Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 15152681

Optimizing Compton camera geometries.

Abstract

Compton cameras promise to improve the characteristics of nuclear medicine imaging, wherein mechanical collimation is replaced with electronic collimation. This leads to huge gains in sensitivity and, consequently, a reduction in the radiation dosage that needs to be administered to the patient. Design modifications that improve the sensitivity invariably compromise resolution. The scope of the current project was to determine an optimal design and configuration of a Compton camera that strikes a balance between these two properties. Transport of the photon flux from the source to the detectors was simulated with the camera geometry serving as the parameter to be optimized. Two variations of the Boltzmann photon transport equation, with and without photon polarization, were employed to model the flux. Doppler broadening of the energy spectra was also included. The simulation was done in a Monte Carlo framework using GEANT4. Two clinically relevant energies, 140 keV and 511 keV, corresponding to 99mTc and 18F were simulated. The gain in the sensitivity for the Compton camera over the conventional camera was 100 fold. Neither Doppler broadening nor polarization had any significant effect on the sensitivity of the camera. However, the spatial resolution of the camera was affected by these processes. Doppler broadening had a deleterious effect on the spatial resolution, but polarization improved the resolution when accounted for in the reconstruction algorithm.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sudhakar Chelikani, John Gore, George Zubal. 2004-04-21. Optimizing Compton camera geometries.. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155%2F49%2F8%2F002

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Impact of long-term partial aeration on the removal of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol in an initially methanogenic fluidized bed bioreactor.

A fluidized bed bioreactor (FBBR) was operated for more than 1000 days under two regimes, Methanogenic (M) and Methanogenic-Aerobic (M-A), to remove 2,4,6-trichlorophenol (TCP) and phenol (Phe) from a synthetic wastewater, containing different amounts of TCP and Phe, using different aeration flow-rates (0, 2.13, and 1.06 NL O(2)/L.day). M conditions (80:20 mg/L of TCP:Phe, 0 NL O(2)/L.day) showed similar TCP and Phe removal (>95%). Nevertheless accumulation of 4-chlorophenol (4CP) up to 16 mg/L and Phe up to 4 mg/L was observed, while in M-A conditions (80:20 mg/L of TCP:Phe, 2.13 NL O(2)/L.day) TCP and Phe removal achieved 99.9(+)% and after 70 days no accumulation of intermediates were detected. The increase of TCP and Phe in the influent under M-A conditions from 80:20 to 120:30 mg/L of TCP:Phe did not negatively affect the removal of TCP, intermediates and Phe; in fact, they were similar to those in previous M-A conditions. The decrease in the oxygen flow rate from 2.13 to 1.06 NL O(2)/L.day had no negative effect on pollutant removals, which were as high as in previous two M-A conditions. The specific methanogenic activity of bioparticles of the fluidized bed decreased with long-term partial aeration, starting from 1.097 mmol CH(4)/h.g(TKN) in the M regime (day 60) to <0.02 mmolCH(4)/h.g(TKN) at day 1050, suggesting aerobic regime in the bioreactor rather than an M-A regime. In conclusion, complete removal of TCP and less chlorinated intermediates could be achieved in an initially methanogenic FBBR under conditions of partial aeration, although long-term operation seemed to negatively affect the methanogenic activity of biomass. It is also likely that after extended aeration the microbial community was finally enriched with strains with the ability to attack 2,4,6-TCP under aerobic conditions. This report represents the first evidence of a long exposure to oxygen of an anaerobic microbial consortium that efficiently remove TCP.

Air↗

Brewster angle microscopy study of poly(epsilon-caprolactone) crystal growth in Langmuir films at the air/water interface.

Surface pressure-induced crystallization of poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (PCL) from a metastable region of the surface pressure-area per monomer (Pi-A) isotherm in Langmuir monolayers at the air/water (A/W) interface has been captured in real time by Brewster angle microscopy (BAM). Morphological features of PCL crystals grown in Langmuir films during the compression process exhibit four fully developed faces and two distorted faces. During expansion of the crystallized film, polymer chains slowly detach from the crystalline domains and diffuse back into the monolayer as the crystals "melt". Typical diffusion-controlled morphologies are revealed by BAM during the melting process as the secondary dendrites melt away faster, that is, at a higher surface pressure than the principal axes. Electron diffraction on Langmuir-Schaefer films suggests that the lamellar crystals are oriented with the polymer chain axes perpendicular to the substrate surface, while atomic force microscopy reveals a crystal thickness of approximately 7.6 nm.

Air↗

Does 4 MV perform better compared to 6 MV in the presence of air cavities in the head and neck region?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The underdose near air cavities in the head and neck region at photon energies of 4 MV and 6 MV was studied in search for clinical advantages of the 4 MV over 6 MV treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The on-axis and off-axis dose distributions were measured with a parallel-plate ionization chamber and films in polystyrene phantoms containing an air cavity of appropriate size based on the results of computed tomography scans. RESULTS: Although most results are similar for both energies, the 4 MV photon beams give a somewhat smaller underdose effect and a faster re-build up than the 6 MV. For both energies a significant underdose effect was observed at the edge of the field in the larynx phantom. This proved to be true for small and large fields, for smaller and larger cavities, for one-beam as well as parallel-opposed beams. CONCLUSION: For most clinically relevant situations there is no remarkable benefit in the use of either of the two energies.

Air↗