Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 15850045

A work in progress.

Abstract

After expressing gratitude to each contributor, and briefly commenting on each, I probe several main themes of my work, addressing the question of the apparent difference between my earlier "philosophical" and later "clinical" writings. Central to both is the reflexivity of the human agent, and that each exhibits a form of practice regardless of the specific aims embedded in each. I then address the theme of narrative writing as my work has developed over the past several decades at the heart of which are questions of self and integrity.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Richard M Zaner. 2005. A work in progress.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-004-4807-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A window into Richard M. Zaner's clinical ethics.

This essay introduces a thematic issue focused on the contributions to clinical ethics and the philosophy of medicine by Richard M. Zaner. We consider the apparent divorce of Zaner's philosophical roots from his recent narrative immersions into the blooming, buzzing confusions of clinical-moral lifeworlds. Our considerations of the Zanerian context and origins of the clinical encounter introduce the fundamental questions faced by Zaner and his commentators in this issue, questions about the role of ethics consultants, moral authority, and clinical truths.

Ethics Consultation↗

Richard Zaner's "troubled" voice in Troubled Voices: poseur, posing, possibilizing?

This essay considers Richard Zaner's storytelling in Troubled Voices as a form of possibilizing which uses the stories to exemplify important moral themes such as contingency and freedom. Distinguishing between activities of moral discovery through the telling of a story and "posing" in the sense of writing to tell the "moral" of the story, I suggest that something crucial goes on for Zaner in his own tellings. Several of the more insistent implications Zaner reveals about the moral relationships encountered in the activity of clinical ethics consultation are examined in that light, especially regarding this question: is it more beneficial, or harmful, to articulate elements of core meanings and values that are entailed in individual viewpoints, which, prior to an ethics consultant's participation, may have remained unspoken and possibly unacknowledged?

Ethics Consultation↗

Ethics consultation in the intensive care unit.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the medical literature for recent reports of the role of ethics consultations in the intensive care setting. RECENT FINDINGS: Ethical principles can provide important guidelines for dealing with value conflicts in medical treatment decisions, particularly treatment decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment in the intensive care unit. Until recently, advocates of ethics consultations have had to rely on inconclusive supporting data. In the past few years, however, a single-site and multi-site prospective randomized controlled trial of the ethics consultations offered in response to treatment conflicts in the intensive care unit demonstrated significant reductions in hospital days, hospital costs, and ventilator days in patients who did not survive to hospital discharge. The consultations were very well received by all the parties. SUMMARY: Ethics consultations seem to be useful in resolving conflicts that may be inappropriately prolonging nonbeneficial or unwanted treatments at the end of life. Further research on whether ethics consultations are beneficial in other settings is needed to establish the optimal scope of this intervention. Also, because these benefits were achieved by highly skilled and experienced consultants, it is not certain how successful other hospitals will be when adopting this intervention.

Ethics Consultation↗