Navigating a sensorimotor loop.

Erika E Fanselow; Barry W Connors

doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.01.022

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 15694317

Navigating a sensorimotor loop.

Erika E Fanselow·Barry W Connors

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Touch is an active process, but how do the body's somatic sensors influence its movement? In this issue of Neuron, Nguyen and Kleinfeld show that afferent activity from the whiskers on a rat's face trigger rapid and prolonged excitation of the motor neurons that drive movements of the same whiskers. Positive feedback through this sensorimotor loop may serve to optimize the interaction between sensors and stimuli.

Explore related subjects

Afferent Pathways Animals Brain Efferent Pathways Feedback Mechanoreceptors Motor Neurons Movement Rats Touch Vibrissae Comment Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Erika E Fanselow, Barry W Connors. 2005-02-03. Navigating a sensorimotor loop.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.01.022

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Peripheral and central mechanisms of pain generation.

Pain research has uncovered important neuronal mechanisms that underlie clinically relevant pain states such as inflammatory and neuropathic pain. Importantly, both the peripheral and the central nociceptive system contribute significantly to the generation of pain upon inflammation and nerve injury. Peripheral nociceptors are sensitized during inflammation, and peripheral nerve fibres develop ectopic discharges upon nerve injury or disease. As a consequence a complex neuronal response is evoked in the spinal cord where neurons become hyperexcitable, and a new balance is set between excitation and inhibition. The spinal processes are significantly influenced by brain stem circuits that inhibit or facilitate spinal nociceptive processing. Numerous mechanisms are involved in peripheral and central nociceptive processes including rapid functional changes of signalling and long-term regulatory changes such as up-regulation of mediator/receptor systems. Conscious pain is generated by thalamocortical networks that produce both sensory discriminative and affective components of the pain response.

Afferent Pathways↗

PubMed2006

Phenotypic diversity is the cornerstone of evolution: variation in cortical field size within short-tailed opossums.

Natural selection operates on phenotypic variation that exists within a population. Variable aspects of cortical organization, such as the size and connections of a cortical field, can generate differences in behavior, which is a target of natural selection. Yet studies pertaining to within-species variability in cortical organization are limited. In the present investigation, we examined variation in brain size, cortical sheet size, and primary sensory cortical field sizes in the adult short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica). Within individuals, we found no significant difference between the right and left hemispheres in the overall size of the dorsolateral cortex or in primary cortical field sizes. Between individuals, we found relatively little intraspecies variation in brain weight, brain volume, and cortical sheet area for the dorsolateral neocortex and pyriform cortex; however, we observed a large degree of variability in body weight and primary sensory cortical field size, as defined by myeloarchitecture. Further, we found that the size of each cortical field correlated with the size of the other cortical fields as well as with the total size of the dorsolateral cortex. Here we discuss the possible sources of variation and examine the relationship between cortical field size and sensory processing abilities and behaviors across species. Since behavior is the target of natural selection, variation in cortical field size across individuals may supply the raw material necessary for cortical field evolution.

Afferent Pathways↗

PubMed2006

Transitory uptake of serotonin in the developing sensory pathways of the common marmoset.

Serotonin (5-HT) affects brain development during sensitive developmental periods. In rodents, transient sites of high affinity capture of 5-HT were demonstrated in the primary sensory neurons and in the sensory thalamocortical afferents. This uptake is required to adjust 5-HT receptor stimulation during the formation of sensory maps. To determine whether similar mechanisms exist in primates, we analyzed staged embryos and postnatal pups in the common marmoset (total gestation time, 142 days). Immunocytochemical analyses were performed using antisera to 5-HT, to the serotonin transporter (SERT), and to the vesicular monoamine transporter (VMAT2). 5-HT, SERT, and VMAT2 labeled the raphe neurons and their terminal network from embryonic day (E)70 to adulthood. In addition, from E70-130 VMAT2 and SERT were observed in all the sensory cranial nerves, the olfactory nerve, the gustatory, the trigeminal, the auditory fibers, in the retinal ganglion cells, and the optic tract up to the lateral geniculate nucleus and the superior colliculus. All the spinal sensory ganglia and their peripheral sensory branches were labeled. Accumulation of 5-HT was observed in all the sensory neurons expressing SERT and the corresponding axon tracts. Since these neurons were missing tryptophan hydroxylase (TPH), the synthesizing enzyme for 5-HT, they most likely accumulated 5-HT through the action of the amine transporters, as has been shown in rodents. No transient expression of 5-HT markers was detectable in the sensory thalamocortical axons at any of the ages examined. Thus, the existence of 5-HT uptake in nonserotoninergic neurons appears to be a conserved feature in primates, although the topographic extent of this transient expression is more restricted than that previously demonstrated in rodents.

Afferent Pathways↗