Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 15333552

Face value?

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Bethune, E Hern, A Qayyum, R Pratap, R Brown. 2004. Face value?. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2003.009159

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Evaluation of hip fracture risk in relation to fall direction.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate hip fracture risk in relation to fall direction, and to elucidate factors that influence the impact force in falls on the hip. Eight healthy volunteers performed deliberate falls in three directions (lateral, posterolateral and posterior) on a force platform covered by a mattress of 13 cm thickness. Fall descent motions and impact postures were examined by a three-dimensional analyzer. The maximum ground force reaction, velocity of the greater trochanter at impact, and activity of quadriceps and gluteus medius were measured. In all trials of lateral and posterolateral falls, but not of posterior falls, the subjects hit their greater trochanter directly on the mattress. The impact forces were between 2,000 N and 4,000 N. Posterolateral falls showed significantly higher velocity at impact than did posterior falls. The height and the lower limb length exhibited positive correlations with the impact force in all directions of fall. In the lateral fall, there was a positive correlation between the activity of quadriceps and the impact force. In view of the impact point, force, and velocity, the posterolateral fall seemed to carry the highest risk of hip fracture.

Accidental Falls↗

Increased falling as a risk factor for fracture among older women: the study of osteoporotic fractures.

More frequent falling is associated with a higher risk of fracture among older women, but it is not known whether an increased rate of falling, independent of the average rate, also increases fracture risk. The authors examined the relation between an increase in the rate of falls during the first 4 years of follow-up and the subsequent fracture rate, reported for a median of 6.3 years (1986-1998), in 9,106 US women aged 65 years or more. Women in the upper quartile of increasing falls (>0.44 falls/year/year) had greater risks of subsequent hip fracture (rate ratio = 1.42, 95% confidence interval: 0.99, 2.04) and fracture of the proximal humerus (rate ratio = 1.79, 95% confidence interval: 1.08, 2.95) than women without an increase in falls, after adjustment for age, average rate of falls over 4 years, and known risk factors for fracture. Risks of distal forearm, ankle, or foot fracture were not elevated. The associations between fracture risk and increasing falls were not accounted for by baseline physical or cognitive function. An increase in the rate of falls, independent of the average rate, may be associated with a higher risk of frailty (hip and proximal humerus) fractures but not fractures at other sites.

Accidental Falls↗