Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 3719186

Obstructed defaecation.

Abstract

Obstructed defaecation is a common anorectal symptom frequently but not invariably associated with perineal descent. Associated excessive straining at stool leads to external sphincter neuropathy, but this per se does not cause incontinence. Where simple measures are unsuccessful evacuation proctography should elucidate the cause of the obstructive constipation and allow rational treatment.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Bartolo, A Roe. 1986. Obstructed defaecation.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3719186/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Inducible and neuronal nitric oxide synthase involvement in lipopolysaccharide-induced sphincteric dysfunction.

We examined the effect of endotoxin lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on the basal tone and on the effects of different stimuli and agonists and transcriptional and translational expression of nitric oxide (NO) synthase (NOS) isozymes in the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), pyloric sphincter (PS), and internal anal sphincter (IAS). NO release was also examined before and after LPS. LPS caused a dose-dependent fall in the basal tone and augmentation of the relaxation caused by nonadrenergic, noncholinergic (NANC) nerve stimulation in the LES and IAS. In the PS, LPS had no significant effect on the basal tone and caused an attenuation of the NANC relaxation and an augmentation of the contractile response of muscarinic agonist. Interestingly, the smooth muscle relaxation by atrial natriuretic factor was suppressed in the LES and IAS but not in the PS. These changes in the sphincteric function following LPS may be associated with increase in the inducible NOS (iNOS) expression since they were blocked by iNOS inhibitor L-canavanine. Augmentation of NANC relaxation in the LES and IAS smooth muscle by LPS may be due to the increased activity of neuronal NOS and NO production.

Anal Canal↗

Mucosal shedding of human herpesvirus 8 in men.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies suggest that human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) is sexually transmitted among men who have sex with men; however, the mode of transmission is unclear. METHODS: To evaluate the patterns of shedding of HHV-8, we obtained mucosal-secretion samples from a cohort of HHV-8-seropositive men who had sex with men and had no clinical evidence of Kaposi's sarcoma. Quantitative polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) assays, in situ PCR assays, and in situ RNA hybridization were used to identify potential sources of infectious HHV-8. RESULTS: We detected HHV-8 in at least one mucosal sample from 30 of 50 men who were seropositive for HHV-8 (60 percent). Overall, HHV-8 was detected in 30 percent of oropharyngeal samples, as compared with 1 percent of anal and genital samples (P<0.001). In 39 percent of the HHV-8-seropositive men, HHV-8 was detected in saliva on more than 35 percent of the consecutive days on which samples were obtained. The median log titer of HHV-8 from the oral cavity was approximately 2.5 times as high as the titer at all other sites. In situ hybridization studies indicated that HHV-8 DNA and messenger RNA were present in oral epithelial cells. Among 92 men who had sex with men and who were seronegative for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), a history of sex with a partner who had Kaposi's sarcoma, deep kissing with an HIV-positive partner, and the use of amyl nitrite capsules ("poppers") or inhaled nitrites were independent risk factors for infection with HHV-8. CONCLUSIONS: Oral exposure to infectious saliva is a potential risk factor for the acquisition of HHV-8 among men who have sex with men. Hence, currently recommended safer sex practices may not protect against HHV-8 infection.

Anal Canal↗