonvisually guided saccades in saccadic tasks may be found also in saccades in pursuit. In experiment 1, 12 subjects showed catch-up, anticipatory, and overshooting saccades to comprise 70.4% of all saccades in pursuit of periodic, 30 degrees/s constant-velocity targets. Catch-up saccades were faster than the others. Saccadic tasks were run as well, on 19 subjects, including the 12 whose pursuit data were analyzed, with target-onset, target-remaining (saccade to the remaining target when the other three extinguish), and antisaccade tasks. For 17 of the 19 subjects, antisaccade velocities were lower than for either target-onset or target-remaining tasks. Velocities for the target-remaining task were near those for target onset, indicating that target presence, not its onset, defines visually guided saccades. Error and reaction-time data suggest greater cognitive difficulty for target remaining than for target onset, so that the cognitive difficulty of typical nonvisually guided saccade tasks is not sufficient to produce their lowered velocity. To produce reliably, in each subject, catch-up and anticipatory saccades with comparable amplitude distributions, nine new subjects were asked in experiment 2 to make intentional catch-up and anticipatory saccades in pursuit, and were presented with embedded target jumps to elicit catch-up saccades, all with periodic target trajectories of 15 degrees/s and 30 degrees/s. Velocities of intentional anticipatory saccades were lower than velocities of intentional catch-up saccades, while velocities of intentional and embedded catch-up saccades were similar. Target-onset and remembered-target saccadic tasks were run, showing the expected higher velocity for the target-onset task in each subject. Both experiments demonstrate higher peak velocities for catch-up saccades than for anticipatory saccades, suggesting that cortical structures preferentially involved in nonvisually guided saccades may initiate the anticipatory and overshooting saccades in pursuit.

Calibration↗
PubMed2000

Flexibility of saccade adaptation in the monkey: different gain states for saccades in the same direction.

Saccadic accuracy, measured as the ratio of the size of a saccade to the size of the target step that elicits it, i.e., saccade gain, can be altered by jumping the target surreptitiously during the targeting saccade. The gain change produced by this paradigm does not generalize or transfer to saccades of all sizes. Instead, the amount of transfer decreases the more the tested saccade differs in amplitude and direction from that adapted. Here, we tested the limits of this saccade-size specificity by attempting to impose quite different gain states on saccades in the same direction. We altered the saccadic gain by intrasaccadic target jumps of 30% of the initial target step, either forward to produce a gain increase or backward to produce a gain decrease. Three different conditions were studied: (1) saccades to target steps of 20 degrees or 7 degrees were adapted in individual sessions with backward and forward jumps, respectively; (2) saccades to target steps of 20 degrees caused backward target jumps during the same session in which saccades to 7 degrees target steps caused forward steps; (3) the target jumps accompanying 20 and 7 degrees saccades were the same as in (2), but in addition, there were intermediate-sized saccades to 13.5 degrees target steps with no intrasaccadic target jumps. Saccadic gain adaptation was quite flexible. In condition 2, we could simultaneously increase the gain of saccades to 7 degrees target steps while decreasing the gain of saccades to 20 degrees steps in the same direction. Intermediate horizontal saccades to 13.5 degrees target steps experienced gain reductions (average: 6.9%), which were not the sum of gain changes expected from separate 20 degrees gain decreases and 7 degrees gain increases alone, as predicted from condition 1. If adaptation at 20 degrees and 7 degrees occurred while an animal also tracked a non-adapting 13.5 degrees target step (paradigm 3), the gain reduction of saccades to the 13.5 degrees step was reduced considerably (3.4%). Thus, the mechanism that adapts saccade size can support a robust gain increase for saccades of one size while simultaneously supporting a robust gain decrease for saccades only 13 degrees larger. Furthermore, the presence during adaptation of a non-adapted target step with a size intermediate to the two adapting steps reestablishes a nearly normal gain within only 6.5 degrees of a robust gain increase and decrease. These data indicate that saccadic gain adaptation can set very different gain states for saccades with rather similar vectors.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed2002

The initiation of smooth pursuit eye movements and saccades in normal subjects and in "express-saccade makers".

A vast knowledge exists about saccadic reaction times (RT) and their bi- or multimodal distributions with very fast (express) and regular RT. Recently, there has been some evidence that the smooth pursuit system may show a similar RT behavior. Since moving targets usually evoke a combined pursuit/saccade response, we asked which processes influence the initiation of pursuit and saccadic eye movements. Furthermore, we investigated whether and how the pursuit and saccadic system interact during the initiation of eye movements to moving targets. We measured the RT of the initial smooth pursuit (iSP) response and of the first corrective saccade and compared the RT behavior of both. Furthermore we compared the behavior of the corrective saccades to moving targets to that of saccades to stationary targets, known from the literature. The stimulus consisted of a target that moved suddenly at constant velocity (ramp). In addition, prior to the movement, a temporal gap, a position step or a combination of both could occur (gap-ramp, step-ramp, gap-step-ramp, respectively). Differently from most previous studies, we chose step and ramp with the same direction to provoke competition between the pursuit and saccade system. For the first time we investigated pursuit initiation in "express-saccade makers" (ES makers), a subject group known to produce an abnormally high percentage of short-latency saccades in saccade tasks. We compared their results with subject groups who were either naive or trained with respect to saccade tasks. The iSP started at approximately 100 ms, which corresponds to express saccade latencies. These short iSP-RT occurred reflex-like and almost independent of the experimental task. A bimodal frequency distribution of RT with a second peak of longer iSP-RT occurred exclusively in the ramp paradigm. The RT of the first corrective saccades in a pursuit task were comparable with that in a saccade task and depended on the stimulus. The ability of ES makers to produce a high number of express saccades was transferred to corrective saccades in the pursuit task, but not to pursuit initiation. In summary, short-latency pursuit responses differ from express saccades with respect to their independence of experiment and subject group. Therefore, a simple analogy to express saccades cannot be drawn, although some mechanisms seem to act similarly on both the pursuit and the saccade system (such as disengagement of attention with the gap effect). Furthermore, we found evidence that the initial pursuit response and the first corrective saccade are processed independently of each other. The first corrective saccades to moving targets behave like saccades to stationary targets. Normal pursuit but abnormal saccade RT of ES makers can be explained by recent theories of superior colliculus (SC) function in terms of retinal error handling.

Brain↗
PubMed2002

Investigating the site of human saccadic adaptation with express and targeting saccades.

To focus on various objects of interest within the visual environment, primates employ rapid eye movements called saccades. When the accuracy of these movements becomes impaired, the brain can adjust their amplitude by a process known as saccadic adaptation. To investigate the locus of this plasticity in the human brain, we behaviorally adapted two types of saccade thought to be generated through different neuronal pathways. Targeting saccades, which are made to sequentially illuminated targets and have long latencies, are thought to involve higher cortical processing whereas express saccades, which have very short latencies, apparently do not. If adaptation transfers between these two types of saccade, one may conclude that the plasticity must exist at a locus common to the two pathways generating these saccades. We directly reduced the gain of either targeting or express saccades by intrasaccadically moving the target one-third of its amplitude back toward the initial fixation location and then examined whether the gain was also reduced in the other type of saccade. When targeting saccades were adapted directly, all subjects showed significant reductions in the gain of these saccades. In 75% of the 32 experimental target conditions across all subjects, there were also significant reductions in the gain of express saccades, thus providing evidence of adaptation transfer. In 71% of these conditions (i.e., 53% of all target conditions) there was no significant difference between the reductions in gain of the two types of saccade, suggesting that adaptation transfer was complete (100%). Similar results were obtained when express saccades were adapted directly: significant reductions in gain occurred in 91% of express saccades and in 100% of targeting saccades. In 86% of the target conditions, across subjects, in which both express and targeting saccades showed significant reductions in gain, the two types of saccade did not differ significantly in the amount of gain reduction. This suggests that adaptation transfer was complete for 78% of all target conditions. Therefore, we conclude that saccadic adaptation transfers robustly between targeting and express saccades. These results suggest that adaptation in humans occurs after the pathways generating these two types of saccade converge, probably at or downstream from the superior colliculus.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed2001

Inactivation of macaque lateral intraparietal area delays initiation of the second saccade predominantly from contralesional eye positions in a double-saccade task.

Previous studies have shown that, although lateral intraparietal (LIP) area neurons have retinotopic receptive fields, the response strength of these cells is modulated by eye position. This combining of retinal and eye position information can form a distributed coding of target locations in a head-centered coordinate frame. Such an implicit head-centered coding offers one mechanism for maintaining spatial stability across eye movements and can be used to compute new oculomotor error vectors after each eye movement. An alternative mechanism is to use eye displacement signals rather than eye position signals to maintain spatial stability. The aim of this study was to distinguish which of these two extra-retinal signals (or perhaps both signals) are employed in a double saccade task, which required the monkey to use extraretinal information associated with the first saccade to localize a remembered target for a second saccade. By varying the direction and the end point of the first saccade and selectively inactivating area LIP in one hemisphere with muscimol injection, we were able to distinguish between the two mechanisms by observing how the second saccade was impaired in this task. The displacement mechanism predicts that, if the first saccade is in the contralesional direction, the second saccade will be impaired, and the end point of the first saccade would not be important. The eye position mechanism predicts that if the first saccade ended in the contralesional head-centered space, the second saccade will be impaired, no matter in which direction the first saccade is made. Results showed that, after area LIP lesion, when the first saccade stepped into the contralesional field, the error rate of the second saccade became higher and the latency longer. However, when the end point of the first saccade was constant, the direction of the first saccade had much less effect on the second saccade. These results suggest that eye position, and not eye displacement, is the more predominant factor in this task. In a different behavioral paradigm, the monkeys performed single visual and memory saccades from different initial eye positions. It was found that the impairment of either the metrics or dynamics of visual and memory saccades did not significantly vary with the different eye positions. It thus appears that the performance of single visual and memory saccades is best described in an oculocentric coordinate frame that does not rely on extraretinal signals. Altogether these results lend further support to the hypothesis that, by combining retinal and eye position signals, area LIP contains concurrent eye-centered and head-centered representations of the visual space. Depending on the task, either representation can be used.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Human express saccade makers are impaired at suppressing visually evoked saccades.

1. We report the oculomotor behavior of human subjects who produce unusually high numbers (> 30%) of express saccades (latency range 85-135 ms) in the overlap saccade task, where express saccades are usually absent or small in number (< 15%). We refer to these subjects as "express saccade makers" (ES makers). 2. We tested the hypothesis that ES makers have difficulties in maintaining fixation and in suppressing unwanted saccades to a suddenly appearing peripheral target by comparing the performances of 10 ES makers and 10 control subjects in gap and overlap antisaccade tasks and in a memory-guided saccade task. 3. The ES makers produced between 35% and 95% incorrect saccades toward the stimulus (prosaccades) in the antisaccade tasks, compared with control subjects, who produced < 20%. Their correct antisaccades appeared to be normal. 4. We further tested the ability of ES makers to maintain fixation and to avoid reflexive saccades to the onset of a target in the memory-guided saccade task. ES makers tended to glance to the briefly presented cue in many trials (4 of them in 50-80% of the trials) instead of delaying the saccade until fixation point offset. Most of the inappropriate saccades had latencies in the range of express saccades. 5. These results can be associated with the finding of fixation related neurons in different cortical and subcortical brain regions (e.g., inferior-parietal and frontal cortex, basal ganglia, superior colliculus). The unusual number of express saccades made by the ES makers in the standard overlap and gap tasks, and their unwanted short-latency reflexive saccades to the target in the memory-guided saccade task, are reminiscent of the performance in these tasks of monkeys whose collicular fixation neurons were chemically deactivated. The collicular fixation neurons are probably the final common pathway in the control of active fixation, and are in mutual inhibitory relationship with the saccade cells. 6. The decreased saccadic control observed in the ES makers suggests that saccade execution in humans is also gated by a fixation system. These ES makers may have reduced voluntarily control over saccade generation as a result of a defect or poor development of their fixation system.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Effects of pre-cues on voluntary and reflexive saccade generation. I. Anti-cues for pro-saccades.

Experiments on visual attention have employed both physical cues and verbal instructions to enable subjects to allocate attention at a location that becomes relevant within a perceptual or motor task some time later (cue lead time, CLT). In this study we have used valid visual peripheral cues (CLT between 100 and 700 ms) to indicate the direction and location of the next saccade. A cue is considered valid or invalid if its meaning with respect to the next saccade is correct or incorrect. A cue is called an anti- or pro-cue if the side of its presentation is opposite to or the same as the direction of the saccade required on a given trial. Correspondingly, a saccade is called an anti- or pro-saccade if it is directed to the side opposite to or the same as the stimulus presentation. A condition in which the cue and the stimulus are presented on opposite sides provides a simple way of dissociating voluntary attention allocation from automatic orienting. This paper considers the anti-cue pro-saccade task: the subjects were instructed to use the cue to direct attention to the opposite side, i.e. the location, where on valid trials the saccade target would occur. In the companion paper we have used the same physical condition, but we have reversed the instructions as to saccade direction and we have reversed the meaning of the cue, i.e. we designed a pro-cue anti-saccade task. In this first paper, the saccadic reaction times (SRTs) of pro-saccades of five adult subjects were measured in the gap paradigm (fixation point offset precedes target onset by 200 ms). With a CLT of 100 ms, valid anti-cues reduced the number of express saccades (i.e. saccades with SRTs in the range 80-120 ms) significantly compared with the control values (no cues). Valid anti-cues with increasingly long CLTs (100-700 ms) resulted in an increasing incidence of anticipatory saccades and saccades with longer SRTs (more than 120 ms), while the frequency of express saccades remained below the control value. When cue and saccade target were dissociated in location or in both location and direction, the effects of the cueing revealed a much lower spatial selectivity as compared to the effects that have been described for voluntary attention allocation by means of central cues. The results suggest that voluntary allocation of attention and cue-induced automatic orienting not only have different time courses but also have opposite effects on the generation of express saccades, and different spatial selectivities. A possible neuronal basis of these results is discussed considering related findings from electrophysiological studies in monkeys.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Effects of pre-cues on voluntary and reflexive saccade generation. II. Pro-cues for anti-saccades.

The reaction times of saccades (SRT) to a suddenly presented visual stimulus (pro-saccade) can be decreased and a separate mode of express saccades can occur when a gap paradigm is used (i.e. fixation-point offset precedes target onset by 200 ms). A valid peripheral cue, presented briefly (100 ms) before target onset, has been found to facilitate the generation of saccades to the target, thereby increasing the frequency of express saccades and decreasing the mean latency. This facilitation occurs only for cues that correctly indicate the direction of the subsequent target presentation (valid cues). The present study investigates the effects of valid cues on SRTs and error rate in the anti-saccade task (saccades in the direction opposite to the stimulus) by systematically varying the cue lead time (CLT) and using the gap and overlap conditions, i.e. fixation point remains on throughout the trial. For a CLT of 100 ms, both reaction times and error rates were significantly increased. With increasing CLT (200-500 ms), both the reaction times of the anti-saccades and the error rates returned to approximately control level, with CLT more than 200 ms in both the gap and the overlap condition. Additional experiments using non-informative cues in the overlap task showed that the reaction times of correct anti-saccades and the error rate were decreased when cue and stimulus appeared at the same side. Analysis of the erratic pro-saccades revealed that almost all of them were corrected, i.e. they were followed by a second saccade towards the required location. It is found that the correction times were usually very short, with intersaccadic intervals between 0 and 150 ms. We suggest that the orienting mechanism, elicited by a transient peripheral cue, relates to the command and the decision to make a pro- rather than an anti-saccade. The cue elicits pro-orienting towards its position when a pro-saccade is required, and anti-orienting when an anti-saccade is required. The orienting effect is transient and decays with CLTs of more than 200 ms; this result holds for both anti-saccades and pro-saccades. Since subjects reported that they could not prevent the erratic pro-saccades or were often not aware of them, we conclude that this orienting mechanism occurs automatically, beyond voluntary control.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Discharge of saccade-related superior colliculus neurons during saccades accompanied by vergence.

It has long been believed that the superior colliculus (SC) is involved in the production of saccades but plays no role in the generation of vergence eye movements. However, results from several recent studies suggest that it may be worthwhile to examine the role of the SC in saccade-vergence interactions. Specifically, the available literature suggests two questions: do saccade-related neurons in SC have three-dimensional movement fields and is the slowing of saccades by vergence attributable, in part, to changes in the level of activity in SC? Single-unit data were recorded from 51 saccade-related neurons in rhesus monkey SC during saccades without vergence, saccades accompanied by convergence, and saccades accompanied by divergence. Most cells (78% for convergence, 86% for divergence) showed a significant reduction in peak spike density when the saccade was accompanied by vergence. A minority of cells (16% for convergence, 2% for divergence) increased their firing rate for saccades accompanied by vergence. Three cells were found that discharged in association with saccades, vergence, and the combination of the two. There were no cells that exhibited the pattern of discharge that would be expected of a cell tuned for saccades with divergence. Thus the present results do not support the hypothesis that saccade-related SC neurons are, as a rule, tuned in three dimensions. Small, but significant, differences in firing rate were often found for saccades without vergence at near and far distances. Approximately half of the cells showed a significant relationship between spike activity and saccade velocity, but the correlations tended to be very weak. This suggests that the decreased neuronal activity of SC neurons has only a limited effect on saccade velocity. For some cells, the movement field shifted for saccades with vergence. These shifts were highly variable from one cell to another.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed1994

Use of interrupted saccade paradigm to study spatial and temporal dynamics of saccadic burst cells in superior colliculus in monkey.

1. We recorded the spatial and temporal dynamics of saccade-related burst neurons (SRBNs) found in the intermediate layers of the superior colliculus (SC) in the alert, behaving monkey. These burst cells are normally the first neurons recorded during radially directed microelectrode penetrations of the SC after the electrode has left the more dorsally situated visual layers. They have spatially delimited movement fields whose centers describe the well-studied motor map of the SC. They have a rather sharp, saccade-locked burst of activity that peaks just before saccade onset and then declines steeply during the saccade. Many of these cells, when recorded during saccade trials, also have an early, transient visual response and an irregular prelude of presaccadic activity. 2. Because saccadic eye movements normally have very stereotyped durations and velocity trajectories that vary systematically with saccade size, it has been difficult in the past to establish quantitatively whether the activity of SRBNs temporally codes dynamic saccadic control signals, e.g., dynamic motor error or eye velocity, where dynamic motor error is defined as a signal proportional to the instantaneous difference between desired final eye position and the actual eye position during a saccade. It has also not been unequivocally established whether SRBNs participate in an organized spatial shift of ensemble activity in the intermediate layers of the SC during saccadic eye movements. 3. To address these issues, we studied the activity of SRBNs using an interrupted saccade paradigm. Saccades were interrupted with pulsatile electrical stimulation through a microelectrode implanted in the omnipauser region of the brain stem while recordings were made simultaneously from single SRBNs in the SC. 4. Shortly after the beginning of the stimulation (which was electronically triggered at saccade onset), the eyes decelerated rapidly and stopped completely. When the high-frequency (typically 300-400 pulses per second) stimulation was terminated (average duration 12 ms), the eye movement was reinitiated and a resumed saccade was made accurately to the location of the target. 5. When we recorded from SRBNs in the more caudal colliculus, which were active for large saccades, cell discharge was powerfully and rapidly suppressed by the stimulation (average latency = 3.8 ms). Activity in the same cells started again just before the onset of the resumed saccade and continued during this saccade even though it has a much smaller amplitude than would normally be associated with significant discharge for caudal SC cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Saccade-related activity in the primate superior colliculus depends on the presence of local landmarks at the saccade endpoint.

Saccade-related discharge in the superior colliculus is greater for saccades made to a spot of light than for saccades in complete darkness. However, it is unclear whether this enhancement is due to the discontinuity of the spot or due to its being a new object of fixation. In these experiments, we examined the saccade-related activity of intermediate-layer neurons in the primate superior colliculus during delayed saccades to the center or corner of a large, bright square, as well as for visual and memory-guided movements to small spots in isolation. The saccade-related discharge for movements made to a local visual landmark present at the time of the saccade, be it a corner of a square or a small spot, was higher than that for saccades made to the center of a square that contained no local visual landmarks within. Moreover, discharge for movements to the center of a square were very similar to that for saccades to blank, dark space. Saccade velocity was similarly dependent on the presence of such a landmark, though less dramatically. The endpoints of saccades directed toward a square's corner were slightly displaced toward the center of the square. Across all neurons, discharge and velocity for saccades to the center of a square increased as the square size was decreased, but were never greater than those for saccades to a small spot of light. These results suggest that both saccade-related discharge in the superior colliculus and saccade metrics are enhanced for movements directed to parts of the visual scene with high contrast, while shifting fixation to a new object is not itself sufficient to elevate discharge and metrics above those of saccades to blank space.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed2002

Effects of voluntary blinks on saccades, vergence eye movements, and saccade-vergence interactions in humans.

Blinks are known to change the kinematic properties of horizontal saccades, probably by influencing the saccadic premotor circuit. The neuronal basis of this effect could be explained by changes in the activity of omnipause neurons in the nucleus raphe interpositus or in the saccade-related burst neurons of the superior colliculus. Omnipause neurons cease discharge during both saccades and vergence movements. Because eyelid blinks can influence both sets of neurons, we hypothesized that blinks would influence the kinematic parameters of saccades in all directions, vergence, and saccade-vergence interactions. To test this hypothesis, we investigated binocular eye and lid movements in five normal healthy subjects with the magnetic search coil technique. The subjects performed conjugate horizontal and vertical saccades from gaze straight ahead to targets at 20 degrees up, down, right, or left while either attempting not to blink or voluntarily blinking. While following the same blink instruction, subjects made horizontal vergence eye movements of 7 degrees and combined saccade-vergence movements with a version amplitude of 20 degrees. The movements were performed back and forth from two targets simultaneously presented nearby (38 cm) and more distant (145 cm). Small vertical saccades accompanied most vergence movements. These results show that blinks change the kinematics (saccade duration, peak velocity, peak acceleration, peak deceleration) of not only horizontal but also of vertical saccades, of horizontal vergence eye movements, and of combined saccade-vergence eye movements. Peak velocity, acceleration, and deceleration of eye movements were decreased on the average by 30%, and their duration increased by 43% on the average when they were accompanied by blinks. The blink effect was time dependent with respect to saccade and vergence onset: the greatest effect occurred 100 ms prior to saccade onset, whereas there was no effect when the blink started after saccade onset. The effects of blinks on saccades and vergence, which are tightly coupled to latency, support the hypothesis that blinks cause profound spatiotemporal perturbations of the eye movements by interfering with the normal saccade/vergence premotor circuits. However, the measured effect may to a certain degree but not exclusively be explained by mechanical interference.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Saccadic inhibition in voluntary and reflexive saccades.

The present study investigated saccadic inhibition in both voluntary and stimulus-elicited saccades. Two experiments examined saccadic inhibition caused by an irrelevant flash occurring subsequent to target onset. In each trial, participants were required to perform a single saccade following the presentation of a black target on a gray background, 4 degrees to the left or to the right of screen center. In some trials (flash trials), after a variable delay, a 33-msec flash was displayed at the top and bottom third of the monitor (these regions turned white). In all experimental conditions, histograms of flash-to-saccade latencies documented a decrease in saccadic frequency, forming a dip, time-locked to the flash and occurring as early as 60-70 msec following its onset. The fast latency of this effect strongly suggests a low-level, reflex-like, oculomotor effect, which was referred to as saccadic inhibition. A novel procedure was developed to allow comparisons of saccadic inhibition even across conditions, which in the absence of a flash (no-flash trials) produce dissimilar saccadic reaction times (SRTs) distributions. Experiment 1 examined the effects of the fixation stimulus on saccadic inhibition by contrasting three conditions: a gap condition (fixation stimulus disappeared 200 msec prior to target onset), a step condition (offset of the fixation stimulus was simultaneous with target onset), and an overlap condition (the fixation stimulus remained on for the duration of the trial). The overlap condition produced substantially stronger saccadic inhibition, relative to the gap and the step conditions. Experiment 2 contrasted the saccadic inhibition effect obtained for prosaccades (saccades aimed at the target) with the effect obtained for antisaccades (i.e., saccades aimed away from the same target). The onset of saccadic inhibition was earlier, and its magnitude was stronger, for antisaccades, relative to prosaccades. The plausibility that the superior colliculus is the neurophysiological locus of the saccadic inhibition effect was explored.

Attention↗
PubMed1998

Adaptive modifications of post-saccadic smooth pursuit eye movements and their interaction with saccades and the vestibulo-ocular reflex in the primate.

Adaptation of the horizontal smooth pursuit eye movement was examined using step-ramp moving target paradigms in chronically prepared Macaca fuscata. Monkeys were trained to pursue a small target which moved in the horizontal plane in a 3 degrees step-10 degrees/s ramp or a 0 degrees step-10 degrees/s ramp mode for 300-400 ms. When the target moved from central fixation point in a step-ramp mode, the monkeys usually responded with an initial pursuit eye movement (latency, 100-120 ms) which reached to a nearly constant velocity of 4 degrees/s in 50 100 ms, followed by a 1-3.5 degrees catch-up saccade (latency, 170-230 ms). The catch-up saccade was followed by a 7-8 degrees/s post-saccadic pursuit. The post-saccadic pursuit velocity was measured 40-90 ms after the end of the catch-up saccade. When the target velocity was doubled (20 degrees/s) for 100-200 ms immediately after the onset of the catch-up saccade, the post-saccadic pursuit velocity increased by 40%. When the target velocity was decreased by half (5 degrees/s) immediately after the onset of the catch-up saccade for 150 ms, the post-saccadic pursuit velocity decreased by 30%. These increases or decreases of post-saccadic pursuit were observable within just 50-150 trials. The adaptation of post-saccadic pursuit occurred independent of the position of the target. The amplitude and latency of the catch-up saccade also increased correspondingly when the post-saccadic pursuit velocity was adaptively increased. Adaptation of smooth pursuit did not affect the dynamics of reflex eye movements, including the horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex (HVOR) gain and phase measured by 0.33 Hz-10 degrees (peak-to-peak) turntable oscillations in darkness. Conversely, adaptation of the HVOR gain induced by a 2 h sustained oscillation of the turntable and screen in reversed direction at 0.33 Hz-10 degrees affected little the velocity of post-saccadic pursuit or the amplitude of the catch-up saccade. These results suggest that different neural mechanisms are respectively involved for the adaptation of horizontal smooth pursuit and HVOR in the primate.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed1992

Saccadic eye movements in Parkinson's disease: II. Remembered saccades--towards a unified hypothesis?

Ten patients with mild to moderate Parkinson's disease were compared with ten age-matched normal controls in a series of saccadic paradigms in order to test various hypotheses relating to the origin of the Parkinsonian saccadic defect. The paradigms comprised a reflex saccade paradigm, a standard remembered saccade paradigm, a remembered saccade paradigm with delayed centre-offset, and a remembered saccade paradigm with a second target flash immediately prior to saccade execution. Finally, subjects executed both reflex and remembered saccades in a standard remembered paradigm (the "two-saccade" paradigm). As has been reported previously, Parkinsonian subjects demonstrated hypometria on all remembered saccade paradigms, particularly the "two-saccade" paradigm. There was, however, no significant difference between the first three remembered saccade paradigms. These studies serve to refute a simple attentional capture hypothesis, and a hypothesis that suggests that the abnormality of remembered saccades is due to concurrent reflex saccade suppression. On the basis of the results, further hypotheses are advanced in an attempt to explain all published work on Parkinsonian saccades.

Aged↗