Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Sudhakar Chelikani

Publications and source records attributed to Sudhakar Chelikani.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A gradient feature weighted Minimax algorithm for registration of multiple portal images to 3DCT volumes in prostate radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To develop an accurate, fast, and robust algorithm for registering portal and computed tomographic (CT) images for radiotherapy using a combination of sparse and dense field data that complement each other. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Gradient Feature Weighted Minimax (GFW Minimax) method was developed to register multiple portal images to three-dimensional CT images. Its performance was compared with that of three others: Minimax, Mutual Information, and Gilhuijs' method. Phantom and prostate cancer patient images were used. Effects of registration errors on tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) were investigated as a relative measure. RESULTS: Registration of four portals to CTs resulted in 30% lower error when compared with registration with two portals. Computation time increased by nearly 50%. GFW Minimax performed the best, followed by Gilhuijs' method, the Minimax method, and Mutual Information. CONCLUSIONS: Using four portals instead of two lowered the registration error. Reduced fields of view images with full feature sets gave similar results in shorter times as full fields of view images. In clinical situations where soft tissue targets are of importance, GFW Minimax algorithm was significantly more accurate and robust. With registration errors lower than 1 mm, margins may be scaled down to 4 mm without adversely affecting TCP and NTCP.

Algorithms↗

Optimizing Compton camera geometries.

Compton cameras promise to improve the characteristics of nuclear medicine imaging, wherein mechanical collimation is replaced with electronic collimation. This leads to huge gains in sensitivity and, consequently, a reduction in the radiation dosage that needs to be administered to the patient. Design modifications that improve the sensitivity invariably compromise resolution. The scope of the current project was to determine an optimal design and configuration of a Compton camera that strikes a balance between these two properties. Transport of the photon flux from the source to the detectors was simulated with the camera geometry serving as the parameter to be optimized. Two variations of the Boltzmann photon transport equation, with and without photon polarization, were employed to model the flux. Doppler broadening of the energy spectra was also included. The simulation was done in a Monte Carlo framework using GEANT4. Two clinically relevant energies, 140 keV and 511 keV, corresponding to 99mTc and 18F were simulated. The gain in the sensitivity for the Compton camera over the conventional camera was 100 fold. Neither Doppler broadening nor polarization had any significant effect on the sensitivity of the camera. However, the spatial resolution of the camera was affected by these processes. Doppler broadening had a deleterious effect on the spatial resolution, but polarization improved the resolution when accounted for in the reconstruction algorithm.

Air↗