Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 16036699

Neuro exceptionalism?

Ari Schick
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

BioethicsCognitive ScienceDiagnostic Techniques, NeurologicalGeneticsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMind-Body Relations, MetaphysicalNeurosciencesPsychophysiologyBiomedical and Behavioral ResearchCommentJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ari Schick. 2005. Neuro exceptionalism?. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265160590960410

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Findings from a European survey on current bioethics training activities in hospitals.

While much work has been done on improving undergraduate education in bioethics, particularly in medicine, less has been said about continuing education of health care workers, particularly non-medical and nursing personnel. Hospitals bring together a variety of professional and non-professional groups in the place where clinical dilemmas are daily events, and would seem ideal places to conduct an ongoing bioethics dialogue. Yet evidence that this is being achieved is sparse. The European Hospital (-Based) Bioethics Program (EHBP) brings together both current and aspirant members of the EU as partners in a project that aims to assess the current situation with regard to bioethics education in hospitals, identify shortfalls, and address these. In order to achieve the first objective of the EHBP a survey of the current training activities (focused on activities in hospitals) in clinical bioethics in Europe was carried out. The results are presented in this paper, along with a discussion about the implications for the EHBP to address these issues.

Bioethics↗
PubMed2006

Dignity and health: a review.

Attention to dignity is thriving in health. However, much of this recent discourse ignores the broader scholarship pertaining to dignity. The purpose of this review is to synthesize a wide range of multidisciplinary writing in order to put recent discussions of dignity and health into a broader context. The review explicates two main meanings of dignity-human dignity and social dignity, and looks at how these two ideas are used in the arenas of human rights, law, social justice, bioethics, and clinical care, and suggests some implications of these meanings and uses for health research and advocacy.

Bioethics↗