Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 2832828

FRAGMAP--a program for restriction site map comparison.

P D Gershon·N J Knowles
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A program is described which aligns pairs of linear restriction site maps using an algorithm which maximizes the number of coincident sites through the addition of extra 'padding' fragments; and makes maps of the non-conserved sites between pairs and triplets of input maps. A range of display facilities, hardcopy functions and database management routines are also included. The program runs on a stand-alone microcomputer, and is stored along with a database of several hundred files on a single floppy disc.

Explore related subjects

Copying ProcessesDNA Restriction EnzymesGenes, ViralInformation SystemsMicrocomputersNucleotide MappingPoxviridaeSoftwareSoftware DesignComparative StudyJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P D Gershon, N J Knowles. 1988-03-11. FRAGMAP--a program for restriction site map comparison.. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar%2F16.5.1779

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1997

Cost-effective poster and print production with digital camera and computer technology.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this report is to describe a cost-effective method for producing black-and-white prints and color posters within a radiology department. CONCLUSION: Using a high-resolution digital camera, personal computer, and color printer, the average cost of a 5 x 7 inch (12.5 x 17.5 cm) black-and-white print may be reduced from $8.50 to $1 each in our institution. The average cost for a color print (8.5 x 14 inch [21.3 x 35 cm]) varies from $2 to $3 per sheet depending on the selection of ribbons for a color-capable laser printer and the paper used. For a 30-panel, 4 x 8 foot (1.2 x 2.4 m) standard-sized poster, the cost for materials and construction is approximately $100.

Copying Processes↗
PubMed1994

Evaluation of the image quality of ink-jet printed paper copies of digital chest radiographs as compared with film: a receiver operating characteristic study.

Paper copies of digital radiographs printed with the continuous ink-jet technique have proved to be of a high enough quality for demonstration purposes. We present a study on the image quality of ink-jet printed paper copies of digital chest radiographs, based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Eighty-three digital radiographs of a chest phantom with simulated tumors in the mediastinum and right lung, derived from a computed radiography (CR) system were presented in two series of hard copies as ink-jet printed paper copies and as laser recorded film. The images, with a matrix of 1,760 x 2,140 pixels, were printed with a spatial resolution of 10 pixels/mm in the CR film recorder as well as in the ink-jet printer. On film, every image was recorded in two versions, one optimized for the mediastinum and one for the lungs. On paper, only one image was printed; this constituted an effort to optimize both the mediastinum and the lungs. The ink-jet printed images, printed on a matt coated paper, were viewed as on-sight images with reflected light. The examinations were reviewed by six radiologists, and ROC curves were constructed. No significant difference was found between the performance of film and that of ink-jet paper prints. Because the cost for a paper copy is only a tenth of that of film, remarkable cost reductions can be achieved by using the ink jet technique instead. Our results show that further quality studies of ink-jet printed images are worthwhile.

Copying Processes↗